确保联邦正确性:工业网络物理系统中联邦学习的形式化验证

IF 6.2 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Future Generation Computer Systems-The International Journal of Escience Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.future.2024.107675
Badra Souhila Guendouzi , Samir Ouchani , Hiba Al Assaad , Madeleine El Zaher
{"title":"确保联邦正确性:工业网络物理系统中联邦学习的形式化验证","authors":"Badra Souhila Guendouzi ,&nbsp;Samir Ouchani ,&nbsp;Hiba Al Assaad ,&nbsp;Madeleine El Zaher","doi":"10.1016/j.future.2024.107675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In industry 4.0, Industrial Cyber–Physical Systems (<span>ICPS</span>) integrate industrial machines with computer control and data analysis. Federated Learning (FL) improves this by enabling collaborative machine learning and improvement while maintaining data privacy. This method improves the security, and intelligence of industrial processes. FL-based frameworks proposed in the literature do not perform rigorous validation of collaborators’ behaviors, especially with regard to reliability and operational correctness. In contrast, non-FL-based cyber–physical systems have already been verified in the literature using formal methods. Therefore, there is a significant gap in the application of these verification techniques to FL-based systems. To fill this gap, we explore the possibility of introducing formal verification into FL-based cyber–physical systems, starting with our <span><strong>FedGA-Meta</strong></span> published framework. Thus, our research focuses on expanding our <span><strong>FedGA-Meta</strong></span> framework in the context of Industry 4.0, this paper delves into a comprehensive validation of the framework’s operational reliability and correctness within <span>ICPS</span> based on FL. To achieve this, we employ Timed Computation Tree Logic (TCTL) for the precise specification of system requirements, coupled with Labeled Transition Systems (LTS) to construct the <span>ICPS</span> semantic in detail. Through the usage of Uppaal for both simulation and model-checking purposes, we rigorously test the framework under a variety of operational scenarios. This approach allows us to confirm the system’s reliability and correctness, ensuring that the <span><strong>FedGA-Meta</strong></span> framework operates effectively and as intended within the demanding environments of Industry 4.0.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55132,"journal":{"name":"Future Generation Computer Systems-The International Journal of Escience","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 107675"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensuring the federation correctness: Formal verification of Federated Learning in industrial cyber-physical systems\",\"authors\":\"Badra Souhila Guendouzi ,&nbsp;Samir Ouchani ,&nbsp;Hiba Al Assaad ,&nbsp;Madeleine El Zaher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.future.2024.107675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In industry 4.0, Industrial Cyber–Physical Systems (<span>ICPS</span>) integrate industrial machines with computer control and data analysis. Federated Learning (FL) improves this by enabling collaborative machine learning and improvement while maintaining data privacy. This method improves the security, and intelligence of industrial processes. FL-based frameworks proposed in the literature do not perform rigorous validation of collaborators’ behaviors, especially with regard to reliability and operational correctness. In contrast, non-FL-based cyber–physical systems have already been verified in the literature using formal methods. Therefore, there is a significant gap in the application of these verification techniques to FL-based systems. To fill this gap, we explore the possibility of introducing formal verification into FL-based cyber–physical systems, starting with our <span><strong>FedGA-Meta</strong></span> published framework. Thus, our research focuses on expanding our <span><strong>FedGA-Meta</strong></span> framework in the context of Industry 4.0, this paper delves into a comprehensive validation of the framework’s operational reliability and correctness within <span>ICPS</span> based on FL. To achieve this, we employ Timed Computation Tree Logic (TCTL) for the precise specification of system requirements, coupled with Labeled Transition Systems (LTS) to construct the <span>ICPS</span> semantic in detail. Through the usage of Uppaal for both simulation and model-checking purposes, we rigorously test the framework under a variety of operational scenarios. This approach allows us to confirm the system’s reliability and correctness, ensuring that the <span><strong>FedGA-Meta</strong></span> framework operates effectively and as intended within the demanding environments of Industry 4.0.