Lung cancer is a leading global cause of mortality, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for a significant portion of cases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed NSCLC treatment; however, many patients remain unresponsive. ICI resistance in NSCLC and its association with cellular plasticity, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), enhanced adaptability, invasiveness, and resistance is largely influenced by epigenetic changes, signaling pathways, tumor microenvironment, and associated immune cells, fibroblasts, and cytokines. Immunosuppressive cells, including M2 tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells, contribute to resistance by suppressing the immune response. This cellular plasticity is influenced when B cells, natural killer cells, and T cells are exhausted or inhibited by components of the tumor microenvironment. Conversely, diverse T cell, NK cell, and B cell subsets hold potential as predictive response markers particularly cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, effector memory T cells, activated T cells, tumor infiltrated NK cells, tertiary lymphoid structures, etc. influence treatment response. Identifying specific gene expressions and immunophenotypes within T cells may offer insights into early clinical responses to immunotherapy. ICI resistance in NSCLC is a multifaceted process shaped by tumor plasticity, the complex tumor microenvironment, and dynamic immune cell changes. Comprehensive analysis of these factors may lead to the identification of novel biomarkers and combination therapies to enhance ICI efficacy in NSCLC treatment.
{"title":"Cellular plasticity and non-small cell lung cancer: role of T and NK cell immune evasion and acquisition of resistance to immunotherapies.","authors":"Sarra Mestiri, Ana Sami, Naresh Sah, Dina Moustafa Abo El-Ella, Sabiha Khatoon, Khadija Shafique, Afsheen Raza, Darin Mansor Mathkor, Shafiul Haque","doi":"10.1007/s10555-025-10244-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-025-10244-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer is a leading global cause of mortality, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for a significant portion of cases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed NSCLC treatment; however, many patients remain unresponsive. ICI resistance in NSCLC and its association with cellular plasticity, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), enhanced adaptability, invasiveness, and resistance is largely influenced by epigenetic changes, signaling pathways, tumor microenvironment, and associated immune cells, fibroblasts, and cytokines. Immunosuppressive cells, including M2 tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells, contribute to resistance by suppressing the immune response. This cellular plasticity is influenced when B cells, natural killer cells, and T cells are exhausted or inhibited by components of the tumor microenvironment. Conversely, diverse T cell, NK cell, and B cell subsets hold potential as predictive response markers particularly cytotoxic CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells, effector memory T cells, activated T cells, tumor infiltrated NK cells, tertiary lymphoid structures, etc. influence treatment response. Identifying specific gene expressions and immunophenotypes within T cells may offer insights into early clinical responses to immunotherapy. ICI resistance in NSCLC is a multifaceted process shaped by tumor plasticity, the complex tumor microenvironment, and dynamic immune cell changes. Comprehensive analysis of these factors may lead to the identification of novel biomarkers and combination therapies to enhance ICI efficacy in NSCLC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143037165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-24DOI: 10.1007/s10555-025-10242-w
Kumar Rishabh, Sandro Matosevic
The role of natural killer (NK) cells as immune effectors is well established, as is their utility as immunotherapeutic agents against various cancers. However, NK cells' anti-cancer roles are suppressed in cancer patients by various immunomodulatory mechanisms which alter these cells' identity, function, and potential for immunosurveillance. This manifests in abnormal NK cell responses accompanied by changes in phenotypic or genotypic identity, giving rise to specific NK cell subsets that are either hypofunctional or, more broadly, defective in their responses. Anergy, senescence, and exhaustion are some of the terms that have been used to define and characterize these NK cell functional states. These responses vary not only with cancer type but also NK cell location within tissues. Collectively, these phenomena suggest a highly plastic nature of NK cell biology in tumors. In this review, we present and discuss a summary of these functionally distinct states and provide an overview of how NK cells behave at different locations within the context of cancer.
