{"title":"比较类风湿关节炎患者从参比利妥昔单抗转向生物仿制药利妥昔单抗(DRL_RI)后的免疫原性和安全性:一项随机、双盲、3期研究","authors":"Narendra Maharaj, Dharma Rao Uppada, Naveen Reddy, Pramod Reddy, Anastas Batalov, Delina lvanova, Nedyalka Staykova, Asta Baranauskaite, Laila Amirali Hassan","doi":"10.1186/s13075-024-03456-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess immunogenicity and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) transitioning from rituximab [US-licensed rituximab: Reference Product (RP); EU-approved rituximab: Reference Medicinal Product (RMP)] to DRL_RI (proposed rituximab biosimilar), in comparison to those continuing on RP/RMP. This double-blind, randomized, Phase 3 study included 140 RA patients having prior exposure to RP/RMP; transitioned to DRL_RI (n = 70) or continued with RP/RMP (n = 70) for two 1000 mg infusions on Days 1 and 15. Assessments included Time-matched Rituximab Concentration (TMRC), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and ADA titre over 12 weeks, and safety follow-up till 26 weeks. The mean age of subjects was 59.8 years (range: 24, 86) and the mean BMI was 27.76 kg/m2 (range: 17.5, 52.0). Incidence of ADA after dosing was low in both groups: 1.4% in DRL_RI group on Day 15, Week 8, and Week 12; and 2.9% in RP/RMP group at Week 12. Only 1 patient in DRL_RI group was positive for NAbs at Week 8. ADA titre values did not significantly differ between the two groups. The time-matched rituximab concentration was comparable between groups, indicating no interference for immunogenicity assessment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 34.3% and 38.6% patients, respectively, in DRL_RI and RP/RMP groups. Incidences of TEAEs that were drug-related, leading to treatment discontinuation, grade ≥ 3, or serious, were also comparable. Immunogenicity was low and comparable in RA patients transitioning to DRL_RI or continuing on RP/RMP. The overall safety profile in patients transitioning to DRL_RI did not appear to differ in frequency, severity, or quality from patients continuing on RP/RMP and was in line with the known safety profile of rituximab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT0426877 EudraCT:2019-002810-37 US IND 112766. • Immunogenicity and safety in patients with active RA transitioning from reference rituximab to DRL_RI (biosimilar rituximab) were comparable to those continuing with reference rituximab. • Incidence of ADA after dosing was low and similar between patients transitioning to DRL_RI vs. continuing with reference rituximab. • Adverse events in patients who transitioned to DRL_RI or continuing treatment with the reference rituximab were comparable, and overall, in line with the known safety profile of rituximab.","PeriodicalId":8419,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing immunogenicity and safety following transition from reference rituximab to biosimilar rituximab (DRL_RI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study\",\"authors\":\"Narendra Maharaj, Dharma Rao Uppada, Naveen Reddy, Pramod Reddy, Anastas Batalov, Delina lvanova, Nedyalka Staykova, Asta Baranauskaite, Laila Amirali Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13075-024-03456-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To assess immunogenicity and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) transitioning from rituximab [US-licensed rituximab: Reference Product (RP); EU-approved rituximab: Reference Medicinal Product (RMP)] to DRL_RI (proposed rituximab biosimilar), in comparison to those continuing on RP/RMP. This double-blind, randomized, Phase 3 study included 140 RA patients having prior exposure to RP/RMP; transitioned to DRL_RI (n = 70) or continued with RP/RMP (n = 70) for two 1000 mg infusions on Days 1 and 15. Assessments included Time-matched Rituximab Concentration (TMRC), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and ADA titre over 12 weeks, and safety follow-up till 26 weeks. The mean age of subjects was 59.8 years (range: 24, 86) and the mean BMI was 27.76 kg/m2 (range: 17.5, 52.0). Incidence of ADA after dosing was low in both groups: 1.4% in DRL_RI group on Day 15, Week 8, and Week 12; and 2.9% in RP/RMP group at Week 12. Only 1 patient in DRL_RI group was positive for NAbs at Week 8. ADA titre values did not significantly differ between the two groups. The time-matched rituximab concentration was comparable between groups, indicating no interference for immunogenicity assessment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 34.3% and 38.6% patients, respectively, in DRL_RI and RP/RMP groups. Incidences of TEAEs that were drug-related, leading to treatment discontinuation, grade ≥ 3, or serious, were