使用机器学习模型评估绒毛膜下血肿妇女的妊娠风险。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Medical Science Monitor Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.12659/MSM.945472
Lan Wang, Aiping Qin, Yihua Yang, Yufu Jin, Qiuyan Huang, Xinyue Huang, Yu Feng, Ting Liang
{"title":"使用机器学习模型评估绒毛膜下血肿妇女的妊娠风险。","authors":"Lan Wang, Aiping Qin, Yihua Yang, Yufu Jin, Qiuyan Huang, Xinyue Huang, Yu Feng, Ting Liang","doi":"10.12659/MSM.945472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Subchorionic hematoma (SCH) can lead to blood accumulation and potentially affect pregnancy outcomes. Despite being a relatively common finding in early pregnancy, the effects of SCH on pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage, stillbirth, and preterm birth remain debated. This study aims to address these gaps by systematically evaluating the influence of SCH-related clinical factors on pregnancy outcomes using robust analytical techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from SCH and non-SCH pregnant women were collected and split into training and test datasets. Machine learning classifiers and regression models were used to assess the impact of clinical indices on outcomes such as delivery type, NICU transfer, gestational age, and birth weight. Results were evaluated using ROC and calibration plots. RESULTS (1) SCH women had a significantly higher risk of stillbirth or miscarriage than non-SCH women (P<0.001). Logistic regression and XGB models showed AUCs of 0.858 and 0.916, respectively. Key factors affecting delivery outcomes included the first positive HCG level, hematoma duration, CA125 level, gestational sac diameter, fibrinogen level, and spouse age. (2) 12.7% of successfully delivered SCH newborns required NICU transfer, but clinical indices did not predict NICU need (AUC 0.589 and 0.629). (3) Successfully delivered SCH women had longer gestational ages than those with miscarriage/stillbirth (38.8 vs 10.1 weeks), but indices did not predict preterm/full-term birth (AUCs 0.449 and 0.503). (4) Birth weight was significantly affected by live birth times and gestational age (P<0.05), though the adjusted R-square was 0.226. CONCLUSIONS (1) SCH increases miscarriage or stillbirth risk. (2) the first positive HCG level, the hematoma duration, serum CA125 level, the gestational sac maximum diameter, fibrinogen, and the spouse age highly impacted the delivery outcome. (3) SCH indices do not affect NICU transfer or birth weight. (4) Miscarriage/stillbirth mainly occurs in the first trimester; passing this stage often leads to successful delivery. (5) The birth weight of full-term newborns is significantly higher than that of preterm infants. The clinical indices of SCH pregnant women have no impact on the birth weight of the newborn.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e945472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Pregnancy Risks in Women with Subchorionic Hematoma Using Machine Learning Models.\",\"authors\":\"Lan Wang, Aiping Qin, Yihua Yang, Yufu Jin, Qiuyan Huang, Xinyue Huang, Yu Feng, Ting Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.945472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Subchorionic hematoma (SCH) can lead to blood accumulation and potentially affect pregnancy outcomes. Despite being a relatively common finding in early pregnancy, the effects of SCH on pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage, stillbirth, and preterm birth remain debated. This study aims to address these gaps by systematically evaluating the influence of SCH-related clinical factors on pregnancy outcomes using robust analytical techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from SCH and non-SCH pregnant women were collected and split into training and test datasets. Machine learning classifiers and regression models were used to assess the impact of clinical indices on outcomes such as delivery type, NICU transfer, gestational age, and birth weight. Results were evaluated using ROC and calibration plots. RESULTS (1) SCH women had a significantly higher risk of stillbirth or miscarriage than non-SCH women (P<0.001). Logistic regression and XGB models showed AUCs of 0.858 and 0.916, respectively. Key factors affecting delivery outcomes included the first positive HCG level, hematoma duration, CA125 level, gestational sac diameter, fibrinogen level, and spouse age. (2) 12.7% of successfully delivered SCH newborns required NICU transfer, but clinical indices did not predict NICU need (AUC 0.589 and 0.629). (3) Successfully