紧急情况下静脉注射氯胺酮治疗急性躁动的系统评价。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Asian journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104344
Christopher Peter, Satish Suhas, Guru S Gowda, Deepak Ghadigaonkar, Krishna Prasad Muliyala, Venkata Senthil Kumar Reddi
{"title":"紧急情况下静脉注射氯胺酮治疗急性躁动的系统评价。","authors":"Christopher Peter, Satish Suhas, Guru S Gowda, Deepak Ghadigaonkar, Krishna Prasad Muliyala, Venkata Senthil Kumar Reddi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Agitation, a significant psychiatric issue often linked to conditions like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, invariably pose challenges in emergency settings. Acute agitation occurs in 2.6 % of emergency cases and up to 12.2 % among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. With limited available options for effective management of acute agitation, ketamine is emerging as a fast-onset alternative to antipsychotics like haloperidol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, searched databases in April 2024 for studies on parenteral ketamine for acute agitation in emergency settings. Data extraction included patient demographics, ketamine administration details, sedation time, need for additional doses, adverse events, and intubation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 7410 results, narrowing to 29 suitable studies with 1516 patients (mean age 35.5 ± 12.4 years, 67.9 % male). Ketamine was administered intramuscularly (IM) in 69 % of studies, intravenously (IV) in 6.9 %, and either IV or IM in 24.1 %. Most patients (86.5 %) received IM ketamine at a mean dose of 3.83 ± 1.07 mg/kg, while 13.5 % received IV ketamine at 2.09 ± 1.56 mg/kg. Sedation occurred on average in 6.1 min. However, 24.5 % needed rescue medications or additional doses. Adverse effects included tachycardia (5.1 %), hypertension (5.5 %), hypersalivation (5.6 %), nausea (2.1 %), emergence reactions (1.4 %), and, rarely, cardiac arrest (0.2). While 19.1 % required intubation, the reasons for the same could not be attributed to ketamine exclusively. Furthermore, there was no evidence for worsening or development of psychotic symptoms with ketamine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the effectiveness and safety of parenteral ketamine for managing acute agitation in emergency settings. However, further research is needed to optimize ketamine use in this challenging scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"103 ","pages":"104344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of parenteral ketamine for managing acute agitation in emergency settings.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Peter, Satish Suhas, Guru S Gowda, Deepak Ghadigaonkar, Krishna Prasad Muliyala, Venkata Senthil Kumar Reddi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Agitation, a significant psychiatric issue often linked to conditions like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, invariably pose challenges in emergency settings. Acute agitation occurs in 2.6 % of emergency cases and up to 12.2 % among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. With limited available options for effective management of acute agitation, ketamine is emerging as a fast-onset alternative to antipsychotics like haloperidol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, searched databases in April 2024 for studies on parenteral ketamine for acute agitation in emergency settings. Data extraction included patient demographics, ketamine administration details, sedation time, need for additional doses, adverse events, and intubation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 7410 results, narrowing to 29 suitable studies with 1516 patients (mean age 35.5 ± 12.4 years, 67.9 % male). Ketamine was administered intramuscularly (IM) in 69 % of studies, intravenously (IV) in 6.9 %, and either IV or IM in 24.1 %. Most patients (86.5 %) received IM ketamine at a mean dose of 3.83 ± 1.07 mg/kg, while 13.5 % received IV ketamine at 2.09 ± 1.56 mg/kg. Sedation occurred on average in 6.1 min. However, 24.5 % needed rescue medications or additional doses. Adverse effects included tachycardia (5.1 %), hypertension (5.5 %), hypersalivation (5.6 %), nausea (2.1 %), emergence reactions (1.4 %), and, rarely, cardiac arrest (0.2). While 19.1 % required intubation, the reasons for the same could not be attributed to ketamine exclusively. Furthermore, there was no evidence for worsening or development of psychotic symptoms with ketamine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the effectiveness and safety of parenteral ketamine for managing acute agitation in emergency settings. However, further research is needed to optimize ketamine use in this challenging scenario.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"104344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104344\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

