Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1177/10870547251400038
Rebecca Zaritsky, Stephanie C Reed, Suzette M Evans
Objective: Females represent a growing proportion of adults with ADHD yet remain understudied in the literature compared to males. An important aspect of the experience of females with ADHD is the impact of the menstrual cycle and ovarian hormones on both the symptoms of ADHD and effects of stimulant medications on treating these symptoms.
Method: In the present pilot study, female participants being treated with amphetamine salts for ADHD (n = 30) were recruited to complete 35 daily online surveys to track ADHD symptoms, mood, and medication use through the menstrual cycle.
Results: Results indicated that the degree of ADHD symptoms was significantly associated with menstrual cycle phase with ADHD symptoms being most severe in the menstruation phase and comparatively milder ADHD symptoms in the mid-follicular phase. This difference was positively correlated with subjective changes in negative mood.
Conclusion: These results indicate that ADHD symptoms vary across the menstrual cycle among females being treated with amphetamine salts for their ADHD, a finding that could inform clinical and prescribing practices for physicians caring for females with ADHD.
{"title":"Changes in ADHD Symptoms and Mood Across the Menstrual Cycle in Females Treated With Stimulants: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Rebecca Zaritsky, Stephanie C Reed, Suzette M Evans","doi":"10.1177/10870547251400038","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251400038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Females represent a growing proportion of adults with ADHD yet remain understudied in the literature compared to males. An important aspect of the experience of females with ADHD is the impact of the menstrual cycle and ovarian hormones on both the symptoms of ADHD and effects of stimulant medications on treating these symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the present pilot study, female participants being treated with amphetamine salts for ADHD (<i>n</i> = 30) were recruited to complete 35 daily online surveys to track ADHD symptoms, mood, and medication use through the menstrual cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that the degree of ADHD symptoms was significantly associated with menstrual cycle phase with ADHD symptoms being most severe in the menstruation phase and comparatively milder ADHD symptoms in the mid-follicular phase. This difference was positively correlated with subjective changes in negative mood.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that ADHD symptoms vary across the menstrual cycle among females being treated with amphetamine salts for their ADHD, a finding that could inform clinical and prescribing practices for physicians caring for females with ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"329-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145833801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-18DOI: 10.1177/10870547251383430
Natalie Pierotti, Kaushadh Jayakody
Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is well-established as a disorder that persists into adulthood and is commonly comorbid with other mental health conditions. Despite increasing numbers of women entering reproductive years with this diagnosis, there is limited research on it in the perinatal period.
Objective: To critically appraise the available literature and examine the association between maternal ADHD and depression in the perinatal period.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Google Scholar up to August 2024. The available literature was evaluated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). The quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, and a narrative synthesis was completed.
Results: Ten studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The majority were of medium quality, with issues identified in sample size, study design and validity of the self-report scale used. Our review found a prevalence of 16.76% to 57.6% of perinatal depression in women with ADHD. An increased risk of developing perinatal depression was also identified in women with ADHD (OR 1.8-2.63) compared to those without the disorder. Finally, our review also found a positive association between ADHD symptoms and depressive symptoms in perinatal women.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest a much greater vulnerability to perinatal depression among women with ADHD, and an association between ADHD symptoms and depressive symptoms in the perinatal period. There is, however, a clear need for more high-quality studies to replicate and further explore these findings.
{"title":"Maternal Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Natalie Pierotti, Kaushadh Jayakody","doi":"10.1177/10870547251383430","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251383430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is well-established as a disorder that persists into adulthood and is commonly comorbid with other mental health conditions. Despite increasing numbers of women entering reproductive years with this diagnosis, there is limited research on it in the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically appraise the available literature and examine the association between maternal ADHD and depression in the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Google Scholar up to August 2024. The available literature was evaluated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). The quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, and a narrative synthesis was completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The majority were of medium quality, with issues identified in sample size, study design and validity of the self-report scale used. Our review found a prevalence of 16.76% to 57.6% of perinatal depression in women with ADHD. An increased risk of developing perinatal depression was also identified in women with ADHD (OR 1.8-2.63) compared to those without the disorder. Finally, our review also found a positive association between ADHD symptoms and depressive symptoms in perinatal women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a much greater vulnerability to perinatal depression among women with ADHD, and an association between ADHD symptoms and depressive symptoms in the perinatal period. There is, however, a clear need for more high-quality studies to replicate and further explore these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"300-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145313027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-08-28DOI: 10.1177/10870547251364575
Jennie E Ryan, Allison Herens, Mitchell Fruchtman, Philip Veliz, Erin L Kelly, Brooke Worster
