二次离子质谱法分析微粒中铀同位素的准确性

IF 1 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1134/S1061934824701211
Yu. A. Komarov, V. A. Stebelkov
{"title":"二次离子质谱法分析微粒中铀同位素的准确性","authors":"Yu. A. Komarov,&nbsp;V. A. Stebelkov","doi":"10.1134/S1061934824701211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The results of measurements of <sup>235</sup>U/<sup>238</sup>U isotope ratios in microparticles of a reference material performed by Cameca IMS-4f and Cameca IMS 1280-HR mass spectrometers are compared. Twenty-eight particles of various shapes and sizes and also one spherical uranium oxide particle approximately 0.6 μ in size were analyzed by both instruments. These particles were selected based on a preliminary SEM–EDX analysis. The results indicate that the Cameca IMS-1280 HR mass spectrometer can measure uranium isotope ratios with precision up to thousandths of percent, while the Cameca IMS-4f mass spectrometer can measure only up to tenths of percent. For measurements of uranium-235 concentrations at the 0.7% level, the error range for mass spectrometers with a “large” magnet is two orders of magnitude smaller than the errors from mass spectrometers with a “small” magnet, with measurement errors more than ten times lower. Additionally, while mass spectrometers with a small magnet cannot measure minor isotope concentrations at the 5 × 10<sup>–3</sup>% level in submicrometer particles, mass spectrometers with a large magnet can achieve this with an error of less than 10%.</p>","PeriodicalId":606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"79 13","pages":"1956 - 1961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Uranium Isotope Analysis in Microparticles by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry\",\"authors\":\"Yu. A. Komarov,&nbsp;V. A. Stebelkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1061934824701211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The results of measurements of <sup>235</sup>U/<sup>238</sup>U isotope ratios in microparticles of a reference material performed by Cameca IMS-4f and Cameca IMS 1280-HR mass spectrometers are compared. Twenty-eight particles of various shapes and sizes and also one spherical uranium oxide particle approximately 0.6 μ in size were analyzed by both instruments. These particles were selected based on a preliminary SEM–EDX analysis. The results indicate that the Cameca IMS-1280 HR mass spectrometer can measure uranium isotope ratios with precision up to thousandths of percent, while the Cameca IMS-4f mass spectrometer can measure only up to tenths of percent. For measurements of uranium-235 concentrations at the 0.7% level, the error range for mass spectrometers with a “large” magnet is two orders of magnitude smaller than the errors from mass spectrometers with a “small” magnet, with measurement errors more than ten times lower. Additionally, while mass spectrometers with a small magnet cannot measure minor isotope concentrations at the 5 × 10<sup>–3</sup>% level in submicrometer particles, mass spectrometers with a large magnet can achieve this with an error of less than 10%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"79 13\",\"pages\":\"1956 - 1961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1061934824701211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1061934824701211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了Cameca IMS-4f质谱仪和Cameca IMS 1280-HR质谱仪对某标准物质微粒中235U/238U同位素比值的测量结果。用这两种仪器分析了28个不同形状和大小的氧化铀颗粒和一个直径约0.6 μ的球形氧化铀颗粒。这些颗粒是根据初步的SEM-EDX分析选择的。结果表明,Cameca IMS-1280 HR质谱计测量铀同位素比值的精度可达千分之一,而Cameca IMS-4f质谱计的测量精度仅为十分之一。对于0.7%水平的铀-235浓度的测量,使用“大”磁铁的质谱仪的误差范围比使用“小”磁铁的质谱仪的误差小两个数量级,测量误差比使用“小”磁铁的质谱仪小十倍以上。此外,虽然使用小磁铁的质谱仪无法测量亚微米颗粒中5 × 10-3%水平的微量同位素浓度,但使用大磁铁的质谱仪可以实现这一目标,误差小于10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of Uranium Isotope Analysis in Microparticles by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

The results of measurements of 235U/238U isotope ratios in microparticles of a reference material performed by Cameca IMS-4f and Cameca IMS 1280-HR mass spectrometers are compared. Twenty-eight particles of various shapes and sizes and also one spherical uranium oxide particle approximately 0.6 μ in size were analyzed by both instruments. These particles were selected based on a preliminary SEM–EDX analysis. The results indicate that the Cameca IMS-1280 HR mass spectrometer can measure uranium isotope ratios with precision up to thousandths of percent, while the Cameca IMS-4f mass spectrometer can measure only up to tenths of percent. For measurements of uranium-235 concentrations at the 0.7% level, the error range for mass spectrometers with a “large” magnet is two orders of magnitude smaller than the errors from mass spectrometers with a “small” magnet, with measurement errors more than ten times lower. Additionally, while mass spectrometers with a small magnet cannot measure minor isotope concentrations at the 5 × 10–3% level in submicrometer particles, mass spectrometers with a large magnet can achieve this with an error of less than 10%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Journal of Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Chemistry is an international peer reviewed journal that covers theoretical and applied aspects of analytical chemistry; it informs the reader about new achievements in analytical methods, instruments and reagents. Ample space is devoted to problems arising in the analysis of vital media such as water and air. Consideration is given to the detection and determination of metal ions, anions, and various organic substances. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
期刊最新文献
Application of Stir-Bar Sorptive Extraction for Determination of Organic Pollutants in Snow by Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatography—High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Use of Scanning Electron Microscopy to Enhance the Accuracy of Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Uranium Microparticles Rapid Characterization of Kraft Lignin Depolymerization Products by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry with Visualization of Mass Spectrometric Data Method for the Quantitative Detection of Isoforms of Translation Initiation Factors 4E in Potato Leaf Tissues Using Multiple Reaction Monitoring Expected and Unexpected Results in the Separation of Distributions of Deuterosubstituted Multicharged Ions of Apamin and Its Complex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1