来自卫星(OMI)和地面(NDACC)测量的大气二氧化氮含量数据的比较

IF 0.9 Q4 OPTICS Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1134/S1024856024700908
A. N. Gruzdev, A. S. Elokhov
{"title":"来自卫星(OMI)和地面(NDACC)测量的大气二氧化氮含量数据的比较","authors":"A. N. Gruzdev,&nbsp;A. S. Elokhov","doi":"10.1134/S1024856024700908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comparison of satellite measurements with independent measurements is an essential and necessary component of validation of satellite data. In this work, we compare the spectrometric measurements of the NO<sub>2</sub> content in the atmosphere by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) in 2004–2020 with the ground-based twilight zenith measurements at 14 stations of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC). We obtained the latitudinal distributions of NO<sub>2</sub> content and of the comparison characteristics: differences in the contents and the correlation and linear regression coefficients between the satellite and ground-based data. Criteria are proposed for testing the interannual and long-term changes in NO<sub>2</sub> content derived from the OMI data based on the ground-based measurements. The latitudinal—hemispheric and regional—features of the correspondence between the satellite and ground-based data have been revealed. Significantly new results have been obtained on the dependence of the comparison characteristics on the level of pollution of the lower troposphere with nitrogen oxides and on the timescale of NO<sub>2</sub> variations: day-to-day, seasonal, and interannual. The results will be useful in the analysis of NO<sub>2</sub> variability based on OMI data.</p>","PeriodicalId":46751,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics","volume":"37 5","pages":"675 - 683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Atmospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Content Data Derived from Satellite (OMI) and Ground-Based (NDACC) Measurements\",\"authors\":\"A. N. Gruzdev,&nbsp;A. S. Elokhov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1024856024700908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Comparison of satellite measurements with independent measurements is an essential and necessary component of validation of satellite data. In this work, we compare the spectrometric measurements of the NO<sub>2</sub> content in the atmosphere by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) in 2004–2020 with the ground-based twilight zenith measurements at 14 stations of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC). We obtained the latitudinal distributions of NO<sub>2</sub> content and of the comparison characteristics: differences in the contents and the correlation and linear regression coefficients between the satellite and ground-based data. Criteria are proposed for testing the interannual and long-term changes in NO<sub>2</sub> content derived from the OMI data based on the ground-based measurements. The latitudinal—hemispheric and regional—features of the correspondence between the satellite and ground-based data have been revealed. Significantly new results have been obtained on the dependence of the comparison characteristics on the level of pollution of the lower troposphere with nitrogen oxides and on the timescale of NO<sub>2</sub> variations: day-to-day, seasonal, and interannual. The results will be useful in the analysis of NO<sub>2</sub> variability based on OMI data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"675 - 683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1024856024700908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1024856024700908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫星测量值与独立测量值的比较是卫星数据验证的必要组成部分。本文将2004-2020年臭氧监测仪(OMI)对大气NO2含量的光谱测量结果与大气成分变化监测网络(NDACC) 14个站点的地面黄昏天顶测量结果进行了比较。得到了NO2含量的纬向分布和比较特征:卫星与地面数据的含量差异、相关系数和线性回归系数。提出了测试基于地面测量的OMI数据得出的二氧化氮含量年际和长期变化的标准。揭示了卫星与地面数据对应的纬度半球和区域特征。关于比较特征对对流层下层氮氧化物污染水平的依赖性和NO2变化的时间尺度(日、季、年际)的依赖性,获得了重要的新结果。研究结果对基于OMI数据的NO2变异性分析具有一定的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Atmospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Content Data Derived from Satellite (OMI) and Ground-Based (NDACC) Measurements

Comparison of satellite measurements with independent measurements is an essential and necessary component of validation of satellite data. In this work, we compare the spectrometric measurements of the NO2 content in the atmosphere by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) in 2004–2020 with the ground-based twilight zenith measurements at 14 stations of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC). We obtained the latitudinal distributions of NO2 content and of the comparison characteristics: differences in the contents and the correlation and linear regression coefficients between the satellite and ground-based data. Criteria are proposed for testing the interannual and long-term changes in NO2 content derived from the OMI data based on the ground-based measurements. The latitudinal—hemispheric and regional—features of the correspondence between the satellite and ground-based data have been revealed. Significantly new results have been obtained on the dependence of the comparison characteristics on the level of pollution of the lower troposphere with nitrogen oxides and on the timescale of NO2 variations: day-to-day, seasonal, and interannual. The results will be useful in the analysis of NO2 variability based on OMI data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
42.90%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics  is an international peer reviewed journal that presents experimental and theoretical articles relevant to a wide range of problems of atmospheric and oceanic optics, ecology, and climate. The journal coverage includes: scattering and transfer of optical waves, spectroscopy of atmospheric gases, turbulent and nonlinear optical phenomena, adaptive optics, remote (ground-based, airborne, and spaceborne) sensing of the atmosphere and the surface, methods for solving of inverse problems, new equipment for optical investigations, development of computer programs and databases for optical studies. Thematic issues are devoted to the studies of atmospheric ozone, adaptive, nonlinear, and coherent optics, regional climate and environmental monitoring, and other subjects.
期刊最新文献
Determination of Atmospheric Turbulence Type from Operational Meteorological Measurements Vibrational Energy Levels for Sulfur Dioxide Isotopologues Activity of High Cyclones above Erebus Volcano According to ERA5 Reanalysis Data Two-Pulse Laser Fragmentation/Laser-Induced Fluorescence of Organophosphate Aerosol Study of the Wildfire Effect on Local Atmospheric Parameters using Remote Sensing Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1