珊瑚礁鱼类种群水平栖息地宽度随丰富度变化

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Global Ecology and Biogeography Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1111/geb.13948
Itai Granot, Michel Kulbicki, Laurent Vigliola, Jonathan Belmaker
{"title":"珊瑚礁鱼类种群水平栖息地宽度随丰富度变化","authors":"Itai Granot, Michel Kulbicki, Laurent Vigliola, Jonathan Belmaker","doi":"10.1111/geb.13948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimIt has been hypothesised that niche breadth decreases with richness due to interactions, such as competition, forcing species to specialise. This hypothesis has been tested at the community‐level using species‐level niche breadth estimates. However, evidence for changes in niche‐breath among populations of the same species are scant. Our aim was to examine the niche breadth to richness relationship within species, which is crucial for understanding the role of interactions, as opposed to large‐scale climate, in altering realised niche breadth.LocationThe Pacific Ocean.Time Period1988–2015.Major Taxa StudiedFishes.MethodsWe focus on reef fishes along a large‐scale richness gradient not accompanied by marked environmental changes. Fishes were surveyed in four distinct habitats, which allow to estimate habitat‐breadth for each population. We calculated habitat‐breadth across multiple populations of 154 species, and tested how habitat‐breadth varied with richness. We further tested the effect of traits and trait‐distinctiveness on the richness‐sensitivity of habitat‐breadth.ResultsHabitat‐breadth varied with species traits, with larger species more commonly habitat generalists while schooling and planktivorous species more commonly habitat specialists. Importantly, habitat‐breadth was negatively correlated with richness for 109 out of the 154 species, and, across all species, the relationship was highly significant. We found some support that species with distinct traits displayed less sensitivity of habitat‐breadth to richness, but the relationship was dependent on the type of trait‐distinctiveness index used.ConclusionsThis is the first large‐scale evidence that population‐level habitat‐breadth changes with richness. Results suggest that the realised niche is population‐specific and that niche breadth is reduced in high‐diversity settings where more intense interactions, such as competition, are expected. This implies that populations, specifically in species rich areas, do not use their entire fundamental niche. Therefore, the ability to predict habitat preferences response to global changes based on current habitat associations, without accounting for species interactions, may be limited.","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population‐Level Habitat Breadth Varies With Richness in Reef Fishes\",\"authors\":\"Itai Granot, Michel Kulbicki, Laurent Vigliola, Jonathan Belmaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimIt has been hypothesised that niche breadth decreases with richness due to interactions, such as competition, forcing species to specialise. This hypothesis has been tested at the community‐level using species‐level niche breadth estimates. However, evidence for changes in niche‐breath among populations of the same species are scant. Our aim was to examine the niche breadth to richness relationship within species, which is crucial for understanding the role of interactions, as opposed to large‐scale climate, in altering realised niche breadth.LocationThe Pacific Ocean.Time Period1988–2015.Major Taxa StudiedFishes.MethodsWe focus on reef fishes along a large‐scale richness gradient not accompanied by marked environmental changes. Fishes were surveyed in four distinct habitats, which allow to estimate habitat‐breadth for each population. We calculated habitat‐breadth across multiple populations of 154 species, and tested how habitat‐breadth varied with richness. We further tested the effect of traits and trait‐distinctiveness on the richness‐sensitivity of habitat‐breadth.ResultsHabitat‐breadth varied with species traits, with larger species more commonly habitat generalists while schooling and planktivorous species more commonly habitat specialists. Importantly, habitat‐breadth was negatively correlated with richness for 109 out of the 154 species, and, across all species, the relationship was highly significant. We found some support that species with distinct traits displayed less