心脏骤停幸存者的缺氧性肝炎:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100834
Ya-Bei Gao , Jia-Heng Shi , Da-Xing Yu , Hui-Bin Huang
{"title":"心脏骤停幸存者的缺氧性肝炎:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ya-Bei Gao ,&nbsp;Jia-Heng Shi ,&nbsp;Da-Xing Yu ,&nbsp;Hui-Bin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypoxic hepatitis (HH) is commonly seen in critically ill patients, such as those with cardiac shock, sepsis, and respiratory failure. However, data are limited regarding its impact on the prognosis of patients with cardiac arrest (CA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 30, 2024. Studies were included if they focused on adult CA patients with HH compared to controls and had a clear definition of HH (defined as a rapid elevation in liver enzyme levels &gt; 20 times the upper limit of normal after CA). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.</div><div>Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and generic inverse variance analyses were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six studies with 3,005 adults were included. The median prevalence of HH was 16.3 % (ranging from 7.2 to 24.7 %). Overall, patients with HH had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than those without (odds ratio [OR] = 3.49; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.57; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001). This finding was confirmed in subgroups, sensitivity analyses, and regression analyses. HH patients were more likely to have a poor neurological outcome (OR = 2.73; 95 % CI, 1.37–5.42; <em>P</em> = 0.004), post-CA shock (OR = 5.77; 95 % CI, 1.76–18.94; <em>P</em> = 0.004), cardiac failure (OR = 35.84; 95 % CI, 6.02–213.31; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), and higher lactate levels (mean difference [MD] = 4.10 mmol/L; 95 % CI, 2.89–5.31; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001). In addition, HH required more continuous renal replacement therapy (OR = 4.19; 95 % CI, 3.02–5.82; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001), vasopressor therapy, time to return of spontaneous circulation (MD = 5.0 min; 95 % CI, 3.02–6.97; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001) but not mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.40; 95 % CI, 1.00–1.97; <em>P</em> = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Hypoxic hepatitis is not a rare complication after CA, and was independently associated with all-cause mortality. Further prospective, well-designed studies are needed to validate our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypoxic hepatitis in survivors of cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Bei Gao ,&nbsp;Jia-Heng Shi ,&nbsp;Da-Xing Yu ,&nbsp;Hui-Bin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypoxic hepatitis (HH) is commonly seen in critically ill patients, such as those with cardiac shock, sepsis, and respiratory failure. However, data are limited regarding its impact on the prognosis of patients with cardiac arrest (CA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 30, 2024. Studies were included if they focused on adult CA patients with HH compared to controls and had a clear definition of HH (defined as a rapid elevation in liver enzyme levels &gt; 20 times the upper limit of normal after CA). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.</div><div>Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and generic inverse variance analyses were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six studies with 3,005 adults were included. The median prevalence of HH was 16.3 % (ranging from 7.2 to 24.7 %). Overall, patients with HH had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than those without (odds ratio [OR] = 3.49; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.57; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001). This finding was confirmed in subgroups, sensitivity analyses, and regression analyses. HH patients were more likely to have a poor neurological outcome (OR = 2.73; 95 % CI, 1.37–5.42; <em>P</em> = 0.004), post-CA shock (OR = 5.77; 95 % CI, 1.76–18.94; <em>P</em> = 0.004), cardiac failure (OR = 35.84; 95 % CI, 6.02–213.31; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), and higher lactate levels (mean difference [MD] = 4.10 mmol/L; 95 % CI, 2.89–5.31; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001). In addition, HH required more continuous renal replacement therapy (OR = 4.19; 95 % CI, 3.02–5.82; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001), vasopressor therapy, time to return of spontaneous circulation (MD = 5.0 min; 95 % CI, 3.02–6.97; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001) but not mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.40; 95 % CI, 1.00–1.97; <em>P</em> = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Hypoxic hepatitis is not a rare complication after CA, and was independently associated with all-cause mortality. Further prospective, well-designed studies are needed to validate our findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺氧性肝炎(HH)常见于危重患者,如心源性休克、败血症和呼吸衰竭。然而,关于其对心脏骤停(CA)患者预后影响的数据有限。方法:我们对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2024年7月30日的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。如果研究的重点是与对照组相比HH的成年CA患者,并且HH的定义明确(定义为CA后肝酶水平快速升高bbb20倍于正常上限),则纳入研究。主要结局为全因死亡率。进行亚组分析、敏感性分析和一般逆方差分析。结果:纳入了6项涉及3,005名成人的研究。HH的中位患病率为16.3%(范围从7.2%到24.7%)。总体而言,HH患者的全因死亡风险显著高于无HH患者(优势比[OR] = 3.49;95% ci, 2.19-5.57;P = 0.004), ca后休克(OR = 5.77;95% ci, 1.76-18.94;P = 0.004),心力衰竭(OR = 35.84;95% ci, 6.02-213.31;p p p p = 0.05)。结论:缺氧性肝炎不是CA后的罕见并发症,并且与全因死亡率独立相关。需要进一步的前瞻性、精心设计的研究来验证我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hypoxic hepatitis in survivors of cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hypoxic hepatitis (HH) is commonly seen in critically ill patients, such as those with cardiac shock, sepsis, and respiratory failure. However, data are limited regarding its impact on the prognosis of patients with cardiac arrest (CA).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 30, 2024. Studies were included if they focused on adult CA patients with HH compared to controls and had a clear definition of HH (defined as a rapid elevation in liver enzyme levels > 20 times the upper limit of normal after CA). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.
Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and generic inverse variance analyses were conducted.

Results

Six studies with 3,005 adults were included. The median prevalence of HH was 16.3 % (ranging from 7.2 to 24.7 %). Overall, patients with HH had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than those without (odds ratio [OR] = 3.49; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.57; P < 0.00001). This finding was confirmed in subgroups, sensitivity analyses, and regression analyses. HH patients were more likely to have a poor neurological outcome (OR = 2.73; 95 % CI, 1.37–5.42; P = 0.004), post-CA shock (OR = 5.77; 95 % CI, 1.76–18.94; P = 0.004), cardiac failure (OR = 35.84; 95 % CI, 6.02–213.31; P < 0.0001), and higher lactate levels (mean difference [MD] = 4.10 mmol/L; 95 % CI, 2.89–5.31; P < 0.00001). In addition, HH required more continuous renal replacement therapy (OR = 4.19; 95 % CI, 3.02–5.82; P < 0.00001), vasopressor therapy, time to return of spontaneous circulation (MD = 5.0 min; 95 % CI, 3.02–6.97; P < 0.00001) but not mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.40; 95 % CI, 1.00–1.97; P = 0.05).

Conclusions

Hypoxic hepatitis is not a rare complication after CA, and was independently associated with all-cause mortality. Further prospective, well-designed studies are needed to validate our findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Measurement properties of the Minimal Insomnia Symptom Scale (MISS) among cardiac arrest survivors – A Rasch evaluation study A survey of team culture and learning organization in the resuscitation of neonates with congenital anomalies: A single center experience Effectiveness of chain of survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries: A systematic review Potential benefits and challenges of simulation-based neonatal resuscitation competition: A survey analysis of provincial competition in China Exoskeletons as potential devices to support and enhance rescuers’ chest compression performance during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1