公共创业机会：制度逻辑如何塑造公务员的机会评价

IF 6.1 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Administration Review Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1111/puar.13920

Petter Gullmark, Tommy Høyvarde Clausen, Ali Aslan Gümüsay, Gry Agnete Alsos

{"title":"公共创业机会：制度逻辑如何塑造公务员的机会评价","authors":"Petter Gullmark, Tommy Høyvarde Clausen, Ali Aslan Gümüsay, Gry Agnete Alsos","doi":"10.1111/puar.13920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Which entrepreneurial opportunities do public servants find appealing, and what influences their evaluation? Our investigation of 14 Norwegian municipal entrepreneurial projects indicates that public servants positively assess the attractiveness of welfare, economic, and participatory opportunities. Their evaluations are shaped by public sector logics. Our contribution is twofold: first, we connect the discourse on entrepreneurial opportunities with that of institutional logics, demonstrating that evaluations of public entrepreneurial opportunities depend on the presence and hierarchy of state, market, and community logics. This underscores the limited yet meaningful agency of public servants in these evaluations. Second, we illuminate underexplored public entrepreneurial opportunities by proposing a taxonomy that categorizes them based on the interplay of state, market, and community logics.","PeriodicalId":48431,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public entrepreneurial opportunities: How institutional logics shape public servants' opportunity evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Petter Gullmark, Tommy Høyvarde Clausen, Ali Aslan Gümüsay, Gry Agnete Alsos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/puar.13920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Which entrepreneurial opportunities do public servants find appealing, and what influences their evaluation? Our investigation of 14 Norwegian municipal entrepreneurial projects indicates that public servants positively assess the attractiveness of welfare, economic, and participatory opportunities. Their evaluations are shaped by public sector logics. Our contribution is twofold: first, we connect the discourse on entrepreneurial opportunities with that of institutional logics, demonstrating that evaluations of public entrepreneurial opportunities depend on the presence and hierarchy of state, market, and community logics. This underscores the limited yet meaningful agency of public servants in these evaluations. Second, we illuminate underexplored public entrepreneurial opportunities by proposing a taxonomy that categorizes them based on the interplay of state, market, and community logics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13920\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13920","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

哪些创业机会对公务员有吸引力，是什么影响了他们的评价？我们对挪威14个市政创业项目的调查表明，公务员积极评价福利、经济和参与性机会的吸引力。他们的评价受到公共部门逻辑的影响。我们的贡献是双重的：首先，我们将关于创业机会的论述与制度逻辑的论述联系起来，证明对公共创业机会的评估取决于国家、市场和社区逻辑的存在和等级。这突出了公务员在这些评价中的有限而有意义的作用。其次，我们通过提出一种基于国家、市场和社区逻辑的相互作用对其进行分类的分类法，阐明了未被充分开发的公共创业机会。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Public entrepreneurial opportunities: How institutional logics shape public servants' opportunity evaluation

Which entrepreneurial opportunities do public servants find appealing, and what influences their evaluation? Our investigation of 14 Norwegian municipal entrepreneurial projects indicates that public servants positively assess the attractiveness of welfare, economic, and participatory opportunities. Their evaluations are shaped by public sector logics. Our contribution is twofold: first, we connect the discourse on entrepreneurial opportunities with that of institutional logics, demonstrating that evaluations of public entrepreneurial opportunities depend on the presence and hierarchy of state, market, and community logics. This underscores the limited yet meaningful agency of public servants in these evaluations. Second, we illuminate underexplored public entrepreneurial opportunities by proposing a taxonomy that categorizes them based on the interplay of state, market, and community logics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Administration Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

15.10

自引率

10.80%

发文量

130

期刊介绍： Public Administration Review (PAR), a bi-monthly professional journal, has held its position as the premier outlet for public administration research, theory, and practice for 75 years. Published for the American Society for Public Administration,TM/SM, it uniquely serves both academics and practitioners in the public sector. PAR features articles that identify and analyze current trends, offer a factual basis for decision-making, stimulate discussion, and present leading literature in an easily accessible format. Covering a diverse range of topics and featuring expert book reviews, PAR is both exciting to read and an indispensable resource in the field.