<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Assess prevalence and correlates of cannabis use in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and explore its impact on comorbidities, symptoms, and side effects of prescription stimulants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey (April to July 2023) was emailed to 9,274 potential adult participants with a documented ADHD diagnosis, based on ICD-10 codes in the electronic medical record, which was secondarily verified by self-report. A total of 900 participants completed the survey. The 46-item survey covered demographics, medical history, prescription stimulant use, cannabis use, and its impact on ADHD symptoms and prescribed stimulant side effects, prescription stimulant misuse, cannabis use disorder, and health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this large sample of adults diagnosed with ADHD, 75% reported ever using cannabis, with 41% reporting prior 30-day use. Groups of cannabis users were categorized into three groups; (1) no recent use (including never; <i>N</i> = 458); (2) non-daily use (<30 days in past month; <i>N</i> = 256); and (3) daily use (≥30 days in past month; <i>N</i> = 112). Compared to non-daily cannabis users, daily cannabis users showed comparable rates of prescription stimulant misuse (29% vs. 37%, OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.87, 2.23], <i>p</i> = .166), and substance use disorder diagnoses (2% vs. 4%, OR = 1.54, 95% CI [0.43, 5.58], <i>p</i> = .508), but higher rates of cannabis use disorder (38% vs. 62%, OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.69, 4.22], <i>p</i> < .001). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report fair or poor general health compared to non-daily cannabis users (24% vs. 11%, OR = 2.58, 95% CI [1.44, 4.64], <i>p</i> = .001). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report a comorbid diagnosis of anxiety (70% vs. 48%, OR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.59, 4.10], <i>p</i> < .001), depression (54% vs. 35%, OR = 2.24, 95% CI [1.42, 3.53], <i>p</i> < .001), bipolar disorder (15% vs. 5%, OR = 3.345, 95% CI [1.56, 7.15], <i>p</i> = .002), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (30% vs. 14%, OR = 2.752, 95% CI [1.61, 4.71], <i>p</i> < .001), compared to non-daily cannabis users. Among participants who ever used cannabis, 278 (42%) reported they had used cannabis to manage their ADHD symptoms. Compared to non-daily cannabis users, daily cannabis users were significantly more likely to report that cannabis use improved ADHD symptoms of mental frustration (OR = 2.39, 95% CI [1.36, 4.19], <i>p</i> = .002) and impulsivity (OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.07, 2.69], <i>p</i> = .026). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report that cannabis use worsened ADHD symptoms of inattention (OR = .59, 95% CI [0.36, 0.98], <i>p</i> = .043) compared to non-daily cannabis users. Participants reported mixed effects of cannabis use on anxiety: 156 noted improvements, while 34 reported worsening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample of adults diagnosed with ADHD, cannabis
目的:评估成人注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)患者使用大麻的患病率及其相关因素,并探讨其对处方兴奋剂合并症、症状和副作用的影响。方法:一项匿名在线调查(2023年4月至7月)通过电子邮件发送给9274名有ADHD诊断记录的潜在成年参与者,该调查基于电子病历中的ICD-10代码,并通过自我报告进行二次验证。共有900名参与者完成了这项调查。这项46项调查包括人口统计、病史、处方兴奋剂使用、大麻使用及其对多动症症状和处方兴奋剂副作用的影响、处方兴奋剂滥用、大麻使用障碍和与健康有关的生活质量。结果:在这个被诊断为多动症的成年人的大样本中,75%的人报告曾经使用过大麻,41%的人报告曾经使用过30天。大麻使用者群体分为三组;(1)近期未使用(包括从未使用;N = 458);(2)非日常使用(N = 256);(3)每日使用情况(最近一个月≥30天,N = 112)。与非每日吸食大麻者相比,每日吸食大麻者的处方兴奋剂滥用率相当(29% vs. 37%, OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.87, 2.23], p =。166)和物质使用障碍诊断(2%对4%,OR = 1.54, 95% CI [0.43, 5.58], p =。508),但大麻使用障碍率较高(38%对62%,OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.69, 4.22], p p = .001)。每日吸食大麻者更有可能报告焦虑共病诊断(70% vs. 48%, OR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.59, 4.10], p p p =。002)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD) (30% vs. 14%, OR = 2.752, 95% CI [1.61, 4.71], p p =。002)和冲动(OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.07, 2.69], p = .026)。每天吸食大麻的人更有可能报告说,大麻的使用加重了注意力不集中的多动症症状(OR =。59, 95% CI [0.36, 0.98], p =。043)与非每日吸食大麻的人相比。参与者报告了使用大麻对焦虑的不同影响:156人表示有所改善,34人表示恶化。结论:在被诊断患有ADHD的成年人样本中,大麻使用很普遍,与非每日使用者相比,每日使用者显示出更高的大麻使用障碍和共病精神诊断率,突出了临床医生筛查大麻使用障碍和精神共病的必要性。大麻使用者报告了大麻对多动症症状和焦虑的混合影响。需要进一步的研究来了解大麻使用、多动症症状和精神健康之间的复杂关系。
{"title":"Cannabis Use in a Community-Based Sample of Adults Diagnosed With ADHD: Prevalence, Impact on Symptoms, and Stimulant Side Effects.","authors":"Jennie E Ryan, Allison Herens, Mitchell Fruchtman, Philip Veliz, Erin L Kelly, Brooke Worster","doi":"10.1177/10870547251364575","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251364575","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Assess prevalence and correlates of cannabis use in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and explore its impact on comorbidities, symptoms, and side effects of prescription stimulants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey (April to July 2023) was emailed to 9,274 potential adult participants with a documented ADHD diagnosis, based on ICD-10 codes in the electronic medical record, which was secondarily verified by self-report. A total of 900 participants completed the survey. The 46-item survey covered demographics, medical history, prescription stimulant use, cannabis use, and its impact on ADHD symptoms and prescribed stimulant side effects, prescription stimulant misuse, cannabis use disorder, and health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this large sample of adults diagnosed with ADHD, 75% reported ever using cannabis, with 41% reporting prior 30-day use. Groups of cannabis users were categorized into three groups; (1) no recent use (including never; <i>N</i> = 458); (2) non-daily use (<30 days in past month; <i>N</i> = 256); and (3) daily use (≥30 days in past month; <i>N</i> = 112). Compared to non-daily cannabis users, daily cannabis users showed comparable rates of prescription stimulant misuse (29% vs. 37%, OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.87, 2.23], <i>p</i> = .166), and substance use disorder diagnoses (2% vs. 4%, OR = 1.54, 95% CI [0.43, 5.58], <i>p</i> = .508), but higher rates of cannabis use disorder (38% vs. 62%, OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.69, 4.22], <i>p</i> < .001). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report fair or poor general health compared to non-daily cannabis users (24% vs. 11%, OR = 2.58, 95% CI [1.44, 4.64], <i>p</i> = .001). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report a comorbid diagnosis of anxiety (70% vs. 48%, OR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.59, 4.10], <i>p</i> < .001), depression (54% vs. 35%, OR = 2.24, 95% CI [1.42, 3.53], <i>p</i> < .001), bipolar disorder (15% vs. 5%, OR = 3.345, 95% CI [1.56, 7.15], <i>p</i> = .002), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (30% vs. 14%, OR = 2.752, 95% CI [1.61, 4.71], <i>p</i> < .001), compared to non-daily cannabis users. Among participants who ever used cannabis, 278 (42%) reported they had used cannabis to manage their ADHD symptoms. Compared to non-daily cannabis users, daily cannabis users were significantly more likely to report that cannabis use improved ADHD symptoms of mental frustration (OR = 2.39, 95% CI [1.36, 4.19], <i>p</i> = .002) and impulsivity (OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.07, 2.69], <i>p</i> = .026). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report that cannabis use worsened ADHD symptoms of inattention (OR = .59, 95% CI [0.36, 0.98], <i>p</i> = .043) compared to non-daily cannabis users. Participants reported mixed effects of cannabis use on anxiety: 156 noted improvements, while 34 reported worsening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample of adults diagnosed with ADHD, cannabis","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"407-422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144955599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1177/10870547251372730
Kathrine Bang Madsen, Mette Winther, Amalie Thea Jensen, Katrine Marcussen, Trine Munk-Olsen, Rikke Wesselhoeft, Sarah Kittel-Schneider
Objective: The rates of women of reproductive age diagnosed with ADHD have increased significantly. However, little is known about how pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period influence ADHD related problems, help-seeking behaviors or the timing of ADHD diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate incident ADHD diagnoses among women from 5 years before to 5 years after childbirth.
Method: The population-based cohort study utilized Danish nationwide registers to identify mothers of all childbirths between 2010 and 2018. ADHD diagnoses, defined as ICD-10 codes (F90 or F98.8) or redemption of ADHD medication prescriptions, were recorded during 1994 to 2023. Women who received an ADHD diagnosis prior to the five-year pre-birth period were excluded. We estimated calendar-year adjusted incidence of first-time maternal ADHD diagnoses using Poisson regression, and compared incidence across pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, postpartum up to 2 years, and 2 to 5 years postpartum, reporting adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Analyses included psychiatric comorbidities and non-ADHD psychotropic medication use prior to an ADHD diagnosis, for women diagnosed with ADHD postpartum.
Results: The study included 363,904 mothers with a total of 524,936 childbirths. ADHD incidence rates decreased significantly during pregnancy (IRR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37]), remained lower than the pre-pregnancy period 2 years postpartum (IRR 0.82, 95% CI [0.74, 0.92]), and increased significantly above pre-pregnancy levels 2 to 5 years postpartum (IRR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.13, 1.35]). Among mothers diagnosed with ADHD postpartum, 53.9% had an in- or outpatient contact to psychiatric services or redeemed non-ADHD psychotropic medication prescriptions, in the period from childbirth until ADHD diagnosis.
Conclusion: Incident ADHD diagnoses among women giving birth increased postpartum above pre-pregnancy levels, with peak rates observed between 2 and 5 years after childbirth. These findings highlight the postpartum period as a potential critical window of ADHD symptom worsening, underscoring the need for targeted mental health screenings and support for women during the years after childbirth.
{"title":"Maternal ADHD Diagnoses Before and After Childbirth: A Danish Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Kathrine Bang Madsen, Mette Winther, Amalie Thea Jensen, Katrine Marcussen, Trine Munk-Olsen, Rikke Wesselhoeft, Sarah Kittel-Schneider","doi":"10.1177/10870547251372730","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251372730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The rates of women of reproductive age diagnosed with ADHD have increased significantly. However, little is known about how pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period influence ADHD related problems, help-seeking behaviors or the timing of ADHD diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate incident ADHD diagnoses among women from 5 years before to 5 years after childbirth.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The population-based cohort study utilized Danish nationwide registers to identify mothers of all childbirths between 2010 and 2018. ADHD diagnoses, defined as ICD-10 codes (F90 or F98.8) or redemption of ADHD medication prescriptions, were recorded during 1994 to 2023. Women who received an ADHD diagnosis prior to the five-year pre-birth period were excluded. We estimated calendar-year adjusted incidence of first-time maternal ADHD diagnoses using Poisson regression, and compared incidence across pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, postpartum up to 2 years, and 2 to 5 years postpartum, reporting adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Analyses included psychiatric comorbidities and non-ADHD psychotropic medication use prior to an ADHD diagnosis, for women diagnosed with ADHD postpartum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 363,904 mothers with a total of 524,936 childbirths. ADHD incidence rates decreased significantly during pregnancy (IRR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37]), remained lower than the pre-pregnancy period 2 years postpartum (IRR 0.82, 95% CI [0.74, 0.92]), and increased significantly above pre-pregnancy levels 2 to 5 years postpartum (IRR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.13, 1.35]). Among mothers diagnosed with ADHD postpartum, 53.9% had an in- or outpatient contact to psychiatric services or redeemed non-ADHD psychotropic medication prescriptions, in the period from childbirth until ADHD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incident ADHD diagnoses among women giving birth increased postpartum above pre-pregnancy levels, with peak rates observed between 2 and 5 years after childbirth. These findings highlight the postpartum period as a potential critical window of ADHD symptom worsening, underscoring the need for targeted mental health screenings and support for women during the years after childbirth.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"283-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145258478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Previous animal studies have suggested a link between progesterone exposure and the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study clinically evaluated the effect of progesterone use during pregnancy on the risk of ADHD in children.