{"title":"The diversity of natural killer cell functional and phenotypic states in cancer.","authors":"Kumar Rishabh, Sandro Matosevic","doi":"10.1007/s10555-025-10242-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-025-10242-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of natural killer (NK) cells as immune effectors is well established, as is their utility as immunotherapeutic agents against various cancers. However, NK cells' anti-cancer roles are suppressed in cancer patients by various immunomodulatory mechanisms which alter these cells' identity, function, and potential for immunosurveillance. This manifests in abnormal NK cell responses accompanied by changes in phenotypic or genotypic identity, giving rise to specific NK cell subsets that are either hypofunctional or, more broadly, defective in their responses. Anergy, senescence, and exhaustion are some of the terms that have been used to define and characterize these NK cell functional states. These responses vary not only with cancer type but also NK cell location within tissues. Collectively, these phenomena suggest a highly plastic nature of NK cell biology in tumors. In this review, we present and discuss a summary of these functionally distinct states and provide an overview of how NK cells behave at different locations within the context of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143032316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nerve signaling within the tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a critical role in the initiation, progression, and metastasis of solid tumors. Due to their highly responsive behavior and activation upon injury and cancer onset, this review specifically focuses on how sympathetic nerves rewire the TME. Within tumors, sympathetic nerves closely interact with various TME components, and their combined signaling often shifts tumor-intrinsic physiology toward tumor-supportive phenotypes. In turn, the TME components, such as myeloid cells, lymphoid cells, extracellular matrix (ECM), endothelial cells, cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and Schwann cells, secrete neurotrophic and axon guidance factors that influence both sympathetic outgrowth and tumor cell behavior, further exacerbating tumor progression and metastasis. Here, we review the current evidence on the multidirectional impacts of sympathetic nerves and both immune and non-immune TME components, the nature of these communication processes, and how exploring these interactions may inform future therapeutics to impair cancer progression and metastasis.
{"title":"Sympathetic nerve signaling rewires the tumor microenvironment: a shift in \"microenvironmental-ity\".","authors":"Ariana Sattler, Tetiana Korzun, Kasmira Gupta, Parham Diba, Natasha Kyprianou, Sebnem Ece Eksi","doi":"10.1007/s10555-025-10241-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10555-025-10241-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nerve signaling within the tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a critical role in the initiation, progression, and metastasis of solid tumors. Due to their highly responsive behavior and activation upon injury and cancer onset, this review specifically focuses on how sympathetic nerves rewire the TME. Within tumors, sympathetic nerves closely interact with various TME components, and their combined signaling often shifts tumor-intrinsic physiology toward tumor-supportive phenotypes. In turn, the TME components, such as myeloid cells, lymphoid cells, extracellular matrix (ECM), endothelial cells, cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and Schwann cells, secrete neurotrophic and axon guidance factors that influence both sympathetic outgrowth and tumor cell behavior, further exacerbating tumor progression and metastasis. Here, we review the current evidence on the multidirectional impacts of sympathetic nerves and both immune and non-immune TME components, the nature of these communication processes, and how exploring these interactions may inform future therapeutics to impair cancer progression and metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753337/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143000500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1007/s10555-025-10243-9
Yuhang Wang, Thuy Anh Bui, Xinpu Yang, Gyorgy Hutvagner, Wei Deng
Mutations in the KRAS gene are well-known tumourigenic drivers of colorectal, pancreatic and lung cancers. Mechanistically, these mutations promote uncontrolled cell proliferation and alter the tumour microenvironment during early carcinoma stages. Given their critical carcinogenic functions, significant progress has been made in developing KRAS inhibitors for cancer treatment. However, clinical applications of these KRAS inhibitor compounds are limited to specific cancer types which carry the relevant KRAS mutations. Additionally, clinical findings have shown that these compounds can induce moderate to serious side effects. Therefore, new approaches have emerged focusing on the development of universal therapeutics capable of targeting a wider range of KRAS mutations, minimising toxicity and enhancing the therapeutic efficacy. This review aims to examine these therapeutic strategies in the context of cancer treatment. It firstly provides an overview of fundamental KRAS biology within the cell signalling landscape and how KRAS mutations are associated with cancer pathogenesis. Subsequently, it introduces the development of current KRAS inhibitors which target certain KRAS mutants in different types of cancer. It then explores the potential of gene therapy approaches, including siRNA, miRNA and CRISPR methodologies. Furthermore, it discusses the use of lipid-based nanocarriers to deliver gene cargos for targeting KRAS gene mutants. Finally, it provides the insights into the future prospects for combatting KRAS mutation-associated cancers.