delivered SCH women had longer gestational ages than those with miscarriage/stillbirth (38.8 vs 10.1 weeks), but indices did not predict preterm/full-term birth (AUCs 0.449 and 0.503). (4) Birth weight was significantly affected by live birth times and gestational age (P<0.05), though the adjusted R-square was 0.226. CONCLUSIONS (1) SCH increases miscarriage or stillbirth risk. (2) the first positive HCG level, the hematoma duration, serum CA125 level, the gestational sac maximum diameter, fibrinogen, and the spouse age highly impacted the delivery outcome. (3) SCH indices do not affect NICU transfer or birth weight. (4) Miscarriage/stillbirth mainly occurs in the first trimester; passing this stage often leads to successful delivery. (5) The birth weight of full-term newborns is significantly higher than that of preterm infants. The clinical indices of SCH pregnant women have no impact on the birth weight of the newborn.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e945472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945472\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绒毛膜下血肿(SCH)可导致血液积聚,并可能影响妊娠结局。尽管在早期妊娠中相对常见,但SCH对流产、死胎和早产等妊娠结局的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过使用强大的分析技术系统地评估sch相关临床因素对妊娠结局的影响来解决这些差距。材料与方法收集重度妊娠和非重度妊娠孕妇的数据,分为训练数据集和测试数据集。使用机器学习分类器和回归模型来评估临床指标对分娩类型、NICU转移、胎龄和出生体重等结局的影响。采用ROC和校正图对结果进行评价。结果(1)超常规妊娠妇女死产或流产的风险明显高于非超常规妊娠妇女(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Pregnancy Risks in Women with Subchorionic Hematoma Using Machine Learning Models.

BACKGROUND Subchorionic hematoma (SCH) can lead to blood accumulation and potentially affect pregnancy outcomes. Despite being a relatively common finding in early pregnancy, the effects of SCH on pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage, stillbirth, and preterm birth remain debated. This study aims to address these gaps by systematically evaluating the influence of SCH-related clinical factors on pregnancy outcomes using robust analytical techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from SCH and non-SCH pregnant women were collected and split into training and test datasets. Machine learning classifiers and regression models were used to assess the impact of clinical indices on outcomes such as delivery type, NICU transfer, gestational age, and birth weight. Results were evaluated using ROC and calibration plots. RESULTS (1) SCH women had a significantly higher risk of stillbirth or miscarriage than non-SCH women (P<0.001). Logistic regression and XGB models showed AUCs of 0.858 and 0.916, respectively. Key factors affecting delivery outcomes included the first positive HCG level, hematoma duration, CA125 level, gestational sac diameter, fibrinogen level, and spouse age. (2) 12.7% of successfully delivered SCH newborns required NICU transfer, but clinical indices did not predict NICU need (AUC 0.589 and 0.629). (3) Successfully delivered SCH women had longer gestational ages than those with miscarriage/stillbirth (38.8 vs 10.1 weeks), but indices did not predict preterm/full-term birth (AUCs 0.449 and 0.503). (4) Birth weight was significantly affected by live birth times and gestational age (P<0.05), though the adjusted R-square was 0.226. CONCLUSIONS (1) SCH increases miscarriage or stillbirth risk. (2) the first positive HCG level, the hematoma duration, serum CA125 level, the gestational sac maximum diameter, fibrinogen, and the spouse age highly impacted the delivery outcome. (3) SCH indices do not affect NICU transfer or birth weight. (4) Miscarriage/stillbirth mainly occurs in the first trimester; passing this stage often leads to successful delivery. (5) The birth weight of full-term newborns is significantly higher than that of preterm infants. The clinical indices of SCH pregnant women have no impact on the birth weight of the newborn.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
期刊最新文献
Linear Dimensional Accuracy in Maxillomandibular Records: A Comparative Study of Scannable and Transparent Materials. Long-Term Outcomes of Implanon in Managing Adenomyosis: A 3-Year Prospective Study. Predicting Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Burden Based on Thromboelastography in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pilot Study. Procedure Dynamics in Transfemoral vs Transradial Cerebral Angiography: A Retrospective Study. Retracted: IC-2 Suppresses Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis of Bladder Cancer Cells via the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1