个性化干预对术前焦虑的影响和确定焦虑水平的最小临床重要差异——一项随机临床试验

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1097/aln.0000000000005351
Stefan Salzmann,Laura Kikker,Ellen Tosberg,Noah Becker,Markus Spies,Frank Euteneuer,Dirk Rüsch
{"title":"个性化干预对术前焦虑的影响和确定焦虑水平的最小临床重要差异——一项随机临床试验","authors":"Stefan Salzmann,Laura Kikker,Ellen Tosberg,Noah Becker,Markus Spies,Frank Euteneuer,Dirk Rüsch","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPreoperative anxiety is common and most patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support to cope with their anxiety. Studies examining the effectiveness of information to reduce anxiety have been inconsistent. In addition, it is unclear whether results reported to be statistically significant are also clinically relevant. This study's primary objective was to test the hypothesis that a personalized and information-based intervention would reduce anesthesia-related anxiety.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 122 adults awaiting elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive a personalized and information-based intervention in addition to standard preanesthetic consultation (intervention group) or standard preanesthetic consultation (control group) the day before surgery. Anxiety was assessed at two time points before and at four time points after randomization until induction of anesthesia to state their anxiety level using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (two items each for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, each item's score range: 1-5). Constrained linear mixed models were used to analyze the intervention effects. Patients' subjective changes in anxiety (reduced vs. not reduced) and associated numeric scores were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe intervention led to reduced anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety in the intervention group compared to the control group after randomization (indicated by significant two-way interactions for anesthesia-related anxiety (F(5, 96.291) = 7.449, p<.001) and surgery-related anxiety (F(5, 112.486) = 5.466, p<.001)). The minimal clinically important difference in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety scores was 1.03 and 1.13 points for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nA personalized and information-based intervention can reduce anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety to a statistically significant and clinically relevant degree. Future studies should include an active control group to evaluate this intervention's specific effects which may be helpful only in patients seeking anxiety-reducing interventions.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a personalized intervention on preoperative anxiety and determination of the minimal clinically important difference in anxiety levels - a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Salzmann,Laura Kikker,Ellen Tosberg,Noah Becker,Markus Spies,Frank Euteneuer,Dirk Rüsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/aln.0000000000005351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPreoperative anxiety is common and most patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support to cope with their anxiety. Studies examining the effectiveness of information to reduce anxiety have been inconsistent. In addition, it is unclear whether results reported to be statistically significant are also clinically relevant. This study's primary objective was to test the hypothesis that a personalized and information-based intervention would reduce anesthesia-related anxiety.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nIn this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 122 adults awaiting elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive a personalized and information-based intervention in addition to standard preanesthetic consultation (intervention group) or standard preanesthetic consultation (control group) the day before surgery. Anxiety was assessed at two time points before and at four time points after randomization until induction of anesthesia to state their anxiety level using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (two items each for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, each item's score range: 1-5). Constrained linear mixed models were used to analyze the intervention effects. Patients' subjective changes in anxiety (reduced vs. not reduced) and associated numeric scores were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe intervention led to reduced anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety in the intervention group compared to the control group after randomization (indicated by significant two-way interactions for anesthesia-related anxiety (F(5, 96.291) = 7.449, p<.001) and surgery-related anxiety (F(5, 112.486) = 5.466, p<.001)). The minimal clinically important difference in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety scores was 1.03 and 1.13 points for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, respectively.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nA personalized and information-based intervention can reduce anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety to a statistically significant and clinically relevant degree. Future studies should include an active control group to evaluate this intervention's specific effects which may be helpful only in patients seeking anxiety-reducing interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005351\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005351","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景术前焦虑是常见的,大多数经历术前焦虑的患者都欢迎支持来应对他们的焦虑。关于信息减少焦虑的有效性的研究一直不一致。此外,尚不清楚报道的具有统计学意义的结果是否也与临床相关。本研究的主要目的是验证个性化和基于信息的干预可以减少麻醉相关焦虑的假设。方法本研究采用单中心、前瞻性、随机、对照的方法,对122例在全麻下等待择期手术的成人患者进行随机(1:1)分组,在术前进行标准麻前会诊(干预组)或标准麻前会诊(对照组)的基础上进行个性化、信息化干预。在随机化前的两个时间点和麻醉诱导后的四个时间点评估焦虑,使用阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑和信息量表(麻醉和手术相关焦虑各两项,每项评分范围:1-5)陈述他们的焦虑水平。采用约束线性混合模型分析干预效果。患者焦虑的主观变化(减少与未减少)和相关的数字评分被用来确定最小的临床重要差异。结果随机分组后,干预组与对照组相比,麻醉相关焦虑(F(5,96.291) = 7.449, p< 0.001)和手术相关焦虑(F(5,112.486) = 5.466, p< 0.001)均显著降低。阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑和信息量表焦虑评分的最小临床重要差异麻醉相关焦虑和手术相关焦虑分别为1.03分和1.13分。结论个性化、信息化干预可显著降低麻醉及手术相关焦虑,且具有统计学意义和临床相关性。未来的研究应该包括一个积极的对照组来评估这种干预的具体效果,这可能只对寻求减少焦虑干预的患者有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of a personalized intervention on preoperative anxiety and determination of the minimal clinically important difference in anxiety levels - a randomized clinical trial.
BACKGROUND Preoperative anxiety is common and most patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support to cope with their anxiety. Studies examining the effectiveness of information to reduce anxiety have been inconsistent. In addition, it is unclear whether results reported to be statistically significant are also clinically relevant. This study's primary objective was to test the hypothesis that a personalized and information-based intervention would reduce anesthesia-related anxiety. METHODS In this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 122 adults awaiting elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive a personalized and information-based intervention in addition to standard preanesthetic consultation (intervention group) or standard preanesthetic consultation (control group) the day before surgery. Anxiety was assessed at two time points before and at four time points after randomization until induction of anesthesia to state their anxiety level using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (two items each for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, each item's score range: 1-5). Constrained linear mixed models were used to analyze the intervention effects. Patients' subjective changes in anxiety (reduced vs. not reduced) and associated numeric scores were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference. RESULTS The intervention led to reduced anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety in the intervention group compared to the control group after randomization (indicated by significant two-way interactions for anesthesia-related anxiety (F(5, 96.291) = 7.449, p<.001) and surgery-related anxiety (F(5, 112.486) = 5.466, p<.001)). The minimal clinically important difference in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety scores was 1.03 and 1.13 points for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A personalized and information-based intervention can reduce anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety to a statistically significant and clinically relevant degree. Future studies should include an active control group to evaluate this intervention's specific effects which may be helpful only in patients seeking anxiety-reducing interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Genome-wide Study on Propofol Requirements: Reply. Instructions for Obtaining Anesthesiology Continuing Medical Education (CME) Credit. Intersections of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry: Comment. Intersections of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry: Comment. Intersections of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry: Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1