{"title":"比较耻骨颈筋膜折叠联合阴道旁修复与标准阴道前裂术治疗阴道前壁脱垂女性压力性尿失禁:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Yujie Cai, Ke Su, Aiping Bian","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07864-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is prevalent among women, often occurring alongside anterior vaginal wall prolapse. This study compares the efficacy and safety of an improved vaginal wall repair technique with pubocervical fascia fixation versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for treating SUI in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial was conducted between September 2021 and June 2024. Women aged 40–70 years with symptomatic SUI and stage 2–3 anterior vaginal wall prolapse were randomised to either the improved repair group or the standard repair group. The primary outcome was patient-reported success at 12 months post-surgery, defined as ‘very much improved’ or ‘much improved’ on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Secondary outcomes included objective cure rates, quality of life scores, urodynamic parameters, anatomical outcomes, perioperative outcomes and adverse events.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 102 women were randomised (51 in each group). At 12 months, the patient-reported success rate was significantly higher in the improved repair group (94.1% vs 78.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.019). The objective cure rate was also higher in the improved repair group (90.2% vs 74.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.038). Quality of life scores and urodynamic parameters showed greater improvements in the improved repair group. Anatomical success was achieved in 92.2% of the improved repair group compared with 80.4% in the standard repair group (<i>p</i> = 0.048). The improved repair technique was associated with longer operative time but lower estimated blood loss, shorter hospital stay and quicker return to normal activities. The overall complication rate was lower in the improved repair group (11.8% vs 23.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.043).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The improved vaginal wall repair with pubocervical fascia fixation demonstrates superior outcomes compared with standard anterior colporrhaphy, with higher patient-reported success rates, improved quality of life and fewer complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"311 1","pages":"163 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing combined paravaginal repair with pubocervical fascia plication versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Yujie Cai, Ke Su, Aiping Bian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07864-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is prevalent among women, often occurring alongside anterior vaginal wall prolapse. This study compares the efficacy and safety of an improved vaginal wall repair technique with pubocervical fascia fixation versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for treating SUI in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial was conducted between September 2021 and June 2024. Women aged 40–70 years with symptomatic SUI and stage 2–3 anterior vaginal wall prolapse were randomised to either the improved repair group or the standard repair group. The primary outcome was patient-reported success at 12 months post-surgery, defined as ‘very much improved’ or ‘much improved’ on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Secondary outcomes included objective cure rates, quality of life scores, urodynamic parameters, anatomical outcomes, perioperative outcomes and adverse events.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 102 women were randomised (51 in each group). At 12 months, the patient-reported success rate was significantly higher in the improved repair group (94.1% vs 78.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.019). The objective cure rate was also higher in the improved repair group (90.2% vs 74.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.038). Quality of life scores and urodynamic parameters showed greater improvements in the improved repair group. Anatomical success was achieved in 92.2% of the improved repair group compared with 80.4% in the standard repair group (<i>p</i> = 0.048). The improved repair technique was associated with longer operative time but lower estimated blood loss, shorter hospital stay and quicker return to normal activities. The overall complication rate was lower in the improved repair group (11.8% vs 23.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.043).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The improved vaginal wall repair with pubocervical fascia fixation demonstrates superior outcomes compared with standard anterior colporrhaphy, with higher patient-reported success rates, improved quality of life and fewer complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\"311 1\",\"pages\":\"163 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07864-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07864-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:压力性尿失禁(SUI)在女性中很常见,常伴有阴道前壁脱垂。本研究比较了改良阴道壁修复技术结合耻骨颈筋膜固定与标准阴道前裂术治疗阴道前壁脱垂女性SUI的疗效和安全性。方法:于2021年9月至2024年6月进行单中心、平行组、随机对照试验。年龄40-70岁,有症状性SUI和2-3期阴道前壁脱垂的女性被随机分为改良修复组和标准修复组。主要结果是术后12个月患者报告的成功,在患者总体印象改善量表上定义为“非常改善”或“大大改善”。次要结局包括客观治愈率、生活质量评分、尿动力学参数、解剖学结局、围手术期结局和不良事件。结果:共纳入102例女性(每组51例)。12个月时,改良修复组患者报告的成功率显著高于改良修复组(94.1% vs 78.4%, p = 0.019)。改良修复组的客观治愈率也更高(90.2% vs 74.5%, p = 0.038)。改善修复组的生活质量评分和尿动力学参数均有较大改善。改良修复组解剖成功率为92.2%,而标准修复组为80.4% (p = 0.048)。改进的修复技术与较长的手术时间、较低的估计出血量、较短的住院时间和更快地恢复正常活动有关。改良修复组总并发症发生率较低(11.8% vs 23.5%, p = 0.043)。结论:与标准阴道前裂术相比,改良的阴道壁修复与耻骨颈筋膜固定具有更好的结果,患者报告的成功率更高,生活质量得到改善,并发症更少。
Comparing combined paravaginal repair with pubocervical fascia plication versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial
Background
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is prevalent among women, often occurring alongside anterior vaginal wall prolapse. This study compares the efficacy and safety of an improved vaginal wall repair technique with pubocervical fascia fixation versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for treating SUI in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
Methods
A single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial was conducted between September 2021 and June 2024. Women aged 40–70 years with symptomatic SUI and stage 2–3 anterior vaginal wall prolapse were randomised to either the improved repair group or the standard repair group. The primary outcome was patient-reported success at 12 months post-surgery, defined as ‘very much improved’ or ‘much improved’ on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Secondary outcomes included objective cure rates, quality of life scores, urodynamic parameters, anatomical outcomes, perioperative outcomes and adverse events.
Results
A total of 102 women were randomised (51 in each group). At 12 months, the patient-reported success rate was significantly higher in the improved repair group (94.1% vs 78.4%, p = 0.019). The objective cure rate was also higher in the improved repair group (90.2% vs 74.5%, p = 0.038). Quality of life scores and urodynamic parameters showed greater improvements in the improved repair group. Anatomical success was achieved in 92.2% of the improved repair group compared with 80.4% in the standard repair group (p = 0.048). The improved repair technique was associated with longer operative time but lower estimated blood loss, shorter hospital stay and quicker return to normal activities. The overall complication rate was lower in the improved repair group (11.8% vs 23.5%, p = 0.043).
Conclusions
The improved vaginal wall repair with pubocervical fascia fixation demonstrates superior outcomes compared with standard anterior colporrhaphy, with higher patient-reported success rates, improved quality of life and fewer complications.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.