首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Attention Disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Changes in ADHD Symptoms and Mood Across the Menstrual Cycle in Females Treated With Stimulants: A Pilot Study. 服用兴奋剂的女性在月经周期中ADHD症状和情绪的变化:一项初步研究
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251400038
Rebecca Zaritsky, Stephanie C Reed, Suzette M Evans

Objective: Females represent a growing proportion of adults with ADHD yet remain understudied in the literature compared to males. An important aspect of the experience of females with ADHD is the impact of the menstrual cycle and ovarian hormones on both the symptoms of ADHD and effects of stimulant medications on treating these symptoms.

Method: In the present pilot study, female participants being treated with amphetamine salts for ADHD (n = 30) were recruited to complete 35 daily online surveys to track ADHD symptoms, mood, and medication use through the menstrual cycle.

Results: Results indicated that the degree of ADHD symptoms was significantly associated with menstrual cycle phase with ADHD symptoms being most severe in the menstruation phase and comparatively milder ADHD symptoms in the mid-follicular phase. This difference was positively correlated with subjective changes in negative mood.

Conclusion: These results indicate that ADHD symptoms vary across the menstrual cycle among females being treated with amphetamine salts for their ADHD, a finding that could inform clinical and prescribing practices for physicians caring for females with ADHD.

目的:与男性相比,女性在成人ADHD患者中所占的比例越来越大,但在文献中仍未得到充分研究。女性ADHD患者经历的一个重要方面是月经周期和卵巢激素对ADHD症状的影响以及兴奋剂药物对治疗这些症状的影响。方法:在目前的初步研究中,接受安非他明盐治疗ADHD的女性参与者(n = 30)被招募完成35项每日在线调查,以跟踪ADHD症状、情绪和月经周期的药物使用情况。结果:ADHD症状程度与月经周期阶段有显著相关性,月经期ADHD症状最严重,卵泡中期ADHD症状相对较轻。这种差异与消极情绪的主观变化呈正相关。结论:这些结果表明,在接受安非他明盐治疗ADHD的女性中,ADHD症状在月经周期中有所不同,这一发现可以为照顾ADHD女性的医生提供临床和处方实践信息。
{"title":"Changes in ADHD Symptoms and Mood Across the Menstrual Cycle in Females Treated With Stimulants: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Rebecca Zaritsky, Stephanie C Reed, Suzette M Evans","doi":"10.1177/10870547251400038","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251400038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Females represent a growing proportion of adults with ADHD yet remain understudied in the literature compared to males. An important aspect of the experience of females with ADHD is the impact of the menstrual cycle and ovarian hormones on both the symptoms of ADHD and effects of stimulant medications on treating these symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the present pilot study, female participants being treated with amphetamine salts for ADHD (<i>n</i> = 30) were recruited to complete 35 daily online surveys to track ADHD symptoms, mood, and medication use through the menstrual cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that the degree of ADHD symptoms was significantly associated with menstrual cycle phase with ADHD symptoms being most severe in the menstruation phase and comparatively milder ADHD symptoms in the mid-follicular phase. This difference was positively correlated with subjective changes in negative mood.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that ADHD symptoms vary across the menstrual cycle among females being treated with amphetamine salts for their ADHD, a finding that could inform clinical and prescribing practices for physicians caring for females with ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"329-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145833801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maternal Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review. 母亲注意缺陷多动障碍与围产期抑郁症:系统综述。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-18 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251383430
Natalie Pierotti, Kaushadh Jayakody

Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is well-established as a disorder that persists into adulthood and is commonly comorbid with other mental health conditions. Despite increasing numbers of women entering reproductive years with this diagnosis, there is limited research on it in the perinatal period.

Objective: To critically appraise the available literature and examine the association between maternal ADHD and depression in the perinatal period.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Google Scholar up to August 2024. The available literature was evaluated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). The quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, and a narrative synthesis was completed.

Results: Ten studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The majority were of medium quality, with issues identified in sample size, study design and validity of the self-report scale used. Our review found a prevalence of 16.76% to 57.6% of perinatal depression in women with ADHD. An increased risk of developing perinatal depression was also identified in women with ADHD (OR 1.8-2.63) compared to those without the disorder. Finally, our review also found a positive association between ADHD symptoms and depressive symptoms in perinatal women.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a much greater vulnerability to perinatal depression among women with ADHD, and an association between ADHD symptoms and depressive symptoms in the perinatal period. There is, however, a clear need for more high-quality studies to replicate and further explore these findings.

