提高医疗保健组织中患者安全的患者参与活动的障碍和促进因素:基于delphi的专家调查。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S489522
Amelie Koch, Larissa Brust, Matthias Weigl
{"title":"提高医疗保健组织中患者安全的患者参与活动的障碍和促进因素:基于delphi的专家调查。","authors":"Amelie Koch, Larissa Brust, Matthias Weigl","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S489522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In order to obtain sustainable healthcare, engagement of patients in patient safety improvement is vital. Drawing upon a multi-perspective approach, this study aimed to investigate perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on key implementation factors (ie, barriers and facilitators) for effective patient engagement (PE) in healthcare organizations to improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi technique comprising semi-structured interviews and an online survey was applied to consolidate the individual perspectives of stakeholders and establish consensus on factors (expected, potential or experienced) that facilitate or mitigate successful implementation of PE in healthcare organizations (ie, all types, including hospital and outpatient medical practices). Adult, German-speaking experts in patient safety or PE (ie, with professional background or personal experience) were eligible to participate. Purposive and convenience sampling for inclusion of different healthcare professionals and patient representatives was established. Thirty-four panelists participated in data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified eight key barriers and seven facilitators for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations. Time constraints and perceived low effectiveness of patient engagement activities were deemed as most critical barriers. Supportive organizational culture, education and training opportunities, and clearly nominated responsibilities for patient feedback and engagement were rated as the most important facilitators. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratings between patient representatives and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of real-world implementation factors for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations in Germany to improve patient safety. Our insights may further inform recommendations for future development and implementation of effective patient involvement in healthcare organizations, especially for similar countries with low levels of PE.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00031837).</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"3217-3226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators of Patient Engagement Activities to Improve Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi-Based Expert Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Amelie Koch, Larissa Brust, Matthias Weigl\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S489522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In order to obtain sustainable healthcare, engagement of patients in patient safety improvement is vital. Drawing upon a multi-perspective approach, this study aimed to investigate perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on key implementation factors (ie, barriers and facilitators) for effective patient engagement (PE) in healthcare organizations to improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A two-round Delphi technique comprising semi-structured interviews and an online survey was applied to consolidate the individual perspectives of stakeholders and establish consensus on factors (expected, potential or experienced) that facilitate or mitigate successful implementation of PE in healthcare organizations (ie, all types, including hospital and outpatient medical practices). Adult, German-speaking experts in patient safety or PE (ie, with professional background or personal experience) were eligible to participate. Purposive and convenience sampling for inclusion of different healthcare professionals and patient representatives was established. Thirty-four panelists participated in data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified eight key barriers and seven facilitators for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations. Time constraints and perceived low effectiveness of patient engagement activities were deemed as most critical barriers. Supportive organizational culture, education and training opportunities, and clearly nominated responsibilities for patient feedback and engagement were rated as the most important facilitators. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratings between patient representatives and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of real-world implementation factors for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations in Germany to improve patient safety. Our insights may further inform recommendations for future development and implementation of effective patient involvement in healthcare organizations, especially for similar countries with low levels of PE.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00031837).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"3217-3226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S489522\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S489522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了获得可持续的医疗保健,患者参与改善患者安全是至关重要的。利用多视角方法,本研究旨在调查患者和医疗保健专业人员对医疗保健组织中有效患者参与(PE)的关键实施因素(即障碍和促进因素)的观点,以提高患者安全。患者和方法:采用两轮德尔菲技术,包括半结构化访谈和在线调查,以巩固利益相关者的个人观点,并就促进或减轻医疗机构(即所有类型,包括医院和门诊医疗实践)成功实施PE的因素(预期的、潜在的或经验的)建立共识。成人,讲德语的患者安全或体育专家(即具有专业背景或个人经验)有资格参加。建立了有目的和方便的抽样,以纳入不同的医疗保健专业人员和患者代表。34名小组成员参与了数据收集。结果:我们确定了医疗保健组织中有效的患者参与的8个关键障碍和7个促进因素。时间限制和患者参与活动的低效率被认为是最关键的障碍。支持性的组织文化,教育和培训机会,以及明确指定的患者反馈和参与的责任被评为最重要的促进因素。在患者代表和医疗保健专业人员之间的评分没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果有助于更深入地了解德国医疗保健组织中有效的患者参与以提高患者安全的现实世界实施因素。我们的见解可以进一步为未来发展和实施医疗机构中有效的患者参与提供建议,特别是在PE水平较低的类似国家。试验注册:德国临床试验注册(ID: DRKS00031837)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and Facilitators of Patient Engagement Activities to Improve Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi-Based Expert Survey.

Purpose: In order to obtain sustainable healthcare, engagement of patients in patient safety improvement is vital. Drawing upon a multi-perspective approach, this study aimed to investigate perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on key implementation factors (ie, barriers and facilitators) for effective patient engagement (PE) in healthcare organizations to improve patient safety.

Patients and methods: A two-round Delphi technique comprising semi-structured interviews and an online survey was applied to consolidate the individual perspectives of stakeholders and establish consensus on factors (expected, potential or experienced) that facilitate or mitigate successful implementation of PE in healthcare organizations (ie, all types, including hospital and outpatient medical practices). Adult, German-speaking experts in patient safety or PE (ie, with professional background or personal experience) were eligible to participate. Purposive and convenience sampling for inclusion of different healthcare professionals and patient representatives was established. Thirty-four panelists participated in data collection.

Results: We identified eight key barriers and seven facilitators for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations. Time constraints and perceived low effectiveness of patient engagement activities were deemed as most critical barriers. Supportive organizational culture, education and training opportunities, and clearly nominated responsibilities for patient feedback and engagement were rated as the most important facilitators. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratings between patient representatives and healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of real-world implementation factors for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations in Germany to improve patient safety. Our insights may further inform recommendations for future development and implementation of effective patient involvement in healthcare organizations, especially for similar countries with low levels of PE.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00031837).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Association Between GABRG2 and Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol in a French Young Adult Sample. Factors Affecting Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Study. Assessing COVID-19 Pandemic-Era Vaccine Uptake and Adherence to Prevention Measures: A Comparative Analysis Among Men and Women Using Lot Quality Assurance Sampling in Central Uganda. Association Between Diurnal Temperature Range and Risk of Cardiomyopathy-Induced Hospitalisation in Henan, China: A Time-Series Study. The Effect of Cognitive-Motor Dual Tasks on the Risk of Falls in Female Saudi Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1