[阿尔茨海默病患者血清β-淀粉样蛋白1-42和总胆红素的变化及其相关性]。

X Y Wang, H Deng, W Li, Y F Zhou, S J Pan
{"title":"[阿尔茨海默病患者血清β-淀粉样蛋白1-42和总胆红素的变化及其相关性]。","authors":"X Y Wang, H Deng, W Li, Y F Zhou, S J Pan","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240813-00652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the levels of β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42) and total bilirubin (TBIL) in serum of patients with Alzheimer 's disease (AD) and the relationship between them. <b>Methods:</b> A case-control study was conducted to select 73 patients with AD who were hospitalized in Beijing Huilongguan Hospital from November 2023 to February 2024 as AD group, and 70 healthy controls (HC) were selected as HC group. The basic information of all subjects and the clinical information of AD patients were collected, and the levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL were detected and compared between the two groups. The effects of Aβ1-42 and TBIL on AD were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between TBIL and Aβ1-42 in AD group and HC group. According to the level of Aβ1-42 in AD patients, they were divided into Aβ1-42 elevated group and Aβ1-42 normal group. The differences of clinical data and TBIL levels between the two groups were compared. According to the quartile of TBIL in AD patients, they were divided into Q1 group, Q2 group, Q3 group and Q4 group. The correlation between TBIL and the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation was analyzed by binary logistic regression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the ability of TBIL level to predict the increase of Aβ1-42 in AD patients. <b>Results:</b> There was no significant difference in gender, marital status, education level, smoking and drinking between AD group and HC group (<i>P></i>0.05), while the levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL and age in AD group were significantly higher than those in HC group [101.10(71.20, 128.60) pg/ml/22.40(10.00, 39.60) pg/ml<i>, Z</i>=-8.714, <i>P</i><0.001;(11.00±3.22/8.07±3.00) μmol/L<i>, t</i>=5.621, <i>P</i><0.001;(77.14±8.20/68.30±10.27) years, <i>t</i>=5.672, <i>P</i><0.001]. For AD patients, the TBIL level in the Aβ1-42 elevated group was lower than that in the Aβ1-42 normal group [(10.05±2.94/11.66±3.28) μmol/L<i>, t</i>=-2.148, <i>P</i>=0.035], while there was no significant difference in other demographic and clinical data between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that higher levels of Aβ1-42 (<i>OR</i>=1.021, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.010-1.032) and TBIL (<i>OR</i>=1.505, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.249-1.814), older age (<i>OR</i>=1.083, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.020-1.150) and female (<i>OR</i>=4.348, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.253-15.094) were risk factors for AD. Correlation analysis showed that TBIL was negatively correlated with Aβ1-42 in AD patients (<i>r=</i>-0.322, <i>P</i>=0.006). After adjusting the relevant covariates, binary logistic regression showed that compared with AD patients in Q1 group, the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation in AD patients in Q4 group was lower (<i>OR</i>=0.052, 95%<i>CI</i>:0.005-0.535, <i>P</i><0.05), and TBIL was negatively correlated with the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation (<i>P</i> trend<0.05). ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of TBIL in predicting the increase of Aβ1-42 in AD patients was 0.642. <b>Conclusion:</b> The levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL in AD patients were higher, and the level of TBIL was negatively correlated with the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation.</p>","PeriodicalId":24033,"journal":{"name":"中华预防医学杂志","volume":"58 12","pages":"1987-1993"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Changes and correlation between serum β-amyloid 1-42 and total bilirubin in patients with Alzheimer's disease].