背景:注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)被认为是一种持续到成年的障碍,通常与其他精神健康状况共病。尽管越来越多的妇女在进入生育年龄时诊断出这种疾病,但在围产期对其进行的研究有限。目的:对现有文献进行批判性评价,探讨围产期母亲ADHD与抑郁之间的关系。方法:通过检索EMBASE、PsycINFO、MEDLINE和谷歌Scholar,对截至2024年8月的文献进行系统综述。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目(PRISMA)对现有文献进行评估。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所框架进行质量评估,并完成叙述综合。结果:10项研究符合纳入标准。大多数是中等质量的,在样本量、研究设计和使用的自我报告量表的有效性方面存在问题。我们的综述发现,ADHD女性围产期抑郁症患病率为16.76%至57.6%。与没有ADHD的女性相比,患有ADHD的女性患围产期抑郁症的风险也增加了(OR为1.8-2.63)。最后,我们的综述还发现围产期妇女ADHD症状和抑郁症状之间存在正相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,患有ADHD的妇女更容易患围产期抑郁症,并且ADHD症状与围产期抑郁症状之间存在关联。然而,显然需要更多高质量的研究来重复和进一步探索这些发现。
{"title":"Maternal Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Natalie Pierotti, Kaushadh Jayakody","doi":"10.1177/10870547251383430","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251383430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is well-established as a disorder that persists into adulthood and is commonly comorbid with other mental health conditions. Despite increasing numbers of women entering reproductive years with this diagnosis, there is limited research on it in the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically appraise the available literature and examine the association between maternal ADHD and depression in the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Google Scholar up to August 2024. The available literature was evaluated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). The quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, and a narrative synthesis was completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The majority were of medium quality, with issues identified in sample size, study design and validity of the self-report scale used. Our review found a prevalence of 16.76% to 57.6% of perinatal depression in women with ADHD. An increased risk of developing perinatal depression was also identified in women with ADHD (OR 1.8-2.63) compared to those without the disorder. Finally, our review also found a positive association between ADHD symptoms and depressive symptoms in perinatal women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a much greater vulnerability to perinatal depression among women with ADHD, and an association between ADHD symptoms and depressive symptoms in the perinatal period. There is, however, a clear need for more high-quality studies to replicate and further explore these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"300-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145313027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cannabis Use in a Community-Based Sample of Adults Diagnosed With ADHD: Prevalence, Impact on Symptoms, and Stimulant Side Effects. 以社区为基础的诊断为ADHD的成人样本中的大麻使用:患病率、对症状的影响和兴奋剂副作用。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251364575
Jennie E Ryan, Allison Herens, Mitchell Fruchtman, Philip Veliz, Erin L Kelly, Brooke Worster
<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Assess prevalence and correlates of cannabis use in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and explore its impact on comorbidities, symptoms, and side effects of prescription stimulants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey (April to July 2023) was emailed to 9,274 potential adult participants with a documented ADHD diagnosis, based on ICD-10 codes in the electronic medical record, which was secondarily verified by self-report. A total of 900 participants completed the survey. The 46-item survey covered demographics, medical history, prescription stimulant use, cannabis use, and its impact on ADHD symptoms and prescribed stimulant side effects, prescription stimulant misuse, cannabis use disorder, and health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this large sample of adults diagnosed with ADHD, 75% reported ever using cannabis, with 41% reporting prior 30-day use. Groups of cannabis users were categorized into three groups; (1) no recent use (including never; <i>N</i> = 458); (2) non-daily use (<30 days in past month; <i>N</i> = 256); and (3) daily use (≥30 days in past month; <i>N</i> = 112). Compared to non-daily cannabis users, daily cannabis users showed comparable rates of prescription stimulant misuse (29% vs. 37%, OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.87, 2.23], <i>p</i> = .166), and substance use disorder diagnoses (2% vs. 4%, OR = 1.54, 95% CI [0.43, 5.58], <i>p</i> = .508), but higher rates of cannabis use disorder (38% vs. 62%, OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.69, 4.22], <i>p</i> < .001). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report fair or poor general health compared to non-daily cannabis users (24% vs. 11%, OR = 2.58, 95% CI [1.44, 4.64], <i>p</i> = .001). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report a comorbid diagnosis of anxiety (70% vs. 48%, OR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.59, 4.10], <i>p</i> < .001), depression (54% vs. 35%, OR = 2.24, 95% CI [1.42, 3.53], <i>p</i> < .001), bipolar disorder (15% vs. 5%, OR = 3.345, 95% CI [1.56, 7.15], <i>p</i> = .002), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (30% vs. 14%, OR = 2.752, 95% CI [1.61, 4.71], <i>p</i> < .001), compared to non-daily cannabis users. Among participants who ever used cannabis, 278 (42%) reported they had used cannabis to manage their ADHD symptoms. Compared to non-daily cannabis users, daily cannabis users were significantly more likely to report that cannabis use improved ADHD symptoms of mental frustration (OR = 2.39, 95% CI [1.36, 4.19], <i>p</i> = .002) and impulsivity (OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.07, 2.69], <i>p</i> = .026). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report that cannabis use worsened ADHD symptoms of inattention (OR = .59, 95% CI [0.36, 0.98], <i>p</i> = .043) compared to non-daily cannabis users. Participants reported mixed effects of cannabis use on anxiety: 156 noted improvements, while 34 reported worsening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample of adults diagnosed with ADHD, cannabis
目的:评估成人注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)患者使用大麻的患病率及其相关因素,并探讨其对处方兴奋剂合并症、症状和副作用的影响。方法:一项匿名在线调查(2023年4月至7月)通过电子邮件发送给9274名有ADHD诊断记录的潜在成年参与者,该调查基于电子病历中的ICD-10代码,并通过自我报告进行二次验证。共有900名参与者完成了这项调查。这项46项调查包括人口统计、病史、处方兴奋剂使用、大麻使用及其对多动症症状和处方兴奋剂副作用的影响、处方兴奋剂滥用、大麻使用障碍和与健康有关的生活质量。结果:在这个被诊断为多动症的成年人的大样本中,75%的人报告曾经使用过大麻,41%的人报告曾经使用过30天。大麻使用者群体分为三组;(1)近期未使用(包括从未使用;N = 458);(2)非日常使用(N = 256);(3)每日使用情况(最近一个月≥30天,N = 112)。与非每日吸食大麻者相比,每日吸食大麻者的处方兴奋剂滥用率相当(29% vs. 37%, OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.87, 2.23], p =。166)和物质使用障碍诊断(2%对4%,OR = 1.54, 95% CI [0.43, 5.58], p =。508),但大麻使用障碍率较高(38%对62%,OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.69, 4.22], p p = .001)。每日吸食大麻者更有可能报告焦虑共病诊断(70% vs. 48%, OR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.59, 4.10], p p p =。002)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD) (30% vs. 14%, OR = 2.752, 95% CI [1.61, 4.71], p p =。002)和冲动(OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.07, 2.69], p = .026)。每天吸食大麻的人更有可能报告说,大麻的使用加重了注意力不集中的多动症症状(OR =。59, 95% CI [0.36, 0.98], p =。043)与非每日吸食大麻的人相比。参与者报告了使用大麻对焦虑的不同影响:156人表示有所改善,34人表示恶化。结论:在被诊断患有ADHD的成年人样本中,大麻使用很普遍,与非每日使用者相比,每日使用者显示出更高的大麻使用障碍和共病精神诊断率,突出了临床医生筛查大麻使用障碍和精神共病的必要性。大麻使用者报告了大麻对多动症症状和焦虑的混合影响。需要进一步的研究来了解大麻使用、多动症症状和精神健康之间的复杂关系。
{"title":"Cannabis Use in a Community-Based Sample of Adults Diagnosed With ADHD: Prevalence, Impact on Symptoms, and Stimulant Side Effects.","authors":"Jennie E Ryan, Allison Herens, Mitchell Fruchtman, Philip Veliz, Erin L Kelly, Brooke Worster","doi":"10.1177/10870547251364575","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251364575","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aim: &lt;/strong&gt;Assess prevalence and correlates of cannabis use in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and explore its impact on comorbidities, symptoms, and side effects of prescription stimulants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;An anonymous online survey (April to July 2023) was emailed to 9,274 potential adult participants with a documented ADHD diagnosis, based on ICD-10 codes in the electronic medical record, which was secondarily verified by self-report. A total of 900 participants completed the survey. The 46-item survey covered demographics, medical history, prescription stimulant use, cannabis use, and its impact on ADHD symptoms and prescribed stimulant side effects, prescription stimulant misuse, cannabis use disorder, and health-related quality of life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In this large sample of adults diagnosed with ADHD, 75% reported ever using cannabis, with 41% reporting prior 30-day use. Groups of cannabis users were categorized into three groups; (1) no recent use (including never; &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 458); (2) non-daily use (&lt;30 days in past month; &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 256); and (3) daily use (≥30 days in past month; &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 112). Compared to non-daily cannabis users, daily cannabis users showed comparable rates of prescription stimulant misuse (29% vs. 37%, OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.87, 2.23], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .166), and substance use disorder diagnoses (2% vs. 4%, OR = 1.54, 95% CI [0.43, 5.58], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .508), but higher rates of cannabis use disorder (38% vs. 62%, OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.69, 4.22], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; .001). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report fair or poor general health compared to non-daily cannabis users (24% vs. 11%, OR = 2.58, 95% CI [1.44, 4.64], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .001). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report a comorbid diagnosis of anxiety (70% vs. 48%, OR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.59, 4.10], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; .001), depression (54% vs. 35%, OR = 2.24, 95% CI [1.42, 3.53], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; .001), bipolar disorder (15% vs. 5%, OR = 3.345, 95% CI [1.56, 7.15], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .002), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (30% vs. 14%, OR = 2.752, 95% CI [1.61, 4.71], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; .001), compared to non-daily cannabis users. Among participants who ever used cannabis, 278 (42%) reported they had used cannabis to manage their ADHD symptoms. Compared to non-daily cannabis users, daily cannabis users were significantly more likely to report that cannabis use improved ADHD symptoms of mental frustration (OR = 2.39, 95% CI [1.36, 4.19], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .002) and impulsivity (OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.07, 2.69], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .026). Daily cannabis users were more likely to report that cannabis use worsened ADHD symptoms of inattention (OR = .59, 95% CI [0.36, 0.98], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .043) compared to non-daily cannabis users. Participants reported mixed effects of cannabis use on anxiety: 156 noted improvements, while 34 reported worsening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;In this sample of adults diagnosed with ADHD, cannabis","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"407-422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144955599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maternal ADHD Diagnoses Before and After Childbirth: A Danish Population-Based Cohort Study. 分娩前后母亲ADHD诊断:一项基于丹麦人群的队列研究
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251372730
Kathrine Bang Madsen, Mette Winther, Amalie Thea Jensen, Katrine Marcussen, Trine Munk-Olsen, Rikke Wesselhoeft, Sarah Kittel-Schneider

