COVID-19患者肺部远程康复的全远程监测与混合监测:一项随机临床试验

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08634-9
Bruna S Vian, Lígia S Ratti, Mariangela R Resende, Lucieni de O Conterno, Mônica C Pereira
{"title":"COVID-19患者肺部远程康复的全远程监测与混合监测:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Bruna S Vian, Lígia S Ratti, Mariangela R Resende, Lucieni de O Conterno, Mônica C Pereira","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08634-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have impeded the traditional rehabilitation process, prompting the widespread adoption of remote programs for the recovery of survivors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a pulmonary telerehabilitation program (PTRP) in the exclusively remote modality versus the hybrid modality (remote and face-to-face) in patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction following hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, and to compare the functional capacity of patients who participated in a PTRP with those who did not.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomised, interventional, prospective clinical trial was conducted. In parallel, an observational cohort study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient rehabilitation clinic and home-based rehabilitation program.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Thirty patients post-COVID-19 were randomised into two groups: G1 (fully remote supervision of PTRP) or G2 (hybrid supervision of PTRP). Thirty-seven post-COVID-19 patients were followed up without participating in PTRP (non-intervention group - NIG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction and reduced functional capacity, as measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), after hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, were considered eligible for a PTRP. To assess the efficacy of the PTRP, the primary outcome (I) was distance walked on the 6MWT (6MWD) and the secondary outcome (II) was quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both G1 and G2 demonstrated similar improvement in 6MWD, P<0.001 and quality of life (P<0.05). The IG showed higher 6MWD than the NIG (P<0.001). The increase in 6MWD for the IG was 140.5 m, while for the NIG it was 16.8 m (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PTRP was found to be a feasible and highly effective intervention for restoring functional capacity and improving quality of life, regardless of the type of supervision. Furthermore, this functional gain was maintained over the long term. In patients with pulmonary dysfunction, participation in the PTRP improved functional capacity compared with those who were simply advised to resume physical activity during recovery.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>Telerehabilitation has been demonstrated to be a viable and efficacious alternative to traditional in-person programs in low-income contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fully remote versus hybrid supervision of pulmonary telerehabilitation in COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Bruna S Vian, Lígia S Ratti, Mariangela R Resende, Lucieni de O Conterno, Mônica C Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08634-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have impeded the traditional rehabilitation process, prompting the widespread adoption of remote programs for the recovery of survivors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a pulmonary telerehabilitation program (PTRP) in the exclusively remote modality versus the hybrid modality (remote and face-to-face) in patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction following hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, and to compare the functional capacity of patients who participated in a PTRP with those who did not.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomised, interventional, prospective clinical trial was conducted. In parallel, an observational cohort study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient rehabilitation clinic and home-based rehabilitation program.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Thirty patients post-COVID-19 were randomised into two groups: G1 (fully remote supervision of PTRP) or G2 (hybrid supervision of PTRP). Thirty-seven post-COVID-19 patients were followed up without participating in PTRP (non-intervention group - NIG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction and reduced functional capacity, as measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), after hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, were considered eligible for a PTRP. To assess the efficacy of the PTRP, the primary outcome (I) was distance walked on the 6MWT (6MWD) and the secondary outcome (II) was quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both G1 and G2 demonstrated similar improvement in 6MWD, P<0.001 and quality of life (P<0.05). The IG showed higher 6MWD than the NIG (P<0.001). The increase in 6MWD for the IG was 140.5 m, while for the NIG it was 16.8 m (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PTRP was found to be a feasible and highly effective intervention for restoring functional capacity and improving quality of life, regardless of the type of supervision. Furthermore, this functional gain was maintained over the long term. In patients with pulmonary dysfunction, participation in the PTRP improved functional capacity compared with those who were simply advised to resume physical activity during recovery.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>Telerehabilitation has been demonstrated to be a viable and efficacious alternative to traditional in-person programs in low-income contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08634-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08634-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行带来的限制阻碍了传统的康复进程,促使人们广泛采用远程方案进行幸存者康复。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较纯远程模式与混合模式(远程和面对面)对COVID-19肺炎住院后持续呼吸功能障碍患者的肺远程康复计划(PTRP)的有效性,并比较参加PTRP的患者和未参加PTRP的患者的功能能力。设计:进行一项随机、介入性、前瞻性临床试验。同时进行了一项观察性队列研究。设置:门诊康复诊所和家庭康复项目。人群:30例covid -19后患者随机分为两组:G1(完全远程监测PTRP)或G2(混合监测PTRP)。对37例未参加PTRP的新冠肺炎后患者进行随访(非干预组- NIG)。方法:在COVID-19肺炎住院后,通过6分钟步行试验(6MWT)测量持续呼吸功能障碍和功能能力下降的患者被认为符合PTRP的条件。为了评估PTRP的疗效,主要结局(I)是在6MWT上行走的距离(6MWD),次要结局(II)是通过SF-36问卷评估的生活质量。结果:G1和G2对6MWD的改善相似,结论:无论何种监护方式,PTRP都是恢复功能能力和改善生活质量的一种可行且高效的干预措施。此外,这种功能增益可以长期保持。在肺功能障碍患者中,与那些在康复期间被简单建议恢复体力活动的患者相比,参加PTRP可改善功能能力。临床康复影响:在低收入环境中,远程康复已被证明是传统面对面项目的可行和有效的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fully remote versus hybrid supervision of pulmonary telerehabilitation in COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: The restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have impeded the traditional rehabilitation process, prompting the widespread adoption of remote programs for the recovery of survivors.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a pulmonary telerehabilitation program (PTRP) in the exclusively remote modality versus the hybrid modality (remote and face-to-face) in patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction following hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, and to compare the functional capacity of patients who participated in a PTRP with those who did not.

Design: A randomised, interventional, prospective clinical trial was conducted. In parallel, an observational cohort study was conducted.

Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic and home-based rehabilitation program.

Population: Thirty patients post-COVID-19 were randomised into two groups: G1 (fully remote supervision of PTRP) or G2 (hybrid supervision of PTRP). Thirty-seven post-COVID-19 patients were followed up without participating in PTRP (non-intervention group - NIG).

Methods: Patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction and reduced functional capacity, as measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), after hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, were considered eligible for a PTRP. To assess the efficacy of the PTRP, the primary outcome (I) was distance walked on the 6MWT (6MWD) and the secondary outcome (II) was quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire.

Results: Both G1 and G2 demonstrated similar improvement in 6MWD, P<0.001 and quality of life (P<0.05). The IG showed higher 6MWD than the NIG (P<0.001). The increase in 6MWD for the IG was 140.5 m, while for the NIG it was 16.8 m (P=0.002).

Conclusions: The PTRP was found to be a feasible and highly effective intervention for restoring functional capacity and improving quality of life, regardless of the type of supervision. Furthermore, this functional gain was maintained over the long term. In patients with pulmonary dysfunction, participation in the PTRP improved functional capacity compared with those who were simply advised to resume physical activity during recovery.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: Telerehabilitation has been demonstrated to be a viable and efficacious alternative to traditional in-person programs in low-income contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of different treatment positions of nerve slider technique for patients with low back pain: a randomized control trial. Primary care and outpatient rehabilitation: complementary approaches for comprehensive healthcare. Ultrasound tissue characterization and function of Achilles tendon in psoriatic arthritis patients: a cross-sectional study. Evidence synthesis of health policy and systems research in rehabilitation: a protocol for Cochrane overviews of systematic reviews on delivery, governance, financial arrangements, and implementation strategies. Impact of low back and neck pain on the Spanish women-workers' health: effectiveness of a Back School.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1