从单细胞水平探讨IUA患者TCRA后雌激素治疗效果的分子机制。

IF 5.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Biology Direct Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x
Yue Du, Ruzhen Shuai, Sang Luo, Yiran Jin, Fengjuan Xu, Jingyi Zhang, Dan Liu, Limin Feng
{"title":"从单细胞水平探讨IUA患者TCRA后雌激素治疗效果的分子机制。","authors":"Yue Du, Ruzhen Shuai, Sang Luo, Yiran Jin, Fengjuan Xu, Jingyi Zhang, Dan Liu, Limin Feng","doi":"10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a common cause of clinically refractory infertility, and there exists significant heterogeneity in the treatment outcomes among IUA patients with the similar severity after transcervical resection of adhesion(TCRA). The underlying mechanism of different treatment outcomes occur remains elusive, and the precise contribution of various cell subtypes in this process remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing on 10 human endometrial samples to establish a single-cell atlas differences between patients who responded to estrogen therapy and those who did not. The results showed increased infiltration of immune cells such as monocyte macrophages, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells in patients who did not respond to estrogen therapy. Our findings indicate that distinct fibroblast subsets are implicated in the modulation of the Wnt, Hippo, and Hedgehog signaling pathways, as evidenced by functional enrichment analyses. This may have implications for the therapeutic efficacy in patients with IUA. Furthermore, we delineated the markers and transcriptional status of different macrophage subsets and identified two cell clusters, CXCL10high and CCL4L2high macrophage subsets, which are intimately associated with inflammation and fibrosis. The state of fibrosis and inflammatory response in human endometrial tissues with disparate treatment outcomes is revealed, and providing evidence to clarify the underlying determinants of sensitivity to estrogen therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We described the transcriptional status of different cell subtypes in the two groups of patients, providing new ideas for exploring the molecular mechanism of the difference in the effectiveness of estrogen therapy in patients, and providing theoretical basis for providing precise and individualized treatment plans for IUA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9164,"journal":{"name":"Biology Direct","volume":"19 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the molecular mechanism of estrogen therapy effectiveness after TCRA in IUA patients at single-cell level.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Du, Ruzhen Shuai, Sang Luo, Yiran Jin, Fengjuan Xu, Jingyi Zhang, Dan Liu, Limin Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a common cause of clinically refractory infertility, and there exists significant heterogeneity in the treatment outcomes among IUA patients with the similar severity after transcervical resection of adhesion(TCRA). The underlying mechanism of different treatment outcomes occur remains elusive, and the precise contribution of various cell subtypes in this process remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing on 10 human endometrial samples to establish a single-cell atlas differences between patients who responded to estrogen therapy and those who did not. The results showed increased infiltration of immune cells such as monocyte macrophages, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells in patients who did not respond to estrogen therapy. Our findings indicate that distinct fibroblast subsets are implicated in the modulation of the Wnt, Hippo, and Hedgehog signaling pathways, as evidenced by functional enrichment analyses. This may have implications for the therapeutic efficacy in patients with IUA. Furthermore, we delineated the markers and transcriptional status of different macrophage subsets and identified two cell clusters, CXCL10high and CCL4L2high macrophage subsets, which are intimately associated with inflammation and fibrosis. The state of fibrosis and inflammatory response in human endometrial tissues with disparate treatment outcomes is revealed, and providing evidence to clarify the underlying determinants of sensitivity to estrogen therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We described the transcriptional status of different cell subtypes in the two groups of patients, providing new ideas for exploring the molecular mechanism of the difference in the effectiveness of estrogen therapy in patients, and providing theoretical basis for providing precise and individualized treatment plans for IUA patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Direct\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670502/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Direct","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-024-00583-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:宫内粘连(Intrauterine adhesion, IUA)是临床上难治性不孕症的常见原因,经宫颈粘连切除术(TCRA)后,同等严重程度的宫内粘连患者的治疗结果存在显著的异质性。不同治疗结果发生的潜在机制仍然难以捉摸,各种细胞亚型在这一过程中的确切贡献仍然不确定。结果:在这里,我们对10个人类子宫内膜样本进行了单细胞转录组测序,以建立对雌激素治疗有反应的患者和对雌激素治疗没有反应的患者之间的单细胞图谱差异。结果显示,在对雌激素治疗无反应的患者中,免疫细胞如单核巨噬细胞、T细胞和自然杀伤(NK)细胞的浸润增加。我们的研究结果表明,不同的成纤维细胞亚群与Wnt、Hippo和Hedgehog信号通路的调节有关,正如功能富集分析所证明的那样。这可能对IUA患者的治疗效果有影响。此外,我们描述了不同巨噬细胞亚群的标记物和转录状态,并鉴定了两个细胞簇,CXCL10high和CCL4L2high巨噬细胞亚群,它们与炎症和纤维化密切相关。揭示了不同治疗结果的人子宫内膜组织的纤维化和炎症反应状态,并提供证据澄清对雌激素治疗敏感性的潜在决定因素。结论:我们描述了两组患者不同细胞亚型的转录状态,为探索雌激素治疗患者疗效差异的分子机制提供了新的思路,为IUA患者提供精准、个体化的治疗方案提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the molecular mechanism of estrogen therapy effectiveness after TCRA in IUA patients at single-cell level.

