抗体-药物共轭物的可裂解性、药物-抗体比率和游离有效载荷浓度对全身毒性的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 7.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer and Metastasis Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s10555-024-10231-5
Shou-Ching Tang, Carrie Wynn, Tran Le, Martin McCandless, Yunxi Zhang, Ritesh Patel, Nita Maihle, William Hillegass
{"title":"抗体-药物共轭物的可裂解性、药物-抗体比率和游离有效载荷浓度对全身毒性的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Shou-Ching Tang, Carrie Wynn, Tran Le, Martin McCandless, Yunxi Zhang, Ritesh Patel, Nita Maihle, William Hillegass","doi":"10.1007/s10555-024-10231-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While in theory antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver high-dose chemotherapy directly to target cells, numerous side effects are observed in clinical practice. We sought to determine the effect of linker design (cleavable versus non-cleavable), drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), and free payload concentration on systemic toxicity. Two systematic reviews were performed via PubMed search of clinical trials published between January 1998-July 2022. Eligible studies: (1) clinical trial for cancer therapy in adults, (2) ≥ 1 study arm included a single-agent ADC, (3) ADC used was commercially available/FDA-approved. Data was extracted and pooled using generalized linear mixed effects logistic models. 40 clinical trials involving 7,879 patients from 11 ADCs, including 9 ADCs with cleavable linkers (N = 2,985) and 2 with non-cleavable linkers (N = 4,894), were included. Significantly more composite adverse events (AEs) ≥ grade 3 occurred in patients in the cleavable linkers arm (47%) compared with the non-cleavable arm (34%). When adjusted for DAR, for grade ≥ 3 toxicities, non-cleavable linkers remained independently associated with lower toxicity for any AE (p = 0.002). Higher DAR was significantly associated with higher probability of grade ≥ 3 toxicity for any AE. There was also a significant interaction between cleavability status and DAR for any AE (p = 0.002). Finally, higher measured systemic free payload concentrations were significantly associated with higher DARs (p = 0.043). Our results support the hypothesis that ADCs with cleavable linkers result in premature payload release, leading to increased systemic free payload concentrations and associated toxicities. This may help to inform future ADC design and rational clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of antibody-drug conjugate cleavability, drug-to-antibody ratio, and free payload concentration on systemic toxicities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shou-Ching Tang, Carrie Wynn, Tran Le, Martin McCandless, Yunxi Zhang, Ritesh Patel, Nita Maihle, William Hillegass\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10555-024-10231-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While in theory antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver high-dose chemotherapy directly to target cells, numerous side effects are observed in clinical practice. We sought to determine the effect of linker design (cleavable versus non-cleavable), drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), and free payload concentration on systemic toxicity. Two systematic reviews were performed via PubMed search of clinical trials published between January 1998-July 2022. Eligible studies: (1) clinical trial for cancer therapy in adults, (2) ≥ 1 study arm included a single-agent ADC, (3) ADC used was commercially available/FDA-approved. Data was extracted and pooled using generalized linear mixed effects logistic models. 40 clinical trials involving 7,879 patients from 11 ADCs, including 9 ADCs with cleavable linkers (N = 2,985) and 2 with non-cleavable linkers (N = 4,894), were included. Significantly more composite adverse events (AEs) ≥ grade 3 occurred in patients in the cleavable linkers arm (47%) compared with the non-cleavable arm (34%). When adjusted for DAR, for grade ≥ 3 toxicities, non-cleavable linkers remained independently associated with lower toxicity for any AE (p = 0.002). Higher DAR was significantly associated with higher probability of grade ≥ 3 toxicity for any AE. There was also a significant interaction between cleavability status and DAR for any AE (p = 0.002). Finally, higher measured systemic free payload concentrations were significantly associated with higher DARs (p = 0.043). Our results support the hypothesis that ADCs with cleavable linkers result in premature payload release, leading to increased systemic free payload concentrations and associated toxicities. This may help to inform future ADC design and rational clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662062/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-024-10231-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-024-10231-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然理论上抗体药物偶联物(adc)可将大剂量化疗直接传递到靶细胞,但在临床实践中观察到许多副作用。