Alexander Mäder , Monika Bachinger , Andreas Ziermann , Patricia Harprecht , Volker Kromrey , Franziska Schlemmer
{"title":"社交媒体、协商沟通与冲突管理——基于德国弗莱堡案例的思考","authors":"Alexander Mäder , Monika Bachinger , Andreas Ziermann , Patricia Harprecht , Volker Kromrey , Franziska Schlemmer","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recreation in forests may be conceived of as a common pool resource. This resource degrades if a too large number of recreationists or recreationists with too different activities populate the forest. In such cases conflicts due to resource degradation might occur. Deliberative communication is a respectful form of communication, which enables individuals to develop a mutual understanding and realize accepted solutions. Deliberative communication might take various forms, also being mediated by social media. These media, however, contain specific challenges. By taking the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework by <span><span>Ostrom (2010)</span></span> as a conceptual base, the commentary looks at the conflict between cyclists and other forest visitors in Freiburg im Breisgau (Germany) to discuss whether and how social media posts could live up to the principles of deliberative communication and thus contribute to the mitigation of recreational conflicts in forests. Results show that social media posts host a great opportunity for deliberative communication, enhancing interactivity, rationality, constructiveness, empathy and a common-good reference. However, there are shortcomings of social media as well, which relate to the communication's solution-orientation and the inclusion of silent voices. Moderation of communication on social media appears to be a complex undertaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 103390"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social media, deliberative communication and conflict management: Reflections based on the example case of Freiburg Im Breisgau (Germany)\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Mäder , Monika Bachinger , Andreas Ziermann , Patricia Harprecht , Volker Kromrey , Franziska Schlemmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recreation in forests may be conceived of as a common pool resource. This resource degrades if a too large number of recreationists or recreationists with too different activities populate the forest. In such cases conflicts due to resource degradation might occur. Deliberative communication is a respectful form of communication, which enables individuals to develop a mutual understanding and realize accepted solutions. Deliberative communication might take various forms, also being mediated by social media. These media, however, contain specific challenges. By taking the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework by <span><span>Ostrom (2010)</span></span> as a conceptual base, the commentary looks at the conflict between cyclists and other forest visitors in Freiburg im Breisgau (Germany) to discuss whether and how social media posts could live up to the principles of deliberative communication and thus contribute to the mitigation of recreational conflicts in forests. Results show that social media posts host a great opportunity for deliberative communication, enhancing interactivity, rationality, constructiveness, empathy and a common-good reference. However, there are shortcomings of social media as well, which relate to the communication's solution-orientation and the inclusion of silent voices. Moderation of communication on social media appears to be a complex undertaking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124002442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124002442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
森林里的娱乐活动可以看作是一种共同的资源池。如果太多的游憩者或从事不同活动的游憩者居住在森林中,这种资源就会退化。在这种情况下,可能会发生资源退化引起的冲突。协商沟通是一种相互尊重的沟通形式,它使个体能够相互理解并实现公认的解决方案。协商沟通可能有多种形式,也以社交媒体为媒介。然而,这些媒介包含着具体的挑战。本文以奥斯特罗姆(2010)的制度分析与发展框架(IAD)为概念基础,着眼于德国弗莱堡(Freiburg im Breisgau)骑自行车者与其他森林游客之间的冲突,讨论社交媒体帖子是否以及如何符合协商沟通的原则,从而有助于缓解森林中的娱乐冲突。结果表明,社交媒体帖子为深思熟虑的沟通提供了很好的机会,增强了互动性、合理性、建设性、同理心和共同利益的参考。然而,社交媒体也有其不足之处,这与传播的解决导向和沉默声音的包容有关。节制社交媒体上的交流似乎是一项复杂的任务。
Social media, deliberative communication and conflict management: Reflections based on the example case of Freiburg Im Breisgau (Germany)
Recreation in forests may be conceived of as a common pool resource. This resource degrades if a too large number of recreationists or recreationists with too different activities populate the forest. In such cases conflicts due to resource degradation might occur. Deliberative communication is a respectful form of communication, which enables individuals to develop a mutual understanding and realize accepted solutions. Deliberative communication might take various forms, also being mediated by social media. These media, however, contain specific challenges. By taking the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework by Ostrom (2010) as a conceptual base, the commentary looks at the conflict between cyclists and other forest visitors in Freiburg im Breisgau (Germany) to discuss whether and how social media posts could live up to the principles of deliberative communication and thus contribute to the mitigation of recreational conflicts in forests. Results show that social media posts host a great opportunity for deliberative communication, enhancing interactivity, rationality, constructiveness, empathy and a common-good reference. However, there are shortcomings of social media as well, which relate to the communication's solution-orientation and the inclusion of silent voices. Moderation of communication on social media appears to be a complex undertaking.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.