英国和爱尔兰共和国的一组乳腺病理学专家代表英国国家乳腺病理学协调委员会对柱状细胞病变非典型性评估的诊断观察者间可变性进行了研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Histopathology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1111/his.15402
Soha El Sheikh, Mohamed A Mansour, Elena Provenzano, Abeer Shaaban, Andrew Lee, Yasmeen Mir, Rebecca McMillan-Slater, Pauline Carder, Silvana Di Palma, Clinton Boyd, Purnima Makhija, Madhuri Warren, Susan Pritchard, Rahul Deb, Ian Ellis, Emad Rakha, Cecily Quinn, Sarah Pinder
{"title":"英国和爱尔兰共和国的一组乳腺病理学专家代表英国国家乳腺病理学协调委员会对柱状细胞病变非典型性评估的诊断观察者间可变性进行了研究。","authors":"Soha El Sheikh, Mohamed A Mansour, Elena Provenzano, Abeer Shaaban, Andrew Lee, Yasmeen Mir, Rebecca McMillan-Slater, Pauline Carder, Silvana Di Palma, Clinton Boyd, Purnima Makhija, Madhuri Warren, Susan Pritchard, Rahul Deb, Ian Ellis, Emad Rakha, Cecily Quinn, Sarah Pinder","doi":"10.1111/his.15402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Atypical ductal hyperplasia and flat epithelial atypia (FEA) have defined diagnostic criteria, yet there is variation in the interpretation of these criteria, particularly when the atypia is present in a background of columnar cell lesions (CCLs). This study focuses upon cases which are especially challenging or difficult to classify reproducibly according to existing criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Thirteen breast pathology experts were asked to classify 10 challenging cases with CLLs as atypical or non-atypical. Interobserver agreement was calculated. After two consensus meetings, which explored the morphological features underlying the decision, the cases were reassessed. Finally, a photomontage was compiled as a visual aid for practising pathologists representing a range of straightforward cases and others where subjective interpretation causes disagreement within current diagnostic criteria. Overall interobserver agreement and pairwise pathologist agreement coefficients were both in the fair range (κ = 0.22 and κ = 0.3-0.4, respectively). This improved to moderate or substantial agreement (κ = 0.6-0.8) after two consensus meetings. The most controversial cases were atypical cases that lacked the regular rounded nuclei of FEA, and non-atypical cases that had florid architectural changes bordering on architectural atypia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among expert breast pathologists, interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of atypia in CCLs was higher in cases with classical features of FEA. Consensus was difficult to achieve if nuclear or architectural atypia fell outside the classical definition of FEA, suggesting that this category does not encompass the range of low-grade cytological atypia in CLLs. This study provides rationale for expanding the definition of atypia in CCLs other than FEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic interobserver variability of atypia assessment in columnar cell lesions among a group of expert breast pathologists in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, on behalf of the UK national coordinating committee for breast pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Soha El Sheikh, Mohamed A Mansour, Elena Provenzano, Abeer Shaaban, Andrew Lee, Yasmeen Mir, Rebecca McMillan-Slater, Pauline Carder, Silvana Di Palma, Clinton Boyd, Purnima Makhija, Madhuri Warren, Susan Pritchard, Rahul Deb, Ian Ellis, Emad Rakha, Cecily Quinn, Sarah Pinder\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/his.15402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Atypical ductal hyperplasia and flat epithelial atypia (FEA) have defined diagnostic criteria, yet there is variation in the interpretation of these criteria, particularly when the atypia is present in a background of columnar cell lesions (CCLs). This study focuses upon cases which are especially challenging or difficult to classify reproducibly according to existing criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Thirteen breast pathology experts were asked to classify 10 challenging cases with CLLs as atypical or non-atypical. Interobserver agreement was calculated. After two consensus meetings, which explored the morphological features underlying the decision, the cases were reassessed. Finally, a photomontage was compiled as a visual aid for practising pathologists representing a range of straightforward cases and others where subjective interpretation causes disagreement within current diagnostic criteria. Overall interobserver agreement and pairwise pathologist agreement coefficients were both in the fair range (κ = 0.22 and κ = 0.3-0.4, respectively). This improved to moderate or substantial agreement (κ = 0.6-0.8) after two consensus meetings. The most controversial cases were atypical cases that lacked the regular rounded nuclei of FEA, and non-atypical cases that had florid architectural changes bordering on architectural atypia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among expert breast pathologists, interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of atypia in CCLs was higher in cases with classical features of FEA. Consensus was difficult to achieve if nuclear or architectural atypia fell outside the classical definition of FEA, suggesting that this category does not encompass the range of low-grade cytological atypia in CLLs. This study provides rationale for expanding the definition of atypia in CCLs other than FEA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15402\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非典型导管增生和扁平上皮异型性(FEA)有明确的诊断标准,但对这些标准的解释存在差异,特别是当异型性出现在柱状细胞病变(CCLs)背景时。本研究的重点是那些特别具有挑战性或难以根据现有标准进行可重复性分类的病例。方法和结果:13名乳腺病理学专家被要求将10例具有挑战性的cll分为非典型或非典型。计算了观察员间的一致意见。经过两次协商一致的会议,探讨了决定背后的形态学特征,重新评估了这些病例。最后,编制了一个蒙太奇,作为执业病理学家的视觉辅助,代表了一系列简单的病例和其他主观解释导致当前诊断标准不一致的病例。整体观察者间一致性和病理一致性系数均在合理范围内(κ = 0.22和κ = 0.3-0.4)。在两次共识会议后,这一结果改善为中度或实质性一致(κ = 0.6-0.8)。最具争议的病例是缺乏规则圆形FEA核的非典型病例,以及具有接近非典型建筑的华丽建筑变化的非典型病例。结论:在乳腺病理学专家中,具有典型FEA特征的ccl非典型性诊断一致性较高。如果核非典型性或建筑非典型性超出FEA的经典定义,则很难达成共识,这表明这一类别不包括cll中低级别细胞学非典型性的范围。本研究为扩展FEA以外的ccl非典型性定义提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic interobserver variability of atypia assessment in columnar cell lesions among a group of expert breast pathologists in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, on behalf of the UK national coordinating committee for breast pathology.

