Stefan Salzmann,Laura Kikker,Ellen Tosberg,Noah Becker,Markus Spies,Frank Euteneuer,Dirk Rüsch
{"title":"个性化干预对术前焦虑的影响和确定焦虑水平的最小临床重要差异——一项随机临床试验","authors":"Stefan Salzmann,Laura Kikker,Ellen Tosberg,Noah Becker,Markus Spies,Frank Euteneuer,Dirk Rüsch","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPreoperative anxiety is common and most patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support to cope with their anxiety. Studies examining the effectiveness of information to reduce anxiety have been inconsistent. In addition, it is unclear whether results reported to be statistically significant are also clinically relevant. This study's primary objective was to test the hypothesis that a personalized and information-based intervention would reduce anesthesia-related anxiety.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 122 adults awaiting elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive a personalized and information-based intervention in addition to standard preanesthetic consultation (intervention group) or standard preanesthetic consultation (control group) the day before surgery. Anxiety was assessed at two time points before and at four time points after randomization until induction of anesthesia to state their anxiety level using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (two items each for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, each item's score range: 1-5). Constrained linear mixed models were used to analyze the intervention effects. Patients' subjective changes in anxiety (reduced vs. not reduced) and associated numeric scores were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe intervention led to reduced anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety in the intervention group compared to the control group after randomization (indicated by significant two-way interactions for anesthesia-related anxiety (F(5, 96.291) = 7.449, p<.001) and surgery-related anxiety (F(5, 112.486) = 5.466, p<.001)). The minimal clinically important difference in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety scores was 1.03 and 1.13 points for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nA personalized and information-based intervention can reduce anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety to a statistically significant and clinically relevant degree. Future studies should include an active control group to evaluate this intervention's specific effects which may be helpful only in patients seeking anxiety-reducing interventions.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a personalized intervention on preoperative anxiety and determination of the minimal clinically important difference in anxiety levels - a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Salzmann,Laura Kikker,Ellen Tosberg,Noah Becker,Markus Spies,Frank Euteneuer,Dirk Rüsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/aln.0000000000005351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPreoperative anxiety is common and most patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support to cope with their anxiety. Studies examining the effectiveness of information to reduce anxiety have been inconsistent. In addition, it is unclear whether results reported to be statistically significant are also clinically relevant. This study's primary objective was to test the hypothesis that a personalized and information-based intervention would reduce anesthesia-related anxiety.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nIn this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 122 adults awaiting elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive a personalized and information-based intervention in addition to standard preanesthetic consultation (intervention group) or standard preanesthetic consultation (control group) the day before surgery. Anxiety was assessed at two time points before and at four time points after randomization until induction of anesthesia to state their anxiety level using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (two items each for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, each item's score range: 1-5). Constrained linear mixed models were used to analyze the intervention effects. Patients' subjective changes in anxiety (reduced vs. not reduced) and associated numeric scores were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe intervention led to reduced anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety in the intervention group compared to the control group after randomization (indicated by significant two-way interactions for anesthesia-related anxiety (F(5, 96.291) = 7.449, p<.001) and surgery-related anxiety (F(5, 112.486) = 5.466, p<.001)). The minimal clinically important difference in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety scores was 1.03 and 1.13 points for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, respectively.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nA personalized and information-based intervention can reduce anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety to a statistically significant and clinically relevant degree. Future studies should include an active control group to evaluate this intervention's specific effects which may be helpful only in patients seeking anxiety-reducing interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005351\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005351","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of a personalized intervention on preoperative anxiety and determination of the minimal clinically important difference in anxiety levels - a randomized clinical trial.
BACKGROUND
Preoperative anxiety is common and most patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support to cope with their anxiety. Studies examining the effectiveness of information to reduce anxiety have been inconsistent. In addition, it is unclear whether results reported to be statistically significant are also clinically relevant. This study's primary objective was to test the hypothesis that a personalized and information-based intervention would reduce anesthesia-related anxiety.
METHODS
In this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 122 adults awaiting elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive a personalized and information-based intervention in addition to standard preanesthetic consultation (intervention group) or standard preanesthetic consultation (control group) the day before surgery. Anxiety was assessed at two time points before and at four time points after randomization until induction of anesthesia to state their anxiety level using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (two items each for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, each item's score range: 1-5). Constrained linear mixed models were used to analyze the intervention effects. Patients' subjective changes in anxiety (reduced vs. not reduced) and associated numeric scores were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference.
RESULTS
The intervention led to reduced anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety in the intervention group compared to the control group after randomization (indicated by significant two-way interactions for anesthesia-related anxiety (F(5, 96.291) = 7.449, p<.001) and surgery-related anxiety (F(5, 112.486) = 5.466, p<.001)). The minimal clinically important difference in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety scores was 1.03 and 1.13 points for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
A personalized and information-based intervention can reduce anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety to a statistically significant and clinically relevant degree. Future studies should include an active control group to evaluate this intervention's specific effects which may be helpful only in patients seeking anxiety-reducing interventions.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.