4D-VAR微物理方案在模拟超级气旋风暴“安潘”路径和强度中的性能评价

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS pure and applied geophysics Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s00024-024-03573-2
Arun Kumar, Kanak Lata Xalxo, Sushil Kumar, Biranchi Kumar Mahala, Ashish Routray, Nagendra Kumar
{"title":"4D-VAR微物理方案在模拟超级气旋风暴“安潘”路径和强度中的性能评价","authors":"Arun Kumar,&nbsp;Kanak Lata Xalxo,&nbsp;Sushil Kumar,&nbsp;Biranchi Kumar Mahala,&nbsp;Ashish Routray,&nbsp;Nagendra Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03573-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Four-Dimensional Variational (4DVar) data assimilation system of the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, developed by the international community dedicated to data assimilation research and operations, is customised to simulate the super cyclonic storm \"Amphan\" formed over the Bay of Bengal during May 16, 2020, to May 21, 2020. Five simulations are conducted using five different microphysics schemes namely, Kessler, Lin et al., WRF Single Moment 3-class (WSM3), WSM5, and WSM6 at a horizontal resolution of 18 km, keeping the Kain–Fritsch cumulus and the Yonsei University planetary boundary-layer scheme fixed. The model simulated features of \"Amphan\" are compared with observational data from the India Meteorological Department (IMD), the Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM), and the 5th generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Atmospheric Reanalysis (ERA-5) over the specified region. Among all the schemes, Lin et al. scheme shows track remarkably close to the observed track. Lin et al. (WSM5) scheme shows least along track (AT) error of 7.47 km at 24-h forecast length. Lin et al. shows least AT error of 5.8 km (28.12 km) for 48-h (72-h) forecast length. All schemes except Kessler and WSM3 show the spatial distribution of maximum sustained wind (MSW) surrounding the eye of the cyclone which is similar with ERA5 data. All the schemes underestimate the 10m-MSW during the entire life of the storm. However, the Kessler scheme simulates higher 10m-MSW during 00 UTC 18 May to 12 UTC 19 May in comparison to other schemes and further the simulated MSW matches with IMD observation up to 06 UTC 20 May. The Kessler scheme overestimates the MSLP for the intensity level ESCS-VSCS-SCS-CS valid 09 UTC on 19 May to 00 UTC on 21 May and other schemes underestimate during this period. The analysis carried out with the Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation tool reveals that the Lin et al. (WSM6) scheme indicates enhanced forecast proficiency for accumulation valid 00 UTC 20 May (21 May) 2020. The analysis of vertically integrated moisture transport (VIMT) and vertically integrated moisture divergence (VIMD) suggests that the greater moisture transport is quite evident in Lin et al. scheme during the SuCS intensity level. Kessler scheme is efficient in simulating warm-rain process and high intensity storm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"181 11","pages":"3375 - 3391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Assessment of 4D-VAR Microphysics Schemes in Simulating the Track and Intensity of Super Cyclonic Storm “Amphan”\",\"authors\":\"Arun Kumar,&nbsp;Kanak Lata Xalxo,&nbsp;Sushil Kumar,&nbsp;Biranchi Kumar Mahala,&nbsp;Ashish Routray,&nbsp;Nagendra Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00024-024-03573-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Four-Dimensional Variational (4DVar) data assimilation system of the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, developed by the international community dedicated to data assimilation research and operations, is customised to simulate the super cyclonic storm \\\"Amphan\\\" formed over the Bay of Bengal during May 16, 2020, to May 21, 2020. Five simulations are conducted using five different microphysics schemes namely, Kessler, Lin et al., WRF Single Moment 3-class (WSM3), WSM5, and WSM6 at a horizontal resolution of 18 km, keeping the Kain–Fritsch cumulus and the Yonsei University planetary boundary-layer scheme fixed. The model simulated features of \\\"Amphan\\\" are compared with observational data from the India Meteorological Department (IMD), the Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM), and the 5th generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Atmospheric Reanalysis (ERA-5) over the specified region. Among all the schemes, Lin et al. scheme shows track remarkably close to the observed track. Lin et al. (WSM5) scheme shows least along track (AT) error of 7.47 km at 24-h forecast length. Lin et al. shows least AT error of 5.8 km (28.12 km) for 48-h (72-h) forecast length. All schemes except Kessler and WSM3 show the spatial distribution of maximum sustained wind (MSW) surrounding the eye of the cyclone which is similar with ERA5 data. All the schemes underestimate the 10m-MSW during the entire life of the storm. However, the Kessler scheme simulates higher 10m-MSW during 00 UTC 18 May to 12 UTC 19 May in comparison to other schemes and further the