\",\"authors\":\"X Y Wang, H Deng, W Li, Y F Zhou, S J Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240813-00652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the levels of β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42) and total bilirubin (TBIL) in serum of patients with Alzheimer 's disease (AD) and the relationship between them. <b>Methods:</b> A case-control study was conducted to select 73 patients with AD who were hospitalized in Beijing Huilongguan Hospital from November 2023 to February 2024 as AD group, and 70 healthy controls (HC) were selected as HC group. The basic information of all subjects and the clinical information of AD patients were collected, and the levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL were detected and compared between the two groups. The effects of Aβ1-42 and TBIL on AD were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between TBIL and Aβ1-42 in AD group and HC group. According to the level of Aβ1-42 in AD patients, they were divided into Aβ1-42 elevated group and Aβ1-42 normal group. The differences of clinical data and TBIL levels between the two groups were compared. According to the quartile of TBIL in AD patients, they were divided into Q1 group, Q2 group, Q3 group and Q4 group. The correlation between TBIL and the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation was analyzed by binary logistic regression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the ability of TBIL level to predict the increase of Aβ1-42 in AD patients. <b>Results:</b> There was no significant difference in gender, marital status, education level, smoking and drinking between AD group and HC group (<i>P></i>0.05), while the levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL and age in AD group were significantly higher than those in HC group [101.10(71.20, 128.60) pg/ml/22.40(10.00, 39.60) pg/ml<i>, Z</i>=-8.714, <i>P</i><0.001;(11.00±3.22/8.07±3.00) μmol/L<i>, t</i>=5.621, <i>P</i><0.001;(77.14±8.20/68.30±10.27) years, <i>t</i>=5.672, <i>P</i><0.001]. For AD patients, the TBIL level in the Aβ1-42 elevated group was lower than that in the Aβ1-42 normal group [(10.05±2.94/11.66±3.28) μmol/L<i>, t</i>=-2.148, <i>P</i>=0.035], while there was no significant difference in other demographic and clinical data between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that higher levels of Aβ1-42 (<i>OR</i>=1.021, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.010-1.032) and TBIL (<i>OR</i>=1.505, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.249-1.814), older age (<i>OR</i>=1.083, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.020-1.150) and female (<i>OR</i>=4.348, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.253-15.094) were risk factors for AD. Correlation analysis showed that TBIL was negatively correlated with Aβ1-42 in AD patients (<i>r=</i>-0.322, <i>P</i>=0.006). After adjusting the relevant covariates, binary logistic regression showed that compared with AD patients in Q1 group, the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation in AD patients in Q4 group was lower (<i>OR</i>=0.052, 95%<i>CI</i>:0.005-0.535, <i>P</i><0.05), and TBIL was negatively correlated with the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation (<i>P</i> trend<0.05). ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of TBIL in predicting the increase of Aβ1-42 in AD patients was 0.642. <b>Conclusion:</b> The levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL in AD patients were higher, and the level of TBIL was negatively correlated with the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华预防医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"58 12\",\"pages\":\"1987-1993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华预防医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240813-00652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华预防医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240813-00652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者血清β-淀粉样蛋白1-42 (a - β1-42)和总胆红素(TBIL)水平及其相关性。方法:选取2023年11月至2024年2月在北京回龙观医院住院的73例AD患者作为AD组,健康对照(HC) 70例作为HC组。收集所有受试者的基本信息和AD患者的临床信息,检测两组间Aβ1-42和TBIL的水平并进行比较。采用二元logistic回归分析a - β1-42和TBIL对AD的影响。采用相关分析分析AD组和HC组TBIL与a - β1-42的关系。根据AD患者Aβ1-42水平分为Aβ1-42升高组和Aβ1-42正常组。比较两组患者临床资料及TBIL水平的差异。根据AD患者TBIL的四分位数分为Q1组、Q2组、Q3组和Q4组。采用二元logistic回归分析TBIL与Aβ1-42升高风险的相关性。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析TBIL水平对AD患者a - β1-42升高的预测能力。结果:AD组与HC组在性别、婚姻状况、文化程度、吸烟、饮酒等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05), AD组Aβ1-42、TBIL水平及年龄均显著高于HC组[101.10(71.20,128.60)pg/ml/22.40(10.00, 39.60) pg/ml, Z=-8.714, P, t=5.621, Pt=5.672, P, t=-2.148, P=0.035],其他人口统计学及临床资料两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。二元logistic回归分析显示,较高水平的Aβ1-42 (OR=1.021, 95%CI:1.010 ~ 1.032)和TBIL (OR=1.505, 95%CI:1.249 ~ 1.814)、年龄(OR=1.083, 95%CI:1.020 ~ 1.150)和女性(OR=4.348, 95%CI:1.253 ~ 15.094)是AD的危险因素。相关分析显示,AD患者TBIL与a - β1-42呈负相关(r=-0.322, P=0.006)。调整相关协变量后,二元logistic回归显示,与Q1组AD患者相比,Q4组AD患者Aβ1-42升高的风险较低(OR=0.052, 95%CI:0.005 ~ 0.535, PP趋势)。结论:AD患者Aβ1-42和TBIL水平较高,且TBIL水平与Aβ1-42升高的风险呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Changes and correlation between serum β-amyloid 1-42 and total bilirubin in patients with Alzheimer's disease].

