住院成人经皮内镜胃造口术后6小时喂养方案与术后住院时间的关系:一项前后队列研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1002/jpen.2718
Jeffrey L Roberson, Jesse E Passman, Marianne Aloupis, Yessenia Caballero-Tilleria, Anthony Audia, Melissa R Ramirez, Patricia Martinez Quinones, Patrick Kim, Elinore J Kaufman, Catherine E Sharoky
{"title":"住院成人经皮内镜胃造口术后6小时喂养方案与术后住院时间的关系:一项前后队列研究","authors":"Jeffrey L Roberson, Jesse E Passman, Marianne Aloupis, Yessenia Caballero-Tilleria, Anthony Audia, Melissa R Ramirez, Patricia Martinez Quinones, Patrick Kim, Elinore J Kaufman, Catherine E Sharoky","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tolerance of enteral nutrition following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a barrier to discharge. This study investigated the impact of an expedited feeding protocol following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on postprocedure length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a before-and-after cohort study on hospitalized adults in whom percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was placed by surgeons following the implementation of a standardized feeding protocol in which enteral feeds were resumed at the preoperative rate 6 h later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enteral feeding resumed within 6 h postoperatively in 93% of patients after protocol initiation. The mean ± SD time to the goal enteral rate after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was significantly shorter following protocol implementation (15 ± 10 vs 50 ± 26 h, P ≤ 0.0001). Compared with the preprotocol cohort, there was no change in postoperative aspiration at 1 week (6% vs 4%, P = 0.531) or rates of tube dislodgement (10% vs 9%, P = 0.89), return to the operating room (10% vs 6%, P = 0.36), and surgical-site infection (9% vs 8%, P = 0.92) at 1 month in the protocol implementation cohort. On multivariable regression, an expedited feeding protocol generated a significantly shorter postprocedure LOS for patients remaining in the hospital for ≤1 week (β = -2.14, 95% CI, -2.98 to -1.30; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An expedited feeding protocol following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement had a high degree of provider uptake without any significant change in safety outcomes. Beginning enteral nutrition within 6 h postoperatively at the preoperative rate reduced LOS by >2 days, suggesting that these protocols can address common delays to discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between a 6-h feeding protocol and postprocedure hospital length of stay following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in hospitalized adults: A before-and-after cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey L Roberson, Jesse E Passman, Marianne Aloupis, Yessenia Caballero-Tilleria, Anthony Audia, Melissa R Ramirez, Patricia Martinez Quinones, Patrick Kim, Elinore J Kaufman, Catherine E Sharoky\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpen.2718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tolerance of enteral nutrition following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a barrier to discharge. This study investigated the impact of an expedited feeding protocol following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on postprocedure length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a before-and-after cohort study on hospitalized adults in whom percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was placed by surgeons following the implementation of a standardized feeding protocol in which enteral feeds were resumed at the preoperative rate 6 h later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enteral feeding resumed within 6 h postoperatively in 93% of patients after protocol initiation. The mean ± SD time to the goal enteral rate after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was significantly shorter following protocol implementation (15 ± 10 vs 50 ± 26 h, P ≤ 0.0001). Compared with the preprotocol cohort, there was no change in postoperative aspiration at 1 week (6% vs 4%, P = 0.531) or rates of tube dislodgement (10% vs 9%, P = 0.89), return to the operating room (10% vs 6%, P = 0.36), and surgical-site infection (9% vs 8%, P = 0.92) at 1 month in the protocol implementation cohort. On multivariable regression, an expedited feeding protocol generated a significantly shorter postprocedure LOS for patients remaining in the hospital for ≤1 week (β = -2.14, 95% CI, -2.98 to -1.30; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An expedited feeding protocol following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement had a high degree of provider uptake without any significant change in safety outcomes. Beginning enteral nutrition within 6 h postoperatively at the preoperative rate reduced LOS by >2 days, suggesting that these protocols can address common delays to discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2718\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经皮内镜胃造口术后肠内营养耐受性是排泄障碍。本研究探讨了经皮内镜胃造口术后加速喂养方案对术后住院时间(LOS)的影响。方法:我们对住院的成年人进行了一项前后队列研究,这些成年人在实施标准化喂养方案后经皮内镜胃造口术,6小时后按术前率恢复肠内喂养。结果:93%的患者在方案启动后6小时内恢复肠内喂养。经皮内镜胃造口术后达到目标肠内率的平均±SD时间在方案实施后显著缩短(15±10 vs 50±26 h, P≤0.0001)。与方案前队列相比,方案实施队列中术后1周的抽吸率(6%对4%,P = 0.531)、1个月的管脱位率(10%对9%,P = 0.89)、返回手术室率(10%对6%,P = 0.36)和手术部位感染率(9%对8%,P = 0.92)均无变化。在多变量回归中,对于住院≤1周的患者,加速喂养方案显著缩短了术后LOS (β = -2.14, 95% CI, -2.98至-1.30;结论:经皮内窥镜胃造口置入后的加速喂养方案具有高度的提供者摄取,而安全性结果没有任何显着变化。在术前6小时内开始肠内营养可使LOS减少60 ~ 2天,这表明这些方案可以解决常见的延迟出院问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between a 6-h feeding protocol and postprocedure hospital length of stay following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in hospitalized adults: A before-and-after cohort study.

Background: Tolerance of enteral nutrition following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a barrier to discharge. This study investigated the impact of an expedited feeding protocol following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on postprocedure length of stay (LOS).

Methods: We performed a before-and-after cohort study on hospitalized adults in whom percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was placed by surgeons following the implementation of a standardized feeding protocol in which enteral feeds were resumed at the preoperative rate 6 h later.

Results: Enteral feeding resumed within 6 h postoperatively in 93% of patients after protocol initiation. The mean ± SD time to the goal enteral rate after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was significantly shorter following protocol implementation (15 ± 10 vs 50 ± 26 h, P ≤ 0.0001). Compared with the preprotocol cohort, there was no change in postoperative aspiration at 1 week (6% vs 4%, P = 0.531) or rates of tube dislodgement (10% vs 9%, P = 0.89), return to the operating room (10% vs 6%, P = 0.36), and surgical-site infection (9% vs 8%, P = 0.92) at 1 month in the protocol implementation cohort. On multivariable regression, an expedited feeding protocol generated a significantly shorter postprocedure LOS for patients remaining in the hospital for ≤1 week (β = -2.14, 95% CI, -2.98 to -1.30; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: An expedited feeding protocol following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement had a high degree of provider uptake without any significant change in safety outcomes. Beginning enteral nutrition within 6 h postoperatively at the preoperative rate reduced LOS by >2 days, suggesting that these protocols can address common delays to discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of taurolidine with 4% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on antimicrobial lock effectiveness: An experimental study. Association between oral feeding versus enteral feeding and cerumen impaction in older hospitalized adults: A retrospective cohort study. Prognostic evaluation of nutrition risk screening tools in hospitalized adults with normal weight range, overweight, or obesity: A comparative analysis. Forty-seventh ASPEN Presidential Address: Parenteral nutrition compounding-Advancement or regression, where do we stand? Parenteral nutrition and bioelectrical impedance analysis estimated fat-free mass in adult patients with chronic intestinal failure: A descriptive cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1