Objective: The rates of women of reproductive age diagnosed with ADHD have increased significantly. However, little is known about how pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period influence ADHD related problems, help-seeking behaviors or the timing of ADHD diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate incident ADHD diagnoses among women from 5 years before to 5 years after childbirth.

Method: The population-based cohort study utilized Danish nationwide registers to identify mothers of all childbirths between 2010 and 2018. ADHD diagnoses, defined as ICD-10 codes (F90 or F98.8) or redemption of ADHD medication prescriptions, were recorded during 1994 to 2023. Women who received an ADHD diagnosis prior to the five-year pre-birth period were excluded. We estimated calendar-year adjusted incidence of first-time maternal ADHD diagnoses using Poisson regression, and compared incidence across pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, postpartum up to 2 years, and 2 to 5 years postpartum, reporting adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Analyses included psychiatric comorbidities and non-ADHD psychotropic medication use prior to an ADHD diagnosis, for women diagnosed with ADHD postpartum.

Results: The study included 363,904 mothers with a total of 524,936 childbirths. ADHD incidence rates decreased significantly during pregnancy (IRR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37]), remained lower than the pre-pregnancy period 2 years postpartum (IRR 0.82, 95% CI [0.74, 0.92]), and increased significantly above pre-pregnancy levels 2 to 5 years postpartum (IRR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.13, 1.35]). Among mothers diagnosed with ADHD postpartum, 53.9% had an in- or outpatient contact to psychiatric services or redeemed non-ADHD psychotropic medication prescriptions, in the period from childbirth until ADHD diagnosis.

Conclusion: Incident ADHD diagnoses among women giving birth increased postpartum above pre-pregnancy levels, with peak rates observed between 2 and 5 years after childbirth. These findings highlight the postpartum period as a potential critical window of ADHD symptom worsening, underscoring the need for targeted mental health screenings and support for women during the years after childbirth.

目的:育龄妇女诊断为ADHD的比例显著增加。然而,对于怀孕、分娩和产后如何影响ADHD相关问题、寻求帮助的行为或ADHD诊断的时机,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在调查分娩前5年至分娩后5年的女性ADHD诊断事件。方法:基于人群的队列研究利用丹麦全国登记册来确定2010年至2018年间所有分娩的母亲。ADHD诊断,定义为ICD-10代码(F90或F98.8)或ADHD药物处方的赎回,记录于1994年至2023年。在出生前5年被诊断为多动症的妇女被排除在外。我们使用泊松回归估计了历年调整后的首次母亲ADHD诊断的发病率,并比较了孕前、孕期、产后2年和产后2至5年的发病率,报告了调整后的发病率比(IRRs)。分析包括精神合并症和产后诊断为ADHD的妇女在ADHD诊断前使用非ADHD精神药物的情况。结果:该研究包括363,904名母亲,共524,936名分娩。妊娠期ADHD发病率显著降低(IRR = 0.28, 95% CI[0.22, 0.37]),产后2年仍低于孕前(IRR = 0.82, 95% CI[0.74, 0.92]),产后2 ~ 5年显著高于孕前水平(IRR = 1.24, 95% CI[1.13, 1.35])。在产后诊断为ADHD的母亲中,53.9%的人从分娩到诊断为ADHD期间,曾在门诊或住院期间接触过精神科服务或使用过非ADHD精神药物处方。结论:产后分娩的女性ADHD发病率高于孕前水平,在分娩后2至5年达到高峰。这些发现强调了产后时期是ADHD症状恶化的潜在关键窗口,强调了在分娩后的几年中对妇女进行有针对性的心理健康筛查和支持的必要性。
{"title":"Maternal ADHD Diagnoses Before and After Childbirth: A Danish Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Kathrine Bang Madsen, Mette Winther, Amalie Thea Jensen, Katrine Marcussen, Trine Munk-Olsen, Rikke Wesselhoeft, Sarah Kittel-Schneider","doi":"10.1177/10870547251372730","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251372730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The rates of women of reproductive age diagnosed with ADHD have increased significantly. However, little is known about how pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period influence ADHD related problems, help-seeking behaviors or the timing of ADHD diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate incident ADHD diagnoses among women from 5 years before to 5 years after childbirth.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The population-based cohort study utilized Danish nationwide registers to identify mothers of all childbirths between 2010 and 2018. ADHD diagnoses, defined as ICD-10 codes (F90 or F98.8) or redemption of ADHD medication prescriptions, were recorded during 1994 to 2023. Women who received an ADHD diagnosis prior to the five-year pre-birth period were excluded. We estimated calendar-year adjusted incidence of first-time maternal ADHD diagnoses using Poisson regression, and compared incidence across pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, postpartum up to 2 years, and 2 to 5 years postpartum, reporting adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Analyses included psychiatric comorbidities and non-ADHD psychotropic medication use prior to an ADHD diagnosis, for women diagnosed with ADHD postpartum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 363,904 mothers with a total of 524,936 childbirths. ADHD incidence rates decreased significantly during pregnancy (IRR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37]), remained lower than the pre-pregnancy period 2 years postpartum (IRR 0.82, 95% CI [0.74, 0.92]), and increased significantly above pre-pregnancy levels 2 to 5 years postpartum (IRR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.13, 1.35]). Among mothers diagnosed with ADHD postpartum, 53.9% had an in- or outpatient contact to psychiatric services or redeemed non-ADHD psychotropic medication prescriptions, in the period from childbirth until ADHD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incident ADHD diagnoses among women giving birth increased postpartum above pre-pregnancy levels, with peak rates observed between 2 and 5 years after childbirth. These findings highlight the postpartum period as a potential critical window of ADHD symptom worsening, underscoring the need for targeted mental health screenings and support for women during the years after childbirth.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"283-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145258478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Association Between Maternal Progesterone Use During Pregnancy and Offspring Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Risk. 孕期孕激素使用与后代注意缺陷多动障碍风险的关系。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251381867
Elham Bidabadi, Seyedeh Hajar Sharami, Seyyedeh Azade Hoseini Nouri, Masoumeh Parandavar, Afagh Hassanzadeh Rad

