共同收缩诱发任务中的肌间连贯性是肌张力障碍和 GPi-DBS 疗效的生物标记。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2024.12.011
S.A.J.E.A. Lagerweij , J.C. van Zijl , M. Smit , H. Eggink , D.L.M. Oterdoom , J.M.C. van Dijk , M.E. van Egmond , J.W. Elting , M.A.J. Tijssen
{"title":"共同收缩诱发任务中的肌间连贯性是肌张力障碍和 GPi-DBS 疗效的生物标记。","authors":"S.A.J.E.A. Lagerweij ,&nbsp;J.C. van Zijl ,&nbsp;M. Smit ,&nbsp;H. Eggink ,&nbsp;D.L.M. Oterdoom ,&nbsp;J.M.C. van Dijk ,&nbsp;M.E. van Egmond ,&nbsp;J.W. Elting ,&nbsp;M.A.J. Tijssen","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Clinical rating scales often fail to capture the full spectrum of dystonic symptoms. Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus interna (GPi-DBS) effectively treats dystonia, but response variability necessitates a reliable biomarker. Intermuscular coherence (4–12 Hz) has been linked to abnormal activity in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (CBGTC) loop and may serve as an objective measure of dystonia and GPi-DBS effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study included 12 dystonia patients undergoing GPi-DBS implantation. Clinical rating scales and a neurophysiological assessment were performed before and one year post-DBS. Coherence in the 4–12 Hz range was analyzed from electromyography (EMG) of antagonistic arm muscles. Comparisons were made between patients with and without arm dystonia, t-tests evaluated the differences between pre- and post-DBS, and correlations between coherence and clinical scales were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven patients with arm dystonia appeared to have higher pre-operative intermuscular coherence compared to those without. Coherence was significantly decreased after GPi-DBS in the arm dystonia group. No strong correlations were found between coherence and clinical rating scales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Intermuscular coherence is present in dystonic muscles and decreases following GPi-DBS. Correlations with motor scores were inconclusive due to patient heterogeneity and ill-fitting clinical scales.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Intermuscular coherence has potential to aid GPi-DBS patient selection and optimization but larger studies are needed to validate its use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"170 ","pages":"Pages 70-79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intermuscular coherence during co-contraction eliciting tasks as a biomarker for dystonia and GPi-DBS efficacy\",\"authors\":\"S.A.J.E.A. Lagerweij ,&nbsp;J.C. van Zijl ,&nbsp;M. Smit ,&nbsp;H. Eggink ,&nbsp;D.L.M. Oterdoom ,&nbsp;J.M.C. van Dijk ,&nbsp;M.E. van Egmond ,&nbsp;J.W. Elting ,&nbsp;M.A.J. Tijssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.12.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Clinical rating scales often fail to capture the full spectrum of dystonic symptoms. Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus interna (GPi-DBS) effectively treats dystonia, but response variability necessitates a reliable biomarker. Intermuscular coherence (4–12 Hz) has been linked to abnormal activity in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (CBGTC) loop and may serve as an objective measure of dystonia and GPi-DBS effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study included 12 dystonia patients undergoing GPi-DBS implantation. Clinical rating scales and a neurophysiological assessment were performed before and one year post-DBS. Coherence in the 4–12 Hz range was analyzed from electromyography (EMG) of antagonistic arm muscles. Comparisons were made between patients with and without arm dystonia, t-tests evaluated the differences between pre- and post-DBS, and correlations between coherence and clinical scales were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven patients with arm dystonia appeared to have higher pre-operative intermuscular coherence compared to those without. Coherence was significantly decreased after GPi-DBS in the arm dystonia group. No strong correlations were found between coherence and clinical rating scales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Intermuscular coherence is present in dystonic muscles and decreases following GPi-DBS. Correlations with motor scores were inconclusive due to patient heterogeneity and ill-fitting clinical scales.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Intermuscular coherence has potential to aid GPi-DBS patient selection and optimization but larger studies are needed to validate its use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 70-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724003729\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724003729","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床评定量表往往不能捕捉全谱张力障碍症状。脑深部白球内刺激(GPi-DBS)有效治疗肌张力障碍,但反应变异性需要一个可靠的生物标志物。肌间相干性(4-12 Hz)与皮质-基底神经节-丘脑-皮质(CBGTC)回路的异常活动有关,可以作为肌张力障碍和GPi-DBS有效性的客观测量指标。方法:回顾性队列研究包括12例接受GPi-DBS植入的肌张力障碍患者。临床评定量表和神经生理评估在dbs之前和之后一年进行。对抗性手臂肌肉的肌电图(EMG)分析了4-12 Hz范围内的相干性。对有和没有手臂肌张力障碍的患者进行比较,t检验评估dbs前后的差异,并对连贯性和临床量表进行相关性分析。结果:7例手臂肌张力障碍患者术前肌间一致性高于无张力障碍患者。手臂肌张力障碍组在GPi-DBS后连贯性明显下降。连贯性和临床评定量表之间没有很强的相关性。结论:肌间连贯存在于张力障碍肌肉中,并在GPi-DBS后减弱。由于患者异质性和临床量表不合适,与运动评分的相关性尚无定论。意义:肌间相干有可能帮助GPi-DBS患者选择和优化,但需要更大规模的研究来验证其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intermuscular coherence during co-contraction eliciting tasks as a biomarker for dystonia and GPi-DBS efficacy

Objective

Clinical rating scales often fail to capture the full spectrum of dystonic symptoms. Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus interna (GPi-DBS) effectively treats dystonia, but response variability necessitates a reliable biomarker. Intermuscular coherence (4–12 Hz) has been linked to abnormal activity in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (CBGTC) loop and may serve as an objective measure of dystonia and GPi-DBS effectiveness.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study included 12 dystonia patients undergoing GPi-DBS implantation. Clinical rating scales and a neurophysiological assessment were performed before and one year post-DBS. Coherence in the 4–12 Hz range was analyzed from electromyography (EMG) of antagonistic arm muscles. Comparisons were made between patients with and without arm dystonia, t-tests evaluated the differences between pre- and post-DBS, and correlations between coherence and clinical scales were performed.

Results

Seven patients with arm dystonia appeared to have higher pre-operative intermuscular coherence compared to those without. Coherence was significantly decreased after GPi-DBS in the arm dystonia group. No strong correlations were found between coherence and clinical rating scales.

Conclusion

Intermuscular coherence is present in dystonic muscles and decreases following GPi-DBS. Correlations with motor scores were inconclusive due to patient heterogeneity and ill-fitting clinical scales.

Significance

Intermuscular coherence has potential to aid GPi-DBS patient selection and optimization but larger studies are needed to validate its use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of lateralized periodic discharge features associated with epileptogenesis Altered cortical excitability in tuberous sclerosis and the effect of mTOR inhibitors: An intracranial electrical stimulation study Alterations in temporal-spatial brain entropy in treatment-resistant depression treated with nitrous oxide: Evidence from resting-state EEG Neural correlates of semantic and phonemic variants of verbal fluency tasks: A combined MEG and fMRI study. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1