维度早期生活逆境与焦虑症状:网络分析和纵向研究。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107201
Zhao-ying Wang , Shi-xiong Hu , Jian Lu , Wen Shang , Tao Chen , Rui-ting Zhang
{"title":"维度早期生活逆境与焦虑症状:网络分析和纵向研究。","authors":"Zhao-ying Wang ,&nbsp;Shi-xiong Hu ,&nbsp;Jian Lu ,&nbsp;Wen Shang ,&nbsp;Tao Chen ,&nbsp;Rui-ting Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accumulating literature has found a close relation between early life adversity (ELA) and anxiety. However, previous studies did not rule out the high co-occurrence of different types of ELA when exploring the association of ELA and anxiety. In the present study, we carried out network analysis based on a cross-sectional sample and longitudinal sample to investigate the relationship between ELA and anxiety symptoms in non-clinical populations over time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Online advertisement was carried out to recruit participants. The cross-sectional sample included 871 Chinese participants (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 19.11, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 1.57), and the longitudinal sample involved 440 Chinese participants (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 18.93, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 0.75). Three dimensions of ELA were assessed. The Threat/Harm dimension was assessed by subscales of physical abuse, emotional abuse, and sexual abuse of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). The Deprivation dimension of ELA was measured by subscales of physical neglect, and emotional neglect of CTQ. The Unpredictability dimension of ELA was evaluated by the Childhood Unpredictability scale. Anxiety symptoms were captured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Regularized partial correlation networks were constructed, and the expected influence (EI) as well as predictability of each node were calculated. Stability within the network was tested and the network comparison test was conducted to examine the difference between the cross-sectional network and the longitudinal network.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cross-sectional network was relatively tight, and nodes within the dimension of ELA clustered together. Childhood unpredictability and emotional abuse revealed stronger associations with anxiety symptoms than other ELAs. Emotional abuse showed the highest EI in the network. These findings were replicated in the longitudinal network. The network comparison test indicated no significant difference between the cross-sectional network and the longitudinal network.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Childhood unpredictability and emotional abuse were strong predictors of anxiety symptoms, and the prediction was reliable and persistent. Reduce the experience of childhood emotional abuse can serve as a target to prevent anxiety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 107201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensional early life adversity and anxiety symptoms: A network analysis and longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Zhao-ying Wang ,&nbsp;Shi-xiong Hu ,&nbsp;Jian Lu ,&nbsp;Wen Shang ,&nbsp;Tao Chen ,&nbsp;Rui-ting Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accumulating literature has found a close relation between early life adversity (ELA) and anxiety. However, previous studies did not rule out the high co-occurrence of different types of ELA when exploring the association of ELA and anxiety. In the present study, we carried out network analysis based on a cross-sectional sample and longitudinal sample to investigate the relationship between ELA and anxiety symptoms in non-clinical populations over time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Online advertisement was carried out to recruit participants. The cross-sectional sample included 871 Chinese participants (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 19.11, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 1.57), and the longitudinal sample involved 440 Chinese participants (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 18.93, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 0.75). Three dimensions of ELA were assessed. The Threat/Harm dimension was assessed by subscales of physical abuse, emotional abuse, and sexual abuse of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). The Deprivation dimension of ELA was measured by subscales of physical neglect, and emotional neglect of CTQ. The Unpredictability dimension of ELA was evaluated by the Childhood Unpredictability scale. Anxiety symptoms were captured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Regularized partial correlation networks were constructed, and the expected influence (EI) as well as predictability of each node were calculated. Stability within the network was tested and the network comparison test was conducted to examine the difference between the cross-sectional network and the longitudinal network.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cross-sectional network was relatively tight, and nodes within the dimension of ELA clustered together. Childhood unpredictability and emotional abuse revealed stronger associations with anxiety symptoms than other ELAs. Emotional abuse showed the highest EI in the network. These findings were replicated in the longitudinal network. The network comparison test indicated no significant difference between the cross-sectional network and the longitudinal network.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Childhood unpredictability and emotional abuse were strong predictors of anxiety symptoms, and the prediction was reliable and persistent. Reduce the experience of childhood emotional abuse can serve as a target to prevent anxiety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424005945\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424005945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的文献发现,早期生活逆境与焦虑有着密切的关系。然而,以往的研究在探讨ELA与焦虑的关系时,并未排除不同类型ELA的高共发性。在本研究中,我们进行了基于横断面样本和纵向样本的网络分析,以调查非临床人群中ELA与焦虑症状之间的关系。方法:采用网络广告进行招募。横断面样本包括871名中国参与者(Mage = 19.11, SDage = 1.57),纵向样本包括440名中国参与者(Mage = 18.93, SDage = 0.75)。评估ELA的三个维度。威胁/伤害维度采用儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)中身体虐待、情感虐待和性虐待的子量表进行评估。ELA的剥夺维度采用CTQ的身体忽视分量表和情绪忽视分量表测量。ELA的不可预测性维度采用童年不可预测性量表进行评估。焦虑症状由广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)记录。构造正则化偏相关网络,计算各节点的期望影响(EI)和可预测性。对网络内部的稳定性进行了测试,并进行了网络对比测试,以检验横截面网络与纵向网络之间的差异。结果:横截面网络较为紧密,ELA维度内的节点聚集在一起。童年时期的不可预测性和情绪虐待与焦虑症状的关联比其他ELAs更强。情感虐待者在网络中表现出最高的EI。这些发现在纵向网络中得到了重复。网络对比试验表明,横断面网络与纵向网络之间无显著差异。结论:童年不可预测性和情绪虐待是焦虑症状的强预测因子,预测可靠且持续。减少童年经历的情感虐待可以作为预防焦虑的一个目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dimensional early life adversity and anxiety symptoms: A network analysis and longitudinal study