Objective: Previous animal studies have suggested a link between progesterone exposure and the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study clinically evaluated the effect of progesterone use during pregnancy on the risk of ADHD in children.

Methods: In this prospective case-control study, 97 children diagnosed with ADHD and 194 age- and sex-matched controls were included. Maternal progesterone use-via suppositories or injections-during pregnancy was assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS.

Results: The mean age was slightly higher in the ADHD group, but not significantly. Male predominance was observed among ADHD cases, although not statistically significant. While neonatal hospitalization rates were similar, the duration was longer in the ADHD group (p = .009). Cesarean delivery and lower maternal education levels were significantly more common in the ADHD group (p = .004 and p = .013, respectively). No significant difference in overall progesterone use was found between ADHD and control groups (17.5% vs. 19.1%; p = .749). Injectable progesterone was used in 5.2% of ADHD cases and 10.8% of controls (p = .130), and the timing of use across pregnancy trimesters did not differ significantly (p = .493). Vaginal suppository use was also comparable (15.5% vs. 12.4%; p = .465). However, continuous progesterone use throughout all trimesters was more frequently reported among ADHD cases (20.0% vs. 4.2%), suggesting a possible association that needs further investigation.

Conclusion: Unlike findings from animal models, progesterone use during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with ADHD development. Still, prolonged exposure may warrant further investigation.

目的:以往的动物研究表明,黄体酮暴露与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的发展之间存在联系。本研究临床评估妊娠期间使用黄体酮对儿童ADHD风险的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性病例对照研究中,纳入了97名诊断为ADHD的儿童和194名年龄和性别匹配的对照组。评估孕妇在妊娠期间通过栓剂或注射剂使用孕酮的情况。数据采用SPSS进行分析。结果:ADHD组的平均年龄略高,但不显著。男性在ADHD病例中占优势,尽管没有统计学意义。虽然新生儿住院率相似,但ADHD组的持续时间更长(p = 0.009)。剖宫产和较低的母亲教育水平在ADHD组中更为常见(p =。004和p =。013年,分别)。ADHD组与对照组在总体孕酮使用方面无显著差异(17.5% vs. 19.1%; p = .749)。注射黄体酮的ADHD病例占5.2%,对照组占10.8% (p =。130),妊娠三个月的使用时间没有显著差异(p = .493)。阴道栓剂的使用也具有可比性(15.5%比12.4%;p = .465)。然而,在所有妊娠期持续使用黄体酮的ADHD病例中更为常见(20.0%对4.2%),这表明两者之间可能存在关联,需要进一步调查。结论:与动物模型的发现不同,怀孕期间使用黄体酮似乎与多动症的发展无关。尽管如此,长期接触可能需要进一步调查。
{"title":"The Association Between Maternal Progesterone Use During Pregnancy and Offspring Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Risk.","authors":"Elham Bidabadi, Seyedeh Hajar Sharami, Seyyedeh Azade Hoseini Nouri, Masoumeh Parandavar, Afagh Hassanzadeh Rad","doi":"10.1177/10870547251381867","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251381867","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous animal studies have suggested a link between progesterone exposure and the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study clinically evaluated the effect of progesterone use during pregnancy on the risk of ADHD in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective case-control study, 97 children diagnosed with ADHD and 194 age- and sex-matched controls were included. Maternal progesterone use-via suppositories or injections-during pregnancy was assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was slightly higher in the ADHD group, but not significantly. Male predominance was observed among ADHD cases, although not statistically significant. While neonatal hospitalization rates were similar, the duration was longer in the ADHD group (<i>p</i> = .009). Cesarean delivery and lower maternal education levels were significantly more common in the ADHD group (<i>p</i> = .004 and <i>p</i> = .013, respectively). No significant difference in overall progesterone use was found between ADHD and control groups (17.5% vs. 19.1%; <i>p</i> = .749). Injectable progesterone was used in 5.2% of ADHD cases and 10.8% of controls (<i>p</i> = .130), and the timing of use across pregnancy trimesters did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = .493). Vaginal suppository use was also comparable (15.5% vs. 12.4%; <i>p</i> = .465). However, continuous progesterone use throughout all trimesters was more frequently reported among ADHD cases (20.0% vs. 4.2%), suggesting a possible association that needs further investigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unlike findings from animal models, progesterone use during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with ADHD development. Still, prolonged exposure may warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"292-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145251249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging the Gap: Digital CBT for Adults Managing ADHD Challenges. 弥合差距:成人管理ADHD挑战的数字CBT。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251384462
Kevin M Antshel, Haley McBride, Laura E Knouse

Objective: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious treatment for adult ADHD, yet access and availability concerns limit scalability. Mobile health apps are promising tools for delivering scalable CBT. The current study reports findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a CBT-informed health app for adults with ADHD.

Methods: A sample of assessed adults with ADHD (N = 154; ages 18-55 years) were recruited to participate and randomized to either 8 weeks of use of the CBT-informed app or a waitlist control condition. Participants in both groups completed measures of ADHD symptoms and functioning at baseline, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks.

Results: Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements revealed significant group x time interactions for inattentive symptoms (η2 = .15), hyperactive-impulsive symptoms (η2 = .05), and ADHD associated quality of life (η2 = .04) in favor of the CBT-informed app relative to participants who knew they were not receiving help; however, these results did not extend to a measure of functional impairment. Changes in organizational, time management, and planning behaviors and ADHD-related cognitions partially mediated the association between group and inattentive symptom changes. ADHD inattentive symptom reductions were positively associated with the total number of app exercises completed.

Conclusions: The confidence in our results is limited by our use of a waitlist control design. However, participants who used the CBT-informed app perceived improvements in inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms and quality of life relative to participants who knew they were not receiving help.