simulated MSW matches with IMD observation up to 06 UTC 20 May. The Kessler scheme overestimates the MSLP for the intensity level ESCS-VSCS-SCS-CS valid 09 UTC on 19 May to 00 UTC on 21 May and other schemes underestimate during this period. The analysis carried out with the Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation tool reveals that the Lin et al. (WSM6) scheme indicates enhanced forecast proficiency for accumulation valid 00 UTC 20 May (21 May) 2020. The analysis of vertically integrated moisture transport (VIMT) and vertically integrated moisture divergence (VIMD) suggests that the greater moisture transport is quite evident in Lin et al. scheme during the SuCS intensity level. Kessler scheme is efficient in simulating warm-rain process and high intensity storm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"volume\":\"181 11\",\"pages\":\"3375 - 3391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03573-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03573-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高级研究天气研究与预报(WRF)模式的四维变分(4DVar)数据同化系统是由国际社会专门开发的数据同化研究和业务,用于模拟2020年5月16日至5月21日在孟加拉湾形成的超级气旋风暴“Amphan”。采用Kessler, Lin等人、WRF单时刻3级(WSM3)、WSM5和WSM6 5种不同的微物理方案进行了5次模拟,水平分辨率为18 km,保持了Kain-Fritsch积云和延世大学行星边界层方案的固定。模式模拟的“Amphan”特征与印度气象局(IMD)、全球降水测量任务(GPM)和第五代欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)大气再分析(ERA-5)在指定区域的观测资料进行了比较。在所有方案中,Lin等方案的航迹与观测航迹非常接近。Lin等(WSM5)方案在24 h预报长度下的AT误差最小,为7.47 km。Lin等人给出的48小时(72小时)预报长度的最小AT误差为5.8 km (28.12 km)。除Kessler和WSM3外,其余方案均显示了气旋眼周围最大持续风(MSW)的空间分布,与ERA5数据相似。所有的方案都低估了风暴整个生命周期的10米城市垃圾。然而,与其他方案相比,Kessler方案在5月18日00 UTC至5月19日12 UTC期间模拟的10m-MSW更高,并且模拟的MSW与5月20日06 UTC的IMD观测相匹配。Kessler方案高估了5月19日09 - 5月21日00 UTC有效的ESCS-VSCS-SCS-CS强度水平的MSLP,而其他方案则低估了这一时期的MSLP。使用基于对象的诊断评估方法进行的分析显示,Lin等人(WSM6)方案表明,2020年5月20日(5月21日)00 UTC有效的累积预测能力增强。对垂直积分水汽输运(VIMT)和垂直积分水汽散度(VIMD)的分析表明,在SuCS强度水平上,Lin等方案中较大的水汽输运非常明显。Kessler格式对于模拟暖雨过程和强暴雨是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Assessment of 4D-VAR Microphysics Schemes in Simulating the Track and Intensity of Super Cyclonic Storm “Amphan”

The Four-Dimensional Variational (4DVar) data assimilation system of the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, developed by the international community dedicated to data assimilation research and operations, is customised to simulate the super cyclonic storm "Amphan" formed over the Bay of Bengal during May 16, 2020, to May 21, 2020. Five simulations are conducted using five different microphysics schemes namely, Kessler, Lin et al., WRF Single Moment 3-class (WSM3), WSM5, and WSM6 at a horizontal resolution of 18 km, keeping the Kain–Fritsch cumulus and the Yonsei University planetary boundary-layer scheme fixed. The model simulated features of "Amphan" are compared with observational data from the India Meteorological Department (IMD), the Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM), and the 5th generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Atmospheric Reanalysis (ERA-5) over the specified region. Among all the schemes, Lin et al. scheme shows track remarkably close to the observed track. Lin et al. (WSM5) scheme shows least along track (AT) error of 7.47 km at 24-h forecast length. Lin et al. shows least AT error of 5.8 km (28.12 km) for 48-h (72-h) forecast length. All schemes except Kessler and WSM3 show the spatial distribution of maximum sustained wind (MSW) surrounding the eye of the cyclone which is similar with ERA5 data. All the schemes underestimate the 10m-MSW during the entire life of the storm. However, the Kessler scheme simulates higher 10m-MSW during 00 UTC 18 May to 12 UTC 19 May in comparison to other schemes and further the simulated MSW matches with IMD observation up to 06 UTC 20 May. The Kessler scheme overestimates the MSLP for the intensity level ESCS-VSCS-SCS-CS valid 09 UTC on 19 May to 00 UTC on 21 May and other schemes underestimate during this period. The analysis carried out with the Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation tool reveals that the Lin et al. (WSM6) scheme indicates enhanced forecast proficiency for accumulation valid 00 UTC 20 May (21 May) 2020. The analysis of vertically integrated moisture transport (VIMT) and vertically integrated moisture divergence (VIMD) suggests that the greater moisture transport is quite evident in Lin et al. scheme during the SuCS intensity level. Kessler scheme is efficient in simulating warm-rain process and high intensity storm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between TTI and Various Thunderstorm Related Parameters over Kerala, India Frequency-dependent Layered Q Model and Attenuation Tomography of the Himachal North-West Himalaya, India: Insight to Explore Crustal Variation Adaptive Window Approach for Curie Depth Calculation Based on Modified Centroid Method and the Application in the South China Block Modeling the Ventilation of the Vortex Periphery for Anticyclonic Quasi-Permanent Lofoten Vortex Stable Distribution of Fractional Fluctuations of Well Log Data in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1