Background: Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a common cause of clinically refractory infertility, and there exists significant heterogeneity in the treatment outcomes among IUA patients with the similar severity after transcervical resection of adhesion(TCRA). The underlying mechanism of different treatment outcomes occur remains elusive, and the precise contribution of various cell subtypes in this process remains uncertain.

Results: Here, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing on 10 human endometrial samples to establish a single-cell atlas differences between patients who responded to estrogen therapy and those who did not. The results showed increased infiltration of immune cells such as monocyte macrophages, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells in patients who did not respond to estrogen therapy. Our findings indicate that distinct fibroblast subsets are implicated in the modulation of the Wnt, Hippo, and Hedgehog signaling pathways, as evidenced by functional enrichment analyses. This may have implications for the therapeutic efficacy in patients with IUA. Furthermore, we delineated the markers and transcriptional status of different macrophage subsets and identified two cell clusters, CXCL10high and CCL4L2high macrophage subsets, which are intimately associated with inflammation and fibrosis. The state of fibrosis and inflammatory response in human endometrial tissues with disparate treatment outcomes is revealed, and providing evidence to clarify the underlying determinants of sensitivity to estrogen therapy.

Conclusions: We described the transcriptional status of different cell subtypes in the two groups of patients, providing new ideas for exploring the molecular mechanism of the difference in the effectiveness of estrogen therapy in patients, and providing theoretical basis for providing precise and individualized treatment plans for IUA patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Direct
Biology Direct 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
32
审稿时长
7 months
期刊介绍: Biology Direct serves the life science research community as an open access, peer-reviewed online journal, providing authors and readers with an alternative to the traditional model of peer review. Biology Direct considers original research articles, hypotheses, comments, discovery notes and reviews in subject areas currently identified as those most conducive to the open review approach, primarily those with a significant non-experimental component.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the role of oxidative stress in carotid atherosclerosis: insights from transcriptomic data and single-cell sequencing combined with machine learning. BRCA1 is involved in sustaining rapid antler growth possibly via balancing of the p53/endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling pathway. Correction: Integrated Mendelian randomization and single-cell RNA-sequencing analyses identified OAS1 as a novel therapeutic target for erectile dysfunction via targeting fibroblasts. Functional genomic imaging (FGI), a virtual tool for visualization of functional gene expression modules in heterogeneous tumor samples. Uncovering glycolysis-driven molecular subtypes in diabetic nephropathy: a WGCNA and machine learning approach for diagnostic precision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1