我们试图确定连接体设计(可切割与不可切割)、药物-抗体比(DAR)和游离有效载荷浓度对全身毒性的影响。通过PubMed检索1998年1月至2022年7月间发表的临床试验进行了两项系统评价。符合条件的研究:(1)成人癌症治疗的临床试验,(2)≥1个研究组包括单药ADC,(3)使用的ADC是市售/ fda批准的。数据提取和合并使用广义线性混合效应逻辑模型。纳入了来自11个adc的40项临床试验,涉及7879例患者,其中9例adc具有可切割连接体(N = 2985), 2例adc具有不可切割连接体(N = 4894)。与不可切割连接体组(34%)相比,可切割连接体组(47%)的患者发生≥3级的复合不良事件(ae)明显更多。当根据DAR进行调整时,对于≥3级毒性,不可切割连接子仍然与任何AE的较低毒性独立相关(p = 0.002)。较高的DAR与任何AE≥3级毒性的可能性显著相关。对于任何AE,可切割性状态与DAR之间也存在显著的相互作用(p = 0.002)。最后,较高的测量系统游离有效载荷浓度与较高的dar显著相关(p = 0.043)。我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即具有可切割连接体的adc会导致有效载荷过早释放,从而导致系统游离有效载荷浓度增加和相关毒性。这可能有助于未来ADC的设计和合理的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of antibody-drug conjugate cleavability, drug-to-antibody ratio, and free payload concentration on systemic toxicities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

While in theory antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver high-dose chemotherapy directly to target cells, numerous side effects are observed in clinical practice. We sought to determine the effect of linker design (cleavable versus non-cleavable), drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), and free payload concentration on systemic toxicity. Two systematic reviews were performed via PubMed search of clinical trials published between January 1998-July 2022. Eligible studies: (1) clinical trial for cancer therapy in adults, (2) ≥ 1 study arm included a single-agent ADC, (3) ADC used was commercially available/FDA-approved. Data was extracted and pooled using generalized linear mixed effects logistic models. 40 clinical trials involving 7,879 patients from 11 ADCs, including 9 ADCs with cleavable linkers (N = 2,985) and 2 with non-cleavable linkers (N = 4,894), were included. Significantly more composite adverse events (AEs) ≥ grade 3 occurred in patients in the cleavable linkers arm (47%) compared with the non-cleavable arm (34%). When adjusted for DAR, for grade ≥ 3 toxicities, non-cleavable linkers remained independently associated with lower toxicity for any AE (p = 0.002). Higher DAR was significantly associated with higher probability of grade ≥ 3 toxicity for any AE. There was also a significant interaction between cleavability status and DAR for any AE (p = 0.002). Finally, higher measured systemic free payload concentrations were significantly associated with higher DARs (p = 0.043). Our results support the hypothesis that ADCs with cleavable linkers result in premature payload release, leading to increased systemic free payload concentrations and associated toxicities. This may help to inform future ADC design and rational clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary biomedical research is on the threshold of an era in which physiological and pathological processes can be analyzed in increasingly precise and mechanistic terms.The transformation of biology from a largely descriptive, phenomenological discipline to one in which the regulatory principles can be understood and manipulated with predictability brings a new dimension to the study of cancer and the search for effective therapeutic modalities for this disease. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews provides a forum for critical review and discussion of these challenging developments. A major function of the journal is to review some of the more important and interesting recent developments in the biology and treatment of malignant disease, as well as to highlight new and promising directions, be they technological or conceptual. Contributors are encouraged to review their personal work and be speculative.
期刊最新文献
Cellular plasticity and non-small cell lung cancer: role of T and NK cell immune evasion and acquisition of resistance to immunotherapies. The diversity of natural killer cell functional and phenotypic states in cancer. Sympathetic nerve signaling rewires the tumor microenvironment: a shift in "microenvironmental-ity". Advancements in gene therapies targeting mutant KRAS in cancers. LGR5: An emerging therapeutic target for cancer metastasis and chemotherapy resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1