目的:认知行为疗法(CBT)是一种有效的成人ADHD治疗方法,但其可及性和可用性限制了其可扩展性。移动健康应用程序是提供可扩展CBT的有前途的工具。目前的研究报告了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的结果,该试验是针对患有多动症的成年人的一款cbt健康应用程序。方法:招募了一组患有ADHD的成人样本(N = 154,年龄18-55岁),并随机分配到使用cbt应用程序8周或等待列表控制条件。两组的参与者在基线、4周和8周时完成了ADHD症状和功能的测量。结果:重复测量的线性混合效应模型显示,注意力不集中症状的组x时间相互作用显著(η2 =)。15)、多动冲动症状(η2 =。05),以及ADHD相关的生活质量(η2 = .04),相对于那些知道自己没有得到帮助的参与者,支持cbt通知的应用程序;然而,这些结果并没有延伸到功能损伤的测量。组织、时间管理、计划行为和adhd相关认知的改变部分介导了群体和注意力不集中症状变化之间的关联。ADHD注意力不集中症状的减少与完成应用程序练习的总数呈正相关。结论:我们的结果的可信度受限于我们使用的候补名单对照设计。然而,与那些知道自己没有得到帮助的参与者相比,使用cbt应用程序的参与者在注意力不集中、多动冲动症状和生活质量方面都得到了改善。
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Digital CBT for Adults Managing ADHD Challenges.","authors":"Kevin M Antshel, Haley McBride, Laura E Knouse","doi":"10.1177/10870547251384462","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251384462","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious treatment for adult ADHD, yet access and availability concerns limit scalability. Mobile health apps are promising tools for delivering scalable CBT. The current study reports findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a CBT-informed health app for adults with ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of assessed adults with ADHD (<i>N</i> = 154; ages 18-55 years) were recruited to participate and randomized to either 8 weeks of use of the CBT-informed app or a waitlist control condition. Participants in both groups completed measures of ADHD symptoms and functioning at baseline, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements revealed significant group x time interactions for inattentive symptoms (η<sup>2</sup> = .15), hyperactive-impulsive symptoms (η<sup>2</sup> = .05), and ADHD associated quality of life (η<sup>2</sup> = .04) in favor of the CBT-informed app relative to participants who knew they were not receiving help; however, these results did not extend to a measure of functional impairment. Changes in organizational, time management, and planning behaviors and ADHD-related cognitions partially mediated the association between group and inattentive symptom changes. ADHD inattentive symptom reductions were positively associated with the total number of app exercises completed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The confidence in our results is limited by our use of a waitlist control design. However, participants who used the CBT-informed app perceived improvements in inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms and quality of life relative to participants who knew they were not receiving help.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"370-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145495611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Does Adult Temperament Relate to ADHD Symptom Domains? Testing the Dual-Pathway Model. 成人气质与ADHD症状域的关系?双途径模型的检验。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-29 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251393062
Clara Teuchert, Julia Kerner Auch Koerner, Monika Daseking, Henning Heinze

Object: Temperament provides a valuable framework for understanding ADHD across the lifespan, as extreme temperamental traits are considered etiological risk factors. The dual-pathway model links specific temperamental traits to ADHD symptom domains: elevated reactive traits, surgency and negative affect, to hyperactivity/impulsivity, and a low regulatory trait, effortful control, to inattention.

Method: One hundred fifty-eight adults (79 with clinical diagnoses of ADHD and 79 controls) filled in the Adult Temperament Questionnaire. Consistent with a compensatory extension of the dual-pathway model, it was hypothesized that effortful control would moderate the effects of reactive traits (surgency/negative affect) on hyperactive/impulsive symptoms and influence both ADHD symptom domains. For exploratory purposes, orienting sensitivity, an adult temperament factor related to perceptual sensitivity, was included in the analyses.

Results: Binary logistic regression identified lower effortful control as the strongest predictor of an ADHD diagnosis. Negative affect had a significant but small effect, while surgency and orienting sensitivity were non-significant. Two hierarchical regressions were performed for self-rated symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention. Consistent with a compensatory model, effortful control was significantly related to symptom expression in both ADHD symptom domains. Contrary to expectations, surgency did not explain variance in hyperactivity/impulsivity, and the effect of negative affect was strongly reduced, after effortful control was added to the model. Effortful control did not moderate the effects of surgency and negative affect.

Conclusion: These findings challenge the dual-pathway model and highlight self-regulation deficits over reactive traits in sustaining ADHD in adulthood. They underscore the value of temperament-based approaches for refining diagnosis and developing targeted interventions for adult ADHD.

目的:性情为理解ADHD提供了一个有价值的框架,因为极端的性情特征被认为是致病的危险因素。双途径模型将特定的气质特征与ADHD症状域联系起来:反应性特征升高,紧急和负面影响,多动/冲动,以及低调节特征,努力控制,注意力不集中。方法:158例成人(临床诊断为ADHD者79例,对照组79例)填写成人气质问卷。与双通路模型的代偿性延伸相一致,我们假设努力控制可以缓和反应性特征(紧急/负面影响)对多动/冲动症状的影响,并影响ADHD的两个症状域。为了探索目的,取向敏感性,一个与感知敏感性相关的成人气质因素,被纳入分析。结果:二元逻辑回归确定较低的努力控制是ADHD诊断的最强预测因子。负性情绪有显著但不显著的影响,急迫性和定向敏感性无显著影响。对多动/冲动和注意力不集中的自评症状进行了两次分层回归。与代偿模型一致,努力控制与ADHD两个症状域的症状表达显著相关。与预期相反,突发性并不能解释多动/冲动的差异,并且在模型中加入努力控制后,负面情绪的影响大大降低。努力控制并没有缓和急症和负面影响的影响。结论:这些发现挑战了双通路模型,并强调了反应性特征的自我调节缺陷在成年期持续ADHD中的作用。他们强调了以气质为基础的方法在完善诊断和开发针对成人多动症的针对性干预方面的价值。
{"title":"How Does Adult Temperament Relate to ADHD Symptom Domains? Testing the Dual-Pathway Model.","authors":"Clara Teuchert, Julia Kerner Auch Koerner, Monika Daseking, Henning Heinze","doi":"10.1177/10870547251393062","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251393062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Object: </strong>Temperament provides a valuable framework for understanding ADHD across the lifespan, as extreme temperamental traits are considered etiological risk factors. The dual-pathway model links specific temperamental traits to ADHD symptom domains: elevated reactive traits, surgency and negative affect, to hyperactivity/impulsivity, and a low regulatory trait, effortful control, to inattention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred fifty-eight adults (79 with clinical diagnoses of ADHD and 79 controls) filled in the Adult Temperament Questionnaire. Consistent with a compensatory extension of the dual-pathway model, it was hypothesized that effortful control would moderate the effects of reactive traits (surgency/negative affect) on hyperactive/impulsive symptoms and influence both ADHD symptom domains. For exploratory purposes, orienting sensitivity, an adult temperament factor related to perceptual sensitivity, was included in the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Binary logistic regression identified lower effortful control as the strongest predictor of an ADHD diagnosis. Negative affect had a significant but small effect, while surgency and orienting sensitivity were non-significant. Two hierarchical regressions were performed for self-rated symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention. Consistent with a compensatory model, effortful control was significantly related to symptom expression in both ADHD symptom domains. Contrary to expectations, surgency did not explain variance in hyperactivity/impulsivity, and the effect of negative affect was strongly reduced, after effortful control was added to the model. Effortful control did not moderate the effects of surgency and negative affect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings challenge the dual-pathway model and highlight self-regulation deficits over reactive traits in sustaining ADHD in adulthood. They underscore the value of temperament-based approaches for refining diagnosis and developing targeted interventions for adult ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"386-406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12864529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145634082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effects of Sleep Treatment on Symptoms of ADHD, Sleep Quality, Fatigue, and Depressive Symptoms in Adults. 睡眠治疗对成人ADHD症状、睡眠质量、疲劳和抑郁症状的影响
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251379103
Mirte van der Ham, Denise Bijlenga, Nina Molenaar, Daniëlle E J Starreveld, Mylène N Böhmer, Ravian Wettstein, Glenn Dumont, Aartjan T F Beekman, Sandra Kooij

