建立ADHD专业人员研究重点:一项国际德尔菲研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Attention Disorders Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1177/10870547241307739
Kate Stephens, Emma Sciberras, Matthew Bisset, Ainsley Summerton, David Coghill, Christel M Middeldorp, Leanne Payne, Mark A Bellgrove, Stephen V Faraone, Tobias Banaschewski, Jeffery H Newcorn, Stacey D Espinet, Iris Manor, Mohammed M J Alqahtani, Jeremy Varnham, Timothy J Silk
{"title":"建立ADHD专业人员研究重点:一项国际德尔菲研究。","authors":"Kate Stephens, Emma Sciberras, Matthew Bisset, Ainsley Summerton, David Coghill, Christel M Middeldorp, Leanne Payne, Mark A Bellgrove, Stephen V Faraone, Tobias Banaschewski, Jeffery H Newcorn, Stacey D Espinet, Iris Manor, Mohammed M J Alqahtani, Jeremy Varnham, Timothy J Silk","doi":"10.1177/10870547241307739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine ADHD research priorities from the perspective of ADHD professionals internationally.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A two-stage modified Delphi design was used. In Stage 1 (qualitative), participants listed research questions relating to ADHD that they perceived to be most important (<i>N</i> = 132). In Stage 2 (quantitative), participants were then asked to rate each research question that was deemed appropriate (able to be researched and not already addressed by research) in terms of perceived importance (<i>N</i> = 180).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stage 1 generated 382 research questions with 10 broad areas identified for example, co-occurring conditions and treatment, etc. The top 20 most important questions related to ADHD in women/girls, long-term medication use, non-pharmacological interventions, ADHD measurement/rating scales, and efficacy of emotional regulation interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results can inform an ADHD research agenda which represents the views of the individuals from major ADHD professional groups internationally. Parallel work is needed focusing on research priorities from the perspective of ADHD consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547241307739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing the Research Priorities of ADHD Professionals: An International Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Stephens, Emma Sciberras, Matthew Bisset, Ainsley Summerton, David Coghill, Christel M Middeldorp, Leanne Payne, Mark A Bellgrove, Stephen V Faraone, Tobias Banaschewski, Jeffery H Newcorn, Stacey D Espinet, Iris Manor, Mohammed M J Alqahtani, Jeremy Varnham, Timothy J Silk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10870547241307739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine ADHD research priorities from the perspective of ADHD professionals internationally.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A two-stage modified Delphi design was used. In Stage 1 (qualitative), participants listed research questions relating to ADHD that they perceived to be most important (<i>N</i> = 132). In Stage 2 (quantitative), participants were then asked to rate each research question that was deemed appropriate (able to be researched and not already addressed by research) in terms of perceived importance (<i>N</i> = 180).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stage 1 generated 382 research questions with 10 broad areas identified for example, co-occurring conditions and treatment, etc. The top 20 most important questions related to ADHD in women/girls, long-term medication use, non-pharmacological interventions, ADHD measurement/rating scales, and efficacy of emotional regulation interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results can inform an ADHD research agenda which represents the views of the individuals from major ADHD professional groups internationally. Parallel work is needed focusing on research priorities from the perspective of ADHD consumers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Attention Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10870547241307739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Attention Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547241307739\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547241307739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从国际上ADHD专业人士的角度确定ADHD的研究重点。方法:采用两阶段改进德尔菲设计。在第一阶段(定性),参与者列出他们认为最重要的与ADHD相关的研究问题(N = 132)。在第二阶段(定量),然后要求参与者根据感知到的重要性(N = 180)对每个研究问题进行评级,这些问题被认为是适当的(能够被研究并且尚未被研究解决)。结果:第一阶段产生了382个研究问题,确定了10个广泛的领域,例如,共同发生的条件和治疗等。前20个最重要的问题与妇女/女孩的注意力缺陷多动障碍、长期药物使用、非药物干预、注意力缺陷多动障碍测量/评定量表以及情绪调节干预的有效性有关。结论:这些结果可以为ADHD研究议程提供信息,该议程代表了国际上主要ADHD专业团体的个人观点。需要从注意力缺陷多动障碍消费者的角度关注研究重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishing the Research Priorities of ADHD Professionals: An International Delphi Study.

Objectives: To determine ADHD research priorities from the perspective of ADHD professionals internationally.

Method: A two-stage modified Delphi design was used. In Stage 1 (qualitative), participants listed research questions relating to ADHD that they perceived to be most important (N = 132). In Stage 2 (quantitative), participants were then asked to rate each research question that was deemed appropriate (able to be researched and not already addressed by research) in terms of perceived importance (N = 180).

Results: Stage 1 generated 382 research questions with 10 broad areas identified for example, co-occurring conditions and treatment, etc. The top 20 most important questions related to ADHD in women/girls, long-term medication use, non-pharmacological interventions, ADHD measurement/rating scales, and efficacy of emotional regulation interventions.

Conclusion: These results can inform an ADHD research agenda which represents the views of the individuals from major ADHD professional groups internationally. Parallel work is needed focusing on research priorities from the perspective of ADHD consumers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
期刊最新文献
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Revised Version of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale in Chinese Adolescents. Evaluation of Frontal QRS-T Angle in Children With ADHD and Healthy Controls. Unmet Needs of Children and Young Adults With ADHD: Insights From Key Stakeholders on Priorities for Stigma Reduction. Adult Diagnosis of ADHD in Women: A Mixed Methods Investigation. Emotion Recognition Accuracy Among Individuals With ADHD: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1