{"title":"Advancements in gene therapies targeting mutant KRAS in cancers.","authors":"Yuhang Wang, Thuy Anh Bui, Xinpu Yang, Gyorgy Hutvagner, Wei Deng","doi":"10.1007/s10555-025-10243-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10555-025-10243-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mutations in the KRAS gene are well-known tumourigenic drivers of colorectal, pancreatic and lung cancers. Mechanistically, these mutations promote uncontrolled cell proliferation and alter the tumour microenvironment during early carcinoma stages. Given their critical carcinogenic functions, significant progress has been made in developing KRAS inhibitors for cancer treatment. However, clinical applications of these KRAS inhibitor compounds are limited to specific cancer types which carry the relevant KRAS mutations. Additionally, clinical findings have shown that these compounds can induce moderate to serious side effects. Therefore, new approaches have emerged focusing on the development of universal therapeutics capable of targeting a wider range of KRAS mutations, minimising toxicity and enhancing the therapeutic efficacy. This review aims to examine these therapeutic strategies in the context of cancer treatment. It firstly provides an overview of fundamental KRAS biology within the cell signalling landscape and how KRAS mutations are associated with cancer pathogenesis. Subsequently, it introduces the development of current KRAS inhibitors which target certain KRAS mutants in different types of cancer. It then explores the potential of gene therapy approaches, including siRNA, miRNA and CRISPR methodologies. Furthermore, it discusses the use of lipid-based nanocarriers to deliver gene cargos for targeting KRAS gene mutants. Finally, it provides the insights into the future prospects for combatting KRAS mutation-associated cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748474/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143000495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10239-x
Wanqi Wang, Noor A Lokman, Simon C Barry, Martin K Oehler, Carmela Ricciardelli
Cancer stem cells play an important role in tumor progression and chemotherapy resistance. Leucine-rich G repeat-containing protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) has been identified as a cancer stem cell marker in several cancer types. LGR5 is involved in cancer development and progression via several pathways including WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway. LGR5 plays a role in tumor progression by promoting cancer cell migration, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis in many cancers including colorectal, brain, gastric, and ovarian cancer. This review summarises the current knowledge on the expression and functional role of LGR5 in cancers, the molecular mechanisms regulated by LGR5, and the relationship between LGR5 and chemotherapy resistance. The review also includes highlights potential strategies to inhibit LGR5 expression and function. The majority of functional studies have shown that LGR5 plays an important role in promoting cancer progression, metastasis and chemotherapy resistance however, in some contexts LGR5 can also activate tumor-suppressive pathways and LGR5 negative cells can also promote cancer progression. The review highlights that targeting LGR5 is a promising anti-cancer treatment but the functional effect of LGR5 on tumor cells is complex may be dependent on cancer type, tumor microenvironment and cross-talk with other molecules in the LGR5 signaling pathway.
{"title":"LGR5: An emerging therapeutic target for cancer metastasis and chemotherapy resistance.","authors":"Wanqi Wang, Noor A Lokman, Simon C Barry, Martin K Oehler, Carmela Ricciardelli","doi":"10.1007/s10555-024-10239-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-024-10239-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer stem cells play an important role in tumor progression and chemotherapy resistance. Leucine-rich G repeat-containing protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) has been identified as a cancer stem cell marker in several cancer types. LGR5 is involved in cancer development and progression via several pathways including WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway. LGR5 plays a role in tumor progression by promoting cancer cell migration, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis in many cancers including colorectal, brain, gastric, and ovarian cancer. This review summarises the current knowledge on the expression and functional role of LGR5 in cancers, the molecular mechanisms regulated by LGR5, and the relationship between LGR5 and chemotherapy resistance. The review also includes highlights potential strategies to inhibit LGR5 expression and function. The majority of functional studies have shown that LGR5 plays an important role in promoting cancer progression, metastasis and chemotherapy resistance however, in some contexts LGR5 can also activate tumor-suppressive pathways and LGR5 negative cells can also promote cancer progression. The review highlights that targeting LGR5 is a promising anti-cancer treatment but the functional effect of LGR5 on tumor cells is complex may be dependent on cancer type, tumor microenvironment and cross-talk with other molecules in the LGR5 signaling pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742290/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143000498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s10555-025-10240-y
Stefan Koch
FOXQ1 is a member of the large forkhead box (FOX) family of transcription factors that is involved in all aspects of mammalian development, physiology, and pathobiology. FOXQ1 has emerged as a major regulator of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumour metastasis in cancers, especially carcinomas of the digestive tract. Accordingly, FOXQ1 induction is recognised as an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival in several types of cancer, including gastric and colorectal cancer. In this review article, I summarise new evidence on the role of FOXQ1 in cancer, with a focus on molecular mechanisms that control FOXQ1 levels and the regulation of FOXQ1 target genes. Unravelling the functions of FOXQ1 has the potential to facilitate the development of targeted treatments for metastatic cancers.
