母权的形式:从弗里德里希-恩格斯到卢-梅尔腾的马克思主义母权起源

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS GERMAN QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1111/gequ.12477
Mari Jarris
{"title":"母权的形式:从弗里德里希-恩格斯到卢-梅尔腾的马克思主义母权起源","authors":"Mari Jarris","doi":"10.1111/gequ.12477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The nineteenth-century discovery of the matrilineal origins of society shattered assumptions about the necessity of the bourgeois family. For Marxists, ethnographic studies of the mother right provided an aesthetic form to reevaluate the “woman question” from a scientific perspective. Although Marx and Engels had long rejected the idea of <i>the</i> family in favor of “family forms,” Engels's adaptation of Morgan's <i>Ancient Society</i> (1877) in <i>Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staats</i> (1884) was canonized as the authoritative Marxist text on the subject. While the ethnographic form enabled the denaturalization of the family, its racialized and gendered temporality undercut socialist critiques of social forms. This article introduces Lu Märten's queer utopian response to the mother right, <i>Geschichte der Frau vom Mutterrecht bis zur Gegenwart</i> (1947), which dispenses with the evolutionary structure of the ethnographic study to offer a vision of polyamorous and androgynous forms in a classless society.</p>","PeriodicalId":54057,"journal":{"name":"GERMAN QUARTERLY","volume":"97 4","pages":"472-489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forms of the Mother Right: Marxism's Matriarchal Origins from Friedrich Engels to Lu Märten\",\"authors\":\"Mari Jarris\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gequ.12477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The nineteenth-century discovery of the matrilineal origins of society shattered assumptions about the necessity of the bourgeois family. For Marxists, ethnographic studies of the mother right provided an aesthetic form to reevaluate the “woman question” from a scientific perspective. Although Marx and Engels had long rejected the idea of <i>the</i> family in favor of “family forms,” Engels's adaptation of Morgan's <i>Ancient Society</i> (1877) in <i>Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staats</i> (1884) was canonized as the authoritative Marxist text on the subject. While the ethnographic form enabled the denaturalization of the family, its racialized and gendered temporality undercut socialist critiques of social forms. This article introduces Lu Märten's queer utopian response to the mother right, <i>Geschichte der Frau vom Mutterrecht bis zur Gegenwart</i> (1947), which dispenses with the evolutionary structure of the ethnographic study to offer a vision of polyamorous and androgynous forms in a classless society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERMAN QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"97 4\",\"pages\":\"472-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERMAN QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gequ.12477\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMAN QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gequ.12477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

19世纪对社会母系起源的发现打破了关于资产阶级家庭必要性的假设。对马克思主义者来说,对母权的民族志研究提供了一种从科学角度重新评价“女性问题”的美学形式。虽然马克思和恩格斯长期以来一直反对家庭的概念,而赞成“家庭形式”,但恩格斯在《家庭的起源》(1877)中改编了摩尔根的《古代社会》(1884),被奉为马克思主义关于这一主题的权威文本。虽然民族志形式使家庭的变性成为可能,但其种族化和性别化的暂时性削弱了社会主义对社会形式的批判。本文介绍了Lu Märten对母权的酷儿乌托邦式回应,即《母权》(1947),它摒弃了民族志研究的进化结构,提供了一种无阶级社会中多妻制和雌雄同体形式的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forms of the Mother Right: Marxism's Matriarchal Origins from Friedrich Engels to Lu Märten

The nineteenth-century discovery of the matrilineal origins of society shattered assumptions about the necessity of the bourgeois family. For Marxists, ethnographic studies of the mother right provided an aesthetic form to reevaluate the “woman question” from a scientific perspective. Although Marx and Engels had long rejected the idea of the family in favor of “family forms,” Engels's adaptation of Morgan's Ancient Society (1877) in Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staats (1884) was canonized as the authoritative Marxist text on the subject. While the ethnographic form enabled the denaturalization of the family, its racialized and gendered temporality undercut socialist critiques of social forms. This article introduces Lu Märten's queer utopian response to the mother right, Geschichte der Frau vom Mutterrecht bis zur Gegenwart (1947), which dispenses with the evolutionary structure of the ethnographic study to offer a vision of polyamorous and androgynous forms in a classless society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERMAN QUARTERLY
GERMAN QUARTERLY Multiple-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The German Quarterly serves as a forum for all sorts of scholarly debates - topical, ideological, methodological, theoretical, of both the established and the experimental variety, as well as debates on recent developments in the profession. We particularly encourage essays employing new theoretical or methodological approaches, essays on recent developments in the field, and essays on subjects that have recently been underrepresented in The German Quarterly, such as studies on pre-modern subjects.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Preface: German Quarterly Special Issue on Form Intertextuelle Verhandlungen. Zur Kafka-Rezeption in der afrikanischen Literatur The Sociality of Form: Camillo Sitte's Urban Morphologies Meter Against Essentialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1