Objective: To investigate the levels of β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42) and total bilirubin (TBIL) in serum of patients with Alzheimer 's disease (AD) and the relationship between them. Methods: A case-control study was conducted to select 73 patients with AD who were hospitalized in Beijing Huilongguan Hospital from November 2023 to February 2024 as AD group, and 70 healthy controls (HC) were selected as HC group. The basic information of all subjects and the clinical information of AD patients were collected, and the levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL were detected and compared between the two groups. The effects of Aβ1-42 and TBIL on AD were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between TBIL and Aβ1-42 in AD group and HC group. According to the level of Aβ1-42 in AD patients, they were divided into Aβ1-42 elevated group and Aβ1-42 normal group. The differences of clinical data and TBIL levels between the two groups were compared. According to the quartile of TBIL in AD patients, they were divided into Q1 group, Q2 group, Q3 group and Q4 group. The correlation between TBIL and the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation was analyzed by binary logistic regression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the ability of TBIL level to predict the increase of Aβ1-42 in AD patients. Results: There was no significant difference in gender, marital status, education level, smoking and drinking between AD group and HC group (P>0.05), while the levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL and age in AD group were significantly higher than those in HC group [101.10(71.20, 128.60) pg/ml/22.40(10.00, 39.60) pg/ml, Z=-8.714, P<0.001;(11.00±3.22/8.07±3.00) μmol/L, t=5.621, P<0.001;(77.14±8.20/68.30±10.27) years, t=5.672, P<0.001]. For AD patients, the TBIL level in the Aβ1-42 elevated group was lower than that in the Aβ1-42 normal group [(10.05±2.94/11.66±3.28) μmol/L, t=-2.148, P=0.035], while there was no significant difference in other demographic and clinical data between the two groups (P>0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that higher levels of Aβ1-42 (OR=1.021, 95%CI:1.010-1.032) and TBIL (OR=1.505, 95%CI:1.249-1.814), older age (OR=1.083, 95%CI:1.020-1.150) and female (OR=4.348, 95%CI:1.253-15.094) were risk factors for AD. Correlation analysis showed that TBIL was negatively correlated with Aβ1-42 in AD patients (r=-0.322, P=0.006). After adjusting the relevant covariates, binary logistic regression showed that compared with AD patients in Q1 group, the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation in AD patients in Q4 group was lower (OR=0.052, 95%CI:0.005-0.535, P<0.05), and TBIL was negatively correlated with the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation (P trend<0.05). ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of TBIL in predicting the increase of Aβ1-42 in AD patients was 0.642. Conclusion: The levels of Aβ1-42 and TBIL in AD patients were higher, and the level of TBIL was negatively correlated with the risk of Aβ1-42 elevation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华预防医学杂志
中华预防医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12678
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine (CJPM), the successor to Chinese Health Journal , was initiated on October 1, 1953. In 1960, it was amalgamated with the Chinese Medical Journal and the Journal of Medical History and Health Care , and thereafter, was renamed as People’s Care . On November 25, 1978, the publication was denominated as Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine . The contents of CJPM deal with a wide range of disciplines and technologies including epidemiology, environmental health, nutrition and food hygiene, occupational health, hygiene for children and adolescents, radiological health, toxicology, biostatistics, social medicine, pathogenic and epidemiological research in malignant tumor, surveillance and immunization.
期刊最新文献
[Promotion and implementation of respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody in vaccination clinics in Tianjin City]. [A follow-up study on the bidirectional associations between smartphone multitasking behavior and comorbid symptoms of anxiety and depression among college students]. [Analysis of multimorbidity trends and influencing factors of internet addiction and depression symptoms among middle school students in Zhejiang Province]. [Analysis of the prevalence of multimorbidity among adolescents aged 13-18 in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2019 to 2022 and its association with moderate to high-intensity physical activity]. [Implementing high-quality school health standards to promote joint prevention of common diseases and multimorbidity among students].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1