躁动是一种重要的精神问题,通常与精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症等疾病有关,在紧急情况下总是会带来挑战。急性躁动发生在2.6 %的急诊病例中,在精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者中高达12.2 %。由于急性躁动的有效治疗方法有限,氯胺酮正在成为氟哌啶醇等抗精神病药物的快速替代方案。方法:本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南,检索了2024年4月的数据库,检索了紧急情况下静脉注射氯胺酮治疗急性躁动的研究。数据提取包括患者人口统计、氯胺酮给药细节、镇静时间、需要额外剂量、不良事件和插管率。结果:检索得到7410个结果,缩小到29个合适的研究,1516例患者(平均年龄35.5 ± 12.4岁,67.9% %为男性)。氯胺酮在69% %的研究中肌肉注射(IM), 6.9 %的研究中静脉注射(IV), 24.1% %的研究中静脉注射或IM。大多数患者(86.5 %)接受注射氯胺酮,平均剂量为3.83 ± 1.07 mg/kg, 13.5 %接受静脉注射氯胺酮,平均剂量为2.09 ± 1.56 mg/kg。镇静平均发生时间为6.1 min。然而,24.5% %需要抢救药物或额外剂量。不良反应包括心动过速(5.1% %)、高血压(5.5% %)、唾液过多(5.6% %)、恶心(2.1 %)、紧急反应(1.4 %),以及罕见的心脏骤停(0.2%)。虽然19.1 %需要插管,但其原因不能完全归因于氯胺酮。此外,没有证据表明氯胺酮会加重或发展精神病症状。结论:本综述强调了在紧急情况下静脉注射氯胺酮治疗急性躁动的有效性和安全性。然而,在这种具有挑战性的情况下,需要进一步的研究来优化氯胺酮的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review of parenteral ketamine for managing acute agitation in emergency settings.

Introduction: Agitation, a significant psychiatric issue often linked to conditions like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, invariably pose challenges in emergency settings. Acute agitation occurs in 2.6 % of emergency cases and up to 12.2 % among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. With limited available options for effective management of acute agitation, ketamine is emerging as a fast-onset alternative to antipsychotics like haloperidol.

Methods: This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, searched databases in April 2024 for studies on parenteral ketamine for acute agitation in emergency settings. Data extraction included patient demographics, ketamine administration details, sedation time, need for additional doses, adverse events, and intubation rates.

Results: The search yielded 7410 results, narrowing to 29 suitable studies with 1516 patients (mean age 35.5 ± 12.4 years, 67.9 % male). Ketamine was administered intramuscularly (IM) in 69 % of studies, intravenously (IV) in 6.9 %, and either IV or IM in 24.1 %. Most patients (86.5 %) received IM ketamine at a mean dose of 3.83 ± 1.07 mg/kg, while 13.5 % received IV ketamine at 2.09 ± 1.56 mg/kg. Sedation occurred on average in 6.1 min. However, 24.5 % needed rescue medications or additional doses. Adverse effects included tachycardia (5.1 %), hypertension (5.5 %), hypersalivation (5.6 %), nausea (2.1 %), emergence reactions (1.4 %), and, rarely, cardiac arrest (0.2). While 19.1 % required intubation, the reasons for the same could not be attributed to ketamine exclusively. Furthermore, there was no evidence for worsening or development of psychotic symptoms with ketamine.

Conclusion: This review highlights the effectiveness and safety of parenteral ketamine for managing acute agitation in emergency settings. However, further research is needed to optimize ketamine use in this challenging scenario.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the cognitive vulnerabilities in traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study conducted in an urban south India cohort. Methylphenidate augmentation for electroconvulsive therapy-resistant major depressive disorder. Considering early adversities in the personalized treatment of addiction. Dyce Sombre's 'Lunacy'. Development of a suicide early warning system for Hong Kong using statistical process control and nowcasting based on media reported suicide deaths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1