Methods: In this prospective case-control study, 97 children diagnosed with ADHD and 194 age- and sex-matched controls were included. Maternal progesterone use-via suppositories or injections-during pregnancy was assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS.
Results: The mean age was slightly higher in the ADHD group, but not significantly. Male predominance was observed among ADHD cases, although not statistically significant. While neonatal hospitalization rates were similar, the duration was longer in the ADHD group (p = .009). Cesarean delivery and lower maternal education levels were significantly more common in the ADHD group (p = .004 and p = .013, respectively). No significant difference in overall progesterone use was found between ADHD and control groups (17.5% vs. 19.1%; p = .749). Injectable progesterone was used in 5.2% of ADHD cases and 10.8% of controls (p = .130), and the timing of use across pregnancy trimesters did not differ significantly (p = .493). Vaginal suppository use was also comparable (15.5% vs. 12.4%; p = .465). However, continuous progesterone use throughout all trimesters was more frequently reported among ADHD cases (20.0% vs. 4.2%), suggesting a possible association that needs further investigation.
Conclusion: Unlike findings from animal models, progesterone use during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with ADHD development. Still, prolonged exposure may warrant further investigation.
目的:以往的动物研究表明,黄体酮暴露与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的发展之间存在联系。本研究临床评估妊娠期间使用黄体酮对儿童ADHD风险的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性病例对照研究中,纳入了97名诊断为ADHD的儿童和194名年龄和性别匹配的对照组。评估孕妇在妊娠期间通过栓剂或注射剂使用孕酮的情况。数据采用SPSS进行分析。结果:ADHD组的平均年龄略高,但不显著。男性在ADHD病例中占优势,尽管没有统计学意义。虽然新生儿住院率相似,但ADHD组的持续时间更长(p = 0.009)。剖宫产和较低的母亲教育水平在ADHD组中更为常见(p =。004和p =。013年,分别)。ADHD组与对照组在总体孕酮使用方面无显著差异(17.5% vs. 19.1%; p = .749)。注射黄体酮的ADHD病例占5.2%,对照组占10.8% (p =。130),妊娠三个月的使用时间没有显著差异(p = .493)。阴道栓剂的使用也具有可比性(15.5%比12.4%;p = .465)。然而,在所有妊娠期持续使用黄体酮的ADHD病例中更为常见(20.0%对4.2%),这表明两者之间可能存在关联,需要进一步调查。结论:与动物模型的发现不同,怀孕期间使用黄体酮似乎与多动症的发展无关。尽管如此,长期接触可能需要进一步调查。
{"title":"The Association Between Maternal Progesterone Use During Pregnancy and Offspring Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Risk.","authors":"Elham Bidabadi, Seyedeh Hajar Sharami, Seyyedeh Azade Hoseini Nouri, Masoumeh Parandavar, Afagh Hassanzadeh Rad","doi":"10.1177/10870547251381867","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251381867","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous animal studies have suggested a link between progesterone exposure and the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study clinically evaluated the effect of progesterone use during pregnancy on the risk of ADHD in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective case-control study, 97 children diagnosed with ADHD and 194 age- and sex-matched controls were included. Maternal progesterone use-via suppositories or injections-during pregnancy was assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was slightly higher in the ADHD group, but not significantly. Male predominance was observed among ADHD cases, although not statistically significant. While neonatal hospitalization rates were similar, the duration was longer in the ADHD group (<i>p</i> = .009). Cesarean delivery and lower maternal education levels were significantly more common in the ADHD group (<i>p</i> = .004 and <i>p</i> = .013, respectively). No significant difference in overall progesterone use was found between ADHD and control groups (17.5% vs. 19.1%; <i>p</i> = .749). Injectable progesterone was used in 5.2% of ADHD cases and 10.8% of controls (<i>p</i> = .130), and the timing of use across pregnancy trimesters did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = .493). Vaginal suppository use was also comparable (15.5% vs. 12.4%; <i>p</i> = .465). However, continuous progesterone use throughout all trimesters was more frequently reported among ADHD cases (20.0% vs. 4.2%), suggesting a possible association that needs further investigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unlike findings from animal models, progesterone use during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with ADHD development. Still, prolonged exposure may warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"292-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145251249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1177/10870547251384462
Kevin M Antshel, Haley McBride, Laura E Knouse
Objective: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious treatment for adult ADHD, yet access and availability concerns limit scalability. Mobile health apps are promising tools for delivering scalable CBT. The current study reports findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a CBT-informed health app for adults with ADHD.
