“我们在所有事情上都使用它”:黎巴嫩难民营的抗生素和日常生活。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117652
Amanda Hylland Spjeldnæs , Livia Wick , Heidi E. Fjeld , Anne Kveim Lie
{"title":"“我们在所有事情上都使用它”:黎巴嫩难民营的抗生素和日常生活。","authors":"Amanda Hylland Spjeldnæs ,&nbsp;Livia Wick ,&nbsp;Heidi E. Fjeld ,&nbsp;Anne Kveim Lie","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance has accelerated global efforts to reduce antibiotic use. While antibiotic resistance poses a significant threat, especially in low-income settings, there is a scarcity of research on how people in such environments, including refugee camps, access and use antibiotics. This article explores factors that contribute to the shaping of antibiotic use in Shatila refugee camp in Lebanon. It is based on six months of fieldwork from October 2021 to April 2022 in Shatila, consisting of participant observation, semi-structured interviews and group workshops with 32 camp residents and health workers. Following the onset of the Syrian war in 2011, the number of informal pharmacies and Syrian medicines boomed in Shatila. Aiming to describe and analyze how camp residents access and use antibiotics, we address two main themes: 1) the omnipresence of antibiotics in a context of scarcity, and 2) antibiotics as a panacea – a quick-fix for everyday ailments. Antibiotic consumption patterns in Shatila are formed by a scarcity of quality healthcare services on the one hand, and an omnipresence of antibiotics on the other. We demonstrate that in this loosely regulated context, where pharmaceuticals are bought over-the-counter; there is extensive antibiotic consumption. Camp residents often self-medicate with antibiotics for a wide range of purposes, extending beyond the treatment of infections. The high consumption of antibiotics will increase the level of antimicrobial resistance and pose a risk to the camp residents by disturbing local microbiomes and the amount of resistant genes (the resistome) in the environment, thus leading to new potential health risks. Building on theories of pharmaceuticalization and social suffering, we propose the concept of “antibioticalization.” This distinct form of pharmaceuticalization is characterized by the pervasive and generalized use of antibiotics, especially in contexts of healthcare and resource scarcity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117652"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“We use it a lot for everything”: Antibioticalization and everyday life in a refugee camp in Lebanon\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Hylland Spjeldnæs ,&nbsp;Livia Wick ,&nbsp;Heidi E. Fjeld ,&nbsp;Anne Kveim Lie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance has accelerated global efforts to reduce antibiotic use. While antibiotic resistance poses a significant threat, especially in low-income settings, there is a scarcity of research on how people in such environments, including refugee camps, access and use antibiotics. This article explores factors that contribute to the shaping of antibiotic use in Shatila refugee camp in Lebanon. It is based on six months of fieldwork from October 2021 to April 2022 in Shatila, consisting of participant observation, semi-structured interviews and group workshops with 32 camp residents and health workers. Following the onset of the Syrian war in 2011, the number of informal pharmacies and Syrian medicines boomed in Shatila. Aiming to describe and analyze how camp residents access and use antibiotics, we address two main themes: 1) the omnipresence of antibiotics in a context of scarcity, and 2) antibiotics as a panacea – a quick-fix for everyday ailments. Antibiotic consumption patterns in Shatila are formed by a scarcity of quality healthcare services on the one hand, and an omnipresence of antibiotics on the other. We demonstrate that in this loosely regulated context, where pharmaceuticals are bought over-the-counter; there is extensive antibiotic consumption. Camp residents often self-medicate with antibiotics for a wide range of purposes, extending beyond the treatment of infections. The high consumption of antibiotics will increase the level of antimicrobial resistance and pose a risk to the camp residents by disturbing local microbiomes and the amount of resistant genes (the resistome) in the environment, thus leading to new potential health risks. Building on theories of pharmaceuticalization and social suffering, we propose the concept of “antibioticalization.” This distinct form of pharmaceuticalization is characterized by the pervasive and generalized use of antibiotics, especially in contexts of healthcare and resource scarcity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"366 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011067\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不断增加的抗菌素耐药性加速了全球减少抗生素使用的努力。虽然抗生素耐药性构成重大威胁,特别是在低收入环境中,但缺乏关于包括难民营在内的这种环境中的人们如何获得和使用抗生素的研究。本文探讨了影响黎巴嫩沙提拉难民营抗生素使用的因素。该报告基于2021年10月至2022年4月在夏提拉进行的为期6个月的实地考察,包括参与观察、半结构化访谈和与32名营地居民和卫生工作者的小组讲习班。2011年叙利亚战争爆发后,沙提拉的非正规药店和叙利亚药品数量激增。为了描述和分析营地居民如何获取和使用抗生素,我们讨论了两个主要主题:1)在稀缺的背景下抗生素无处不在,2)抗生素作为万灵药-一种快速解决日常疾病的方法。沙提拉的抗生素消费模式一方面是由于缺乏高质量的卫生保健服务,另一方面是由于抗生素无处不在。我们证明,在这种监管松散的情况下,药品是非处方购买的;大量使用抗生素。难民营的居民经常出于多种目的自行使用抗生素,而不仅仅是治疗感染。抗生素的大量消耗将增加抗菌素耐药性水平,并通过扰乱当地微生物组和环境中耐药基因(抗性组)的数量,对营地居民构成风险,从而导致新的潜在健康风险。在药物化和社会苦难理论的基础上,我们提出了“抗生素化”的概念。这种独特的药物化形式的特点是抗生素的普遍和广泛使用,特别是在卫生保健和资源稀缺的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“We use it a lot for everything”: Antibioticalization and everyday life in a refugee camp in Lebanon
Increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance has accelerated global efforts to reduce antibiotic use. While antibiotic resistance poses a significant threat, especially in low-income settings, there is a scarcity of research on how people in such environments, including refugee camps, access and use antibiotics. This article explores factors that contribute to the shaping of antibiotic use in Shatila refugee camp in Lebanon. It is based on six months of fieldwork from October 2021 to April 2022 in Shatila, consisting of participant observation, semi-structured interviews and group workshops with 32 camp residents and health workers. Following the onset of the Syrian war in 2011, the number of informal pharmacies and Syrian medicines boomed in Shatila. Aiming to describe and analyze how camp residents access and use antibiotics, we address two main themes: 1) the omnipresence of antibiotics in a context of scarcity, and 2) antibiotics as a panacea – a quick-fix for everyday ailments. Antibiotic consumption patterns in Shatila are formed by a scarcity of quality healthcare services on the one hand, and an omnipresence of antibiotics on the other. We demonstrate that in this loosely regulated context, where pharmaceuticals are bought over-the-counter; there is extensive antibiotic consumption. Camp residents often self-medicate with antibiotics for a wide range of purposes, extending beyond the treatment of infections. The high consumption of antibiotics will increase the level of antimicrobial resistance and pose a risk to the camp residents by disturbing local microbiomes and the amount of resistant genes (the resistome) in the environment, thus leading to new potential health risks. Building on theories of pharmaceuticalization and social suffering, we propose the concept of “antibioticalization.” This distinct form of pharmaceuticalization is characterized by the pervasive and generalized use of antibiotics, especially in contexts of healthcare and resource scarcity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
“It does help but there's a limit …”: Young people's perspectives on policies to manage hot food takeaways opening near schools The time-lagged effect of noise exposure on noise annoyance: The role of temporal, spatial and social contexts The relationship between housing and asylum seekers’ mental health: A systematic review Editorial Board A biopsychosocial approach towards understanding disparities in exercise participation between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients living with knee osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1