also comparable. Immunogenicity was low and comparable in RA patients transitioning to DRL_RI or continuing on RP/RMP. The overall safety profile in patients transitioning to DRL_RI did not appear to differ in frequency, severity, or quality from patients continuing on RP/RMP and was in line with the known safety profile of rituximab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT0426877 EudraCT:2019-002810-37 US IND 112766. • Immunogenicity and safety in patients with active RA transitioning from reference rituximab to DRL_RI (biosimilar rituximab) were comparable to those continuing with reference rituximab. • Incidence of ADA after dosing was low and similar between patients transitioning to DRL_RI vs. continuing with reference rituximab. • Adverse events in patients who transitioned to DRL_RI or continuing treatment with the reference rituximab were comparable, and overall, in line with the known safety profile of rituximab.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03456-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03456-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
评估活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者从美罗华过渡的免疫原性和安全性[美罗华:参考产品(RP);欧盟批准的利妥昔单抗:参考药物(RMP)]到DRL_RI(拟议的利妥昔单抗生物仿制药),与继续使用RP/RMP的药物进行比较。这项双盲、随机、3期研究纳入了140名RA患者,他们之前曾暴露于RP/RMP;过渡到DRL_RI (n = 70)或继续RP/RMP (n = 70),在第1天和第15天两次1000 mg输注。评估包括12周时间匹配利妥昔单抗浓度(TMRC)、抗药物抗体(ADAs)、中和抗体(nab)和ADA滴度,以及安全随访至26周。受试者平均年龄为59.8岁(范围:24、86),平均BMI为27.76 kg/m2(范围:17.5、52.0)。两组给药后ADA的发生率均较低:DRL_RI组在第15天、第8周和第12周的发生率为1.4%;第12周,RP/RMP组为2.9%。DRL_RI组只有1例患者在第8周nab阳性。两组间ADA滴度值无显著差异。时间匹配的利妥昔单抗浓度在两组之间具有可比性,表明对免疫原性评估没有干扰。DRL_RI组和RP/RMP组出现治疗不良事件(teae)的比例分别为34.3%和38.6%。与药物相关、导致停药、≥3级或严重teae的发生率也具有可比性。在过渡到DRL_RI或继续RP/RMP的RA患者中,免疫原性较低且相当。过渡到DRL_RI的患者的总体安全性与继续使用RP/RMP的患者在频率、严重程度或质量上没有差异,并且与利妥昔单抗的已知安全性一致。ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT0426877稿号:2019-002810-37 US IND 112766。•活动性RA患者从参考利妥昔单抗过渡到DRL_RI(生物仿制药利妥昔单抗)的免疫原性和安全性与继续使用参考利妥昔单抗的患者相当。•在过渡到DRL_RI和继续使用利妥昔单抗的患者中,给药后ADA的发生率较低且相似。•过渡到DRL_RI或继续使用参考利妥昔单抗治疗的患者的不良事件具有可比性,总体而言,符合利妥昔单抗已知的安全性。
Comparing immunogenicity and safety following transition from reference rituximab to biosimilar rituximab (DRL_RI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study
To assess immunogenicity and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) transitioning from rituximab [US-licensed rituximab: Reference Product (RP); EU-approved rituximab: Reference Medicinal Product (RMP)] to DRL_RI (proposed rituximab biosimilar), in comparison to those continuing on RP/RMP. This double-blind, randomized, Phase 3 study included 140 RA patients having prior exposure to RP/RMP; transitioned to DRL_RI (n = 70) or continued with RP/RMP (n = 70) for two 1000 mg infusions on Days 1 and 15. Assessments included Time-matched Rituximab Concentration (TMRC), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and ADA titre over 12 weeks, and safety follow-up till 26 weeks. The mean age of subjects was 59.8 years (range: 24, 86) and the mean BMI was 27.76 kg/m2 (range: 17.5, 52.0). Incidence of ADA after dosing was low in both groups: 1.4% in DRL_RI group on Day 15, Week 8, and Week 12; and 2.9% in RP/RMP group at Week 12. Only 1 patient in DRL_RI group was positive for NAbs at Week 8. ADA titre values did not significantly differ between the two groups. The time-matched rituximab concentration was comparable between groups, indicating no interference for immunogenicity assessment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 34.3% and 38.6% patients, respectively, in DRL_RI and RP/RMP groups. Incidences of TEAEs that were drug-related, leading to treatment discontinuation, grade ≥ 3, or serious, were also comparable. Immunogenicity was low and comparable in RA patients transitioning to DRL_RI or continuing on RP/RMP. The overall safety profile in patients transitioning to DRL_RI did not appear to differ in frequency, severity, or quality from patients continuing on RP/RMP and was in line with the known safety profile of rituximab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT0426877 EudraCT:2019-002810-37 US IND 112766. • Immunogenicity and safety in patients with active RA transitioning from reference rituximab to DRL_RI (biosimilar rituximab) were comparable to those continuing with reference rituximab. • Incidence of ADA after dosing was low and similar between patients transitioning to DRL_RI vs. continuing with reference rituximab. • Adverse events in patients who transitioned to DRL_RI or continuing treatment with the reference rituximab were comparable, and overall, in line with the known safety profile of rituximab.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.