Methods: A sample of assessed adults with ADHD (N = 154; ages 18-55 years) were recruited to participate and randomized to either 8 weeks of use of the CBT-informed app or a waitlist control condition. Participants in both groups completed measures of ADHD symptoms and functioning at baseline, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks.
Results: Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements revealed significant group x time interactions for inattentive symptoms (η2 = .15), hyperactive-impulsive symptoms (η2 = .05), and ADHD associated quality of life (η2 = .04) in favor of the CBT-informed app relative to participants who knew they were not receiving help; however, these results did not extend to a measure of functional impairment. Changes in organizational, time management, and planning behaviors and ADHD-related cognitions partially mediated the association between group and inattentive symptom changes. ADHD inattentive symptom reductions were positively associated with the total number of app exercises completed.
Conclusions: The confidence in our results is limited by our use of a waitlist control design. However, participants who used the CBT-informed app perceived improvements in inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms and quality of life relative to participants who knew they were not receiving help.
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Digital CBT for Adults Managing ADHD Challenges.","authors":"Kevin M Antshel, Haley McBride, Laura E Knouse","doi":"10.1177/10870547251384462","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251384462","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious treatment for adult ADHD, yet access and availability concerns limit scalability. Mobile health apps are promising tools for delivering scalable CBT. The current study reports findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a CBT-informed health app for adults with ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of assessed adults with ADHD (<i>N</i> = 154; ages 18-55 years) were recruited to participate and randomized to either 8 weeks of use of the CBT-informed app or a waitlist control condition. Participants in both groups completed measures of ADHD symptoms and functioning at baseline, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements revealed significant group x time interactions for inattentive symptoms (η<sup>2</sup> = .15), hyperactive-impulsive symptoms (η<sup>2</sup> = .05), and ADHD associated quality of life (η<sup>2</sup> = .04) in favor of the CBT-informed app relative to participants who knew they were not receiving help; however, these results did not extend to a measure of functional impairment. Changes in organizational, time management, and planning behaviors and ADHD-related cognitions partially mediated the association between group and inattentive symptom changes. ADHD inattentive symptom reductions were positively associated with the total number of app exercises completed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The confidence in our results is limited by our use of a waitlist control design. However, participants who used the CBT-informed app perceived improvements in inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms and quality of life relative to participants who knew they were not receiving help.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"370-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145495611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-29DOI: 10.1177/10870547251393062
Clara Teuchert, Julia Kerner Auch Koerner, Monika Daseking, Henning Heinze
Object: Temperament provides a valuable framework for understanding ADHD across the lifespan, as extreme temperamental traits are considered etiological risk factors. The dual-pathway model links specific temperamental traits to ADHD symptom domains: elevated reactive traits, surgency and negative affect, to hyperactivity/impulsivity, and a low regulatory trait, effortful control, to inattention.
Method: One hundred fifty-eight adults (79 with clinical diagnoses of ADHD and 79 controls) filled in the Adult Temperament Questionnaire. Consistent with a compensatory extension of the dual-pathway model, it was hypothesized that effortful control would moderate the effects of reactive traits (surgency/negative affect) on hyperactive/impulsive symptoms and influence both ADHD symptom domains. For exploratory purposes, orienting sensitivity, an adult temperament factor related to perceptual sensitivity, was included in the analyses.
Results: Binary logistic regression identified lower effortful control as the strongest predictor of an ADHD diagnosis. Negative affect had a significant but small effect, while surgency and orienting sensitivity were non-significant. Two hierarchical regressions were performed for self-rated symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention. Consistent with a compensatory model, effortful control was significantly related to symptom expression in both ADHD symptom domains. Contrary to expectations, surgency did not explain variance in hyperactivity/impulsivity, and the effect of negative affect was strongly reduced, after effortful control was added to the model. Effortful control did not moderate the effects of surgency and negative affect.
Conclusion: These findings challenge the dual-pathway model and highlight self-regulation deficits over reactive traits in sustaining ADHD in adulthood. They underscore the value of temperament-based approaches for refining diagnosis and developing targeted interventions for adult ADHD.