Background: Sleep problems are highly prevalent in adults with ADHD. Sleep problems and ADHD symptoms can cause, amplify, and maintain each other. We studied the effects of additive treatment for sleep problems on self-reported symptoms of ADHD as primary outcome, with subscales of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity, objective, performance-based ADHD symptoms, sleep quality, fatigue, and depressive symptoms as secondary outcomes.

Methods: Preliminary open-label randomized controlled trial of adult patients diagnosed with ADHD and a positive screening for at least one sleep disorder. Participants were recruited between March, 2020 and May, 2023, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Seventy patients (60% female, mean age 27.9 years [SD = 8.2]) were randomized to a 12-week period of: (1) ADHD treatment as usual (TAU, n = 25), (2) ADHD TAU + sleep treatment (n = 22), or (3) stand-alone sleep treatment (n = 33). Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, and after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. A total of 20% of participants did not complete the post-treatment assessment. Primary analyses compared changes between groups 1 and 2. Exploratory within-group analyses were conducted to assess improvements in the stand-alone sleep treatment group. All performed analyses were pre-specified.

Results: Primary analysis showed no significant difference in the reduction of subjective ADHD symptoms between the ADHD TAU + sleep treatment group and the ADHD TAU group (β = -1.30, 95% CI [-5.57, 2.96], d = 0.21). The ADHD TAU + sleep treatment group did show significantly larger improvements in subjective sleep quality (β = -1.98, 95% CI [-3.65, -0.30], d = 0.42) and fatigue (β = -6.52, 95% CI [-12.33, -0.70], d = 1.59) compared to the ADHD TAU group. Pre-specified, exploratory within-group analysis showed a significant reduction in subjective ADHD symptoms in the stand-alone sleep treatment group (β = -4.80, 95% CI [-7.60, -2.01], d = 0.62).

Conclusion: Adding sleep treatment to standard ADHD treatment did not lead to significantly greater reductions in subjective or objective, performance based ADHD symptoms. However, combined treatment showed the largest improvements in sleep quality and fatigue, suggesting that such an approach may offer additional benefits. Subjective ADHD symptoms improved in the stand-alone sleep treatment group, but to a lesser extent than the other groups. Future studies with greater statistical power are needed, with long-term effects and quality of life as important outcomes.

