[城市生态承载力定量评价方法研究进展]。

Q3 Environmental Science 应用生态学报 Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.022
Ming-Song Zhan, Meng-Yuan Wang, Cong Liu, Ya-Qi Chu, Chun-Lin Li
{"title":"[城市生态承载力定量评价方法研究进展]。","authors":"Ming-Song Zhan, Meng-Yuan Wang, Cong Liu, Ya-Qi Chu, Chun-Lin Li","doi":"10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative evaluation of urban ecological carrying capacity is a critical foundation for measuring urban sustainable development in the new era. This review would enrich the concept and connotation of urban ecological carrying capacity by sorting out its components and characteristics. We categorized the methods for quantifying urban ecological carrying capacity into static evaluation methods, including ecological footprint method, comprehensive evaluation method, state space method, net primary productivity method, and carbon-oxygen balance method, as well as dynamic simulation prediction methods, including system dynamics models, BP neural network prediction models, and grey prediction models. We further summarized both the advantages and disadvantages of these quantitative evaluation methods. Finally, we predicted the development trends of quantitative evaluation methods for urban ecological carrying capacity, and put forward further in-depth research from aspects such as strengthening theoretical foundations, constructing indicator systems, establishing evaluation principles, and optimizing methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":35942,"journal":{"name":"应用生态学报","volume":"35 10","pages":"2925-2932"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Research progress on quantitative evaluation methods of urban ecological carrying capacity].\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Song Zhan, Meng-Yuan Wang, Cong Liu, Ya-Qi Chu, Chun-Lin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative evaluation of urban ecological carrying capacity is a critical foundation for measuring urban sustainable development in the new era. This review would enrich the concept and connotation of urban ecological carrying capacity by sorting out its components and characteristics. We categorized the methods for quantifying urban ecological carrying capacity into static evaluation methods, including ecological footprint method, comprehensive evaluation method, state space method, net primary productivity method, and carbon-oxygen balance method, as well as dynamic simulation prediction methods, including system dynamics models, BP neural network prediction models, and grey prediction models. We further summarized both the advantages and disadvantages of these quantitative evaluation methods. Finally, we predicted the development trends of quantitative evaluation methods for urban ecological carrying capacity, and put forward further in-depth research from aspects such as strengthening theoretical foundations, constructing indicator systems, establishing evaluation principles, and optimizing methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"应用生态学报\",\"volume\":\"35 10\",\"pages\":\"2925-2932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"应用生态学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"应用生态学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市生态承载力定量评价是衡量新时期城市可持续发展的重要基础。通过梳理城市生态承载力的构成要素和特征,丰富城市生态承载力的概念和内涵。将城市生态承载力量化方法分为静态评价方法(生态足迹法、综合评价法、状态空间法、净初级生产力法、碳氧平衡法)和动态模拟预测方法(系统动力学模型、BP神经网络预测模型和灰色预测模型)。我们进一步总结了这些定量评价方法的优缺点。最后,对城市生态承载力定量评价方法的发展趋势进行了预测,并从强化理论基础、构建指标体系、确立评价原则、优化方法等方面提出了进一步深入研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Research progress on quantitative evaluation methods of urban ecological carrying capacity].

Quantitative evaluation of urban ecological carrying capacity is a critical foundation for measuring urban sustainable development in the new era. This review would enrich the concept and connotation of urban ecological carrying capacity by sorting out its components and characteristics. We categorized the methods for quantifying urban ecological carrying capacity into static evaluation methods, including ecological footprint method, comprehensive evaluation method, state space method, net primary productivity method, and carbon-oxygen balance method, as well as dynamic simulation prediction methods, including system dynamics models, BP neural network prediction models, and grey prediction models. We further summarized both the advantages and disadvantages of these quantitative evaluation methods. Finally, we predicted the development trends of quantitative evaluation methods for urban ecological carrying capacity, and put forward further in-depth research from aspects such as strengthening theoretical foundations, constructing indicator systems, establishing evaluation principles, and optimizing methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
应用生态学报
应用生态学报 Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11393
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Hydrochemical and isotopic characteristics and water transformation relationships in the Zhenglan Banner section of Shandian River Basin, China. Impact of litter decomposition driven by nitrogen deposition on the soil organic carbon fractions in a Moso bamboo forest. Impacts of heartwood decay on radial growth of Abies georgei var. smithii in Sygera Mountains, China. Optimal inversion model for cultivated land soil salinity based on UAV hyperspectral data. Prediction of the potential distribution area of endangered medicinal plant Gymnadenia conopsea in China under the background of climate change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1