{"title":"How Does Adult Temperament Relate to ADHD Symptom Domains? Testing the Dual-Pathway Model.","authors":"Clara Teuchert, Julia Kerner Auch Koerner, Monika Daseking, Henning Heinze","doi":"10.1177/10870547251393062","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251393062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Object: </strong>Temperament provides a valuable framework for understanding ADHD across the lifespan, as extreme temperamental traits are considered etiological risk factors. The dual-pathway model links specific temperamental traits to ADHD symptom domains: elevated reactive traits, surgency and negative affect, to hyperactivity/impulsivity, and a low regulatory trait, effortful control, to inattention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred fifty-eight adults (79 with clinical diagnoses of ADHD and 79 controls) filled in the Adult Temperament Questionnaire. Consistent with a compensatory extension of the dual-pathway model, it was hypothesized that effortful control would moderate the effects of reactive traits (surgency/negative affect) on hyperactive/impulsive symptoms and influence both ADHD symptom domains. For exploratory purposes, orienting sensitivity, an adult temperament factor related to perceptual sensitivity, was included in the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Binary logistic regression identified lower effortful control as the strongest predictor of an ADHD diagnosis. Negative affect had a significant but small effect, while surgency and orienting sensitivity were non-significant. Two hierarchical regressions were performed for self-rated symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention. Consistent with a compensatory model, effortful control was significantly related to symptom expression in both ADHD symptom domains. Contrary to expectations, surgency did not explain variance in hyperactivity/impulsivity, and the effect of negative affect was strongly reduced, after effortful control was added to the model. Effortful control did not moderate the effects of surgency and negative affect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings challenge the dual-pathway model and highlight self-regulation deficits over reactive traits in sustaining ADHD in adulthood. They underscore the value of temperament-based approaches for refining diagnosis and developing targeted interventions for adult ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"386-406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12864529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145634082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-27DOI: 10.1177/10870547251379103
Mirte van der Ham, Denise Bijlenga, Nina Molenaar, Daniëlle E J Starreveld, Mylène N Böhmer, Ravian Wettstein, Glenn Dumont, Aartjan T F Beekman, Sandra Kooij
Background: Sleep problems are highly prevalent in adults with ADHD. Sleep problems and ADHD symptoms can cause, amplify, and maintain each other. We studied the effects of additive treatment for sleep problems on self-reported symptoms of ADHD as primary outcome, with subscales of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity, objective, performance-based ADHD symptoms, sleep quality, fatigue, and depressive symptoms as secondary outcomes.
Methods: Preliminary open-label randomized controlled trial of adult patients diagnosed with ADHD and a positive screening for at least one sleep disorder. Participants were recruited between March, 2020 and May, 2023, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Seventy patients (60% female, mean age 27.9 years [SD = 8.2]) were randomized to a 12-week period of: (1) ADHD treatment as usual (TAU, n = 25), (2) ADHD TAU + sleep treatment (n = 22), or (3) stand-alone sleep treatment (n = 33). Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, and after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. A total of 20% of participants did not complete the post-treatment assessment. Primary analyses compared changes between groups 1 and 2. Exploratory within-group analyses were conducted to assess improvements in the stand-alone sleep treatment group. All performed analyses were pre-specified.
Results: Primary analysis showed no significant difference in the reduction of subjective ADHD symptoms between the ADHD TAU + sleep treatment group and the ADHD TAU group (β = -1.30, 95% CI [-5.57, 2.96], d = 0.21). The ADHD TAU + sleep treatment group did show significantly larger improvements in subjective sleep quality (β = -1.98, 95% CI [-3.65, -0.30], d = 0.42) and fatigue (β = -6.52, 95% CI [-12.33, -0.70], d = 1.59) compared to the ADHD TAU group. Pre-specified, exploratory within-group analysis showed a significant reduction in subjective ADHD symptoms in the stand-alone sleep treatment group (β = -4.80, 95% CI [-7.60, -2.01], d = 0.62).
Conclusion: Adding sleep treatment to standard ADHD treatment did not lead to significantly greater reductions in subjective or objective, performance based ADHD symptoms. However, combined treatment showed the largest improvements in sleep quality and fatigue, suggesting that such an approach may offer additional benefits. Subjective ADHD symptoms improved in the stand-alone sleep treatment group, but to a lesser extent than the other groups. Future studies with greater statistical power are needed, with long-term effects and quality of life as important outcomes.
背景:睡眠问题在患有多动症的成年人中非常普遍。睡眠问题和注意力缺陷多动障碍症状可以相互引起、放大和维持。我们研究了睡眠问题的附加治疗对自我报告的ADHD症状的影响,并将注意力不集中和多动-冲动性、客观的、基于表现的ADHD症状、睡眠质量、疲劳和抑郁症状作为次要结果。方法:初步开放标签随机对照试验,诊断为ADHD的成人患者,至少有一种睡眠障碍筛查阳性。参与者是在2020年3月至2023年5月COVID-19大流行期间招募的。70例患者(60%为女性,平均年龄27.9岁[SD = 8.2])随机分为12周的治疗组:(1)ADHD照常治疗(TAU, n = 25), (2) ADHD TAU +睡眠治疗(n = 22),或(3)单独睡眠治疗(n = 33)。在基线、治疗6周和12周后评估结果。总共有20%的参与者没有完成治疗后评估。初步分析比较了1组和2组之间的变化。进行探索性组内分析以评估独立睡眠治疗组的改善情况。所有的分析都是预先指定的。结果:初步分析显示ADHD TAU +睡眠治疗组与ADHD TAU组在主观ADHD症状减轻方面无显著差异(β = -1.30, 95% CI [-5.57, 2.96], d = 0.21)。与ADHD TAU组相比,ADHD TAU +睡眠治疗组在主观睡眠质量(β = -1.98, 95% CI [-3.65, -0.30], d = 0.42)和疲劳(β = -6.52, 95% CI [-12.33, -0.70], d = 1.59)方面确实表现出明显更大的改善。预先指定的探索性组内分析显示,独立睡眠治疗组主观ADHD症状显著减少(β = -4.80, 95% CI [-7.60, -2.01], d = 0.62)。结论:在标准ADHD治疗的基础上增加睡眠治疗并不能显著减少主观或客观的、基于表现的ADHD症状。然而,联合治疗在睡眠质量和疲劳方面显示出最大的改善,这表明这种方法可能会带来额外的好处。单独睡眠治疗组的主观ADHD症状有所改善,但改善程度低于其他组。未来的研究需要更大的统计能力,长期效果和生活质量是重要的结果。
