胃内球囊不良事件:综合MAUDE数据库回顾。

Q3 Medicine Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2024.2406710
Islam Mohamed, Jagadish Koyi, Husam Abu Suilik, Hazem Abosheiashaa, Fouad Jaber, Syed Hamaad Rahman, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Ahmed Telbany, Omar T Ahmed, Yusuke Hashimoto
{"title":"胃内球囊不良事件:综合MAUDE数据库回顾。","authors":"Islam Mohamed, Jagadish Koyi, Husam Abu Suilik, Hazem Abosheiashaa, Fouad Jaber, Syed Hamaad Rahman, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Ahmed Telbany, Omar T Ahmed, Yusuke Hashimoto","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2024.2406710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic bariatric interventions are viable alternatives to traditional weight loss surgeries for patients with a body mass index between 30 and 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. While studies have explored the impact of intragastric balloons on obesity and weight reduction, comprehensive data on real-world device-related complications and failures are limited. This study aimed to investigate mechanical failures leading to patient adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis using the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database examined device-related events and patient outcomes associated with various intragastric balloons from July 2017 to October 2023. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software to assess the reported events and their associations with specific types of intragastric balloons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review included 1393 cases, revealing 1758 device malfunctions and 1760 patient complications. Deflation problems (25.31%) and balloon leakage or rupture (21.90%) were the most common device-related complications. Patient complications were primarily linked to the Orbera balloon, with implant failure (24.30%), abdominal pain (21.92%), and vomiting (21.26%) as leading adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for continuous surveillance, rigorous monitoring, and enhanced safety protocols for intragastric balloons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 1","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intragastric balloon adverse events: a comprehensive MAUDE database review.\",\"authors\":\"Islam Mohamed, Jagadish Koyi, Husam Abu Suilik, Hazem Abosheiashaa, Fouad Jaber, Syed Hamaad Rahman, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Ahmed Telbany, Omar T Ahmed, Yusuke Hashimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2024.2406710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic bariatric interventions are viable alternatives to traditional weight loss surgeries for patients with a body mass index between 30 and 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. While studies have explored the impact of intragastric balloons on obesity and weight reduction, comprehensive data on real-world device-related complications and failures are limited. This study aimed to investigate mechanical failures leading to patient adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis using the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database examined device-related events and patient outcomes associated with various intragastric balloons from July 2017 to October 2023. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software to assess the reported events and their associations with specific types of intragastric balloons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review included 1393 cases, revealing 1758 device malfunctions and 1760 patient complications. Deflation problems (25.31%) and balloon leakage or rupture (21.90%) were the most common device-related complications. Patient complications were primarily linked to the Orbera balloon, with implant failure (24.30%), abdominal pain (21.92%), and vomiting (21.26%) as leading adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for continuous surveillance, rigorous monitoring, and enhanced safety protocols for intragastric balloons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"63-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657097/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2406710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2406710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于体重指数在30 - 40 kg/m2之间的患者,内镜下减肥干预是传统减肥手术的可行选择。虽然研究已经探讨了胃内气球对肥胖和减肥的影响,但关于现实世界中与设备相关的并发症和失败的综合数据有限。本研究旨在调查向美国食品和药物管理局报告的机械故障导致的患者不良事件。方法:使用制造商和用户设施设备体验(MAUDE)数据库进行回顾性分析,检查2017年7月至2023年10月期间与各种胃内气球相关的设备相关事件和患者结局。使用SPSS软件进行数据分析,以评估报告的事件及其与特定类型的胃内气球的关联。结果:我们回顾了1393例病例,发现器械故障1758例,并发症1760例。充气问题(25.31%)和气囊泄漏或破裂(21.90%)是最常见的器械相关并发症。患者并发症主要与Orbera气囊相关,主要不良事件为植入失败(24.30%)、腹痛(21.92%)和呕吐(21.26%)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了持续监测、严格监测和加强胃内气球安全协议的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intragastric balloon adverse events: a comprehensive MAUDE database review.

Background: Endoscopic bariatric interventions are viable alternatives to traditional weight loss surgeries for patients with a body mass index between 30 and 40 kg/m2. While studies have explored the impact of intragastric balloons on obesity and weight reduction, comprehensive data on real-world device-related complications and failures are limited. This study aimed to investigate mechanical failures leading to patient adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration.

Methods: A retrospective analysis using the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database examined device-related events and patient outcomes associated with various intragastric balloons from July 2017 to October 2023. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software to assess the reported events and their associations with specific types of intragastric balloons.

Results: Our review included 1393 cases, revealing 1758 device malfunctions and 1760 patient complications. Deflation problems (25.31%) and balloon leakage or rupture (21.90%) were the most common device-related complications. Patient complications were primarily linked to the Orbera balloon, with implant failure (24.30%), abdominal pain (21.92%), and vomiting (21.26%) as leading adverse events.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need for continuous surveillance, rigorous monitoring, and enhanced safety protocols for intragastric balloons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
期刊最新文献
Herpes zoster ophthalmicus temporally after COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review of uncontrolled case reports and case series. Prevalence of Kaposi sarcoma in the United States: SEER cross-sectional study. Institution of a formal multidisciplinary heart team for high-risk coronary revascularization. Barriers to guideline implementation. Avocations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1