{"title":"提高医疗保健组织中患者安全的患者参与活动的障碍和促进因素:基于delphi的专家调查。","authors":"Amelie Koch, Larissa Brust, Matthias Weigl","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S489522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In order to obtain sustainable healthcare, engagement of patients in patient safety improvement is vital. Drawing upon a multi-perspective approach, this study aimed to investigate perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on key implementation factors (ie, barriers and facilitators) for effective patient engagement (PE) in healthcare organizations to improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi technique comprising semi-structured interviews and an online survey was applied to consolidate the individual perspectives of stakeholders and establish consensus on factors (expected, potential or experienced) that facilitate or mitigate successful implementation of PE in healthcare organizations (ie, all types, including hospital and outpatient medical practices). Adult, German-speaking experts in patient safety or PE (ie, with professional background or personal experience) were eligible to participate. Purposive and convenience sampling for inclusion of different healthcare professionals and patient representatives was established. Thirty-four panelists participated in data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified eight key barriers and seven facilitators for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations. Time constraints and perceived low effectiveness of patient engagement activities were deemed as most critical barriers. Supportive organizational culture, education and training opportunities, and clearly nominated responsibilities for patient feedback and engagement were rated as the most important facilitators. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratings between patient representatives and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of real-world implementation factors for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations in Germany to improve patient safety. Our insights may further inform recommendations for future development and implementation of effective patient involvement in healthcare organizations, especially for similar countries with low levels of PE.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00031837).</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"3217-3226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators of Patient Engagement Activities to Improve Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi-Based Expert Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Amelie Koch, Larissa Brust, Matthias Weigl\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S489522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In order to obtain sustainable healthcare, engagement of patients in patient safety improvement is vital. Drawing upon a multi-perspective approach, this study aimed to investigate perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on key implementation factors (ie, barriers and facilitators) for effective patient engagement (PE) in healthcare organizations to improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi technique comprising semi-structured interviews and an online survey was applied to consolidate the individual perspectives of stakeholders and establish consensus on factors (expected, potential or experienced) that facilitate or mitigate successful implementation of PE in healthcare organizations (ie, all types, including hospital and outpatient medical practices). Adult, German-speaking experts in patient safety or PE (ie, with professional background or personal experience) were eligible to participate. Purposive and convenience sampling for inclusion of different healthcare professionals and patient representatives was established. Thirty-four panelists participated in data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified eight key barriers and seven facilitators for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations. Time constraints and perceived low effectiveness of patient engagement activities were deemed as most critical barriers. Supportive organizational culture, education and training opportunities, and clearly nominated responsibilities for patient feedback and engagement were rated as the most important facilitators. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratings between patient representatives and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of real-world implementation factors for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations in Germany to improve patient safety. Our insights may further inform recommendations for future development and implementation of effective patient involvement in healthcare organizations, especially for similar countries with low levels of PE.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00031837).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"3217-3226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S489522\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S489522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Barriers and Facilitators of Patient Engagement Activities to Improve Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi-Based Expert Survey.
Purpose: In order to obtain sustainable healthcare, engagement of patients in patient safety improvement is vital. Drawing upon a multi-perspective approach, this study aimed to investigate perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on key implementation factors (ie, barriers and facilitators) for effective patient engagement (PE) in healthcare organizations to improve patient safety.
Patients and methods: A two-round Delphi technique comprising semi-structured interviews and an online survey was applied to consolidate the individual perspectives of stakeholders and establish consensus on factors (expected, potential or experienced) that facilitate or mitigate successful implementation of PE in healthcare organizations (ie, all types, including hospital and outpatient medical practices). Adult, German-speaking experts in patient safety or PE (ie, with professional background or personal experience) were eligible to participate. Purposive and convenience sampling for inclusion of different healthcare professionals and patient representatives was established. Thirty-four panelists participated in data collection.
Results: We identified eight key barriers and seven facilitators for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations. Time constraints and perceived low effectiveness of patient engagement activities were deemed as most critical barriers. Supportive organizational culture, education and training opportunities, and clearly nominated responsibilities for patient feedback and engagement were rated as the most important facilitators. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratings between patient representatives and healthcare professionals.
Conclusion: Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of real-world implementation factors for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations in Germany to improve patient safety. Our insights may further inform recommendations for future development and implementation of effective patient involvement in healthcare organizations, especially for similar countries with low levels of PE.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00031837).
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.