医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划患者的州级医疗补助报销和成像利用。

Eric W Christensen, Alexandra R Drake, Neil C Davey, Elizabeth Y Rula
{"title":"医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划患者的州级医疗补助报销和成像利用。","authors":"Eric W Christensen, Alexandra R Drake, Neil C Davey, Elizabeth Y Rula","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if relative Medicaid-to-Medicare reimbursement rates are associated with patient imaging utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study estimated the association of diagnostic imaging utilization with the state-level Medicaid-to-Medicare reimbursement ratio (MMRR) of professional payments. State-specific reimbursement ratios were computed for each imaging modality. Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of having imaging, and gamma regression was used to estimate the average number of imaging studies for those with imaging. These models were performed for each gender-modality combination controlling for patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 48,835,765 Medicaid patients, 54.3% were women. The median MMRR was 0.82 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.73-0.94) for CT, 0.87 (IQR: 0.76-1.01) for MR, 0.76 (IQR: 0.69-0.99) for nuclear medicine (NM), 0.85 (IQR: 0.73-1.09) for ultrasound, and 0.82 (IQR: 0.74-0.97) for radiography or fluoroscopy (XR). The probability of having imaging was 25.9% for CT, 25.9% for MR, 21.4% for ultrasound, and 31.8% for XR higher at 75th percentile of the MMRR distribution compared with the 25th percentile (P < .001). For those with imaging, the mean number of imaging studies received was associated with 5.7% fewer studies for NM at the 75th percentile compared with the 25th percentile (P < .001), although there was no difference for other modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicaid payments are related to imaging utilization. A higher MMRR is associated with a substantially increased likelihood of Medicaid patients receiving CT, MR, ultrasound, and XR imaging but no difference in the amount of imaging studies received for those with imaging for these modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State-Level Medicaid Reimbursement and Imaging Utilization by Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Eric W Christensen, Alexandra R Drake, Neil C Davey, Elizabeth Y Rula\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if relative Medicaid-to-Medicare reimbursement rates are associated with patient imaging utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study estimated the association of diagnostic imaging utilization with the state-level Medicaid-to-Medicare reimbursement ratio (MMRR) of professional payments. State-specific reimbursement ratios were computed for each imaging modality. Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of having imaging, and gamma regression was used to estimate the average number of imaging studies for those with imaging. These models were performed for each gender-modality combination controlling for patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 48,835,765 Medicaid patients, 54.3% were women. The median MMRR was 0.82 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.73-0.94) for CT, 0.87 (IQR: 0.76-1.01) for MR, 0.76 (IQR: 0.69-0.99) for nuclear medicine (NM), 0.85 (IQR: 0.73-1.09) for ultrasound, and 0.82 (IQR: 0.74-0.97) for radiography or fluoroscopy (XR). The probability of having imaging was 25.9% for CT, 25.9% for MR, 21.4% for ultrasound, and 31.8% for XR higher at 75th percentile of the MMRR distribution compared with the 25th percentile (P < .001). For those with imaging, the mean number of imaging studies received was associated with 5.7% fewer studies for NM at the 75th percentile compared with the 25th percentile (P < .001), although there was no difference for other modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicaid payments are related to imaging utilization. A higher MMRR is associated with a substantially increased likelihood of Medicaid patients receiving CT, MR, ultrasound, and XR imaging but no difference in the amount of imaging studies received for those with imaging for these modalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定相对医疗补助-医疗保险报销率是否与患者影像利用相关。方法:本横断面研究估计诊断成像利用与国家级医疗补助-医疗保险报销比例(MMRR)的专业支付的关系。计算了每种成像方式的州特有报销比率。Logistic回归用于估计影像学检查的可能性,伽玛回归用于估计影像学检查的平均次数。这些模型是针对控制患者特征的每种性别模式组合进行的。结果:在48,835,765名医疗补助患者中,54.3%为女性。CT的中位MMRR为0.82(四分位间距[IQR]: 0.73-0.94), MR为0.87 (IQR: 0.76-1.01),核医学(NM)为0.76 (IQR: 0.69-0.99),超声为0.85 (IQR: 0.73-1.09), x线或透视(XR)为0.82 (IQR: 0.74-0.97)。在MMRR分布中,第75百分位的显像概率为25.9%,MR为25.9%,超声为21.4%,XR为31.8% (P < 0.001)。对于那些接受影像学检查的患者,与第25百分位数相比,接受影像学检查的平均次数与第75百分位数的NM研究减少5.7%相关(P < 0.001),尽管其他方式没有差异。结论:医疗补助支付与影像利用有关。较高的MMRR与医疗补助患者接受CT、MR、超声和XR成像的可能性显著增加有关,但接受这些方式成像的患者接受的成像研究数量没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State-Level Medicaid Reimbursement and Imaging Utilization by Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program Patients.

Purpose: To determine if relative Medicaid-to-Medicare reimbursement rates are associated with patient imaging utilization.

Methods: This cross-sectional study estimated the association of diagnostic imaging utilization with the state-level Medicaid-to-Medicare reimbursement ratio (MMRR) of professional payments. State-specific reimbursement ratios were computed for each imaging modality. Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of having imaging, and gamma regression was used to estimate the average number of imaging studies for those with imaging. These models were performed for each gender-modality combination controlling for patient characteristics.

Results: Among 48,835,765 Medicaid patients, 54.3% were women. The median MMRR was 0.82 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.73-0.94) for CT, 0.87 (IQR: 0.76-1.01) for MR, 0.76 (IQR: 0.69-0.99) for nuclear medicine (NM), 0.85 (IQR: 0.73-1.09) for ultrasound, and 0.82 (IQR: 0.74-0.97) for radiography or fluoroscopy (XR). The probability of having imaging was 25.9% for CT, 25.9% for MR, 21.4% for ultrasound, and 31.8% for XR higher at 75th percentile of the MMRR distribution compared with the 25th percentile (P < .001). For those with imaging, the mean number of imaging studies received was associated with 5.7% fewer studies for NM at the 75th percentile compared with the 25th percentile (P < .001), although there was no difference for other modalities.

Conclusions: Medicaid payments are related to imaging utilization. A higher MMRR is associated with a substantially increased likelihood of Medicaid patients receiving CT, MR, ultrasound, and XR imaging but no difference in the amount of imaging studies received for those with imaging for these modalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization and Targeting of the Main Drivers of Elective Imaging Utilization: A Cross-sectional Study Applying Conjoint Analysis. Patient-Friendly Summary of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density: 2024 Update. Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Leadership Survey. The End of CMS' Appropriate Use Criteria Program. Preference Signaling in the Radiology Residency Match: National Survey of Applicants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1