救护人员对心理健康状况态度的评估:救护人员医疗状况关注量表的翻译与心理测量学评价。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-02312-5
Kristin Häikiö, Carl Robert Christiansen, Rune Kveen, Eva Marie Engebakken Flaathen, Milada Hagen
{"title":"救护人员对心理健康状况态度的评估:救护人员医疗状况关注量表的翻译与心理测量学评价。","authors":"Kristin Häikiö, Carl Robert Christiansen, Rune Kveen, Eva Marie Engebakken Flaathen, Milada Hagen","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02312-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ambulance staff play a crucial role in responding to mental health crises. However, negative regard toward patients with mental health conditions can hinder care. The Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) assesses regards or attitudes but has not previously been validated for educated ambulance staff and has never been translated into Norwegian. This study aims to translate the instrument into Norwegian, test it on a population of ambulance staff, explore the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version, and measure regard for patients with psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The MCRS is an 11-item instrument with a Likert scale of 1-6. Possible sum scores range from 11 to 66 (higher score = more positive regards). We chose \"psychosis\" as the condition to investigate. Translation followed eight steps: (1) preparation, (2) forward translation, (3) backward translation, (4) first expert panel review, (5) harmonisation, (6) cognitive debriefing, (7) second expert panel review, and (8) writing of the final version. The instrument was tested and re-tested regarding the condition \"psychosis\" on a representative sample of 114 Norwegian ambulance staff in 2023, with a temporal gap of one month. We explored item scores and distribution, as well as floor and ceiling effects. We tested the internal consistency of the items using Cronbach's Alpha and consistency in answers over time (test and re-test) using the Paired Sample-T test. We used factor analyses to explore the inter-item relationships of the items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 114 participants had a mean sum score of 47, which is mid-range. The scale has a ceiling effect on five items, which was not described in detail earlier. Two items regarding the monetary spending on patients with the given condition had the largest ceiling effects. However, the Norwegian translation showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.82) and is reliable over time. Test and re-test showed no significant differences in the scale's total score (Paired sample T-test, p > 0.05). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicate that the scale should be used as a one-dimensional instrument in a Norwegian setting in ambulance staff populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Norwegian translation of the MCRS is a reliable instrument for ambulance staff measuring medical condition regards. However, the ceiling effect limits the ability to discern differences among high-scoring individuals. Ambulance staff's regard for patients with psychosis is medium positive (mid-range level), but slightly more positive than what is reported in the international literature regarding patients with mental health issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing ambulance staff attitudes toward mental health conditions: translation and psychometric evaluation of the medical condition regard scale among ambulance staff.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Häikiö, Carl Robert Christiansen, Rune Kveen, Eva Marie Engebakken Flaathen, Milada Hagen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-024-02312-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ambulance staff play a crucial role in responding to mental health crises. However, negative regard toward patients with mental health conditions can hinder care. The Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) assesses regards or attitudes but has not previously been validated for educated ambulance staff and has never been translated into Norwegian. This study aims to translate the instrument into Norwegian, test it on a population of ambulance staff, explore the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version, and measure regard for patients with psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The MCRS is an 11-item instrument with a Likert scale of 1-6. Possible sum scores range from 11 to 66 (higher score = more positive regards). We chose \\\"psychosis\\\" as the condition to investigate. Translation followed eight steps: (1) preparation, (2) forward translation, (3) backward translation, (4) first expert panel review, (5) harmonisation, (6) cognitive debriefing, (7) second expert panel review, and (8) writing of the final version. The instrument was tested and re-tested regarding the condition \\\"psychosis\\\" on a representative sample of 114 Norwegian ambulance staff in 2023, with a temporal gap of one month. We explored item scores and distribution, as well as floor and ceiling effects. We tested the internal consistency of the items using Cronbach's Alpha and consistency in answers over time (test and re-test) using the Paired Sample-T test. We used factor analyses to explore the inter-item relationships of the items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 114 participants had a mean sum score of 47, which is mid-range. The scale has a ceiling effect on five items, which was not described in detail earlier. Two items regarding the monetary spending on patients with the given condition had the largest ceiling effects. However, the Norwegian translation showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.82) and is reliable over time. Test and re-test showed no significant differences in the scale's total score (Paired sample T-test, p > 0.05). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicate that the scale should be used as a one-dimensional instrument in a Norwegian setting in ambulance staff populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Norwegian translation of the MCRS is a reliable instrument for ambulance staff measuring medical condition regards. However, the ceiling effect limits the ability to discern differences among high-scoring individuals. Ambulance staff's regard for patients with psychosis is medium positive (mid-range level), but slightly more positive than what is reported in the international literature regarding patients with mental health issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681673/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02312-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02312-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:救护人员在应对心理健康危机中发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,对精神疾病患者的负面看法可能会阻碍护理。医疗状况关注量表(MCRS)评估关注或态度,但此前尚未对受过教育的救护车工作人员进行验证,也从未翻译成挪威语。本研究旨在将该工具翻译成挪威语,在救护车工作人员人群中进行测试,探索挪威语版本的心理测量特性,并测量对精神病患者的关注。方法:MCRS量表共11项,李克特量表1-6分。可能的总得分范围从11到66(更高的分数=更多的积极评价)。我们选择“精神病”作为调查条件。翻译遵循八个步骤:(1)准备,(2)向前翻译,(3)向后翻译,(4)第一次专家组评审,(5)协调,(6)认知汇报,(7)第二次专家组评审,(8)撰写最终版本。该仪器在2023年对114名挪威救护人员的代表性样本进行了关于“精神病”的测试和重新测试,时间间隔为一个月。我们探索了项目分数和分布,以及地板和天花板效果。我们使用Cronbach's Alpha测试了项目的内部一致性,并使用配对样本-t测试测试了答案随时间的一致性(测试和再测试)。我们使用因子分析来探讨项目间的关系。结果:114名参与者的平均总分为47分,处于中档。该比额表对五个项目有上限效应,前面没有详细说明。有两个项目的上限效应是最大的,这两个项目涉及对患有特定疾病的患者的金钱支出。然而,挪威语翻译显示出足够的内部一致性(Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.82),并且随着时间的推移是可靠的。经检验和重测,量表总分差异无统计学意义(配对样本t检验,p < 0.05)。探索性和验证性因素分析表明,该量表应作为一个一维的工具,在挪威设置的救护人员人口。结论:MCRS的挪威语翻译是救护人员测量医疗状况的可靠工具。然而,天花板效应限制了辨别高分个体之间差异的能力。救护人员对精神病患者的关注是中等积极的(中等水平),但比国际文献中关于精神健康问题患者的报道稍微积极一些。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing ambulance staff attitudes toward mental health conditions: translation and psychometric evaluation of the medical condition regard scale among ambulance staff.