{"title":"The transcription factor FOXQ1 in cancer.","authors":"Stefan Koch","doi":"10.1007/s10555-025-10240-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10555-025-10240-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>FOXQ1 is a member of the large forkhead box (FOX) family of transcription factors that is involved in all aspects of mammalian development, physiology, and pathobiology. FOXQ1 has emerged as a major regulator of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumour metastasis in cancers, especially carcinomas of the digestive tract. Accordingly, FOXQ1 induction is recognised as an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival in several types of cancer, including gastric and colorectal cancer. In this review article, I summarise new evidence on the role of FOXQ1 in cancer, with a focus on molecular mechanisms that control FOXQ1 levels and the regulation of FOXQ1 target genes. Unravelling the functions of FOXQ1 has the potential to facilitate the development of targeted treatments for metastatic cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711781/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a sympathetic neurotransmitter widely distributed in the peripheral and central nervous system, affecting many physiological functions. Consequently, dysregulation of the NPY system contributes to numerous pathological disorders, including stress, obesity, and cancer. The pleiotropic functions of NPY in humans are mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (Y1R, Y2R, Y5R), which activate several signaling pathways and thereby regulate cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, proliferation, angiogenesis, and metabolism. These activities of NPY are highly relevant to tumor biology and known hallmarks of cancer, including sustained proliferative potential, resisting cell death, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastases. In this comprehensive review, we describe the cellular functions of NPY and discuss its role in cancer pathobiology, as well as provide the current state of knowledge pertaining to NPY and its receptors in various cancer types. Moreover, we focus on potential clinical applications targeting the NPY system, such as its role as a prognostic and predictive factor, as well as its utility in cancer diagnostics, imaging, and treatment. Altogether, growing evidence supports the significant role of the NPY system in tumor pathobiology and implicates its potential therapeutic and diagnostic value in modern oncology.
{"title":"Neuropeptide Y in cancer-biological functions and potential clinical implications.","authors":"Dawid Sigorski, Aleksandra Sejda, Nouran Abualsaud, Ewa Krawczyk, Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska, Joanna Kitlinska","doi":"10.1007/s10555-024-10237-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10555-024-10237-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a sympathetic neurotransmitter widely distributed in the peripheral and central nervous system, affecting many physiological functions. Consequently, dysregulation of the NPY system contributes to numerous pathological disorders, including stress, obesity, and cancer. The pleiotropic functions of NPY in humans are mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (Y1R, Y2R, Y5R), which activate several signaling pathways and thereby regulate cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, proliferation, angiogenesis, and metabolism. These activities of NPY are highly relevant to tumor biology and known hallmarks of cancer, including sustained proliferative potential, resisting cell death, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastases. In this comprehensive review, we describe the cellular functions of NPY and discuss its role in cancer pathobiology, as well as provide the current state of knowledge pertaining to NPY and its receptors in various cancer types. Moreover, we focus on potential clinical applications targeting the NPY system, such as its role as a prognostic and predictive factor, as well as its utility in cancer diagnostics, imaging, and treatment. Altogether, growing evidence supports the significant role of the NPY system in tumor pathobiology and implicates its potential therapeutic and diagnostic value in modern oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142930681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10217-3
Suchi Chaturvedi, Avinash Sonawane
Protein S-palmitoylation is a reversible form of protein lipidation in which the formation of a thioester bond occurs between a cysteine (Cys) residue of a protein and a 16-carbon fatty acid chain. This modification is catalyzed by a family of palmitoyl acyl transferases, the DHHC enzymes, so called because of their Asp-His-His-Cys (DHHC) catalytic motif. Deregulation of DHHC enzymes has been linked to various diseases, including cancer and infections. Cancer, a major cause of global mortality, is characterized by features like uncontrolled cell growth, resistance to cell death, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Several of these processes are controlled by DHHC-mediated S-palmitoylation of oncogenes or tumor suppressors, including growth factor receptors (e.g., EGFR), kinases (e.g., AKT), and transcription factors (e.g., β-catenin). Dynamic regulation of S-palmitoylation is also governed by protein depalmitoylases. These enzymes balance the cycling of palmitoylation and regulate cellular signaling, cell growth, and its organization. Given the significance of S-palmitoylation in cancer, the DHHCs and protein depalmitoylases are promising targets for cancer therapy. Here we summarize the catalytic mechanisms of DHHC enzymes and depalmitoylases, their role in cancer progression and prevention, as well as the crosstalk of palmitoylation with other post-translational modifications. Additionally, we discuss the methods to detect S-palmitoylation, the limitations of available DHHC-targeting inhibitors, and ongoing research efforts to address these obstacles.
