解析精神分裂症的拓扑症状结构:网络分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.002
Jingjing Li, Lijuan Pang, Fang Liu, Zhe Lu, Yu Zhang, Yongfeng Yang, Xue Li, Qiushi Hu, Keju Su, Yishao Chen, Yan Zhang, Fangfang Zhao, Xueqin Song, Gangrui Hei
{"title":"解析精神分裂症的拓扑症状结构:网络分析。","authors":"Jingjing Li, Lijuan Pang, Fang Liu, Zhe Lu, Yu Zhang, Yongfeng Yang, Xue Li, Qiushi Hu, Keju Su, Yishao Chen, Yan Zhang, Fangfang Zhao, Xueqin Song, Gangrui Hei","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), comprehensively assesses schizophrenia severity. While network analyses of schizophrenic symptoms have yielded inconsistent results, components of disorganized thought consistently rank high in centrality. The present study aims to explore the centrality of disorganized thought across patient subgroups and its potential as a treatment target. We hypothesize that disorganized thought will emerge as a central feature in the symptom network across different patient populations.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a network psychometric analysis on data from 1435 schizophrenia patients, stratified into four groups based on family history and sex. Local and global network properties, including centrality, clustering coefficient, degree, density, and community detection, were investigated. Network comparisons were performed across groups, and results were validated using an independent dataset.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Disorganized thought emerged as the most central factor in Marder 5-factor model, maintaining stability across family history and sex differences. While family history did not significantly impact symptom structures (Females: M = 0.2, P = 0.4; S = 0.4, P = 0.7; Males: M = 0.2, P = 0.7; S = 0.1, P = 0.9), significant differences were observed between male and female symptom structures (Positive family history: M = 0.3, P < 0.05; Negative family history: M = 0.3, P < 0.01). The centrality and high stability of disorganized thought were further confirmed in the validation dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The consistent centrality of disorganized thought across different patient subgroups suggests its potential as a key treatment target for schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"275 ","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the topological symptom structure of schizophrenia: A network analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Li, Lijuan Pang, Fang Liu, Zhe Lu, Yu Zhang, Yongfeng Yang, Xue Li, Qiushi Hu, Keju Su, Yishao Chen, Yan Zhang, Fangfang Zhao, Xueqin Song, Gangrui Hei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), comprehensively assesses schizophrenia severity. While network analyses of schizophrenic symptoms have yielded inconsistent results, components of disorganized thought consistently rank high in centrality. The present study aims to explore the centrality of disorganized thought across patient subgroups and its potential as a treatment target. We hypothesize that disorganized thought will emerge as a central feature in the symptom network across different patient populations.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a network psychometric analysis on data from 1435 schizophrenia patients, stratified into four groups based on family history and sex. Local and global network properties, including centrality, clustering coefficient, degree, density, and community detection, were investigated. Network comparisons were performed across groups, and results were validated using an independent dataset.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Disorganized thought emerged as the most central factor in Marder 5-factor model, maintaining stability across family history and sex differences. While family history did not significantly impact symptom structures (Females: M = 0.2, P = 0.4; S = 0.4, P = 0.7; Males: M = 0.2, P = 0.7; S = 0.1, P = 0.9), significant differences were observed between male and female symptom structures (Positive family history: M = 0.3, P < 0.05; Negative family history: M = 0.3, P < 0.01). The centrality and high stability of disorganized thought were further confirmed in the validation dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The consistent centrality of disorganized thought across different patient subgroups suggests its potential as a key treatment target for schizophrenia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Research\",\"volume\":\"275 \",\"pages\":\"115-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与假设:Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)是一种综合评估精神分裂症严重程度的量表。虽然对精神分裂症症状的网络分析得出了不一致的结果,但无序思维的组成部分始终在中心性方面排名很高。本研究旨在探讨无组织思维在患者亚组中的中心地位及其作为治疗目标的潜力。我们假设,在不同的患者群体中,无组织思维将作为症状网络的中心特征出现。研究设计:我们对1435名精神分裂症患者的数据进行了网络心理测量分析,根据家族史和性别将其分为四组。研究了局部和全局网络特性,包括中心性、聚类系数、程度、密度和社区检测。跨组进行网络比较,并使用独立数据集验证结果。研究结果:无序思维成为Marder五因素模型的最核心因素,在家族史和性别差异中保持稳定。而家族史对症状结构无显著影响(女性:M = 0.2, P = 0.4;S = 0.4, p = 0.7;男性:M = 0.2, P = 0.7;S = 0.1, P = 0.9),男性和女性症状结构存在显著差异(阳性家族史:M = 0.3, P)。结论:在不同患者亚组中,无序思维的中心性一致,表明其可能是精神分裂症的关键治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disentangling the topological symptom structure of schizophrenia: A network analysis.

Background and hypothesis: The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), comprehensively assesses schizophrenia severity. While network analyses of schizophrenic symptoms have yielded inconsistent results, components of disorganized thought consistently rank high in centrality. The present study aims to explore the centrality of disorganized thought across patient subgroups and its potential as a treatment target. We hypothesize that disorganized thought will emerge as a central feature in the symptom network across different patient populations.

Study design: We conducted a network psychometric analysis on data from 1435 schizophrenia patients, stratified into four groups based on family history and sex. Local and global network properties, including centrality, clustering coefficient, degree, density, and community detection, were investigated. Network comparisons were performed across groups, and results were validated using an independent dataset.

Study results: Disorganized thought emerged as the most central factor in Marder 5-factor model, maintaining stability across family history and sex differences. While family history did not significantly impact symptom structures (Females: M = 0.2, P = 0.4; S = 0.4, P = 0.7; Males: M = 0.2, P = 0.7; S = 0.1, P = 0.9), significant differences were observed between male and female symptom structures (Positive family history: M = 0.3, P < 0.05; Negative family history: M = 0.3, P < 0.01). The centrality and high stability of disorganized thought were further confirmed in the validation dataset.

Conclusions: The consistent centrality of disorganized thought across different patient subgroups suggests its potential as a key treatment target for schizophrenia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Research
Schizophrenia Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership! Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue. The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the relationship between personality dimensions and psychosis-specific clinical characteristics. Emotional intelligence as a predictor of functional outcomes in psychotic disorders. Ambient coarse particulate matter pollution and hospital admissions for schizophrenia. Positive mental health interventions for people with schizophrenia: A scoping review. Systematic review and meta-analysis of family-based interventions for early psychosis: Carer and patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1