[在法属圭亚那一家偏远医院实施老年肿瘤学]。

Olivier Angénieux, Bill Wankpo, Angélique Ferrand, Xavier Coulaud, Gilles Albrand, Diane Vernon, Mathieu Nacher, Jean-Pierre Droz
{"title":"[在法属圭亚那一家偏远医院实施老年肿瘤学]。","authors":"Olivier Angénieux, Bill Wankpo, Angélique Ferrand, Xavier Coulaud, Gilles Albrand, Diane Vernon, Mathieu Nacher, Jean-Pierre Droz","doi":"10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim was to analyze the implementation of the Onco-Geriatrics model in a remote ultramarine territory: West-French Guiana. The population is socially precarious in terms of income, social coverage and administrative status, and most often speaks a non-French language and has a non-Western culture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Narrative description of the implementation and retrospective study of anonymized data from the database of older patients managed for cancer between September 2014 and December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 574 new patients were managed. Of these, 107 were aged 70 and over; 78 (73 %) had a G8 test. Forty-two patients had a multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA). More than half the patients had dependency criteria, malnutrition and a high number of severe comorbidities. Difficulties encountered were language, level of education, clinical context (in 18 patients), but also insufficient involvement of health professional and the consequences of health organization and gradual implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation was impacted by the fact that quality criteria for implementation were not sufficient. Studies in high-middle-income countries in South America suggest that initial implementation of the MGA may be preferable, that frailty screening tests and the MGA procedure can be adapted to non-Western populations, and that the use of new technologies can improve the management of older patients in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":93917,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin du cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Implementation of geriatric oncology in a remote hospital in French Guiana].\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Angénieux, Bill Wankpo, Angélique Ferrand, Xavier Coulaud, Gilles Albrand, Diane Vernon, Mathieu Nacher, Jean-Pierre Droz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim was to analyze the implementation of the Onco-Geriatrics model in a remote ultramarine territory: West-French Guiana. The population is socially precarious in terms of income, social coverage and administrative status, and most often speaks a non-French language and has a non-Western culture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Narrative description of the implementation and retrospective study of anonymized data from the database of older patients managed for cancer between September 2014 and December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 574 new patients were managed. Of these, 107 were aged 70 and over; 78 (73 %) had a G8 test. Forty-two patients had a multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA). More than half the patients had dependency criteria, malnutrition and a high number of severe comorbidities. Difficulties encountered were language, level of education, clinical context (in 18 patients), but also insufficient involvement of health professional and the consequences of health organization and gradual implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation was impacted by the fact that quality criteria for implementation were not sufficient. Studies in high-middle-income countries in South America suggest that initial implementation of the MGA may be preferable, that frailty screening tests and the MGA procedure can be adapted to non-Western populations, and that the use of new technologies can improve the management of older patients in this context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin du cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin du cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.11.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin du cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:目的是分析在遥远的海洋地区:西法属圭亚那实施老年肿瘤模型。在收入、社会覆盖面和行政地位方面,人口在社会上是不稳定的,而且大多数人说的不是法语,也没有西方文化。方法:对2014年9月至2020年12月期间接受癌症治疗的老年患者数据库中的匿名数据进行叙述性描述和回顾性研究。结果:共治疗新患者574例。其中,107人年龄在70岁及以上;78例(73%)进行了G8检测。42例患者进行了多维老年评估(MGA)。超过一半的患者有依赖标准、营养不良和大量严重的合并症。遇到的困难包括语言、教育水平、临床背景(18名患者),但也包括卫生专业人员参与不足以及卫生组织和逐步实施的后果。讨论:实施受到实施质量标准不充分这一事实的影响。在南美洲中高收入国家进行的研究表明,最初实施MGA可能更好,虚弱筛查试验和MGA程序可以适用于非西方人群,并且在这种情况下使用新技术可以改善老年患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Implementation of geriatric oncology in a remote hospital in French Guiana].

Introduction: The aim was to analyze the implementation of the Onco-Geriatrics model in a remote ultramarine territory: West-French Guiana. The population is socially precarious in terms of income, social coverage and administrative status, and most often speaks a non-French language and has a non-Western culture.

Methods: Narrative description of the implementation and retrospective study of anonymized data from the database of older patients managed for cancer between September 2014 and December 2020.

Results: A total of 574 new patients were managed. Of these, 107 were aged 70 and over; 78 (73 %) had a G8 test. Forty-two patients had a multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA). More than half the patients had dependency criteria, malnutrition and a high number of severe comorbidities. Difficulties encountered were language, level of education, clinical context (in 18 patients), but also insufficient involvement of health professional and the consequences of health organization and gradual implementation.

Discussion: Implementation was impacted by the fact that quality criteria for implementation were not sufficient. Studies in high-middle-income countries in South America suggest that initial implementation of the MGA may be preferable, that frailty screening tests and the MGA procedure can be adapted to non-Western populations, and that the use of new technologies can improve the management of older patients in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[A commentary: New carbonic anhydrase IX-targeted probes for imaging hypoxic tumors]. Optimizing the management of immune-related adverse events and survival in patients with thoracic cancer receiving immunotherapy through artificial intelligence (electronic patient-reported outcomes): The IMPATHI study. [Luspatercept as first line in transfusion-dependant very low to intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes]. [Patients' perceptions of teleconsultation in long-term follow-up after pediatric cancer]. [Vaccination of children and adolescents treated for acute leukemia, excluding HSCT recipients: Recommendations of the French Society for Childhood and Adolescent Cancer and Leukemia (SFCE)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1