{"title":"The Effects of Sleep Treatment on Symptoms of ADHD, Sleep Quality, Fatigue, and Depressive Symptoms in Adults.","authors":"Mirte van der Ham, Denise Bijlenga, Nina Molenaar, Daniëlle E J Starreveld, Mylène N Böhmer, Ravian Wettstein, Glenn Dumont, Aartjan T F Beekman, Sandra Kooij","doi":"10.1177/10870547251379103","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251379103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep problems are highly prevalent in adults with ADHD. Sleep problems and ADHD symptoms can cause, amplify, and maintain each other. We studied the effects of additive treatment for sleep problems on self-reported symptoms of ADHD as primary outcome, with subscales of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity, objective, performance-based ADHD symptoms, sleep quality, fatigue, and depressive symptoms as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preliminary open-label randomized controlled trial of adult patients diagnosed with ADHD and a positive screening for at least one sleep disorder. Participants were recruited between March, 2020 and May, 2023, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Seventy patients (60% female, mean age 27.9 years [<i>SD</i> = 8.2]) were randomized to a 12-week period of: (1) ADHD treatment as usual (TAU, <i>n</i> = 25), (2) ADHD TAU + sleep treatment (<i>n</i> = 22), or (3) stand-alone sleep treatment (<i>n</i> = 33). Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, and after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. A total of 20% of participants did not complete the post-treatment assessment. Primary analyses compared changes between groups 1 and 2. Exploratory within-group analyses were conducted to assess improvements in the stand-alone sleep treatment group. All performed analyses were pre-specified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary analysis showed no significant difference in the reduction of subjective ADHD symptoms between the ADHD TAU + sleep treatment group and the ADHD TAU group (β = -1.30, 95% CI [-5.57, 2.96], <i>d</i> = 0.21). The ADHD TAU + sleep treatment group did show significantly larger improvements in subjective sleep quality (β = -1.98, 95% CI [-3.65, -0.30], <i>d</i> = 0.42) and fatigue (β = -6.52, 95% CI [-12.33, -0.70], <i>d</i> = 1.59) compared to the ADHD TAU group. Pre-specified, exploratory within-group analysis showed a significant reduction in subjective ADHD symptoms in the stand-alone sleep treatment group (β = -4.80, 95% CI [-7.60, -2.01], <i>d</i> = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding sleep treatment to standard ADHD treatment did not lead to significantly greater reductions in subjective or objective, performance based ADHD symptoms. However, combined treatment showed the largest improvements in sleep quality and fatigue, suggesting that such an approach may offer additional benefits. Subjective ADHD symptoms improved in the stand-alone sleep treatment group, but to a lesser extent than the other groups. Future studies with greater statistical power are needed, with long-term effects and quality of life as important outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"354-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145372776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1177/10870547251397034
Shaquib Al Hasan, Meena Murugappan, Sarah Westberg, Stephen A Contag, Tanya Melnik, Abhijeet Rajpurohit, Joel F Farley
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although studies examining utero exposure to prescription stimulants have suggested an association with maternal and fetal adverse events, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, clinicians may not have clear guidance about stimulant use during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate maternal and fetal risks of prescription stimulant exposure among women of reproductive age throughout the continuum of pregnancy in a large, commercially insured United States population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a large administrative claims database from 2013 to 2021 to compare stimulant exposed pregnancies to a matched cohort of non-exposed pregnancies. Stimulant exposed pregnancies included early stimulant use, defined as one or more stimulant prescription fills at any point during the first trimester and continued exposure, defined as continuation into the second or third trimesters. Relative risk regression models were used to compare the risk of each outcome between exposure and duration of exposure cohorts matched on clinical conditions and medication used by 1:1 greedy neighbor propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a sample of 10,265 matched patients, early stimulant exposure (first trimester only) was associated with a higher likelihood of live birth (RR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.06, 1.10]) and lower risks of spontaneous abortion (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.64, 0.76]) and preterm birth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.62, 0.90]) compared with no stimulant exposure. Stillbirth and ectopic pregnancy did not differ. When exposure continued into the second or third trimesters, risks increased for placental abruption (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.03, 2.57]), pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.19, 1.69]), gestational hypertension (RR = 1.37, 95% CI [1.16, 1.61]), and preterm birth (RR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.12, 1.62]) compared with non-exposed pregnancies. Stillbirth was not significantly different in this comparison (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [0.76, 2.67]). Direct comparison of continued versus early exposure highlighted more pronounced risks with continuation: higher stillbirth (RR = 3.54, 95% CI [1.48, 8.44]), spontaneous abortion (RR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.38, 1.68]), preterm birth (RR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.51, 2.28]), placental abruption (RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.11, 2.84]), and pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.12, 1.59]). Small-for-gestational-age infants were also more frequent in the continuation group (RR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.12, 1.92]). Analyses stratified by stimulant class (amphetamine vs methylphenidate containing) were directionally consistent with the overall findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although early stimulant exposure was not associated with increases in maternal or fetal risk, our study suggests that continuation of stimulants into trimesters 2 and/or 3 may increase some pregnancy complications including stillbirth, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and placental abruption. Cl
