护生的道德敏感性:坎皮罗工具的适应与验证。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104225
Juan Roldán-Merino, Maria F Jiménez-Herrera, Isabel Font-Jiménez, Leticia Bazo-Hernández, Bárbara Hurtado-Pardos, Beatriz Campillo-Zaragoza, Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido
{"title":"护生的道德敏感性:坎皮罗工具的适应与验证。","authors":"Juan Roldán-Merino, Maria F Jiménez-Herrera, Isabel Font-Jiménez, Leticia Bazo-Hernández, Bárbara Hurtado-Pardos, Beatriz Campillo-Zaragoza, Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Analyse the psychometric properties of the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire in nursing care and to examine the level of moral sensitivity among nursing students in Spain.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical sensitivity is essential in nursing for patient care and decision-making. Assessing nursing students' moral sensitivity aids in developing training strategies for improved care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was conducted in two phases: (1) analysis of psychometric properties involving nursing students; and (2) a cross-sectional study design.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 611 Spanish nursing students, recruited through non-probability sampling. A self-report questionnaire, socio-demographic data and the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire were used for data collection. To assess the psychometric properties, both confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were performed. Data were analysed using Student's t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation. Data analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows v28, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 611 nursing students. The adjustment indices of the exploratory factor analysis indicate an excellent fit when items 18, 20 and 21 are grouped in Dimension 1, contrary to the proposal made by Campillo et al. The questionnaire demonstrated high reliability and validity. Second-year students and those from the SJD Campus showed higher moral sensitivity. No differences were found based on work experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study validated the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire for nursing students, revealing its reliability. Early ethical training enhanced moral sensitivity, particularly in second-year students, while institutional values and campus focus significantly influenced scores. Gender and experience were negligible.</p>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"82 ","pages":"104225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral sensitivity of nursing students: Adaptation and validation of the Campillo's tool.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Roldán-Merino, Maria F Jiménez-Herrera, Isabel Font-Jiménez, Leticia Bazo-Hernández, Bárbara Hurtado-Pardos, Beatriz Campillo-Zaragoza, Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Analyse the psychometric properties of the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire in nursing care and to examine the level of moral sensitivity among nursing students in Spain.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical sensitivity is essential in nursing for patient care and decision-making. Assessing nursing students' moral sensitivity aids in developing training strategies for improved care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was conducted in two phases: (1) analysis of psychometric properties involving nursing students; and (2) a cross-sectional study design.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 611 Spanish nursing students, recruited through non-probability sampling. A self-report questionnaire, socio-demographic data and the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire were used for data collection. To assess the psychometric properties, both confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were performed. Data were analysed using Student's t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation. Data analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows v28, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 611 nursing students. The adjustment indices of the exploratory factor analysis indicate an excellent fit when items 18, 20 and 21 are grouped in Dimension 1, contrary to the proposal made by Campillo et al. The questionnaire demonstrated high reliability and validity. Second-year students and those from the SJD Campus showed higher moral sensitivity. No differences were found based on work experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study validated the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire for nursing students, revealing its reliability. Early ethical training enhanced moral sensitivity, particularly in second-year students, while institutional values and campus focus significantly influenced scores. Gender and experience were negligible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"104225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104225\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析护理道德敏感性问卷的心理测量特征,考察西班牙护生的道德敏感性水平。背景:伦理敏感性在护理患者护理和决策中是必不可少的。评估护生的道德敏感性有助于制定改善护理的培训策略。设计:本研究分两个阶段进行:(1)分析护理学生的心理测量特征;(2)横断面研究设计。方法:采用非概率抽样方法对611名西班牙护生进行研究。采用自我报告问卷、社会人口统计数据和道德敏感性问卷进行数据收集。为了评估心理测量特性,进行了验证性因子分析和探索性因子分析。数据分析采用学生t检验、方差分析(ANOVA)和Pearson相关分析。数据分析采用SPSS for Windows v28,显著性水平设置为p 结果:研究纳入611名护生。探索性因子分析的调整指标显示,当项目18、20和21在维度1中分组时,与Campillo等人的建议相反,拟合效果很好。问卷具有较高的信度和效度。二年级学生和SJD校区的学生表现出更高的道德敏感性。在工作经验上没有发现差异。结论:本研究对护生道德敏感性问卷进行了验证,显示了问卷的信度。早期的伦理训练增强了道德敏感性,尤其是二年级学生,而制度价值观和校园焦点对分数有显著影响。性别和经验可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral sensitivity of nursing students: Adaptation and validation of the Campillo's tool.

Aim: Analyse the psychometric properties of the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire in nursing care and to examine the level of moral sensitivity among nursing students in Spain.

Background: Ethical sensitivity is essential in nursing for patient care and decision-making. Assessing nursing students' moral sensitivity aids in developing training strategies for improved care.

Design: The study was conducted in two phases: (1) analysis of psychometric properties involving nursing students; and (2) a cross-sectional study design.

Method: The study included 611 Spanish nursing students, recruited through non-probability sampling. A self-report questionnaire, socio-demographic data and the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire were used for data collection. To assess the psychometric properties, both confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were performed. Data were analysed using Student's t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation. Data analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows v28, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results: The study included 611 nursing students. The adjustment indices of the exploratory factor analysis indicate an excellent fit when items 18, 20 and 21 are grouped in Dimension 1, contrary to the proposal made by Campillo et al. The questionnaire demonstrated high reliability and validity. Second-year students and those from the SJD Campus showed higher moral sensitivity. No differences were found based on work experience.

Conclusion: This study validated the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire for nursing students, revealing its reliability. Early ethical training enhanced moral sensitivity, particularly in second-year students, while institutional values and campus focus significantly influenced scores. Gender and experience were negligible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
The experience of transition from student nurse to registered nurse among newly graduated nurses in the paediatric setting: An integrative literature review. Sexual and reproductive health content in Australian pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs: A review of curricula. Effects of an ARCS-based interactive e-book featuring clinical scenarios on the learning motivation, self-efficacy and practical competence of nursing students in foetal heart rate interpretation. Corrigendum to "Unfinished nursing care occurrence, priority order and reasons as perceived by nursing students: An international study" [Nurse Educ. Pract. 79 (2024) 104100]. A cultural adaptation study of nursing informatics competency scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1