Introduction: Ambulance staff play a crucial role in responding to mental health crises. However, negative regard toward patients with mental health conditions can hinder care. The Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) assesses regards or attitudes but has not previously been validated for educated ambulance staff and has never been translated into Norwegian. This study aims to translate the instrument into Norwegian, test it on a population of ambulance staff, explore the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version, and measure regard for patients with psychosis.

Method: The MCRS is an 11-item instrument with a Likert scale of 1-6. Possible sum scores range from 11 to 66 (higher score = more positive regards). We chose "psychosis" as the condition to investigate. Translation followed eight steps: (1) preparation, (2) forward translation, (3) backward translation, (4) first expert panel review, (5) harmonisation, (6) cognitive debriefing, (7) second expert panel review, and (8) writing of the final version. The instrument was tested and re-tested regarding the condition "psychosis" on a representative sample of 114 Norwegian ambulance staff in 2023, with a temporal gap of one month. We explored item scores and distribution, as well as floor and ceiling effects. We tested the internal consistency of the items using Cronbach's Alpha and consistency in answers over time (test and re-test) using the Paired Sample-T test. We used factor analyses to explore the inter-item relationships of the items.

Results: The 114 participants had a mean sum score of 47, which is mid-range. The scale has a ceiling effect on five items, which was not described in detail earlier. Two items regarding the monetary spending on patients with the given condition had the largest ceiling effects. However, the Norwegian translation showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.82) and is reliable over time. Test and re-test showed no significant differences in the scale's total score (Paired sample T-test, p > 0.05). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicate that the scale should be used as a one-dimensional instrument in a Norwegian setting in ambulance staff populations.

Conclusion: The Norwegian translation of the MCRS is a reliable instrument for ambulance staff measuring medical condition regards. However, the ceiling effect limits the ability to discern differences among high-scoring individuals. Ambulance staff's regard for patients with psychosis is medium positive (mid-range level), but slightly more positive than what is reported in the international literature regarding patients with mental health issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Adverse childhood experiences, sleep quality/duration and later-life lower extremity function among older adults in China: evidence from CHARLS. Driving job satisfaction through inclusive knowledge management: a focus on learning and communication in diverse workplaces. Earthquake effects on youth: understanding psychological challenges and support needs. Experimental paradigm to test the effects of providing social support: study protocol of the PROSPECT trial (Study 2). I've really struggled but it does not seem to work: adolescents' experiences of living with ADHD - a thematic analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1