神经化学如何影响人类的依恋类型?催产素和内源性阿片系统在社会向性和自主性中的作用——系统综述。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105994
Anita Snowdon-Farrell , Chiara Attal , Naghmeh Nikkheslat , Carmine Pariante , Allan H. Young , Roland Zahn
{"title":"神经化学如何影响人类的依恋类型?催产素和内源性阿片系统在社会向性和自主性中的作用——系统综述。","authors":"Anita Snowdon-Farrell ,&nbsp;Chiara Attal ,&nbsp;Naghmeh Nikkheslat ,&nbsp;Carmine Pariante ,&nbsp;Allan H. Young ,&nbsp;Roland Zahn","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oxytocin was hypothesised to play a critical role in forming and maintaining secure attachments, shown to confer resilience against affective disorders. The endogenous opioid system has also emerged as a key player in attachment dynamics. In this pre-registered systematic review, we investigated whether individual differences in the functioning of these neurochemical systems are related to attachment styles, following PRISMA guidelines. As predicted, individuals with higher oxytocin function exhibited more secure attachment styles (p = .006, n = 12 studies) and less insecure attachment styles (p = .021, n = 16 studies). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no association of endogenous opioid function with insecure (p = 0.549, n = 11 studies) or secure attachment styles (p = .065, n = 11 studies). The lack of association between endogenous mu-opioid function and attachment styles remains inconclusive due to inconsistencies in the neurochemical measurements and lack of eligible studies. Therefore, further investigations into the role of the endogenous opioid system in attachment styles are needed. Our findings corroborate the hypothesis that individual differences in oxytocin function relate to differences in attachment styles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 105994"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does neurochemistry affect attachment styles in humans? The role of oxytocin and the endogenous opioid system in sociotropy and autonomy – A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Anita Snowdon-Farrell ,&nbsp;Chiara Attal ,&nbsp;Naghmeh Nikkheslat ,&nbsp;Carmine Pariante ,&nbsp;Allan H. Young ,&nbsp;Roland Zahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Oxytocin was hypothesised to play a critical role in forming and maintaining secure attachments, shown to confer resilience against affective disorders. The endogenous opioid system has also emerged as a key player in attachment dynamics. In this pre-registered systematic review, we investigated whether individual differences in the functioning of these neurochemical systems are related to attachment styles, following PRISMA guidelines. As predicted, individuals with higher oxytocin function exhibited more secure attachment styles (p = .006, n = 12 studies) and less insecure attachment styles (p = .021, n = 16 studies). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no association of endogenous opioid function with insecure (p = 0.549, n = 11 studies) or secure attachment styles (p = .065, n = 11 studies). The lack of association between endogenous mu-opioid function and attachment styles remains inconclusive due to inconsistencies in the neurochemical measurements and lack of eligible studies. Therefore, further investigations into the role of the endogenous opioid system in attachment styles are needed. Our findings corroborate the hypothesis that individual differences in oxytocin function relate to differences in attachment styles.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424004639\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424004639","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据推测,催产素在形成和维持安全依恋中起着关键作用,显示出对情感障碍的恢复能力。内源性阿片系统也在依恋动力学中扮演着关键角色。在这篇预先注册的系统综述中,我们调查了这些神经化学系统功能的个体差异是否与依恋类型有关,遵循PRISMA指南。正如预测的那样,催产素功能较高的个体表现出更安全的依恋类型(p=。006, n=12项研究)和较少的不安全依恋类型(p=。021, n=16项研究)。与我们的假设相反,我们发现内源性阿片功能与不安全(p=0.549, n=11项研究)或安全依恋风格(p=0.549)没有关联。065, n=11研究)。由于神经化学测量的不一致和缺乏合格的研究,内源性mu-阿片功能和依恋类型之间缺乏关联仍然是不确定的。因此,需要进一步研究内源性阿片系统在依恋类型中的作用。我们的研究结果证实了催产素功能的个体差异与依恋类型的差异有关的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How does neurochemistry affect attachment styles in humans? The role of oxytocin and the endogenous opioid system in sociotropy and autonomy – A systematic review
Oxytocin was hypothesised to play a critical role in forming and maintaining secure attachments, shown to confer resilience against affective disorders. The endogenous opioid system has also emerged as a key player in attachment dynamics. In this pre-registered systematic review, we investigated whether individual differences in the functioning of these neurochemical systems are related to attachment styles, following PRISMA guidelines. As predicted, individuals with higher oxytocin function exhibited more secure attachment styles (p = .006, n = 12 studies) and less insecure attachment styles (p = .021, n = 16 studies). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no association of endogenous opioid function with insecure (p = 0.549, n = 11 studies) or secure attachment styles (p = .065, n = 11 studies). The lack of association between endogenous mu-opioid function and attachment styles remains inconclusive due to inconsistencies in the neurochemical measurements and lack of eligible studies. Therefore, further investigations into the role of the endogenous opioid system in attachment styles are needed. Our findings corroborate the hypothesis that individual differences in oxytocin function relate to differences in attachment styles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
The involvement of brain norepinephrine nuclei in eating disorders Cognitive reserve moderates the effect of COVID-19 on cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Perceived stress in adults with epilepsy: A systematic review Causal relationship between B vitamins and neuropsychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis An item-level systematic review of the presentation of ADHD in females
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1