{"title":"Recapitulating the potential contribution of protein S-palmitoylation in cancer.","authors":"Suchi Chaturvedi, Avinash Sonawane","doi":"10.1007/s10555-024-10217-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10555-024-10217-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protein S-palmitoylation is a reversible form of protein lipidation in which the formation of a thioester bond occurs between a cysteine (Cys) residue of a protein and a 16-carbon fatty acid chain. This modification is catalyzed by a family of palmitoyl acyl transferases, the DHHC enzymes, so called because of their Asp-His-His-Cys (DHHC) catalytic motif. Deregulation of DHHC enzymes has been linked to various diseases, including cancer and infections. Cancer, a major cause of global mortality, is characterized by features like uncontrolled cell growth, resistance to cell death, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Several of these processes are controlled by DHHC-mediated S-palmitoylation of oncogenes or tumor suppressors, including growth factor receptors (e.g., EGFR), kinases (e.g., AKT), and transcription factors (e.g., β-catenin). Dynamic regulation of S-palmitoylation is also governed by protein depalmitoylases. These enzymes balance the cycling of palmitoylation and regulate cellular signaling, cell growth, and its organization. Given the significance of S-palmitoylation in cancer, the DHHCs and protein depalmitoylases are promising targets for cancer therapy. Here we summarize the catalytic mechanisms of DHHC enzymes and depalmitoylases, their role in cancer progression and prevention, as well as the crosstalk of palmitoylation with other post-translational modifications. Additionally, we discuss the methods to detect S-palmitoylation, the limitations of available DHHC-targeting inhibitors, and ongoing research efforts to address these obstacles.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142892069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-26DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10238-y
Andrey Kechin, Maksim Koryukov, Regina Mikheeva, Maksim Filipenko
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is considered a universal and effective sign of a tumor's sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. HRD diagnostics have undergone several stages of transformations: from detection of point mutations in HR-related genes and large regions with loss of heterozygosity detected using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays to whole-genome signatures of single-nucleotide variants, large genomic rearrangements (LGRs), and copy number alterations. All these methods have their own advantages and limitations. HRD tests, based on signatures of LGRs and copy number alterations, show in hindsight that some progenitor cells have possessed HRD status but not the current state of the genome. The aim of this review was to compare different methods of HRD detection and mechanisms of formation of HRD-specific LGRs. In the last several years, new data appeared implying a crucial role of proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the resolution of stalled replication forks that may be associated with at least some of LGRs observed in HRD-positive tumors. Reviewing current knowledge on these mechanisms, distributions of different LGR types, and limitations of sequencing technologies and algorithms of data analysis, we offer some new perspectives on HRD diagnostics. We hope that this review will help to accelerate the development of new diagnostic approaches in this important field of molecular oncology.