Background

Accumulating literature has found a close relation between early life adversity (ELA) and anxiety. However, previous studies did not rule out the high co-occurrence of different types of ELA when exploring the association of ELA and anxiety. In the present study, we carried out network analysis based on a cross-sectional sample and longitudinal sample to investigate the relationship between ELA and anxiety symptoms in non-clinical populations over time.

Methods

Online advertisement was carried out to recruit participants. The cross-sectional sample included 871 Chinese participants (Mage = 19.11, SDage = 1.57), and the longitudinal sample involved 440 Chinese participants (Mage = 18.93, SDage = 0.75). Three dimensions of ELA were assessed. The Threat/Harm dimension was assessed by subscales of physical abuse, emotional abuse, and sexual abuse of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). The Deprivation dimension of ELA was measured by subscales of physical neglect, and emotional neglect of CTQ. The Unpredictability dimension of ELA was evaluated by the Childhood Unpredictability scale. Anxiety symptoms were captured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Regularized partial correlation networks were constructed, and the expected influence (EI) as well as predictability of each node were calculated. Stability within the network was tested and the network comparison test was conducted to examine the difference between the cross-sectional network and the longitudinal network.

Results

The cross-sectional network was relatively tight, and nodes within the dimension of ELA clustered together. Childhood unpredictability and emotional abuse revealed stronger associations with anxiety symptoms than other ELAs. Emotional abuse showed the highest EI in the network. These findings were replicated in the longitudinal network. The network comparison test indicated no significant difference between the cross-sectional network and the longitudinal network.

Conclusion

Childhood unpredictability and emotional abuse were strong predictors of anxiety symptoms, and the prediction was reliable and persistent. Reduce the experience of childhood emotional abuse can serve as a target to prevent anxiety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Workplace experiences of nurses in their role as child abuse and neglect mandated reporters Associations between childhood abuse, exposure to domestic violence, and the risk of later violent revictimization in Australia Exploring the relationship between facets of childhood trauma and violent injury risk during adulthood: A dominance analysis study Balancing risk and resilience: Amplifying the voices of the children and mothers in Kalighat red light area Adverse childhood experiences, anger, and violence among justice-involved youth: A network analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1