军人单节段腰椎微椎间盘切除术后复发性腰椎间盘突出和翻修手术率。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00879
Donald F Colantonio, Donald R Fredericks, Michael J Elsenbeck, Clarke Cady, Cody D Schlaff, Daniel L Christensen, Melvin D Helgeson, Scott C Wagner
{"title":"军人单节段腰椎微椎间盘切除术后复发性腰椎间盘突出和翻修手术率。","authors":"Donald F Colantonio, Donald R Fredericks, Michael J Elsenbeck, Clarke Cady, Cody D Schlaff, Daniel L Christensen, Melvin D Helgeson, Scott C Wagner","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar microdiscectomy remains the most commonly performed surgical procedure for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation (LDH). Despite advances in surgical techniques, recurrent LDH (rLDH) ranges from 5% to 24%, representing the most common cause of surgical failure and revision surgery. Optimal treatment of reherniation remains controversial. In addition, no previously reported large database studies capture the rLDH rate in patients who did not undergo revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the recurrence and revision surgery rate, time to revision surgery, and type of revision procedures performed after single-level diskectomy for LDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Military Health System Data Repository, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent single-level microdiscectomy between October 2012 and December 2016. Electronic health records were reviewed to determine demographic data, rLDH rate, revision surgery rate, and type of revision surgery. Rates of subsequent procedures involving instrumented fusion and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three thousand three hundred eighty-eight single-level microdiscectomies were included in the study. The same-level rLDH rate was 22.8%. A total of 396 revision surgeries (11.7%) were performed, with 274 revision microdiscectomies (69.2%) and 122 fusions (30.8%). Thirty-eight patients required additional surgical treatment. Overall, 138 patients (4.1%) progressed to lumbar arthrodesis after single-level microdiscectomy. Of those requiring more than one revision, 16 (42.1%) required an arthrodesis. All-cause complication during the index microdiscectomy was associated with greater reherniation risk (odds ratio 2.1, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective study demonstrates a same-level recurrence rate of 22.8% with an 11.7% revision surgery rate. Within this group, 9.6% would require two or more revision surgeries and 42.1% of these revision microdiscectomy patients would ultimately undergo a lumbar arthrodesis at the same level as the initial disk herniation. Our findings characterize the lumbar disk reherniation population in the military health system, with major implications for the prognosis and treatment strategy of these commonly treated injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation and Revision Surgery Rates After Single-Level Lumbar Microdiscectomy in the Military Population.\",\"authors\":\"Donald F Colantonio, Donald R Fredericks, Michael J Elsenbeck, Clarke Cady, Cody D Schlaff, Daniel L Christensen, Melvin D Helgeson, Scott C Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar microdiscectomy remains the most commonly performed surgical procedure for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation (LDH). Despite advances in surgical techniques, recurrent LDH (rLDH) ranges from 5% to 24%, representing the most common cause of surgical failure and revision surgery. Optimal treatment of reherniation remains controversial. In addition, no previously reported large database studies capture the rLDH rate in patients who did not undergo revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the recurrence and revision surgery rate, time to revision surgery, and type of revision procedures performed after single-level diskectomy for LDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Military Health System Data Repository, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent single-level microdiscectomy between October 2012 and December 2016. Electronic health records were reviewed to determine demographic data, rLDH rate, revision surgery rate, and type of revision surgery. Rates of subsequent procedures involving instrumented fusion and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three thousand three hundred eighty-eight single-level microdiscectomies were included in the study. The same-level rLDH rate was 22.8%. A total of 396 revision surgeries (11.7%) were performed, with 274 revision microdiscectomies (69.2%) and 122 fusions (30.8%). Thirty-eight patients required additional surgical treatment. Overall, 138 patients (4.1%) progressed to lumbar arthrodesis after single-level microdiscectomy. Of those requiring more than one revision, 16 (42.1%) required an arthrodesis. All-cause complication during the index microdiscectomy was associated with greater reherniation risk (odds ratio 2.1, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective study demonstrates a same-level recurrence rate of 22.8% with an 11.7% revision surgery rate. Within this group, 9.6% would require two or more revision surgeries and 42.1% of these revision microdiscectomy patients would ultimately undergo a lumbar arthrodesis at the same level as the initial disk herniation. Our findings characterize the lumbar disk reherniation population in the military health system, with major implications for the prognosis and treatment strategy of these commonly treated injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00879\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰椎微椎间盘切除术仍然是治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)最常用的手术方法。尽管手术技术不断进步,但复发性LDH (rLDH)仍在5%至24%之间,是导致手术失败和翻修手术的最常见原因。再疝的最佳治疗方法仍有争议。此外,以前没有报道过大型数据库研究捕获未接受翻修手术的患者的rLDH率。本研究的目的是确定LDH单节段椎间盘切除术后的复发率和翻修手术率、翻修手术时间和翻修手术类型。方法:利用军队卫生系统数据库,回顾性分析2012年10月至2016年12月期间接受单节段微椎间盘切除术的患者。检查电子健康记录以确定人口统计数据、rLDH率、翻修手术率和翻修手术类型。记录后续手术包括器械融合术和并发症的发生率。结果:本研究纳入了33888例单节段显微椎间盘切除术。同一水平的rLDH率为22.8%。共进行了396例翻修手术(11.7%),显微椎间盘翻修手术274例(69.2%),融合122例(30.8%)。38例患者需要额外的手术治疗。总体而言,138例患者(4.1%)在单节段微椎间盘切除术后进展为腰椎融合术。在需要一次以上翻修的患者中,16例(42.1%)需要关节融合术。指数微椎间盘切除术期间的全因并发症与更大的再突出风险相关(优势比2.1,P < 0.001)。结论:本回顾性研究显示同一水平的复发率为22.8%,翻修手术率为11.7%。在该组中,9.6%需要两次或两次以上翻修手术,42.1%翻修微椎间盘切除术患者最终在初始椎间盘突出的同一水平行腰椎关节融合术。我们的研究结果描述了军队卫生系统中腰椎间盘再突出人群的特征,对这些常用治疗损伤的预后和治疗策略具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation and Revision Surgery Rates After Single-Level Lumbar Microdiscectomy in the Military Population.

