Kari E. A. Norman, Perry de Valpine, Carl Boettiger
{"title":"鸟类和哺乳动物群落功能多样性的变化趋势","authors":"Kari E. A. Norman, Perry de Valpine, Carl Boettiger","doi":"10.1111/geb.13950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Despite unprecedented environmental change due to anthropogenic pressure, recent work has found increasing dissimilarity due to turnover but no overall trend in species diversity through time at the local scale. Functional diversity provides a potentially powerful alternative approach for understanding community composition by linking shifts in species identity to the characteristics that underpin ecosystem processes. Here we present the first multitaxa, multisystem analysis of functional diversity and composition through time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global, with a North American focus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>1923–2014.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Mammals, Birds.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We paired thousands of bird and mammal assemblage time series from the BioTIME database with existing trait data representative of species' functional roles to reconstruct time series of functional diversity and composition metrics. Our dataset included 2432 time series of yearly observations from 50 studies with a maximum spatial extent of 95 km<sup>2</sup>. Using generalised linear mixed models, we estimated general and study-level trends for those metrics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found no overall temporal trends in functional diversity metrics. Study characteristics such as taxa, realm, biome, or protection status did not distinguish between types of change exhibited by communities. We found evidence of a temporal increase in fish consumption across all communities but no evidence to support multiple predictions for specific traits, including decreasing body size, dietary shifts or changes in bird foraging strata.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>General temporal trends indicate that on the aggregate, studies do not exhibit consistent changes in functional diversity across many taxa, biomes and realms. At the study level, the majority of studies showed no temporal trends in species or functional diversity, with the remainder of the studies falling into broad categories of functional diversity change independent of species richness, functional redundancy loss (species richness declines with functional richness maintained) and increasing species richness sometimes accompanied by increasing functional richness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No General Trend in Functional Diversity in Bird and Mammal Communities Despite Compositional Change\",\"authors\":\"Kari E. A. Norman, Perry de Valpine, Carl Boettiger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite unprecedented environmental change due to anthropogenic pressure, recent work has found increasing dissimilarity due to turnover but no overall trend in species diversity through time at the local scale. Functional diversity provides a potentially powerful alternative approach for understanding community composition by linking shifts in species identity to the characteristics that underpin ecosystem processes. Here we present the first multitaxa, multisystem analysis of functional diversity and composition through time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global, with a North American focus.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>1923–2014.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mammals, Birds.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We paired thousands of bird and mammal assemblage time series from the BioTIME database with existing trait data representative of species' functional roles to reconstruct time series of functional diversity and composition metrics. Our dataset included 2432 time series of yearly observations from 50 studies with a maximum spatial extent of 95 km<sup>2</sup>. Using generalised linear mixed models, we estimated general and study-level trends for those metrics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found no overall temporal trends in functional diversity metrics. Study characteristics such as taxa, realm, biome, or protection status did not distinguish between types of change exhibited by communities. We found evidence of a temporal increase in fish consumption across all communities but no evidence to support multiple predictions for specific traits, including decreasing body size, dietary shifts or changes in bird foraging strata.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>General temporal trends indicate that on the aggregate, studies do not exhibit consistent changes in functional diversity across many taxa, biomes and realms. At the study level, the majority of studies showed no temporal trends in species or functional diversity, with the remainder of the studies falling into broad categories of functional diversity change independent of species richness, functional redundancy loss (species richness declines with functional richness maintained) and increasing species richness sometimes accompanied by increasing functional richness.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13950\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13950","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
No General Trend in Functional Diversity in Bird and Mammal Communities Despite Compositional Change
Aim
Despite unprecedented environmental change due to anthropogenic pressure, recent work has found increasing dissimilarity due to turnover but no overall trend in species diversity through time at the local scale. Functional diversity provides a potentially powerful alternative approach for understanding community composition by linking shifts in species identity to the characteristics that underpin ecosystem processes. Here we present the first multitaxa, multisystem analysis of functional diversity and composition through time.
Location
Global, with a North American focus.
Time Period
1923–2014.
Major Taxa Studied
Mammals, Birds.
Methods
We paired thousands of bird and mammal assemblage time series from the BioTIME database with existing trait data representative of species' functional roles to reconstruct time series of functional diversity and composition metrics. Our dataset included 2432 time series of yearly observations from 50 studies with a maximum spatial extent of 95 km2. Using generalised linear mixed models, we estimated general and study-level trends for those metrics.
Results
We found no overall temporal trends in functional diversity metrics. Study characteristics such as taxa, realm, biome, or protection status did not distinguish between types of change exhibited by communities. We found evidence of a temporal increase in fish consumption across all communities but no evidence to support multiple predictions for specific traits, including decreasing body size, dietary shifts or changes in bird foraging strata.
Main Conclusions
General temporal trends indicate that on the aggregate, studies do not exhibit consistent changes in functional diversity across many taxa, biomes and realms. At the study level, the majority of studies showed no temporal trends in species or functional diversity, with the remainder of the studies falling into broad categories of functional diversity change independent of species richness, functional redundancy loss (species richness declines with functional richness maintained) and increasing species richness sometimes accompanied by increasing functional richness.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.