两个大脑基因在人类谱系中的从头出现似乎是不支持的。

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Journal of Molecular Evolution Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s00239-024-10227-3
Joseph Hannon Bozorgmehr
{"title":"两个大脑基因在人类谱系中的从头出现似乎是不支持的。","authors":"Joseph Hannon Bozorgmehr","doi":"10.1007/s00239-024-10227-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, certain studies have claimed that cognitive features and pathologies unique to humans can be traced to certain changes in the nervous system. These are caused by genes that have likely evolved \"from scratch,\" not having any coding precursors. The translated proteins would not appear outside of the human lineage and any orthologs in other species should be non-coding. This contrasts with research that has identified a decisive role for duplication, and modifications to regulatory sequences, for such phenotypic traits. Closer examination, however, reveals that the inferred lineage-specific emergence of at least two of these genes is likely a misinterpretation owing to a lack of peptide verification, experimental oversights, and insufficient species comparisons. A possible pseudogenic origin is proposed for one of them. The implications of these claims for the study of molecular evolution are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The De Novo Emergence of Two Brain Genes in the Human Lineage Appears to be Unsupported.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Hannon Bozorgmehr\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00239-024-10227-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently, certain studies have claimed that cognitive features and pathologies unique to humans can be traced to certain changes in the nervous system. These are caused by genes that have likely evolved \\\"from scratch,\\\" not having any coding precursors. The translated proteins would not appear outside of the human lineage and any orthologs in other species should be non-coding. This contrasts with research that has identified a decisive role for duplication, and modifications to regulatory sequences, for such phenotypic traits. Closer examination, however, reveals that the inferred lineage-specific emergence of at least two of these genes is likely a misinterpretation owing to a lack of peptide verification, experimental oversights, and insufficient species comparisons. A possible pseudogenic origin is proposed for one of them. The implications of these claims for the study of molecular evolution are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Evolution\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-024-10227-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-024-10227-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,一些研究声称,人类独有的认知特征和病理可以追溯到神经系统的某些变化。这些是由可能“从零开始”进化而来的基因引起的,没有任何编码前体。翻译的蛋白质不会出现在人类谱系之外,其他物种的任何同源物都应该是非编码的。这与已经确定的复制和调节序列修饰的决定性作用的研究形成对比,这些表型性状。然而,更仔细的研究表明,由于缺乏肽验证、实验疏忽和物种比较不足,推断出至少两个这些基因的谱系特异性出现可能是一种误解。其中一个可能是假基因起源。讨论了这些主张对分子进化研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The De Novo Emergence of Two Brain Genes in the Human Lineage Appears to be Unsupported.

Recently, certain studies have claimed that cognitive features and pathologies unique to humans can be traced to certain changes in the nervous system. These are caused by genes that have likely evolved "from scratch," not having any coding precursors. The translated proteins would not appear outside of the human lineage and any orthologs in other species should be non-coding. This contrasts with research that has identified a decisive role for duplication, and modifications to regulatory sequences, for such phenotypic traits. Closer examination, however, reveals that the inferred lineage-specific emergence of at least two of these genes is likely a misinterpretation owing to a lack of peptide verification, experimental oversights, and insufficient species comparisons. A possible pseudogenic origin is proposed for one of them. The implications of these claims for the study of molecular evolution are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Journal of Molecular Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
36
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Molecular Evolution covers experimental, computational, and theoretical work aimed at deciphering features of molecular evolution and the processes bearing on these features, from the initial formation of macromolecular systems through their evolution at the molecular level, the co-evolution of their functions in cellular and organismal systems, and their influence on organismal adaptation, speciation, and ecology. Topics addressed include the evolution of informational macromolecules and their relation to more complex levels of biological organization, including populations and taxa, as well as the molecular basis for the evolution of ecological interactions of species and the use of molecular data to infer fundamental processes in evolutionary ecology. This coverage accommodates such subfields as new genome sequences, comparative structural and functional genomics, population genetics, the molecular evolution of development, the evolution of gene regulation and gene interaction networks, and in vitro evolution of DNA and RNA, molecular evolutionary ecology, and the development of methods and theory that enable molecular evolutionary inference, including but not limited to, phylogenetic methods.
期刊最新文献
2024 Zuckerkandl Prize. nT4X and nT4M: Novel Time Non-reversible Mixture Amino Acid Substitution Models. Evidence for Multiple Independent Expansions of Fox Gene Families Within Flatworms. Common Ancestry of the Id Locus: Chromosomal Rearrangement and Polygenic Possibilities. Evolution and Functional Diversification of Serine Racemase Homologs in Bacteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1