{"title":"经动脉化疗栓塞联合Camrelizumab和rivoeranib与单独Camrelizumab和rivoeranib治疗BCLC C期肝细胞癌","authors":"Wen-Jie Zhou, Jin-Tao Huang, Xin Lu, Di Hu, Xin Hong, Fu-An Wang, Peng-Hua Lv, Xiao-Li Zhu","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S494520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Camrelizumab and rivoceranib together provide a new first-line treatment approach for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Meanwhile, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective method for the local control of the HCC. The study compared the clinical benefit and safety between TACE with camrelizumab-rivoceranib and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-C HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multi-center retrospective analysis included continuous BCLC-C HCC patients who received camrelizumab-rivoceranib with TACE and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone from January 2020 to December 2022. The therapeutic response, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and overall survival (OS) were compared. The quantitative data were compared via the <i>t</i>-test or Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test. Comparison of the categorical data was done by chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The comparison of PFS with OS was compared by Log rank test. A Multivariate Cox regression test was utilized to identify risk variables for both PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> This analysis comprised 132 BCLC-C HCC patients who received camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone (n = 74) or combined treatment (n = 58). The combined group displayed higher partial response (44.8% vs 21.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and total response (55.2% versus 36.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.032) rates than camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone group. The median PFS (13.5 months vs 10.3 months, <i>p</i> = 0.046) and OS (22.8 months vs 18.4 months, <i>p</i> = 0.041) for the combined group was significantly longer relative to the camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone group. Additional risk factors, excluding the therapy option, were a higher alpha-fetoprotein level and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The incident rates of camrelizumab-rivoceranib-related advents were comparable between combined and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone groups (46.3% vs 51.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.572). The combined group contained 33 patients (56.9%) who experienced temporary post-embolization symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For BCLC-C HCC patients, TACE may significantly increase the therapeutic effectiveness of camrelizumab-rivoceranib without increasing the risk of camrelizumab-rivoceranib-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"11 ","pages":"2515-2524"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Camrelizumab and Rivoceranib versus Camrelizumab and Rivoceranib Alone for BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Jie Zhou, Jin-Tao Huang, Xin Lu, Di Hu, Xin Hong, Fu-An Wang, Peng-Hua Lv, Xiao-Li Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JHC.S494520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Camrelizumab and rivoceranib together provide a new first-line treatment approach for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Meanwhile, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective method for the local control of the HCC. The study compared the clinical benefit and safety between TACE with camrelizumab-rivoceranib and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-C HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multi-center retrospective analysis included continuous BCLC-C HCC patients who received camrelizumab-rivoceranib with TACE and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone from January 2020 to December 2022. The therapeutic response, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and overall survival (OS) were compared. The quantitative data were compared via the <i>t</i>-test or Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test. Comparison of the categorical data was done by chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The comparison of PFS with OS was compared by Log rank test. A Multivariate Cox regression test was utilized to identify risk variables for both PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> This analysis comprised 132 BCLC-C HCC patients who received camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone (n = 74) or combined treatment (n = 58). The combined group displayed higher partial response (44.8% vs 21.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and total response (55.2% versus 36.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.032) rates than camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone group. The median PFS (13.5 months vs 10.3 months, <i>p</i> = 0.046) and OS (22.8 months vs 18.4 months, <i>p</i> = 0.041) for the combined group was significantly longer relative to the camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone group. Additional risk factors, excluding the therapy option, were a higher alpha-fetoprotein level and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The incident rates of camrelizumab-rivoceranib-related advents were comparable between combined and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone groups (46.3% vs 51.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.572). The combined group contained 33 patients (56.9%) who experienced temporary post-embolization symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For BCLC-C HCC patients, TACE may significantly increase the therapeutic effectiveness of camrelizumab-rivoceranib without increasing the risk of camrelizumab-rivoceranib-related complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"2515-2524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668319/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S494520\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S494520","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:Camrelizumab和rivoeranib联合为不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)提供了一种新的一线治疗方法。同时,经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)是局部控制肝癌的有效方法。该研究比较了TACE联合camremizumab -rivoceranib和camremizumab -rivoceranib单独治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)-C型HCC患者的临床获益和安全性。患者和方法:这项多中心回顾性分析包括从2020年1月至2022年12月连续接受camremizumab -rivoceranib联合TACE和camremizumab -rivoceranib单独治疗的BCLC-C HCC患者。比较治疗反应、无进展生存期(PFS)、安全性和总生存期(OS)。定量资料比较采用t检验或Mann-Whitney u检验。分类数据的比较采用卡方检验或费雪精确检验。PFS与OS的比较采用Log rank检验。采用多变量Cox回归检验确定PFS和OS的风险变量。结果:该分析包括132例接受camrelizumab-rivoceranib单独治疗(n = 74)或联合治疗(n = 58)的BCLC-C HCC患者。联合治疗组的部分缓解率(44.8% vs 21.6%, p = 0.004)和总缓解率(55.2% vs 36.5%, p = 0.032)高于单用camrelizumab-rivoceranib组。联合组的中位PFS(13.5个月vs 10.3个月,p = 0.046)和OS(22.8个月vs 18.4个月,p = 0.041)明显长于单用camrelizumab- rivoeranib组。除治疗方案外,其他危险因素是较高的甲胎蛋白水平和东部肿瘤合作组的表现状况。联用组和单用组camrelizumab-rivoceranib相关事件发生率具有可比性(46.3% vs 51.4%, p = 0.572)。联合组有33例(56.9%)患者出现栓塞后暂时性症状。结论:对于BCLC-C HCC患者,TACE可显著提高camremizumab -rivoceranib的治疗效果,而不会增加camremizumab -rivoceranib相关并发症的风险。
Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Camrelizumab and Rivoceranib versus Camrelizumab and Rivoceranib Alone for BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Purpose: Camrelizumab and rivoceranib together provide a new first-line treatment approach for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Meanwhile, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective method for the local control of the HCC. The study compared the clinical benefit and safety between TACE with camrelizumab-rivoceranib and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-C HCC patients.
Patients and methods: This multi-center retrospective analysis included continuous BCLC-C HCC patients who received camrelizumab-rivoceranib with TACE and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone from January 2020 to December 2022. The therapeutic response, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and overall survival (OS) were compared. The quantitative data were compared via the t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Comparison of the categorical data was done by chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The comparison of PFS with OS was compared by Log rank test. A Multivariate Cox regression test was utilized to identify risk variables for both PFS and OS.
Results: This analysis comprised 132 BCLC-C HCC patients who received camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone (n = 74) or combined treatment (n = 58). The combined group displayed higher partial response (44.8% vs 21.6%, p = 0.004) and total response (55.2% versus 36.5%, p = 0.032) rates than camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone group. The median PFS (13.5 months vs 10.3 months, p = 0.046) and OS (22.8 months vs 18.4 months, p = 0.041) for the combined group was significantly longer relative to the camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone group. Additional risk factors, excluding the therapy option, were a higher alpha-fetoprotein level and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The incident rates of camrelizumab-rivoceranib-related advents were comparable between combined and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone groups (46.3% vs 51.4%, p = 0.572). The combined group contained 33 patients (56.9%) who experienced temporary post-embolization symptoms.
Conclusion: For BCLC-C HCC patients, TACE may significantly increase the therapeutic effectiveness of camrelizumab-rivoceranib without increasing the risk of camrelizumab-rivoceranib-related complications.