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Generation Computer Systems-The International Journal of Escience\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Generation Computer Systems-The International Journal of Escience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X24006393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Generation Computer Systems-The International Journal of Escience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X24006393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在工业4.0中,工业信息物理系统(ICPS)将工业机器与计算机控制和数据分析集成在一起。联邦学习(FL)通过支持协作机器学习和改进,同时维护数据隐私,从而改善了这一点。这种方法提高了工业过程的安全性和智能化。文献中提出的基于人工智能的框架并没有对合作者的行为进行严格的验证,尤其是在可靠性和操作正确性方面。相比之下,非基于fl的网络物理系统已经在文献中使用形式化方法进行了验证。因此,这些验证技术在基于fl的系统中的应用存在很大的差距。为了填补这一空白,我们探索了将正式验证引入基于fl的网络物理系统的可能性,从我们的FedGA-Meta发布框架开始。因此,我们的研究重点是在工业4.0背景下扩展我们的FedGA-Meta框架,本文深入研究了基于FL的ICPS框架的运行可靠性和正确性的全面验证。为了实现这一目标,我们使用定时计算树逻辑(TCTL)来精确规范系统需求,并结合标记转换系统(LTS)来详细构建ICPS语义。通过使用Uppaal进行仿真和模型检查,我们在各种操作场景下严格测试了框架。这种方法使我们能够确认系统的可靠性和正确性,确保FedGA-Meta框架在工业4.0的苛刻环境中有效运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ensuring the federation correctness: Formal verification of Federated Learning in industrial cyber-physical systems
In industry 4.0, Industrial Cyber–Physical Systems (ICPS) integrate industrial machines with computer control and data analysis. Federated Learning (FL) improves this by enabling collaborative machine learning and improvement while maintaining data privacy. This method improves the security, and intelligence of industrial processes. FL-based frameworks proposed in the literature do not perform rigorous validation of collaborators’ behaviors, especially with regard to reliability and operational correctness. In contrast, non-FL-based cyber–physical systems have already been verified in the literature using formal methods. Therefore, there is a significant gap in the application of these verification techniques to FL-based systems. To fill this gap, we explore the possibility of introducing formal verification into FL-based cyber–physical systems, starting with our FedGA-Meta published framework. Thus, our research focuses on expanding our FedGA-Meta framework in the context of Industry 4.0, this paper delves into a comprehensive validation of the framework’s operational reliability and correctness within ICPS based on FL. To achieve this, we employ Timed Computation Tree Logic (TCTL) for the precise specification of system requirements, coupled with Labeled Transition Systems (LTS) to construct the ICPS semantic in detail. Through the usage of Uppaal for both simulation and model-checking purposes, we rigorously test the framework under a variety of operational scenarios. This approach allows us to confirm the system’s reliability and correctness, ensuring that the FedGA-Meta framework operates effectively and as intended within the demanding environments of Industry 4.0.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
2.70%
发文量
376
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computing infrastructures and systems are constantly evolving, resulting in increasingly complex and collaborative scientific applications. To cope with these advancements, there is a growing need for collaborative tools that can effectively map, control, and execute these applications. Furthermore, with the explosion of Big Data, there is a requirement for innovative methods and infrastructures to collect, analyze, and derive meaningful insights from the vast amount of data generated. This necessitates the integration of computational and storage capabilities, databases, sensors, and human collaboration. Future Generation Computer Systems aims to pioneer advancements in distributed systems, collaborative environments, high-performance computing, and Big Data analytics. It strives to stay at the forefront of developments in grids, clouds, and the Internet of Things (IoT) to effectively address the challenges posed by these wide-area, fully distributed sensing and computing systems.
期刊最新文献
Self-sovereign identity framework with user-friendly private key generation and rule table Accelerating complex graph queries by summary-based hybrid partitioning for discovering vulnerabilities of distribution equipment DNA: Dual-radio Dual-constraint Node Activation scheduling for energy-efficient data dissemination in IoT Blending lossy and lossless data compression methods to support health data streaming in smart cities Energy–time modelling of distributed multi-population genetic algorithms with dynamic workload in HPC clusters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1