Paul Pöser MD , Robert Schenk MD , Hannah Miller MD , Ahmad Alghamdi MD , Adrien Lavalley MD , Katharina Tielking MD , Nitzan Nissimov MD , Anton Früh MD , Denny Chakkalakal MD , Victor Patsouris MD , Tarik Alp Sargut MD , Robert Mertens MD , Ran Xu MD , Peter Truckenmüller MD , Kiarash Ferdowssian MD , Judith Rösler MD , David Wasilewski MD , Claudius Jelgersma MD , Anna Roethe MD , Aminaa Sanchin MD , Julia Sophie Onken PD, MD
{"title":"神经外科住院医师非尸体脊柱外科模拟器训练。","authors":"Paul Pöser MD , Robert Schenk MD , Hannah Miller MD , Ahmad Alghamdi MD , Adrien Lavalley MD , Katharina Tielking MD , Nitzan Nissimov MD , Anton Früh MD , Denny Chakkalakal MD , Victor Patsouris MD , Tarik Alp Sargut MD , Robert Mertens MD , Ran Xu MD , Peter Truckenmüller MD , Kiarash Ferdowssian MD , Judith Rösler MD , David Wasilewski MD , Claudius Jelgersma MD , Anna Roethe MD , Aminaa Sanchin MD , Julia Sophie Onken PD, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Spine surgical training faces increasing challenges due to restricted working hours and greater sub specialization. Modern simulators offer a promising approach to teaching both simple and complex spinal procedures. This study evaluated the acceptance and efficacy of spine simulator training using a lumbar herniated disc model tested by 16 neurosurgical residents (PGY-1-6), and compared 3D and 2D teaching methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixteen residents utilized the Realists RealSpine L4/L5 disc simulator with both microscope and exoscope. A mixed-methods analysis assessed the efficacy and acceptance of the training. Six PGY-1 residents participated in a learning curve study, divided into exoscopic and microscopic cohorts. Each group watched a tutorial in either 3D or 2D, followed by 3 surgical sessions. Endpoints included surgical progress within 30 minutes and complication rates. Microsurgical skills and mental concepts were evaluated on a numeric Likert Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants rated the simulator training favorably, with a median score of 8/10 across 6 categories. The learning curve study showed a 30% improvement in microsurgical performance. The completion rate of herniated disc removal increased from 50% at T2 to 100% at T3 and T4. Significant improvement in mental concept was observed (p=.035), with slightly better consolidation in the exoscope group. Self-assessments revealed significantly improved skills across all participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spine simulator training was well-received and resulted in improvements in both mental concept and microsurgical performance, with enhanced outcomes in the 3D teaching/exoscope group. This study supports the integration of spine simulators into spine surgical residency, particularly for early-stage training, to improve both cognitive and practical surgical skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100573"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-cadaveric spine surgery simulator training in neurosurgical residency\",\"authors\":\"Paul Pöser MD , Robert Schenk MD , Hannah Miller MD , Ahmad Alghamdi MD , Adrien Lavalley MD , Katharina Tielking MD , Nitzan Nissimov MD , Anton Früh MD , Denny Chakkalakal MD , Victor Patsouris MD , Tarik Alp Sargut MD , Robert Mertens MD , Ran Xu MD , Peter Truckenmüller MD , Kiarash Ferdowssian MD , Judith Rösler MD , David Wasilewski MD , Claudius Jelgersma MD , Anna Roethe MD , Aminaa Sanchin MD , Julia Sophie Onken PD, MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Spine surgical training faces increasing challenges due to restricted working hours and greater sub specialization. Modern simulators offer a promising approach to teaching both simple and complex spinal procedures. This study evaluated the acceptance and efficacy of spine simulator training using a lumbar herniated disc model tested by 16 neurosurgical residents (PGY-1-6), and compared 3D and 2D teaching methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixteen residents utilized the Realists RealSpine L4/L5 disc simulator with both microscope and exoscope. A mixed-methods analysis assessed the efficacy and acceptance of the training. Six PGY-1 residents participated in a learning curve study, divided into exoscopic and microscopic cohorts. Each group watched a tutorial in either 3D or 2D, followed by 3 surgical sessions. Endpoints included surgical progress within 30 minutes and complication rates. Microsurgical skills and mental concepts were evaluated on a numeric Likert Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants rated the simulator training favorably, with a median score of 8/10 across 6 categories. The learning curve study showed a 30% improvement in microsurgical performance. The completion rate of herniated disc removal increased from 50% at T2 to 100% at T3 and T4. Significant improvement in mental concept was observed (p=.035), with slightly better consolidation in the exoscope group. Self-assessments revealed significantly improved skills across all participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Spine simulator training was well-received and resulted in improvements in both mental concept and microsurgical performance, with enhanced outcomes in the 3D teaching/exoscope group. This study supports the integration of spine simulators into spine surgical residency, particularly for early-stage training, to improve both cognitive and practical surgical skills.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665603/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842400266X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842400266X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-cadaveric spine surgery simulator training in neurosurgical residency
Background
Spine surgical training faces increasing challenges due to restricted working hours and greater sub specialization. Modern simulators offer a promising approach to teaching both simple and complex spinal procedures. This study evaluated the acceptance and efficacy of spine simulator training using a lumbar herniated disc model tested by 16 neurosurgical residents (PGY-1-6), and compared 3D and 2D teaching methods.
Methods
Sixteen residents utilized the Realists RealSpine L4/L5 disc simulator with both microscope and exoscope. A mixed-methods analysis assessed the efficacy and acceptance of the training. Six PGY-1 residents participated in a learning curve study, divided into exoscopic and microscopic cohorts. Each group watched a tutorial in either 3D or 2D, followed by 3 surgical sessions. Endpoints included surgical progress within 30 minutes and complication rates. Microsurgical skills and mental concepts were evaluated on a numeric Likert Scale.
Results
Participants rated the simulator training favorably, with a median score of 8/10 across 6 categories. The learning curve study showed a 30% improvement in microsurgical performance. The completion rate of herniated disc removal increased from 50% at T2 to 100% at T3 and T4. Significant improvement in mental concept was observed (p=.035), with slightly better consolidation in the exoscope group. Self-assessments revealed significantly improved skills across all participants.
Conclusions
Spine simulator training was well-received and resulted in improvements in both mental concept and microsurgical performance, with enhanced outcomes in the 3D teaching/exoscope group. This study supports the integration of spine simulators into spine surgical residency, particularly for early-stage training, to improve both cognitive and practical surgical skills.