一个简单的,主观的,膝关节自我评估使用一个单一的问题,可用于快速评估患者接受膝关节手术

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9
Antonio Klasan, Cedric Donati, Riccardo Compagnoni, Alberto Grassi, Volker Musahl, Jacques Menetrey
{"title":"一个简单的,主观的,膝关节自我评估使用一个单一的问题,可用于快速评估患者接受膝关节手术","authors":"Antonio Klasan,&nbsp;Cedric Donati,&nbsp;Riccardo Compagnoni,&nbsp;Alberto Grassi,&nbsp;Volker Musahl,&nbsp;Jacques Menetrey","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) is the cornerstone of clinical research for surgical disciplines, but the use in daily routine can be challenging. One of the most widespread PROMS in knee surgery is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential correlation of the IKDC score with a patient’s subjective assessment of the knee using a single question. We hypothesized a correlation between the IKDC score and single question score.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, single center study in a comprehensive knee outpatient clinic was performed. Patients willing to participate, presenting in the clinic for the first time were asked to complete the IKDC questionnaire and to answer the question: ”How does your knee know compare to when you were 16 years old, in percentage?” Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the IKDC score and the single-question percentage.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 patients were included. The mean age of the participants was 43.3 ± 9.6 years, and 45.2% of the patients were female. Mean IKDC score was 41.11 ± 13.13, compared to the mean score of the single-question 40.90 ± 22.7 (<i>p</i> = 0.887). The correlation between the IKDC score and the single-question was significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), however, the person coefficient was 0.460, indicating moderate correlation. The linear regression analysis was also statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), but with a model fitness of r<sup>2</sup> = 0.211 and B = 0.266. From the 310 patients, 305 (98.4%) found the single-question of more relevance than the IKDC score.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IKDC score and a simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question demonstrate moderate correlation. The single question can be used for better understanding of discrepancy between the objective score and the patients’ subjective perception of knee function or as a fast, single question proxy score.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question can be used for a quick assessment of patients undergoing knee surgery\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Klasan,&nbsp;Cedric Donati,&nbsp;Riccardo Compagnoni,&nbsp;Alberto Grassi,&nbsp;Volker Musahl,&nbsp;Jacques Menetrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) is the cornerstone of clinical research for surgical disciplines, but the use in daily routine can be challenging. One of the most widespread PROMS in knee surgery is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential correlation of the IKDC score with a patient’s subjective assessment of the knee using a single question. We hypothesized a correlation between the IKDC score and single question score.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, single center study in a comprehensive knee outpatient clinic was performed. Patients willing to participate, presenting in the clinic for the first time were asked to complete the IKDC questionnaire and to answer the question: ”How does your knee know compare to when you were 16 years old, in percentage?” Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the IKDC score and the single-question percentage.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 patients were included. The mean age of the participants was 43.3 ± 9.6 years, and 45.2% of the patients were female. Mean IKDC score was 41.11 ± 13.13, compared to the mean score of the single-question 40.90 ± 22.7 (<i>p</i> = 0.887). The correlation between the IKDC score and the single-question was significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), however, the person coefficient was 0.460, indicating moderate correlation. The linear regression analysis was also statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), but with a model fitness of r<sup>2</sup> = 0.211 and B = 0.266. From the 310 patients, 305 (98.4%) found the single-question of more relevance than the IKDC score.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IKDC score and a simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question demonstrate moderate correlation. The single question can be used for better understanding of discrepancy between the objective score and the patients’ subjective perception of knee function or as a fast, single question proxy score.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05720-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用患者报告的预后指标(PROMS)是外科学科临床研究的基石,但在日常工作中的使用可能具有挑战性。膝关节手术中最广泛的PROMS之一是国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)问卷调查。本研究的目的是通过一个单一的问题来研究IKDC评分与患者对膝关节的主观评估的潜在相关性。我们假设IKDC得分与单题得分之间存在相关性。方法对某综合性膝关节门诊进行前瞻性、单中心研究。第一次到诊所就诊的患者被要求完成IKDC问卷,并回答以下问题:“与16岁时相比,您的膝关节膝关节知度如何?”采用Pearson相关系数和线性回归分析IKDC评分和单题百分比。结果应用纳入和排除标准,纳入310例患者。参与者的平均年龄为43.3±9.6岁,女性占45.2%。平均IKDC得分为41.11±13.13分,单题平均得分为40.90±22.7分(p = 0.887)。IKDC得分与单题的相关性显著(p < 0.001),但人系数为0.460,相关性中等。线性回归分析也有统计学意义(p < 0.001),但模型适应度r2 = 0.211, B = 0.266。在310例患者中,305例(98.4%)发现单一问题比IKDC评分更相关。结论ikdc评分与简单、主观、单题的膝关节自我评价有中度相关性。单题可用于更好地了解客观评分与患者对膝关节功能的主观感知之间的差异,或作为快速的单题代理评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question can be used for a quick assessment of patients undergoing knee surgery

Purpose

The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) is the cornerstone of clinical research for surgical disciplines, but the use in daily routine can be challenging. One of the most widespread PROMS in knee surgery is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential correlation of the IKDC score with a patient’s subjective assessment of the knee using a single question. We hypothesized a correlation between the IKDC score and single question score.

Methods

A prospective, single center study in a comprehensive knee outpatient clinic was performed. Patients willing to participate, presenting in the clinic for the first time were asked to complete the IKDC questionnaire and to answer the question: ”How does your knee know compare to when you were 16 years old, in percentage?” Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the IKDC score and the single-question percentage.

Results

After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 patients were included. The mean age of the participants was 43.3 ± 9.6 years, and 45.2% of the patients were female. Mean IKDC score was 41.11 ± 13.13, compared to the mean score of the single-question 40.90 ± 22.7 (p = 0.887). The correlation between the IKDC score and the single-question was significant (p < 0.001), however, the person coefficient was 0.460, indicating moderate correlation. The linear regression analysis was also statistically significant (p < 0.001), but with a model fitness of r2 = 0.211 and B = 0.266. From the 310 patients, 305 (98.4%) found the single-question of more relevance than the IKDC score.

Conclusion

IKDC score and a simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question demonstrate moderate correlation. The single question can be used for better understanding of discrepancy between the objective score and the patients’ subjective perception of knee function or as a fast, single question proxy score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Postoperative muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration with respect to surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty Distal femoral osteotomy for the treatment of chronic patellofemoral instability improves gait patterns Efficacy of a novel, fluoroscopy-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system in restoring limb length and offset Scaphocapitate fusion in stage III Kienböck’s disease: effects of lunarectomy on postoperative pain and function Clinical added value of 3D printed patient-specific guides in orthopedic surgery (excluding knee arthroplasty): a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1