Camie A. Tomlinson, Amanda Stafford McRell, Christian Gorchow, Jamie Cage, Hope Davis, Shelby E. McDonald
{"title":"儿童福利参与青少年童年逆境与心理适应关系的种族差异:系统回顾","authors":"Camie A. Tomlinson, Amanda Stafford McRell, Christian Gorchow, Jamie Cage, Hope Davis, Shelby E. McDonald","doi":"10.1177/15248380241307901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review examined the extent of evidence that meaningfully examines racial/ethnic differences in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment among child welfare-involved youth and synthesized findings. We pre-registered our study rationale and methodological and analytic plan in PROSPERO (#CRD42022350707). We conducted a search for articles on May 11, 2022, in APA PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete, CENTRAL, Child Development and Adolescent Studies, CINAHL, Family Studies Abstracts, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PubMed, Social Services Abstracts, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts, SocINDEX, Web of Science, and Violence & Abuse Abstracts. Inclusion criteria included: written in English, peer-reviewed, quantitative analysis, examined the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment and examined racial/ethnic differences using moderation or multiple group modeling, and included a sample of child welfare-involved youth (i.e., 0–18 years) in the United States. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed quality. The final sample included 13 articles. There was evidence of racial/ethnic differences in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment; however, some studies found that there were no significant differences across racial/ethnic groups. Variability in findings may be due to inconsistent assessment of childhood adversity and psychological adjustment, differences in sample age ranges and in how race/ethnicity was examined, and/or lack of power. Racial/ethnic differences were primarily between White, Black, and Hispanic racial/ethnic groups, and most studies were cross-sectional. It is important for future research to examine whether racial/ethnic differences exist in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment over time.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Ethnic Differences in Relations Between Childhood Adversity and Psychological Adjustment Among Child Welfare-Involved Youth: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Camie A. Tomlinson, Amanda Stafford McRell, Christian Gorchow, Jamie Cage, Hope Davis, Shelby E. McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248380241307901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This systematic review examined the extent of evidence that meaningfully examines racial/ethnic differences in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment among child welfare-involved youth and synthesized findings. We pre-registered our study rationale and methodological and analytic plan in PROSPERO (#CRD42022350707). We conducted a search for articles on May 11, 2022, in APA PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete, CENTRAL, Child Development and Adolescent Studies, CINAHL, Family Studies Abstracts, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PubMed, Social Services Abstracts, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts, SocINDEX, Web of Science, and Violence & Abuse Abstracts. Inclusion criteria included: written in English, peer-reviewed, quantitative analysis, examined the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment and examined racial/ethnic differences using moderation or multiple group modeling, and included a sample of child welfare-involved youth (i.e., 0–18 years) in the United States. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed quality. The final sample included 13 articles. There was evidence of racial/ethnic differences in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment; however, some studies found that there were no significant differences across racial/ethnic groups. Variability in findings may be due to inconsistent assessment of childhood adversity and psychological adjustment, differences in sample age ranges and in how race/ethnicity was examined, and/or lack of power. Racial/ethnic differences were primarily between White, Black, and Hispanic racial/ethnic groups, and most studies were cross-sectional. It is important for future research to examine whether racial/ethnic differences exist in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241307901\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241307901","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统综述考察了在儿童福利参与青少年中,有意义地考察了童年逆境与心理适应之间的种族/民族差异的证据程度和综合研究结果。我们在PROSPERO (#CRD42022350707)中预先注册了我们的研究原理、方法和分析计划。我们于2022年5月11日检索了APA PsycInfo、学术检索完整、CENTRAL、儿童发展与青少年研究、CINAHL、家庭研究摘要、心理学与行为科学汇编、PubMed、社会服务摘要、社会科学摘要、社会工作摘要、SocINDEX、Web of Science和Violence &;滥用抽象。纳入标准包括:以英文撰写,同行评议,定量分析,检查童年逆境与心理适应之间的关系,使用适度或多群体模型检查种族/民族差异,并纳入美国儿童福利参与青年(即0-18岁)的样本。两位审稿人独立筛选文章纳入、提取数据并评估质量。最后的样本包括13篇文章。有证据表明,童年逆境与心理适应之间存在种族/民族差异;然而,一些研究发现,在种族/民族群体之间没有显著差异。结果的差异可能是由于对童年逆境和心理调整的评估不一致,样本年龄范围和种族/民族检查方式的差异,和/或缺乏权力。种族/民族差异主要在白人、黑人和西班牙裔种族/民族群体之间,大多数研究是横断面的。随着时间的推移,研究童年逆境与心理适应之间是否存在种族/民族差异对未来的研究很重要。
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Relations Between Childhood Adversity and Psychological Adjustment Among Child Welfare-Involved Youth: A Systematic Review
This systematic review examined the extent of evidence that meaningfully examines racial/ethnic differences in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment among child welfare-involved youth and synthesized findings. We pre-registered our study rationale and methodological and analytic plan in PROSPERO (#CRD42022350707). We conducted a search for articles on May 11, 2022, in APA PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete, CENTRAL, Child Development and Adolescent Studies, CINAHL, Family Studies Abstracts, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PubMed, Social Services Abstracts, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts, SocINDEX, Web of Science, and Violence & Abuse Abstracts. Inclusion criteria included: written in English, peer-reviewed, quantitative analysis, examined the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment and examined racial/ethnic differences using moderation or multiple group modeling, and included a sample of child welfare-involved youth (i.e., 0–18 years) in the United States. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed quality. The final sample included 13 articles. There was evidence of racial/ethnic differences in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment; however, some studies found that there were no significant differences across racial/ethnic groups. Variability in findings may be due to inconsistent assessment of childhood adversity and psychological adjustment, differences in sample age ranges and in how race/ethnicity was examined, and/or lack of power. Racial/ethnic differences were primarily between White, Black, and Hispanic racial/ethnic groups, and most studies were cross-sectional. It is important for future research to examine whether racial/ethnic differences exist in the association between childhood adversity and psychological adjustment over time.
期刊介绍:
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.