社交媒体上政治事实核查的偏见处理:测试用户评论和党派世界观对错误信念和政治候选人评估的影响

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Internet Research Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1108/intr-06-2024-0890
Bingbing Zhang, Mike Schmierbach
{"title":"社交媒体上政治事实核查的偏见处理:测试用户评论和党派世界观对错误信念和政治候选人评估的影响","authors":"Bingbing Zhang, Mike Schmierbach","doi":"10.1108/intr-06-2024-0890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Social media platforms offer users the opportunity to engage with fact-checking posts aimed at countering misinformation surrounding political figures. However, limited research considers how the efficacy of fact-checking messages hinges on individuals’ perceptions and acceptance of the information, with user comments and individuals’ pre-existing partisan viewpoints both presenting possible barriers to positive reception of fact-checking messages.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>To bridge this research gap, this study conducted a 2 (misinformation exposure types: partisan worldview-consistent misinformation vs partisan worldview-inconsistent misinformation) × 4 (correction exposure types: a fact-checking post with no comments vs a fact-checking post with negative comments vs a fact-checking post with positive comments vs no fact-checking post) between-subject online experiment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>We found significant main effects of user comments and partisan worldview on political misbelief and political attitudes. Importantly, among participants exposed to worldview-inconsistent misinformation, negative comments significantly decreased voting support compared to positive comments or no comments.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This research is significant for the theoretical examination of the interaction between user comments and partisan worldview in influencing the effectiveness of political fact-checking messages. In addition, it has practical implications for fact-checking organizations and comment moderation in the fight against political misinformation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study presents original research examining the impact of social media user comments beneath a fact-checking post on beliefs in misinformation and evaluations of political candidates. While prior research has demonstrated how partisan worldview affects the effectiveness of corrections, the interaction between social media user comments and partisan worldview has not yet been explored.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biased processing of political fact-checks on social media: testing the effects of user comments and partisan worldview on misbeliefs and political candidate evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Bingbing Zhang, Mike Schmierbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/intr-06-2024-0890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Social media platforms offer users the opportunity to engage with fact-checking posts aimed at countering misinformation surrounding political figures. However, limited research considers how the efficacy of fact-checking messages hinges on individuals’ perceptions and acceptance of the information, with user comments and individuals’ pre-existing partisan viewpoints both presenting possible barriers to positive reception of fact-checking messages.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>To bridge this research gap, this study conducted a 2 (misinformation exposure types: partisan worldview-consistent misinformation vs partisan worldview-inconsistent misinformation) × 4 (correction exposure types: a fact-checking post with no comments vs a fact-checking post with negative comments vs a fact-checking post with positive comments vs no fact-checking post) between-subject online experiment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>We found significant main effects of user comments and partisan worldview on political misbelief and political attitudes. Importantly, among participants exposed to worldview-inconsistent misinformation, negative comments significantly decreased voting support compared to positive comments or no comments.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>This research is significant for the theoretical examination of the interaction between user comments and partisan worldview in influencing the effectiveness of political fact-checking messages. In addition, it has practical implications for fact-checking organizations and comment moderation in the fight against political misinformation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study presents original research examining the impact of social media user comments beneath a fact-checking post on beliefs in misinformation and evaluations of political candidates. While prior research has demonstrated how partisan worldview affects the effectiveness of corrections, the interaction between social media user comments and partisan worldview has not yet been explored.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":54925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Research\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-06-2024-0890\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-06-2024-0890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体平台为用户提供了参与事实核查的机会,这些帖子旨在打击围绕政治人物的错误信息。然而,有限的研究考虑了事实核查信息的有效性如何取决于个人对信息的看法和接受程度,用户评论和个人先前存在的党派观点都可能对事实核查信息的积极接受构成障碍。设计/方法/方法为了弥补这一研究差距,本研究进行了2(错误信息暴露类型:党派世界观一致的错误信息vs党派世界观不一致的错误信息)× 4(纠正暴露类型:没有评论的事实核查帖子vs负面评论的事实核查帖子vs正面评论的事实核查帖子vs无事实核查帖子)的受试者在线实验。我们发现,用户评论和党派世界观对政治误解和政治态度有显著的主要影响。重要的是,在接触到与世界观不一致的错误信息的参与者中,与正面评论或没有评论相比,负面评论显著减少了投票支持。研究局限/启示本研究对于从理论上考察用户评论与党派世界观之间的交互作用对政治事实核查信息有效性的影响具有重要意义。此外,它对事实核查组织和评论节制在打击政治错误信息方面具有实际意义。原创性/价值本研究提出了一项原创研究,考察了社交媒体用户在事实核查帖子下的评论对错误信息的信念和对政治候选人的评估的影响。虽然先前的研究已经证明了党派世界观如何影响纠正的有效性,但尚未探索社交媒体用户评论与党派世界观之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biased processing of political fact-checks on social media: testing the effects of user comments and partisan worldview on misbeliefs and political candidate evaluation

Purpose

Social media platforms offer users the opportunity to engage with fact-checking posts aimed at countering misinformation surrounding political figures. However, limited research considers how the efficacy of fact-checking messages hinges on individuals’ perceptions and acceptance of the information, with user comments and individuals’ pre-existing partisan viewpoints both presenting possible barriers to positive reception of fact-checking messages.

Design/methodology/approach

To bridge this research gap, this study conducted a 2 (misinformation exposure types: partisan worldview-consistent misinformation vs partisan worldview-inconsistent misinformation) × 4 (correction exposure types: a fact-checking post with no comments vs a fact-checking post with negative comments vs a fact-checking post with positive comments vs no fact-checking post) between-subject online experiment.

Findings

We found significant main effects of user comments and partisan worldview on political misbelief and political attitudes. Importantly, among participants exposed to worldview-inconsistent misinformation, negative comments significantly decreased voting support compared to positive comments or no comments.

Research limitations/implications

This research is significant for the theoretical examination of the interaction between user comments and partisan worldview in influencing the effectiveness of political fact-checking messages. In addition, it has practical implications for fact-checking organizations and comment moderation in the fight against political misinformation.

Originality/value

This study presents original research examining the impact of social media user comments beneath a fact-checking post on beliefs in misinformation and evaluations of political candidates. While prior research has demonstrated how partisan worldview affects the effectiveness of corrections, the interaction between social media user comments and partisan worldview has not yet been explored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking the influence of perceived credibility of guaranteed data destruction service on digital device recycling platform use: the perspective of privacy calculus Visiting and exploring digital transformation management: a bibliometric analysis and review study The impact of emotional expressions on the popularity of discussion threads: evidence from Reddit Analyzing the formation mechanism of self-leadership from the perspective of enterprise social media communication visibility Social media-induced fear of missing out (FoMO) in the workplace: the influence on job burnout and workplace relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1