星历理论JPL DE, INPOP和EPM

IF 0.7 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Astronomy Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1134/S1063772924700938
Yu. A. Moiseev, N. V. Emelyanov
{"title":"星历理论JPL DE, INPOP和EPM","authors":"Yu. A. Moiseev,&nbsp;N. V. Emelyanov","doi":"10.1134/S1063772924700938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we have provided an overview and description of three leading sources of planetary ephemerides: the ephemerides from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and their developed ephemeris theory DE; the ephemerides from the Institute of Celestial Mechanics and Ephemeris Calculation (IMCCE) and their developed theory INPOP; and the ephemeris theory EPM developed at the Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences (IAA RAS). The methods and observational data sets used in constructing each of the theories have been described. A comparison of the ephemerides computed within these theories has been made using examples from future space missions. It has been shown that the differences in computed positions do not exhibit systematic characteristics and represent rather random discrepancies caused by variations in dynamic models and the observational data taken into account. The overall conclusion from the comparison of the ephemerides has been that none of the considered options (JPL DE, EPM, and INPOP) has an advantage in terms of accuracy. All three options have been equally valid, and any of the three ephemeris options can be used in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55440,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy Reports","volume":"68 11","pages":"1098 - 1118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ephemeris Theories JPL DE, INPOP, and EPM\",\"authors\":\"Yu. A. Moiseev,&nbsp;N. V. Emelyanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1063772924700938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper, we have provided an overview and description of three leading sources of planetary ephemerides: the ephemerides from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and their developed ephemeris theory DE; the ephemerides from the Institute of Celestial Mechanics and Ephemeris Calculation (IMCCE) and their developed theory INPOP; and the ephemeris theory EPM developed at the Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences (IAA RAS). The methods and observational data sets used in constructing each of the theories have been described. A comparison of the ephemerides computed within these theories has been made using examples from future space missions. It has been shown that the differences in computed positions do not exhibit systematic characteristics and represent rather random discrepancies caused by variations in dynamic models and the observational data taken into account. The overall conclusion from the comparison of the ephemerides has been that none of the considered options (JPL DE, EPM, and INPOP) has an advantage in terms of accuracy. All three options have been equally valid, and any of the three ephemeris options can be used in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomy Reports\",\"volume\":\"68 11\",\"pages\":\"1098 - 1118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomy Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063772924700938\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063772924700938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对行星星历的三个主要来源进行了概述和描述:喷气推进实验室(JPL)的星历表及其发展的星历理论DE;天体力学与星历计算研究所(IMCCE)的星历表及其发展的INPOP理论;以及俄罗斯科学院应用天文学研究所(IAA RAS)开发的星历理论。描述了构建每种理论所使用的方法和观测数据集。用未来太空任务中的例子对这些理论计算出的星历表进行了比较。已经表明,计算位置的差异不表现出系统特征,而是由动态模型和观测数据的变化引起的随机差异。从星历表的比较中得出的总体结论是,在所考虑的选项(JPL DE、EPM和INPOP)中,没有一个在准确性方面具有优势。这三种方法都是同样有效的,而且任何一种星历表方法都可以在实际中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ephemeris Theories JPL DE, INPOP, and EPM

In this paper, we have provided an overview and description of three leading sources of planetary ephemerides: the ephemerides from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and their developed ephemeris theory DE; the ephemerides from the Institute of Celestial Mechanics and Ephemeris Calculation (IMCCE) and their developed theory INPOP; and the ephemeris theory EPM developed at the Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences (IAA RAS). The methods and observational data sets used in constructing each of the theories have been described. A comparison of the ephemerides computed within these theories has been made using examples from future space missions. It has been shown that the differences in computed positions do not exhibit systematic characteristics and represent rather random discrepancies caused by variations in dynamic models and the observational data taken into account. The overall conclusion from the comparison of the ephemerides has been that none of the considered options (JPL DE, EPM, and INPOP) has an advantage in terms of accuracy. All three options have been equally valid, and any of the three ephemeris options can be used in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astronomy Reports
Astronomy Reports 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy Reports is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes original papers on astronomical topics, including theoretical and observational astrophysics, physics of the Sun, planetary astrophysics, radio astronomy, stellar astronomy, celestial mechanics, and astronomy methods and instrumentation.
期刊最新文献
Mathematical Insights into Triangular Configurations of the Sitnikov Four-Body Dynamics A Comparison of Three Approaches to Determining Orbits of Visual Double Stars Based on Observations of Their Short-Arced Orbits Monitoring of the Scintillation Parameters of PSR B1133+16 and B1237+25 at 111 MHz Kinematics of Brown Dwarfs in the Solar Vicinity On the Possibility of Eliminating the Time Parallax Effect in Registration of Moving Objects on CMOS Matrices in Rolling Shutter Mode
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1