Nahush Bansal, Eun Seo Kwak, Mohammad Alqadi, Shuhao Qiu, Ragheb Assaly
{"title":"入院日期对急性失代偿性主动脉瓣狭窄结局的临床影响:一项全国性分析。","authors":"Nahush Bansal, Eun Seo Kwak, Mohammad Alqadi, Shuhao Qiu, Ragheb Assaly","doi":"10.3390/jpm14121118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Aortic stenosis (AS) is a critical valvular heart disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality if not managed promptly. Previous studies have highlighted the \"weekend effect\", where the day of admission impacts outcomes in various cardiac conditions. This study evaluates the impact of weekend versus weekday admissions on outcomes in patients admitted with acutely decompensated aortic stenosis. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database, focusing on patients emergently admitted with decompensated aortic stenosis. Patient outcomes were compared between those admitted on weekends (midnight Friday to midnight Sunday) and weekdays. <b>Results:</b> Among 94,320 patients included, 4537 (4.81%) were admitted on weekends. Weekend admissions were associated with significantly higher mortality (aOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.27-2.74) and longer hospital stays (mean increase 3.18 days; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to weekday admissions. Complication rates were also higher on weekends, including cardiogenic shock (aOR 2.1; 95% CI 1.54-2.87; <i>p</i> < 0.001), acute kidney injury (aOR 2.48; 95% CI 2.09-2.94; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and acute respiratory failure (aOR 2.88; 95% CI 2.38-3.49; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, weekend admissions had lower rates of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (aOR 0.49; 95% CI 0.40-0.62; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than weekday admissions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with aortic stenosis admitted on weekends face significantly higher mortality, extended hospital stays, and increased complication rates compared to weekday admissions. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) rates were also lower for patients admitted on weekends. The \"weekend effect\" markedly influences outcomes, underscoring the need for hospital and administrative strategies to mitigate these adverse effects. Implementing standardized protocols and optimizing resource allocation during weekends could potentially reduce mortality and improve patient outcomes, offering a path to more equitable healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"14 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Impact of Admission Day on Outcomes in Acutely Decompensated Aortic Stenosis: A Nationwide Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nahush Bansal, Eun Seo Kwak, Mohammad Alqadi, Shuhao Qiu, Ragheb Assaly\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm14121118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Aortic stenosis (AS) is a critical valvular heart disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality if not managed promptly. Previous studies have highlighted the \\\"weekend effect\\\", where the day of admission impacts outcomes in various cardiac conditions. This study evaluates the impact of weekend versus weekday admissions on outcomes in patients admitted with acutely decompensated aortic stenosis. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database, focusing on patients emergently admitted with decompensated aortic stenosis. Patient outcomes were compared between those admitted on weekends (midnight Friday to midnight Sunday) and weekdays. <b>Results:</b> Among 94,320 patients included, 4537 (4.81%) were admitted on weekends. Weekend admissions were associated with significantly higher mortality (aOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.27-2.74) and longer hospital stays (mean increase 3.18 days; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to weekday admissions. Complication rates were also higher on weekends, including cardiogenic shock (aOR 2.1; 95% CI 1.54-2.87; <i>p</i> < 0.001), acute kidney injury (aOR 2.48; 95% CI 2.09-2.94; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and acute respiratory failure (aOR 2.88; 95% CI 2.38-3.49; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, weekend admissions had lower rates of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (aOR 0.49; 95% CI 0.40-0.62; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than weekday admissions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with aortic stenosis admitted on weekends face significantly higher mortality, extended hospital stays, and increased complication rates compared to weekday admissions. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) rates were also lower for patients admitted on weekends. The \\\"weekend effect\\\" markedly influences outcomes, underscoring the need for hospital and administrative strategies to mitigate these adverse effects. Implementing standardized protocols and optimizing resource allocation during weekends could potentially reduce mortality and improve patient outcomes, offering a path to more equitable healthcare delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14121118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14121118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:主动脉瓣狭窄(Aortic stenosis, AS)是一种危重的瓣膜性心脏病,如果不及时治疗,其发病率和死亡率都会很高。先前的研究强调了“周末效应”,即入院日期影响各种心脏疾病的结果。本研究评估了周末与工作日入院对急性失代偿性主动脉狭窄患者预后的影响。方法:我们使用国家住院患者样本数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究,重点是急诊住院的失代偿性主动脉瓣狭窄患者。将周末(周五午夜至周日午夜)和工作日入院的患者的结果进行比较。结果:94320例患者中,4537例(4.81%)在周末入院。周末入院与较高的死亡率相关(aOR 1.86;95% CI 1.27-2.74)和更长的住院时间(平均增加3.18天;P < 0.001)。周末的并发症发生率也较高,包括心源性休克(aOR 2.1;95% ci 1.54-2.87;p < 0.001),急性肾损伤(aOR 2.48;95% ci 2.09-2.94;p < 0.001),急性呼吸衰竭(aOR 2.88;95% ci 2.38-3.49;P < 0.001)。此外,周末入院的经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)发生率较低(aOR 0.49;95% ci 0.40-0.62;P < 0.01)。结论:与工作日入院的主动脉瓣狭窄患者相比,周末入院的患者死亡率明显更高,住院时间延长,并发症发生率增加。周末入院的患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)率也较低。“周末效应”显著影响结果,强调医院和行政管理策略的必要性,以减轻这些不利影响。在周末实施标准化协议和优化资源分配可能会降低死亡率,改善患者的预后,为更公平的医疗保健服务提供途径。
Clinical Impact of Admission Day on Outcomes in Acutely Decompensated Aortic Stenosis: A Nationwide Analysis.
Background/Objectives: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a critical valvular heart disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality if not managed promptly. Previous studies have highlighted the "weekend effect", where the day of admission impacts outcomes in various cardiac conditions. This study evaluates the impact of weekend versus weekday admissions on outcomes in patients admitted with acutely decompensated aortic stenosis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database, focusing on patients emergently admitted with decompensated aortic stenosis. Patient outcomes were compared between those admitted on weekends (midnight Friday to midnight Sunday) and weekdays. Results: Among 94,320 patients included, 4537 (4.81%) were admitted on weekends. Weekend admissions were associated with significantly higher mortality (aOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.27-2.74) and longer hospital stays (mean increase 3.18 days; p < 0.001) compared to weekday admissions. Complication rates were also higher on weekends, including cardiogenic shock (aOR 2.1; 95% CI 1.54-2.87; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (aOR 2.48; 95% CI 2.09-2.94; p < 0.001), and acute respiratory failure (aOR 2.88; 95% CI 2.38-3.49; p < 0.001). Additionally, weekend admissions had lower rates of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (aOR 0.49; 95% CI 0.40-0.62; p < 0.01) than weekday admissions. Conclusions: Patients with aortic stenosis admitted on weekends face significantly higher mortality, extended hospital stays, and increased complication rates compared to weekday admissions. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) rates were also lower for patients admitted on weekends. The "weekend effect" markedly influences outcomes, underscoring the need for hospital and administrative strategies to mitigate these adverse effects. Implementing standardized protocols and optimizing resource allocation during weekends could potentially reduce mortality and improve patient outcomes, offering a path to more equitable healthcare delivery.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.