埃塞俄比亚妇女获得待产在家服务及其决定因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1423639
Kassahun Tafesse Hidoto, Kassa Daka Gidebo, Mengistu Meskele Koyira, Maria Luisa Guillén Domínguez
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚妇女获得待产在家服务及其决定因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kassahun Tafesse Hidoto, Kassa Daka Gidebo, Mengistu Meskele Koyira, Maria Luisa Guillén Domínguez","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1423639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Globally, maternal mortality is a major public health problem mainly due to a lack of access to skilled care during childbirth. Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) play a critical role in accessing emergency obstetric care for pregnant women during childbirth. However, available studies show inconsistent findings about women's utilization of maternity waiting homes. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify the pooled prevalence of women's utilization of maternity waiting homes and its associated factors in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used the PRISMA guidelines to report the review. We searched for potentially eligible studies in Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google using Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords. The retrieved articles were screened and assessed for quality. The heterogeneity across studies was checked using Cochran's <i>Q</i> test and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics. The pooled levels of women's utilization and associated factors were analyzed using meta-analysis. The publication bias was measured using the funnel plot and Egger's test. The subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were carried out to identify the studies with high effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 eligible studies with 11,784 study participants were included. The utilization of MWHs was in the range of 7%-42.5%. The pooled estimate of women's utilization of maternity waiting homes was 22.49%. Factors associated with utilization included women's decision-making power, access to transport, walking distance to the nearest facility, and having a companion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>The overall prevalence of maternity waiting home utilization in Ethiopia is low, with significant variation across regions. Health sector program administrators should focus on both the consumer and healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (number CRD42021243526).</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1423639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to maternity waiting home services and its determinants among women in Ethiopia: systematic reviews and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kassahun Tafesse Hidoto, Kassa Daka Gidebo, Mengistu Meskele Koyira, Maria Luisa Guillén Domínguez\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1423639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Globally, maternal mortality is a major public health problem mainly due to a lack of access to skilled care during childbirth. Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) play a critical role in accessing emergency obstetric care for pregnant women during childbirth. However, available studies show inconsistent findings about women's utilization of maternity waiting homes. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify the pooled prevalence of women's utilization of maternity waiting homes and its associated factors in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used the PRISMA guidelines to report the review. We searched for potentially eligible studies in Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google using Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords. The retrieved articles were screened and assessed for quality. The heterogeneity across studies was checked using Cochran's <i>Q</i> test and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics. The pooled levels of women's utilization and associated factors were analyzed using meta-analysis. The publication bias was measured using the funnel plot and Egger's test. The subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were carried out to identify the studies with high effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 eligible studies with 11,784 study participants were included. The utilization of MWHs was in the range of 7%-42.5%. The pooled estimate of women's utilization of maternity waiting homes was 22.49%. Factors associated with utilization included women's decision-making power, access to transport, walking distance to the nearest facility, and having a companion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>The overall prevalence of maternity waiting home utilization in Ethiopia is low, with significant variation across regions. Health sector program administrators should focus on both the consumer and healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (number CRD42021243526).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1423639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663854/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1423639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1423639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在全球范围内,孕产妇死亡率是一个主要的公共卫生问题,主要原因是分娩期间缺乏获得熟练护理的机会。产妇等候之家(MWHs)在孕妇分娩期间获得产科急诊方面发挥着关键作用。然而,现有的研究表明,妇女利用待产之家的结果不一致。因此,本综述的目的是确定埃塞俄比亚妇女利用待产之家的总体流行率及其相关因素。方法:采用PRISMA指南进行综述。我们在b谷歌Scholar、PubMed、Cochrane Library和谷歌中使用医学主题标题术语和关键词搜索可能符合条件的研究。对检索到的文章进行筛选和质量评估。采用Cochran’s Q检验和i2统计检验各研究的异质性。采用荟萃分析对妇女的综合用药水平及相关因素进行分析。发表偏倚采用漏斗图和Egger检验。通过亚组分析和敏感性分析确定高疗效的研究。结果:共纳入11项符合条件的研究,11,784名研究参与者。mwh的利用率在7% ~ 42.5%之间。妇女利用待产之家的综合估计为22.49%。与使用相关的因素包括妇女的决策权、交通工具的可用性、到最近设施的步行距离以及是否有伴侣。结论和建议:埃塞俄比亚待产在家利用的总体流行率很低,各地区差异很大。卫生部门的项目管理者应该同时关注消费者和医疗保健系统。系统综述注册:综述方案在PROSPERO注册(编号CRD42021243526)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access to maternity waiting home services and its determinants among women in Ethiopia: systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Globally, maternal mortality is a major public health problem mainly due to a lack of access to skilled care during childbirth. Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) play a critical role in accessing emergency obstetric care for pregnant women during childbirth. However, available studies show inconsistent findings about women's utilization of maternity waiting homes. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify the pooled prevalence of women's utilization of maternity waiting homes and its associated factors in Ethiopia.

Method: We used the PRISMA guidelines to report the review. We searched for potentially eligible studies in Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google using Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords. The retrieved articles were screened and assessed for quality. The heterogeneity across studies was checked using Cochran's Q test and I 2 statistics. The pooled levels of women's utilization and associated factors were analyzed using meta-analysis. The publication bias was measured using the funnel plot and Egger's test. The subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were carried out to identify the studies with high effects.

Results: A total of 11 eligible studies with 11,784 study participants were included. The utilization of MWHs was in the range of 7%-42.5%. The pooled estimate of women's utilization of maternity waiting homes was 22.49%. Factors associated with utilization included women's decision-making power, access to transport, walking distance to the nearest facility, and having a companion.

Conclusion and recommendation: The overall prevalence of maternity waiting home utilization in Ethiopia is low, with significant variation across regions. Health sector program administrators should focus on both the consumer and healthcare system.

Systematic review registration: The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (number CRD42021243526).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cervical cancer screening utilization among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Male partner involvement in postnatal care service utilization and its associated factors in Wolaita Sodo, southern Ethiopia, 2023. Exploration of the relationship between primary dysmenorrhea, pain perception, and menstruation-related quality of life in young women: a cross-sectional observational study. Predicting pregnancy loss and its determinants among reproductive-aged women using supervised machine learning algorithms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Editorial: Quality of sexual and reproductive health care: strengths, gaps, and challenges for midwifery care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1