背景:睡眠问题在患有多动症的成年人中非常普遍。睡眠问题和注意力缺陷多动障碍症状可以相互引起、放大和维持。我们研究了睡眠问题的附加治疗对自我报告的ADHD症状的影响,并将注意力不集中和多动-冲动性、客观的、基于表现的ADHD症状、睡眠质量、疲劳和抑郁症状作为次要结果。方法:初步开放标签随机对照试验,诊断为ADHD的成人患者,至少有一种睡眠障碍筛查阳性。参与者是在2020年3月至2023年5月COVID-19大流行期间招募的。70例患者(60%为女性,平均年龄27.9岁[SD = 8.2])随机分为12周的治疗组:(1)ADHD照常治疗(TAU, n = 25), (2) ADHD TAU +睡眠治疗(n = 22),或(3)单独睡眠治疗(n = 33)。在基线、治疗6周和12周后评估结果。总共有20%的参与者没有完成治疗后评估。初步分析比较了1组和2组之间的变化。进行探索性组内分析以评估独立睡眠治疗组的改善情况。所有的分析都是预先指定的。结果:初步分析显示ADHD TAU +睡眠治疗组与ADHD TAU组在主观ADHD症状减轻方面无显著差异(β = -1.30, 95% CI [-5.57, 2.96], d = 0.21)。与ADHD TAU组相比,ADHD TAU +睡眠治疗组在主观睡眠质量(β = -1.98, 95% CI [-3.65, -0.30], d = 0.42)和疲劳(β = -6.52, 95% CI [-12.33, -0.70], d = 1.59)方面确实表现出明显更大的改善。预先指定的探索性组内分析显示,独立睡眠治疗组主观ADHD症状显著减少(β = -4.80, 95% CI [-7.60, -2.01], d = 0.62)。结论:在标准ADHD治疗的基础上增加睡眠治疗并不能显著减少主观或客观的、基于表现的ADHD症状。然而,联合治疗在睡眠质量和疲劳方面显示出最大的改善,这表明这种方法可能会带来额外的好处。单独睡眠治疗组的主观ADHD症状有所改善,但改善程度低于其他组。未来的研究需要更大的统计能力,长期效果和生活质量是重要的结果。
{"title":"The Effects of Sleep Treatment on Symptoms of ADHD, Sleep Quality, Fatigue, and Depressive Symptoms in Adults.","authors":"Mirte van der Ham, Denise Bijlenga, Nina Molenaar, Daniëlle E J Starreveld, Mylène N Böhmer, Ravian Wettstein, Glenn Dumont, Aartjan T F Beekman, Sandra Kooij","doi":"10.1177/10870547251379103","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251379103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep problems are highly prevalent in adults with ADHD. Sleep problems and ADHD symptoms can cause, amplify, and maintain each other. We studied the effects of additive treatment for sleep problems on self-reported symptoms of ADHD as primary outcome, with subscales of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity, objective, performance-based ADHD symptoms, sleep quality, fatigue, and depressive symptoms as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preliminary open-label randomized controlled trial of adult patients diagnosed with ADHD and a positive screening for at least one sleep disorder. Participants were recruited between March, 2020 and May, 2023, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Seventy patients (60% female, mean age 27.9 years [<i>SD</i> = 8.2]) were randomized to a 12-week period of: (1) ADHD treatment as usual (TAU, <i>n</i> = 25), (2) ADHD TAU + sleep treatment (<i>n</i> = 22), or (3) stand-alone sleep treatment (<i>n</i> = 33). Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, and after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. A total of 20% of participants did not complete the post-treatment assessment. Primary analyses compared changes between groups 1 and 2. Exploratory within-group analyses were conducted to assess improvements in the stand-alone sleep treatment group. All performed analyses were pre-specified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary analysis showed no significant difference in the reduction of subjective ADHD symptoms between the ADHD TAU + sleep treatment group and the ADHD TAU group (β = -1.30, 95% CI [-5.57, 2.96], <i>d</i> = 0.21). The ADHD TAU + sleep treatment group did show significantly larger improvements in subjective sleep quality (β = -1.98, 95% CI [-3.65, -0.30], <i>d</i> = 0.42) and fatigue (β = -6.52, 95% CI [-12.33, -0.70], <i>d</i> = 1.59) compared to the ADHD TAU group. Pre-specified, exploratory within-group analysis showed a significant reduction in subjective ADHD symptoms in the stand-alone sleep treatment group (β = -4.80, 95% CI [-7.60, -2.01], <i>d</i> = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding sleep treatment to standard ADHD treatment did not lead to significantly greater reductions in subjective or objective, performance based ADHD symptoms. However, combined treatment showed the largest improvements in sleep quality and fatigue, suggesting that such an approach may offer additional benefits. Subjective ADHD symptoms improved in the stand-alone sleep treatment group, but to a lesser extent than the other groups. Future studies with greater statistical power are needed, with long-term effects and quality of life as important outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"354-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145372776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prescription Stimulant Continuation in Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes. 处方兴奋剂在妊娠和分娩结局中的延续。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251397034
Shaquib Al Hasan, Meena Murugappan, Sarah Westberg, Stephen A Contag, Tanya Melnik, Abhijeet Rajpurohit, Joel F Farley
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although studies examining utero exposure to prescription stimulants have suggested an association with maternal and fetal adverse events, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, clinicians may not have clear guidance about stimulant use during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate maternal and fetal risks of prescription stimulant exposure among women of reproductive age throughout the continuum of pregnancy in a large, commercially insured United States population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a large administrative claims database from 2013 to 2021 to compare stimulant exposed pregnancies to a matched cohort of non-exposed pregnancies. Stimulant exposed pregnancies included early stimulant use, defined as one or more stimulant prescription fills at any point during the first trimester and continued exposure, defined as continuation into the second or third trimesters. Relative risk regression models were used to compare the risk of each outcome between exposure and duration of exposure cohorts matched on clinical conditions and medication used by 1:1 greedy neighbor propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a sample of 10,265 matched patients, early stimulant exposure (first trimester only) was associated with a higher likelihood of live birth (RR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.06, 1.10]) and lower risks of spontaneous abortion (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.64, 0.76]) and preterm birth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.62, 0.90]) compared with no stimulant exposure. Stillbirth and ectopic pregnancy did not differ. When exposure continued into the second or third trimesters, risks increased for placental abruption (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.03, 2.57]), pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.19, 1.69]), gestational hypertension (RR = 1.37, 95% CI [1.16, 1.61]), and preterm birth (RR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.12, 1.62]) compared with non-exposed pregnancies. Stillbirth was not significantly different in this comparison (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [0.76, 2.67]). Direct comparison of continued versus early exposure highlighted more pronounced risks with continuation: higher stillbirth (RR = 3.54, 95% CI [1.48, 8.44]), spontaneous abortion (RR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.38, 1.68]), preterm birth (RR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.51, 2.28]), placental abruption (RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.11, 2.84]), and pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.12, 1.59]). Small-for-gestational-age infants were also more frequent in the continuation group (RR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.12, 1.92]). Analyses stratified by stimulant class (amphetamine vs methylphenidate containing) were directionally consistent with the overall findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although early stimulant exposure was not associated with increases in maternal or fetal risk, our study suggests that continuation of stimulants into trimesters 2 and/or 3 may increase some pregnancy complications including stillbirth, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and placental abruption. Cl
目的:尽管研究表明子宫暴露于处方兴奋剂与母体和胎儿不良事件有关,但结果并不一致。因此,临床医生可能没有关于怀孕期间兴奋剂使用的明确指导。本研究的目的是评估在美国大量商业保险人群中,育龄妇女在整个怀孕期间暴露于处方兴奋剂的母婴风险。方法:我们使用2013年至2021年的大型行政索赔数据库,比较兴奋剂暴露妊娠与非暴露妊娠的匹配队列。兴奋剂暴露妊娠包括早期使用兴奋剂,定义为在妊娠早期的任何时候使用一种或多种兴奋剂处方,以及持续使用兴奋剂,定义为持续使用到妊娠中期或晚期。采用相对风险回归模型,比较按1:1贪心邻居倾向评分匹配的临床条件和用药情况匹配的暴露和暴露时间队列之间各结果的风险。结果:在10265例匹配的患者样本中,与未接触兴奋剂的患者相比,早期兴奋剂暴露(仅妊娠早期)与更高的活产可能性(RR = 1.08, 95% CI[1.06, 1.10])和更低的自然流产(RR = 0.69, 95% CI[0.64, 0.76])和早产(RR = 0.75, 95% CI[0.62, 0.90])相关。死胎和异位妊娠没有差异。当暴露持续到妊娠中期或晚期时,与未暴露妊娠相比,胎盘早剥(RR = 1.63, 95% CI[1.03, 2.57])、先兆子痫(RR = 1.42, 95% CI[1.19, 1.69])、妊娠期高血压(RR = 1.37, 95% CI[1.16, 1.61])和早产(RR = 1.34, 95% CI[1.12, 1.62])的风险增加。死产在两组比较中无显著差异(RR = 1.42, 95% CI[0.76, 2.67])。直接比较继续暴露与早期暴露,可以发现继续暴露更明显的风险:更高的死产(RR = 3.54, 95% CI[1.48, 8.44])、自然流产(RR = 1.53, 95% CI[1.38, 1.68])、早产(RR = 1.86, 95% CI[1.51, 2.28])、胎盘早剥(RR = 1.78, 95% CI[1.11, 2.84])和先兆子痫(RR = 1.33, 95% CI[1.12, 1.59])。在继续组中,小胎龄儿的发生率也更高(RR = 1.47, 95% CI[1.12, 1.92])。按兴奋剂类别(安非他明与含哌甲酯)分层的分析方向与总体结果一致。结论:尽管早期兴奋剂暴露与母体或胎儿风险增加无关,但我们的研究表明,在妊娠2和/或3个月继续使用兴奋剂可能会增加一些妊娠并发症,包括死胎、早产、妊娠高血压疾病和胎盘早剥。临床医生在决定在怀孕期间继续使用兴奋剂时应该考虑到这些风险,尤其是在治疗多动症时。
{"title":"Prescription Stimulant Continuation in Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes.","authors":"Shaquib Al Hasan, Meena Murugappan, Sarah Westberg, Stephen A Contag, Tanya Melnik, Abhijeet Rajpurohit, Joel F Farley","doi":"10.1177/10870547251397034","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251397034","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Although studies examining utero exposure to prescription stimulants have suggested an association with maternal and fetal adverse events, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, clinicians may not have clear guidance about stimulant use during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate maternal and fetal risks of prescription stimulant exposure among women of reproductive age throughout the continuum of pregnancy in a large, commercially insured United States population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We used a large administrative claims database from 2013 to 2021 to compare stimulant exposed pregnancies to a matched cohort of non-exposed pregnancies. Stimulant exposed pregnancies included early stimulant use, defined as one or more stimulant prescription fills at any point during the first trimester and continued exposure, defined as continuation into the second or third trimesters. Relative risk regression models were used to compare the risk of each outcome between exposure and duration of exposure cohorts matched on clinical conditions and medication used by 1:1 greedy neighbor propensity score matching.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among a sample of 10,265 matched patients, early stimulant exposure (first trimester only) was associated with a higher likelihood of live birth (RR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.06, 1.10]) and lower risks of spontaneous abortion (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.64, 0.76]) and preterm birth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.62, 0.90]) compared with no stimulant exposure. Stillbirth and ectopic pregnancy did not differ. When exposure continued into the second or third trimesters, risks increased for placental abruption (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.03, 2.57]), pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.19, 1.69]), gestational hypertension (RR = 1.37, 95% CI [1.16, 1.61]), and preterm birth (RR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.12, 1.62]) compared with non-exposed pregnancies. Stillbirth was not significantly different in this comparison (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [0.76, 2.67]). Direct comparison of continued versus early exposure highlighted more pronounced risks with continuation: higher stillbirth (RR = 3.54, 95% CI [1.48, 8.44]), spontaneous abortion (RR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.38, 1.68]), preterm birth (RR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.51, 2.28]), placental abruption (RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.11, 2.84]), and pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.12, 1.59]). Small-for-gestational-age infants were also more frequent in the continuation group (RR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.12, 1.92]). Analyses stratified by stimulant class (amphetamine vs methylphenidate containing) were directionally consistent with the overall findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Although early stimulant exposure was not associated with increases in maternal or fetal risk, our study suggests that continuation of stimulants into trimesters 2 and/or 3 may increase some pregnancy complications including stillbirth, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and placental abruption. Cl","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"315-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parental Stress and Child Irritability in ADHD: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Serial Mediation Model via Experiential Avoidance and Negative Parent-Child Relationship. 父母压力与ADHD儿童易怒:一种基于经验回避和负性亲子关系的双波纵向序列中介模型。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251407731
Armagan Aral, Gizem Gerdan, Yılmaz Orhun Gürlük

