Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Francois Moreau, Thalia S Field, Mayank Goyal, Michael D Hill, Shelagh B Coutts, Mohammed Almekhlafi
{"title":"低风险暂时性或持续性轻微神经事件患者的非狭窄性颈动脉斑块和dwi阳性MRI率:DOUBT亚组研究","authors":"Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Francois Moreau, Thalia S Field, Mayank Goyal, Michael D Hill, Shelagh B Coutts, Mohammed Almekhlafi","doi":"10.1007/s00062-024-01483-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & purpose: </strong>Non-stenotic (< 50%) carotid plaques are increasingly recognized as a potential mechanism for ischemic stroke. We assessed the prevalence of such plaques in patients with low-risk neurologic events and evidence of DWI (Diffusion Weighted Imaging)-positive ischemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post-hoc exploratory analysis from the DOUBT study, a prospective, observational, multicenter study of patients with low-risk transient or persistent minor focal neurological symptoms. Patients who had baseline CT angiography (CTA) and an MRI within 8 days of their event were included in the study. We aimed to assess the prevalence of non-stenotic carotid disease in patients with versus without DWI-positive events, and in patients with ipsilateral DWI-positive events. A carotid-level analysis with univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether any of the assessed plaque features were associated with ipsilateral stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 334 patients (mean age 62.7 years, 50.4% females) with available vascular neuroimaging, 153 (45.9%) had non-stenotic carotid plaques (≤50% stenosis), 174 (52.1%) had no stenosis and 7 (2.1%) patients had >50% stenosis. Of those with non-stenotic carotid plaques, 31/153 (20.3%) had evidence of DWI-positive ischemia, approximately half (15/31; 48.4%) of which was in the territory of the carotid plaque. Amongst patients with DWI-positive ischemia, non-stenotic plaques were significantly more common on the side of DWI-positive lesions [31/49 (63.3%) versus 18/49(36.7%)]. Presence of non-stenotic plaque was a risk marker for DWI-positive events (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p 0.012). On matched analysis, non-stenotic plaques were more likely on the side of DWI+ ischemia (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.36-3.70, McNemar's p value 0.80). Plaque features, including hypodensity, irregularity and greater plaque thickness were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of ipsilateral DWI+ ischemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with low-risk transient or persistent neurologic events, non-stenotic carotid plaques are more common in patients with DWI-positive ischemia. Plaque features like hypodense and irregular plaque were more common with DWI-positive changes in the territory of the affected carotid.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Stenotic Carotid Plaques and Rate of DWI-positive MRI in Patients with Lower-Risk Transient or Persistent Minor Neurologic Events: DOUBT Sub Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Francois Moreau, Thalia S Field, Mayank Goyal, Michael D Hill, Shelagh B Coutts, Mohammed Almekhlafi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00062-024-01483-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & purpose: </strong>Non-stenotic (< 50%) carotid plaques are increasingly recognized as a potential mechanism for ischemic stroke. We assessed the prevalence of such plaques in patients with low-risk neurologic events and evidence of DWI (Diffusion Weighted Imaging)-positive ischemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post-hoc exploratory analysis from the DOUBT study, a prospective, observational, multicenter study of patients with low-risk transient or persistent minor focal neurological symptoms. Patients who had baseline CT angiography (CTA) and an MRI within 8 days of their event were included in the study. We aimed to assess the prevalence of non-stenotic carotid disease in patients with versus without DWI-positive events, and in patients with ipsilateral DWI-positive events. A carotid-level analysis with univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether any of the assessed plaque features were associated with ipsilateral stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 334 patients (mean age 62.7 years, 50.4% females) with available vascular neuroimaging, 153 (45.9%) had non-stenotic carotid plaques (≤50% stenosis), 174 (52.1%) had no stenosis and 7 (2.1%) patients had >50% stenosis. Of those with non-stenotic carotid plaques, 31/153 (20.3%) had