Background: Lumbar microdiscectomy remains the most commonly performed surgical procedure for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation (LDH). Despite advances in surgical techniques, recurrent LDH (rLDH) ranges from 5% to 24%, representing the most common cause of surgical failure and revision surgery. Optimal treatment of reherniation remains controversial. In addition, no previously reported large database studies capture the rLDH rate in patients who did not undergo revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the recurrence and revision surgery rate, time to revision surgery, and type of revision procedures performed after single-level diskectomy for LDH.

Methods: Using the Military Health System Data Repository, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent single-level microdiscectomy between October 2012 and December 2016. Electronic health records were reviewed to determine demographic data, rLDH rate, revision surgery rate, and type of revision surgery. Rates of subsequent procedures involving instrumented fusion and complications were recorded.

Results: Three thousand three hundred eighty-eight single-level microdiscectomies were included in the study. The same-level rLDH rate was 22.8%. A total of 396 revision surgeries (11.7%) were performed, with 274 revision microdiscectomies (69.2%) and 122 fusions (30.8%). Thirty-eight patients required additional surgical treatment. Overall, 138 patients (4.1%) progressed to lumbar arthrodesis after single-level microdiscectomy. Of those requiring more than one revision, 16 (42.1%) required an arthrodesis. All-cause complication during the index microdiscectomy was associated with greater reherniation risk (odds ratio 2.1, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: This retrospective study demonstrates a same-level recurrence rate of 22.8% with an 11.7% revision surgery rate. Within this group, 9.6% would require two or more revision surgeries and 42.1% of these revision microdiscectomy patients would ultimately undergo a lumbar arthrodesis at the same level as the initial disk herniation. Our findings characterize the lumbar disk reherniation population in the military health system, with major implications for the prognosis and treatment strategy of these commonly treated injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Concerning "Risk Factors Associated With Thromboembolic Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 1,129 Pulmonary Emboli". The Effect of Social Drivers of Health on 90-Day Readmission Rates and Costs After Primary Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty. Effect of Adding Stem Extension to a Short-Keeled Knee Implant on the Risk of Tibial Loosening: a Historical Cohort Study. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Risk Factors Associated with Thromboembolic Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 1,129 Pulmonary Emboli. 2023 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: Case Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1