sensitivity of habitat‐breadth to richness, but the relationship was dependent on the type of trait‐distinctiveness index used.ConclusionsThis is the first large‐scale evidence that population‐level habitat‐breadth changes with richness. Results suggest that the realised niche is population‐specific and that niche breadth is reduced in high‐diversity settings where more intense interactions, such as competition, are expected. This implies that populations, specifically in species rich areas, do not use their entire fundamental niche. Therefore, the ability to predict habitat preferences response to global changes based on current habitat associations, without accounting for species interactions, may be limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13948\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标已经假设,由于相互作用,如竞争,迫使物种专门化,生态位宽度随着丰富度而减少。这一假设已经在群落水平上通过物种水平的生态位宽度估算进行了验证。然而,同一物种种群中生态位呼吸变化的证据很少。我们的目的是研究物种内生态位宽度与丰富度的关系,这对于理解相互作用在改变实现生态位宽度中的作用至关重要,而不是大规模气候。地点:太平洋。时间period1988 - 2015。研究鱼类的主要分类群。方法研究沿大尺度丰富度梯度、不伴随明显环境变化的珊瑚礁鱼类。鱼类在四个不同的栖息地进行了调查,从而可以估计每个种群的栖息地宽度。我们计算了154种不同种群的栖息地宽度,并测试了栖息地宽度随丰富度的变化情况。我们进一步测试了性状和性状独特性对生境宽度丰富度敏感性的影响。结果生境宽度随物种特征的变化而变化,体型较大的物种多为生境通用型,而游动型和浮游食性物种多为生境专一型。重要的是,在154个物种中,有109个物种的生境宽度与丰富度呈负相关,并且在所有物种中,这种关系都非常显著。结果表明,具有显著性状的物种生境宽度对丰富度的敏感性较低,但这种关系取决于所使用的性状显著性指数类型。结论首次在大尺度上证明种群水平的生境宽度随丰富度变化。结果表明,实现的生态位是特定于种群的,在高多样性环境中,生态位宽度会减少,而在这种环境中,预期会有更激烈的相互作用,比如竞争。这意味着种群,特别是在物种丰富的地区,不会使用它们的整个基本生态位。因此,在不考虑物种相互作用的情况下,基于当前栖息地关联预测栖息地偏好对全球变化的响应的能力可能是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Population‐Level Habitat Breadth Varies With Richness in Reef Fishes
AimIt has been hypothesised that niche breadth decreases with richness due to interactions, such as competition, forcing species to specialise. This hypothesis has been tested at the community‐level using species‐level niche breadth estimates. However, evidence for changes in niche‐breath among populations of the same species are scant. Our aim was to examine the niche breadth to richness relationship within species, which is crucial for understanding the role of interactions, as opposed to large‐scale climate, in altering realised niche breadth.LocationThe Pacific Ocean.Time Period1988–2015.Major Taxa StudiedFishes.MethodsWe focus on reef fishes along a large‐scale richness gradient not accompanied by marked environmental changes. Fishes were surveyed in four distinct habitats, which allow to estimate habitat‐breadth for each population. We calculated habitat‐breadth across multiple populations of 154 species, and tested how habitat‐breadth varied with richness. We further tested the effect of traits and trait‐distinctiveness on the richness‐sensitivity of habitat‐breadth.ResultsHabitat‐breadth varied with species traits, with larger species more commonly habitat generalists while schooling and planktivorous species more commonly habitat specialists. Importantly, habitat‐breadth was negatively correlated with richness for 109 out of the 154 species, and, across all species, the relationship was highly significant. We found some support that species with distinct traits displayed less sensitivity of habitat‐breadth to richness, but the relationship was dependent on the type of trait‐distinctiveness index used.ConclusionsThis is the first large‐scale evidence that population‐level habitat‐breadth changes with richness. Results suggest that the realised niche is population‐specific and that niche breadth is reduced in high‐diversity settings where more intense interactions, such as competition, are expected. This implies that populations, specifically in species rich areas, do not use their entire fundamental niche. Therefore, the ability to predict habitat preferences response to global changes based on current habitat associations, without accounting for species interactions, may be limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
期刊最新文献
Completing the Speciation Cycle: Ecological Niches and Traits Predict Local Species Coexistence in Birds Across the Globe CoralBleachRisk—Global Projections of Coral Bleaching Risk in the 21st Century SNAPSHOT USA 2019–2023: The First Five Years of Data From a Coordinated Camera Trap Survey of the United States Spatial Scale and the Underestimation of Stream Fish Community Invadedness Marked Variability in Distance-Decay Patterns Suggests Contrasting Dispersal Ability in Abyssal Taxa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1