evidence of DWI-positive ischemia, approximately half (15/31; 48.4%) of which was in the territory of the carotid plaque. Amongst patients with DWI-positive ischemia, non-stenotic plaques were significantly more common on the side of DWI-positive lesions [31/49 (63.3%) versus 18/49(36.7%)]. Presence of non-stenotic plaque was a risk marker for DWI-positive events (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p 0.012). On matched analysis, non-stenotic plaques were more likely on the side of DWI+ ischemia (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.36-3.70, McNemar's p value 0.80). Plaque features, including hypodensity, irregularity and greater plaque thickness were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of ipsilateral DWI+ ischemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with low-risk transient or persistent neurologic events, non-stenotic carotid plaques are more common in patients with DWI-positive ischemia. Plaque features like hypodense and irregular plaque were more common with DWI-positive changes in the territory of the affected carotid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01483-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01483-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:非狭窄性(方法:这是一项来自DOUBT研究的事后探索性分析,这是一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心的研究,研究对象是具有低风险的短暂性或持续性轻微局灶性神经症状的患者。在事件发生后8天内进行基线CT血管造影(CTA)和MRI检查的患者被纳入研究。我们的目的是评估非狭窄性颈动脉疾病在有dwi阳性事件与没有dwi阳性事件的患者以及同侧dwi阳性事件患者中的患病率。采用单变量logistic回归分析进行颈动脉水平分析,以评估评估的斑块特征是否与同侧卒中相关。结果:334例有血管神经影像学检查的患者(平均年龄62.7岁,女性50.4%)中,153例(45.9%)有非狭窄性颈动脉斑块(≤50%狭窄),174例(52.1%)无狭窄,7例(2.1%)有bb0 50%狭窄。在非狭窄性颈动脉斑块中,31/153(20.3%)有dwi阳性缺血的证据,大约一半(15/31;48.4%)发生在颈动脉斑块区域。在dwi阳性缺血患者中,非狭窄性斑块更常见于dwi阳性病变一侧[31/49(63.3%)对18/49(36.7%)]。非狭窄斑块的存在是dwi阳性事件的危险标志(RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p 0.012)。在匹配分析中,非狭窄性斑块更可能出现在DWI+缺血一侧(优势比1.14,95% CI 0.36-3.70, McNemar p值0.80)。斑块特征,包括低密度、不规则和更大的斑块厚度,与同侧DWI+缺血的可能性显著相关。结论:在低风险的短暂性或持续性神经事件患者中,非狭窄性颈动脉斑块在dwi阳性缺血患者中更为常见。斑块特征如低密度和不规则斑块更常见于受影响颈动脉的dwi阳性改变。
Non-Stenotic Carotid Plaques and Rate of DWI-positive MRI in Patients with Lower-Risk Transient or Persistent Minor Neurologic Events: DOUBT Sub Study.
Background & purpose: Non-stenotic (< 50%) carotid plaques are increasingly recognized as a potential mechanism for ischemic stroke. We assessed the prevalence of such plaques in patients with low-risk neurologic events and evidence of DWI (Diffusion Weighted Imaging)-positive ischemia.
Methods: This is a post-hoc exploratory analysis from the DOUBT study, a prospective, observational, multicenter study of patients with low-risk transient or persistent minor focal neurological symptoms. Patients who had baseline CT angiography (CTA) and an MRI within 8 days of their event were included in the study. We aimed to assess the prevalence of non-stenotic carotid disease in patients with versus without DWI-positive events, and in patients with ipsilateral DWI-positive events. A carotid-level analysis with univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether any of the assessed plaque features were associated with ipsilateral stroke.
Results: Of the 334 patients (mean age 62.7 years, 50.4% females) with available vascular neuroimaging, 153 (45.9%) had non-stenotic carotid plaques (≤50% stenosis), 174 (52.1%) had no stenosis and 7 (2.1%) patients had >50% stenosis. Of those with non-stenotic carotid plaques, 31/153 (20.3%) had evidence of DWI-positive ischemia, approximately half (15/31; 48.4%) of which was in the territory of the carotid plaque. Amongst patients with DWI-positive ischemia, non-stenotic plaques were significantly more common on the side of DWI-positive lesions [31/49 (63.3%) versus 18/49(36.7%)]. Presence of non-stenotic plaque was a risk marker for DWI-positive events (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p 0.012). On matched analysis, non-stenotic plaques were more likely on the side of DWI+ ischemia (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.36-3.70, McNemar's p value 0.80). Plaque features, including hypodensity, irregularity and greater plaque thickness were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of ipsilateral DWI+ ischemia.
Conclusion: In patients with low-risk transient or persistent neurologic events, non-stenotic carotid plaques are more common in patients with DWI-positive ischemia. Plaque features like hypodense and irregular plaque were more common with DWI-positive changes in the territory of the affected carotid.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects.
The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.