数字层策略改善新生儿戊二酸尿1型筛查。

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY International Journal of Neonatal Screening Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.3390/ijns10040083
Elaine Zaunseder, Julian Teinert, Nikolas Boy, Sven F Garbade, Saskia Haupt, Patrik Feyh, Georg F Hoffmann, Stefan Kölker, Ulrike Mütze, Vincent Heuveline
{"title":"数字层策略改善新生儿戊二酸尿1型筛查。","authors":"Elaine Zaunseder, Julian Teinert, Nikolas Boy, Sven F Garbade, Saskia Haupt, Patrik Feyh, Georg F Hoffmann, Stefan Kölker, Ulrike Mütze, Vincent Heuveline","doi":"10.3390/ijns10040083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare inherited metabolic disease increasingly included in newborn screening (NBS) programs worldwide. Because of the broad biochemical spectrum of individuals with GA1 and the lack of reliable second-tier strategies, NBS for GA1 is still confronted with a high rate of false positives. In this study, we aim to increase the specificity of NBS for GA1 and, hence, to reduce the rate of false positives through machine learning methods. Therefore, we studied NBS profiles from 1,025,953 newborns screened between 2014 and 2023 at the Heidelberg NBS Laboratory, Germany. We identified a significant sex difference, resulting in twice as many false-positives male than female newborns. Moreover, the proposed digital-tier strategy based on logistic regression analysis, ridge regression, and support vector machine reduced the false-positive rate by over 90% compared to regular NBS while identifying all confirmed individuals with GA1 correctly. An in-depth analysis of the profiles revealed that in particular false-positive results with high associated follow-up costs could be reduced significantly. In conclusion, understanding the origin of false-positive NBS and implementing a digital-tier strategy to enhance the specificity of GA1 testing may significantly reduce the burden on newborns and their families from false-positive NBS results.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital-Tier Strategy Improves Newborn Screening for Glutaric Aciduria Type 1.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Zaunseder, Julian Teinert, Nikolas Boy, Sven F Garbade, Saskia Haupt, Patrik Feyh, Georg F Hoffmann, Stefan Kölker, Ulrike Mütze, Vincent Heuveline\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijns10040083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare inherited metabolic disease increasingly included in newborn screening (NBS) programs worldwide. Because of the broad biochemical spectrum of individuals with GA1 and the lack of reliable second-tier strategies, NBS for GA1 is still confronted with a high rate of false positives. In this study, we aim to increase the specificity of NBS for GA1 and, hence, to reduce the rate of false positives through machine learning methods. Therefore, we studied NBS profiles from 1,025,953 newborns screened between 2014 and 2023 at the Heidelberg NBS Laboratory, Germany. We identified a significant sex difference, resulting in twice as many false-positives male than female newborns. Moreover, the proposed digital-tier strategy based on logistic regression analysis, ridge regression, and support vector machine reduced the false-positive rate by over 90% compared to regular NBS while identifying all confirmed individuals with GA1 correctly. An in-depth analysis of the profiles revealed that in particular false-positive results with high associated follow-up costs could be reduced significantly. In conclusion, understanding the origin of false-positive NBS and implementing a digital-tier strategy to enhance the specificity of GA1 testing may significantly reduce the burden on newborns and their families from false-positive NBS results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neonatal Screening\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679506/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neonatal Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10040083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10040083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

戊二酸尿1型(GA1)是一种罕见的遗传性代谢性疾病,越来越多地被纳入新生儿筛查(NBS)项目。由于GA1患者具有广泛的生化谱,并且缺乏可靠的二级策略,因此GA1的NBS仍然面临着很高的假阳性率。在本研究中,我们的目标是提高NBS对GA1的特异性,从而通过机器学习方法降低误报率。因此,我们研究了2014年至2023年在德国海德堡NBS实验室筛查的1,025,953名新生儿的NBS资料。我们发现了显著的性别差异,导致男婴的假阳性是女婴的两倍。此外,所提出的基于逻辑回归分析、岭回归和支持向量机的数字层策略与常规NBS相比,将假阳性率降低了90%以上,同时正确识别了所有确诊的GA1个体。对资料的深入分析表明,特别是伴随高后续费用的假阳性结果可以显著减少。总之,了解NBS假阳性的起源,并实施数字层策略来提高GA1检测的特异性,可能会显著减轻新生儿及其家庭因NBS假阳性结果所带来的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital-Tier Strategy Improves Newborn Screening for Glutaric Aciduria Type 1.

Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare inherited metabolic disease increasingly included in newborn screening (NBS) programs worldwide. Because of the broad biochemical spectrum of individuals with GA1 and the lack of reliable second-tier strategies, NBS for GA1 is still confronted with a high rate of false positives. In this study, we aim to increase the specificity of NBS for GA1 and, hence, to reduce the rate of false positives through machine learning methods. Therefore, we studied NBS profiles from 1,025,953 newborns screened between 2014 and 2023 at the Heidelberg NBS Laboratory, Germany. We identified a significant sex difference, resulting in twice as many false-positives male than female newborns. Moreover, the proposed digital-tier strategy based on logistic regression analysis, ridge regression, and support vector machine reduced the false-positive rate by over 90% compared to regular NBS while identifying all confirmed individuals with GA1 correctly. An in-depth analysis of the profiles revealed that in particular false-positive results with high associated follow-up costs could be reduced significantly. In conclusion, understanding the origin of false-positive NBS and implementing a digital-tier strategy to enhance the specificity of GA1 testing may significantly reduce the burden on newborns and their families from false-positive NBS results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
International Journal of Neonatal Screening Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Newborn Screening for Gaucher Disease: Parental Stress and Psychological Burden. Seventh ISNS Reference Preparation for Neonatal Screening for Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, Phenylalanine, and 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone in Blood Spots. Clinical Utility of the Addition of Molecular Genetic Testing to Newborn Screening for Hemoglobinopathies for Confirmation of Alpha-Thalassemia Trait. Neonatal Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Severe T- and B-Cell Lymphopenias in Andalusia: A Prospective Study. Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease: Results from a Pilot Study in the Portuguese Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1