协调森林恢复的全球和地方利益:一个共享的跨学科视角

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103381
Stephanie Mansourian , William M. Adams , Karma Bouazza , Joice Nunes Ferreira , David J. Ganz , Jack Hurd , Stefano Pagiola , John Parrotta , Bruno Ramamonjisoa , Nanie Ratsifandrihamanana , Roger Villalobos , Gretchen Walters , Christian A. Kull
{"title":"协调森林恢复的全球和地方利益:一个共享的跨学科视角","authors":"Stephanie Mansourian ,&nbsp;William M. Adams ,&nbsp;Karma Bouazza ,&nbsp;Joice Nunes Ferreira ,&nbsp;David J. Ganz ,&nbsp;Jack Hurd ,&nbsp;Stefano Pagiola ,&nbsp;John Parrotta ,&nbsp;Bruno Ramamonjisoa ,&nbsp;Nanie Ratsifandrihamanana ,&nbsp;Roger Villalobos ,&nbsp;Gretchen Walters ,&nbsp;Christian A. Kull","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restoring ecosystems, and forests in particular, has become a global priority. At larger scales, forest restoration must necessarily reconcile the needs and priorities of multiple stakeholders and, in doing so, raises several governance challenges. Approaching governance in the context of forest restoration through an interdisciplinary lens provides a complex picture consistent with the multiple factors that impact forest restoration. Focusing on one specific governance challenge, namely, how to balance global to local benefits of forest restoration, serves to demonstrate the complexity and value of approaching these challenges with an interdisciplinary lens. This paper presents several options, including: the need for a multi-scale and functioning governance structures or mechanisms involving decision-makers from local to national and international scales; considering multiple brokers (or “intermediaries”) as important leverage points; sharing tools with national governments that help to ensure that restoration brings a balanced flow of benefits to their citizens; redressing power imbalances by strengthening social capital and building the capacity of community-level organizations; recognizing rights (to land or forest tenure rights – whether to communities or privately to local community members); creating a dedicated funding stream for restoration; changing the focus from quantitative targets for tree planting/restoration to more multi-objective based approaches; acknowledging and emphasizing that forest restoration can yield multiple benefits for many individuals or groups, and ensuring that these can be realized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 103381"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconciling global and local benefits of forest restoration: A shared interdisciplinary perspective\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Mansourian ,&nbsp;William M. Adams ,&nbsp;Karma Bouazza ,&nbsp;Joice Nunes Ferreira ,&nbsp;David J. Ganz ,&nbsp;Jack Hurd ,&nbsp;Stefano Pagiola ,&nbsp;John Parrotta ,&nbsp;Bruno Ramamonjisoa ,&nbsp;Nanie Ratsifandrihamanana ,&nbsp;Roger Villalobos ,&nbsp;Gretchen Walters ,&nbsp;Christian A. Kull\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Restoring ecosystems, and forests in particular, has become a global priority. At larger scales, forest restoration must necessarily reconcile the needs and priorities of multiple stakeholders and, in doing so, raises several governance challenges. Approaching governance in the context of forest restoration through an interdisciplinary lens provides a complex picture consistent with the multiple factors that impact forest restoration. Focusing on one specific governance challenge, namely, how to balance global to local benefits of forest restoration, serves to demonstrate the complexity and value of approaching these challenges with an interdisciplinary lens. This paper presents several options, including: the need for a multi-scale and functioning governance structures or mechanisms involving decision-makers from local to national and international scales; considering multiple brokers (or “intermediaries”) as important leverage points; sharing tools with national governments that help to ensure that restoration brings a balanced flow of benefits to their citizens; redressing power imbalances by strengthening social capital and building the capacity of community-level organizations; recognizing rights (to land or forest tenure rights – whether to communities or privately to local community members); creating a dedicated funding stream for restoration; changing the focus from quantitative targets for tree planting/restoration to more multi-objective based approaches; acknowledging and emphasizing that forest restoration can yield multiple benefits for many individuals or groups, and ensuring that these can be realized.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124002351\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124002351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恢复生态系统,特别是森林,已成为全球优先事项。在更大的范围内,森林恢复必须协调多个利益攸关方的需求和优先事项,这样做会带来一些治理挑战。通过跨学科的视角来看待森林恢复背景下的治理,提供了一幅与影响森林恢复的多种因素一致的复杂图景。关注一个具体的治理挑战,即如何平衡森林恢复的全球和地方利益,有助于展示以跨学科视角处理这些挑战的复杂性和价值。本文提出了几个备选方案,包括:需要一个涉及从地方到国家和国际范围的决策者的多尺度和有效的治理结构或机制;考虑多个经纪人(或“中介机构”)作为重要的杠杆点;与各国政府分享工具,帮助确保恢复工作为本国公民带来平衡的利益流动;通过加强社会资本和建设社区一级组织的能力来纠正权力不平衡;承认权利(对土地或森林权属的权利-无论是对社区还是对当地社区成员的私人权利);为修复工作建立专门的资金流;将重点从植树/恢复的定量目标转向更多基于多目标的方法;承认和强调森林恢复可以为许多个人或群体带来多重利益,并确保这些利益能够实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconciling global and local benefits of forest restoration: A shared interdisciplinary perspective
Restoring ecosystems, and forests in particular, has become a global priority. At larger scales, forest restoration must necessarily reconcile the needs and priorities of multiple stakeholders and, in doing so, raises several governance challenges. Approaching governance in the context of forest restoration through an interdisciplinary lens provides a complex picture consistent with the multiple factors that impact forest restoration. Focusing on one specific governance challenge, namely, how to balance global to local benefits of forest restoration, serves to demonstrate the complexity and value of approaching these challenges with an interdisciplinary lens. This paper presents several options, including: the need for a multi-scale and functioning governance structures or mechanisms involving decision-makers from local to national and international scales; considering multiple brokers (or “intermediaries”) as important leverage points; sharing tools with national governments that help to ensure that restoration brings a balanced flow of benefits to their citizens; redressing power imbalances by strengthening social capital and building the capacity of community-level organizations; recognizing rights (to land or forest tenure rights – whether to communities or privately to local community members); creating a dedicated funding stream for restoration; changing the focus from quantitative targets for tree planting/restoration to more multi-objective based approaches; acknowledging and emphasizing that forest restoration can yield multiple benefits for many individuals or groups, and ensuring that these can be realized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Diversity of plant species used as firewood in indigenous colonized communities: An ethnobotanical study in East Misiones, Argentina “Hands off our forests!” - The impact of the authoritarian rule on polish forest policy in the context of the European Green Deal Bioeconomy governance in the global South: State of the art and the way forward Forest diversity and the distribution of farm revenue - Empirical evidence from forest farms in Taiwan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1