Aims: Atypical ductal hyperplasia and flat epithelial atypia (FEA) have defined diagnostic criteria, yet there is variation in the interpretation of these criteria, particularly when the atypia is present in a background of columnar cell lesions (CCLs). This study focuses upon cases which are especially challenging or difficult to classify reproducibly according to existing criteria.

Methods and results: Thirteen breast pathology experts were asked to classify 10 challenging cases with CLLs as atypical or non-atypical. Interobserver agreement was calculated. After two consensus meetings, which explored the morphological features underlying the decision, the cases were reassessed. Finally, a photomontage was compiled as a visual aid for practising pathologists representing a range of straightforward cases and others where subjective interpretation causes disagreement within current diagnostic criteria. Overall interobserver agreement and pairwise pathologist agreement coefficients were both in the fair range (κ = 0.22 and κ = 0.3-0.4, respectively). This improved to moderate or substantial agreement (κ = 0.6-0.8) after two consensus meetings. The most controversial cases were atypical cases that lacked the regular rounded nuclei of FEA, and non-atypical cases that had florid architectural changes bordering on architectural atypia.

Conclusion: Among expert breast pathologists, interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of atypia in CCLs was higher in cases with classical features of FEA. Consensus was difficult to achieve if nuclear or architectural atypia fell outside the classical definition of FEA, suggesting that this category does not encompass the range of low-grade cytological atypia in CLLs. This study provides rationale for expanding the definition of atypia in CCLs other than FEA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Histopathology
Histopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
239
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Histopathology is an international journal intended to be of practical value to surgical and diagnostic histopathologists, and to investigators of human disease who employ histopathological methods. Our primary purpose is to publish advances in pathology, in particular those applicable to clinical practice and contributing to the better understanding of human disease.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Analysis of benign neoplasms of the rete testis formerly termed "Sertoliform cystadenomas" demonstrates that they are not Sertoli cell tumours with intra-rete growth. Male breast atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH): clinicopathological insights from a rare cohort. Colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of two large cohorts and literature review confirm poor prognosis and reveal prognostic aspects. Identification of intraductal-to-invasive spatial transitions in prostate cancer: proposal for a new unifying model on intraductal carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1