减少骨科手术后阿片类药物使用的干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价。

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s40265-024-02116-2
Melanie Hamilton, Stephanie Mathieson, Masoud Jamshidi, Andy Wang, Yi-Ching Lee, Danijela Gnjidic, Chung-Wei Christine Lin
{"title":"减少骨科手术后阿片类药物使用的干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价。","authors":"Melanie Hamilton, Stephanie Mathieson, Masoud Jamshidi, Andy Wang, Yi-Ching Lee, Danijela Gnjidic, Chung-Wei Christine Lin","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02116-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prescribing of opioids to patients for postoperative pain can lead to persistent opioid use. This review investigated the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing opioid use in patients after orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2023. We included randomised controlled trials investigating interventions aimed at reducing opioid use after orthopaedic surgery. Two reviewers conducted the screening and data extraction and assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool) and certainty of evidence (GRADE). The primary outcome was the mean daily dose of opioid analgesic medications in the medium term (1-3 months after randomisation). Results were pooled in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model where appropriate (e.g. I<sup>2</sup> < 50%) or summarised narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 17,471 records, of which 39 trials were included. High heterogeneity meant that most comparisons could not be pooled. The mean daily dose was lower with multimodal analgesia interventions than with placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control in the medium term. No between-group differences were found between other pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions and either placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control at the medium-term time point. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multimodal analgesic interventions may reduce opioid use compared with placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control in the medium term. However, the high heterogeneity and low certainty of evidence means it is uncertain which interventions are effective in reducing opioid use after orthopaedic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Use After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Hamilton, Stephanie Mathieson, Masoud Jamshidi, Andy Wang, Yi-Ching Lee, Danijela Gnjidic, Chung-Wei Christine Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40265-024-02116-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prescribing of opioids to patients for postoperative pain can lead to persistent opioid use. This review investigated the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing opioid use in patients after orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2023. We included randomised controlled trials investigating interventions aimed at reducing opioid use after orthopaedic surgery. Two reviewers conducted the screening and data extraction and assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool) and certainty of evidence (GRADE). The primary outcome was the mean daily dose of opioid analgesic medications in the medium term (1-3 months after randomisation). Results were pooled in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model where appropriate (e.g. I<sup>2</sup> < 50%) or summarised narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 17,471 records, of which 39 trials were included. High heterogeneity meant that most comparisons could not be pooled. The mean daily dose was lower with multimodal analgesia interventions than with placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control in the medium term. No between-group differences were found between other pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions and either placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control at the medium-term time point. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multimodal analgesic interventions may reduce opioid use compared with placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control in the medium term. However, the high heterogeneity and low certainty of evidence means it is uncertain which interventions are effective in reducing opioid use after orthopaedic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02116-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02116-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为术后疼痛患者开具阿片类药物处方可能会导致阿片类药物的持续使用。本综述调查了旨在减少骨科手术后患者阿片类药物使用的干预措施的有效性:方法:检索了从开始到 2023 年 11 月的电子数据库。我们纳入了调查旨在减少骨科手术后阿片类药物使用的干预措施的随机对照试验。两名审稿人进行了筛选和数据提取,并评估了偏倚风险(Cochrane偏倚风险工具)和证据的确定性(GRADE)。主要结果是中期(随机化后1-3个月)阿片类镇痛药物的平均日剂量。在荟萃分析中酌情使用随机效应模型对结果进行汇总(如 I2 结果):搜索共获得 17,471 条记录,其中纳入了 39 项试验。由于异质性较高,因此无法对大多数比较进行汇总。在中期,多模式镇痛干预的平均日剂量低于安慰剂/无干预/常规护理或积极对照组。在中期时间点,其他药物或非药物干预措施与安慰剂/无干预/常规护理或积极对照组之间未发现组间差异。证据的确定性从低度到中度不等:多模式镇痛干预与安慰剂/无干预/常规护理或中期积极控制相比,可减少阿片类药物的使用。然而,证据的高度异质性和低确定性意味着还不能确定哪些干预措施能有效减少骨科手术后阿片类药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Use After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Background: The prescribing of opioids to patients for postoperative pain can lead to persistent opioid use. This review investigated the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing opioid use in patients after orthopaedic surgery.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2023. We included randomised controlled trials investigating interventions aimed at reducing opioid use after orthopaedic surgery. Two reviewers conducted the screening and data extraction and assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool) and certainty of evidence (GRADE). The primary outcome was the mean daily dose of opioid analgesic medications in the medium term (1-3 months after randomisation). Results were pooled in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model where appropriate (e.g. I2 < 50%) or summarised narratively.

Results: The search yielded 17,471 records, of which 39 trials were included. High heterogeneity meant that most comparisons could not be pooled. The mean daily dose was lower with multimodal analgesia interventions than with placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control in the medium term. No between-group differences were found between other pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions and either placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control at the medium-term time point. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate.

Conclusions: Multimodal analgesic interventions may reduce opioid use compared with placebo/no intervention/usual care or active control in the medium term. However, the high heterogeneity and low certainty of evidence means it is uncertain which interventions are effective in reducing opioid use after orthopaedic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs
Drugs 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
134
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs is a journal that aims to enhance pharmacotherapy by publishing review and original research articles on key aspects of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. The journal includes: Leading/current opinion articles providing an overview of contentious or emerging issues. Definitive reviews of drugs and drug classes, and their place in disease management. Therapy in Practice articles including recommendations for specific clinical situations. High-quality, well designed, original clinical research. Adis Drug Evaluations reviewing the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs. AdisInsight Reports summarising development at first global approval. Moreover, the journal offers additional digital features such as animated abstracts, video abstracts, instructional videos, and podcasts to increase visibility and educational value. Plain language summaries accompany articles to assist readers with some knowledge of the field in understanding important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
Buprenorphine Pharmacodynamics: A Bridge to Understanding Buprenorphine Clinical Benefits. Emerging Immunotherapies for Disease Modification of Type 1 Diabetes. Inavolisib: First Approval. Current and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Neurotrophic Keratitis. Targeting HER2 in Gastroesophageal Cancer: A New Appetite for an Old Plight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1