{"title":"Prescription Stimulant Continuation in Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes.","authors":"Shaquib Al Hasan, Meena Murugappan, Sarah Westberg, Stephen A Contag, Tanya Melnik, Abhijeet Rajpurohit, Joel F Farley","doi":"10.1177/10870547251397034","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251397034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although studies examining utero exposure to prescription stimulants have suggested an association with maternal and fetal adverse events, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, clinicians may not have clear guidance about stimulant use during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate maternal and fetal risks of prescription stimulant exposure among women of reproductive age throughout the continuum of pregnancy in a large, commercially insured United States population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a large administrative claims database from 2013 to 2021 to compare stimulant exposed pregnancies to a matched cohort of non-exposed pregnancies. Stimulant exposed pregnancies included early stimulant use, defined as one or more stimulant prescription fills at any point during the first trimester and continued exposure, defined as continuation into the second or third trimesters. Relative risk regression models were used to compare the risk of each outcome between exposure and duration of exposure cohorts matched on clinical conditions and medication used by 1:1 greedy neighbor propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a sample of 10,265 matched patients, early stimulant exposure (first trimester only) was associated with a higher likelihood of live birth (RR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.06, 1.10]) and lower risks of spontaneous abortion (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.64, 0.76]) and preterm birth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.62, 0.90]) compared with no stimulant exposure. Stillbirth and ectopic pregnancy did not differ. When exposure continued into the second or third trimesters, risks increased for placental abruption (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.03, 2.57]), pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.19, 1.69]), gestational hypertension (RR = 1.37, 95% CI [1.16, 1.61]), and preterm birth (RR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.12, 1.62]) compared with non-exposed pregnancies. Stillbirth was not significantly different in this comparison (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [0.76, 2.67]). Direct comparison of continued versus early exposure highlighted more pronounced risks with continuation: higher stillbirth (RR = 3.54, 95% CI [1.48, 8.44]), spontaneous abortion (RR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.38, 1.68]), preterm birth (RR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.51, 2.28]), placental abruption (RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.11, 2.84]), and pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.12, 1.59]). Small-for-gestational-age infants were also more frequent in the continuation group (RR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.12, 1.92]). Analyses stratified by stimulant class (amphetamine vs methylphenidate containing) were directionally consistent with the overall findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although early stimulant exposure was not associated with increases in maternal or fetal risk, our study suggests that continuation of stimulants into trimesters 2 and/or 3 may increase some pregnancy complications including stillbirth, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and placental abruption. Cl","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"315-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1177/10870547251407731
Armagan Aral, Gizem Gerdan, Yılmaz Orhun Gürlük
ADHD is complex neurodevelopmental disorder that causes considerable individual and social difficulties, creating significant parental stress. This study aimed to examine the indirect associations between parental stress and child irritability through two sequential parenting mechanisms: experiential avoidance and negative parent-child relationship, within a sample of school-aged children with ADHD (ages 6-12). Using a two-wave longitudinal serial path analysis based on parent-reported data collected at two time points 1-month apart (Time 1 and Time 2), the study investigated whether early parental stress predicted subsequent child irritability via its influence on experiential avoidance and the quality of the parent-child relationship. Findings supported the hypothesized model. More precisely, higher parental stress was associated with greater experiential avoidance, which in turn predicted more negative parent-child relationship, ultimately resulting in elevated child irritability. Longitudinal serial mediation effects confirmed that all Time 1 variables significantly predicted corresponding Time 2 outcomes across the proposed sequential pathway. Notably, the model explained 41.1% of the variance in child irritability at Time 2, underscoring how stress-related disruptions in experiential avoidance and parent-child relationship can affect child irritability even over a short period of time. Taken together, these findings provide empirical support for a stress-driven sequence of parental mechanisms through which parental stress may contribute to child irritability in ADHD. In this context, interventions targeting parental experiential avoidance and improving the quality of parent-child relationship may help mitigate the early development of irritability in children with ADHD. Clinical implications are discussed.
{"title":"Parental Stress and Child Irritability in ADHD: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Serial Mediation Model via Experiential Avoidance and Negative Parent-Child Relationship.","authors":"Armagan Aral, Gizem Gerdan, Yılmaz Orhun Gürlük","doi":"10.1177/10870547251407731","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251407731","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ADHD is complex neurodevelopmental disorder that causes considerable individual and social difficulties, creating significant parental stress. This study aimed to examine the indirect associations between parental stress and child irritability through two sequential parenting mechanisms: experiential avoidance and negative parent-child relationship, within a sample of school-aged children with ADHD (ages 6-12). Using a two-wave longitudinal serial path analysis based on parent-reported data collected at two time points 1-month apart (Time 1 and Time 2), the study investigated whether early parental stress predicted subsequent child irritability via its influence on experiential avoidance and the quality of the parent-child relationship. Findings supported the hypothesized model. More precisely, higher parental stress was associated with greater experiential avoidance, which in turn predicted more negative parent-child relationship, ultimately resulting in elevated child irritability. Longitudinal serial mediation effects confirmed that all Time 1 variables significantly predicted corresponding Time 2 outcomes across the proposed sequential pathway. Notably, the model explained 41.1% of the variance in child irritability at Time 2, underscoring how stress-related disruptions in experiential avoidance and parent-child relationship can affect child irritability even over a short period of time. Taken together, these findings provide empirical support for a stress-driven sequence of parental mechanisms through which parental stress may contribute to child irritability in ADHD. In this context, interventions targeting parental experiential avoidance and improving the quality of parent-child relationship may help mitigate the early development of irritability in children with ADHD. Clinical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"342-353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}