ADHD is complex neurodevelopmental disorder that causes considerable individual and social difficulties, creating significant parental stress. This study aimed to examine the indirect associations between parental stress and child irritability through two sequential parenting mechanisms: experiential avoidance and negative parent-child relationship, within a sample of school-aged children with ADHD (ages 6-12). Using a two-wave longitudinal serial path analysis based on parent-reported data collected at two time points 1-month apart (Time 1 and Time 2), the study investigated whether early parental stress predicted subsequent child irritability via its influence on experiential avoidance and the quality of the parent-child relationship. Findings supported the hypothesized model. More precisely, higher parental stress was associated with greater experiential avoidance, which in turn predicted more negative parent-child relationship, ultimately resulting in elevated child irritability. Longitudinal serial mediation effects confirmed that all Time 1 variables significantly predicted corresponding Time 2 outcomes across the proposed sequential pathway. Notably, the model explained 41.1% of the variance in child irritability at Time 2, underscoring how stress-related disruptions in experiential avoidance and parent-child relationship can affect child irritability even over a short period of time. Taken together, these findings provide empirical support for a stress-driven sequence of parental mechanisms through which parental stress may contribute to child irritability in ADHD. In this context, interventions targeting parental experiential avoidance and improving the quality of parent-child relationship may help mitigate the early development of irritability in children with ADHD. Clinical implications are discussed.

多动症是一种复杂的神经发育障碍,会导致相当大的个人和社会困难,给父母带来巨大的压力。本研究旨在探讨父母压力与儿童易怒之间的间接联系,通过两种顺序的养育机制:经验回避和消极的亲子关系,在6-12岁的学龄ADHD儿童样本中。本研究采用双波纵向序列路径分析,基于相隔1个月的两个时间点(时间1和时间2)收集的父母报告数据,研究早期父母压力是否通过其对经验回避和亲子关系质量的影响来预测随后的儿童易怒。研究结果支持假设模型。更准确地说,更高的父母压力与更大的经验回避有关,这反过来又预示着更消极的亲子关系,最终导致孩子易怒。纵向序列中介效应证实,所有Time 1变量都能显著预测相应的时序通路中的Time 2结果。值得注意的是,该模型解释了41.1%的时间2儿童易怒的差异,强调了体验回避和亲子关系中的压力相关中断如何在短时间内影响儿童易怒。综上所述,这些发现为压力驱动的父母机制序列提供了经验支持,通过父母压力可能导致ADHD儿童易怒。在这种背景下,针对父母体验回避和改善亲子关系质量的干预措施可能有助于减轻ADHD儿童早期易怒的发展。讨论了临床意义。
{"title":"Parental Stress and Child Irritability in ADHD: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Serial Mediation Model via Experiential Avoidance and Negative Parent-Child Relationship.","authors":"Armagan Aral, Gizem Gerdan, Yılmaz Orhun Gürlük","doi":"10.1177/10870547251407731","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251407731","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ADHD is complex neurodevelopmental disorder that causes considerable individual and social difficulties, creating significant parental stress. This study aimed to examine the indirect associations between parental stress and child irritability through two sequential parenting mechanisms: experiential avoidance and negative parent-child relationship, within a sample of school-aged children with ADHD (ages 6-12). Using a two-wave longitudinal serial path analysis based on parent-reported data collected at two time points 1-month apart (Time 1 and Time 2), the study investigated whether early parental stress predicted subsequent child irritability via its influence on experiential avoidance and the quality of the parent-child relationship. Findings supported the hypothesized model. More precisely, higher parental stress was associated with greater experiential avoidance, which in turn predicted more negative parent-child relationship, ultimately resulting in elevated child irritability. Longitudinal serial mediation effects confirmed that all Time 1 variables significantly predicted corresponding Time 2 outcomes across the proposed sequential pathway. Notably, the model explained 41.1% of the variance in child irritability at Time 2, underscoring how stress-related disruptions in experiential avoidance and parent-child relationship can affect child irritability even over a short period of time. Taken together, these findings provide empirical support for a stress-driven sequence of parental mechanisms through which parental stress may contribute to child irritability in ADHD. In this context, interventions targeting parental experiential avoidance and improving the quality of parent-child relationship may help mitigate the early development of irritability in children with ADHD. Clinical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"342-353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Attention Disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1