{"title":"Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) diagnostics: underlying mechanisms and new perspectives.","authors":"Andrey Kechin, Maksim Koryukov, Regina Mikheeva, Maksim Filipenko","doi":"10.1007/s10555-024-10238-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-024-10238-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is considered a universal and effective sign of a tumor's sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. HRD diagnostics have undergone several stages of transformations: from detection of point mutations in HR-related genes and large regions with loss of heterozygosity detected using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays to whole-genome signatures of single-nucleotide variants, large genomic rearrangements (LGRs), and copy number alterations. All these methods have their own advantages and limitations. HRD tests, based on signatures of LGRs and copy number alterations, show in hindsight that some progenitor cells have possessed HRD status but not the current state of the genome. The aim of this review was to compare different methods of HRD detection and mechanisms of formation of HRD-specific LGRs. In the last several years, new data appeared implying a crucial role of proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the resolution of stalled replication forks that may be associated with at least some of LGRs observed in HRD-positive tumors. Reviewing current knowledge on these mechanisms, distributions of different LGR types, and limitations of sequencing technologies and algorithms of data analysis, we offer some new perspectives on HRD diagnostics. We hope that this review will help to accelerate the development of new diagnostic approaches in this important field of molecular oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142891560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-20DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10231-5
Shou-Ching Tang, Carrie Wynn, Tran Le, Martin McCandless, Yunxi Zhang, Ritesh Patel, Nita Maihle, William Hillegass
While in theory antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver high-dose chemotherapy directly to target cells, numerous side effects are observed in clinical practice. We sought to determine the effect of linker design (cleavable versus non-cleavable), drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), and free payload concentration on systemic toxicity. Two systematic reviews were performed via PubMed search of clinical trials published between January 1998-July 2022. Eligible studies: (1) clinical trial for cancer therapy in adults, (2) ≥ 1 study arm included a single-agent ADC, (3) ADC used was commercially available/FDA-approved. Data was extracted and pooled using generalized linear mixed effects logistic models. 40 clinical trials involving 7,879 patients from 11 ADCs, including 9 ADCs with cleavable linkers (N = 2,985) and 2 with non-cleavable linkers (N = 4,894), were included. Significantly more composite adverse events (AEs) ≥ grade 3 occurred in patients in the cleavable linkers arm (47%) compared with the non-cleavable arm (34%). When adjusted for DAR, for grade ≥ 3 toxicities, non-cleavable linkers remained independently associated with lower toxicity for any AE (p = 0.002). Higher DAR was significantly associated with higher probability of grade ≥ 3 toxicity for any AE. There was also a significant interaction between cleavability status and DAR for any AE (p = 0.002). Finally, higher measured systemic free payload concentrations were significantly associated with higher DARs (p = 0.043). Our results support the hypothesis that ADCs with cleavable linkers result in premature payload release, leading to increased systemic free payload concentrations and associated toxicities. This may help to inform future ADC design and rational clinical application.
{"title":"Influence of antibody-drug conjugate cleavability, drug-to-antibody ratio, and free payload concentration on systemic toxicities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shou-Ching Tang, Carrie Wynn, Tran Le, Martin McCandless, Yunxi Zhang, Ritesh Patel, Nita Maihle, William Hillegass","doi":"10.1007/s10555-024-10231-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10555-024-10231-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While in theory antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver high-dose chemotherapy directly to target cells, numerous side effects are observed in clinical practice. We sought to determine the effect of linker design (cleavable versus non-cleavable), drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), and free payload concentration on systemic toxicity. Two systematic reviews were performed via PubMed search of clinical trials published between January 1998-July 2022. Eligible studies: (1) clinical trial for cancer therapy in adults, (2) ≥ 1 study arm included a single-agent ADC, (3) ADC used was commercially available/FDA-approved. Data was extracted and pooled using generalized linear mixed effects logistic models. 40 clinical trials involving 7,879 patients from 11 ADCs, including 9 ADCs with cleavable linkers (N = 2,985) and 2 with non-cleavable linkers (N = 4,894), were included. Significantly more composite adverse events (AEs) ≥ grade 3 occurred in patients in the cleavable linkers arm (47%) compared with the non-cleavable arm (34%). When adjusted for DAR, for grade ≥ 3 toxicities, non-cleavable linkers remained independently associated with lower toxicity for any AE (p = 0.002). Higher DAR was significantly associated with higher probability of grade ≥ 3 toxicity for any AE. There was also a significant interaction between cleavability status and DAR for any AE (p = 0.002). Finally, higher measured systemic free payload concentrations were significantly associated with higher DARs (p = 0.043). Our results support the hypothesis that ADCs with cleavable linkers result in premature payload release, leading to increased systemic free payload concentrations and associated toxicities. This may help to inform future ADC design and rational clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662062/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142863414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}